PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Verderio

Publications and source records attributed to P Verderio.

30 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

Predictive and prognostic markers in a series of patients with head and neck squamous cell invasive carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

It has been proposed that diverse anticancer drugs and radiation therapy may induce a mode of cell death with the characteristics of apoptosis. Since apoptosis is under the control of several oncogenes, we analyzed the expression of the protein encoded by the proto-oncogenes bcl-2 and p53. Furthermore, we studied cell proliferation [using PC-10 mAb to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)] and vascularization [using the CD-31 mAb and by counting intratumoral microvessel density (IMD)] using immunocytochemistry. A series of 73 patients with clinical stage II-IV squamous cell invasive carcinoma of the head and neck (H&N) were treated with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cisplatin, 80 mg/m2, versus carboplatin, 375 mg/m2, three times every 3 weeks and a total dose of radiation therapy of 64 Gy in 6-8 weeks). We correlated the expression of these markers, determined prior to treatment, with response to the therapy and prognosis. Bcl-2 protein was expressed in 37.4% of the carcinomas (25/67 evaluable), and it was not significantly associated with any other feature studied. Forty (56. 4%) of the 71 carcinomas evaluable for p53 were p53 positive; the median IMD was 38 microvessels/field at the hot spot (range, 18-80), and the median percentage of nuclei labeled by the PC-10 mAb was 50% (range, 0-95%). In the univariate analysis, regional lymph node negativity (P = 0.016), good performance status (PS) (PS >/= 90; P = 0.044), bcl-2 positivity (P = 0.070), and low vascularization (P = 0. 085) were significantly associated with a higher probability of complete remission. In the multivariate analysis (final model), only IMD (continuous variable; P = 0.045) and PS (P = 0.017) retained significance. As far as prognosis is concerned, in the univariate analysis, patients with tumors with low histological grading (grades 1-2; P = 0.006), p53 negative (P = 0.09), bcl-2 positive (P = 0.08), and high PCNA labeling (P = 0.06) had a significantly better disease-free survival. In the multivariate analysis, only grading (P = 0.003) and p53 (P = 0.04) retained significance for disease-free survival. For overall survival, in the univariate analysis, the following markers were significantly prognostic when only deaths due to progression are considered: response to therapy (P = 0.00001), PS (P = 0.04), nodal status (P = 0.028), PCNA (P = 0.04), p53 (P = 0. 08), and grading (P = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, only patients who achieved complete response (P = 0.00002), high PCNA values (P = 0.002), and low histological grading (P = 0.01) retained a statistically significant probability of better overall survival. Our results suggest that in this series of H&N cancer patients the markers capable of predicting response to therapy are distinct from those associated with prognosis, once the remission has been achieved. This information is potentially useful to the clinician for developing a more rational therapeutic approach for H&N cancer patients eligible for concurrent chemoradiation therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Expression of bcl-2 protein predicts efficacy of adjuvant treatments in operable node-positive breast cancer.

The proto-oncogene bcl-2 encodes a protein that inhibits apoptosis, a common mechanism of cell death caused by hormone and chemotherapy. We have analyzed bcl-2 protein expression by immuno-cytochemistry in primary node-positive breast cancers in two groups of patients (for a total of 180 cases). One group received adjuvant hormone therapy, the other chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil), and both groups were followed for a median time of 63 months. We compared our findings with conventional clinicopathological indicators [menopausal status, number of axillary nodes, histological grade, tumor size and type, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor] and with p53 protein expression. bcl-2 protein was present in 65% of the carcinomas (117/180) and it was significantly associated with ER and progesterone receptor and inversely associated with p53 in both the groups of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen. In patients treated either with adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen, relapse-free survival at 5 years was significantly better among patients with bcl-2-positive tumors than in those with bcl-2 negative ones (P = 0.05 and 0.02, respectively). As far as overall survival is concerned, patients with bcl-2-positive tumors had a significantly better outcome in the group treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.03). Multivariate analyses were performed for the two treatment groups. In the group treated with tamoxifen, lack of expression of ER and of bcl-2 was the only significant and independent predictor for poor relapse-free survival (P < 0.01). A number of nodes above 3 was the only significant and independent predictor for poor overall survival (P < 0.01). In the cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil-treated group, bcl-2 absence was significant for poor overall survival (P = 0.02) as well as a number of nodes above 3 (P = 0.04) and a tumor size above 2 cm (P = 0.05). For poor relapse-free survival only a number of nodes above 3 (P < 0.01) and progesterone negativity (P = 0.02) were significant and independent predictors of a higher probability of relapse. Thus, in contrast to in vitro data on drug resistance, bcl-2 expression was associated with better outcomes in patients treated with hormone and chemotherapy. Overall, these results suggest that expression of bcl-2 protein and the number of metastatic lymph nodes are independent features predictive of clinical outcome in patients with node-positive breast cancer, irrespective of the type of adjuvant treatment. The determination of bcl-2 protein may prove to be a useful tool to distinguish patients for whom conventional forms of adjuvant therapy are beneficial from those with bcl-2 negative and ER-negative tumors for whom novel therapeutic strategies are needed.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Cell kinetics in human breast cancer: comparison between the prognostic value of the cytofluorimetric S-phase fraction and that of the antibodies to Ki-67 and PCNA antigens detected by immunocytochemistry.

The determination of cell proliferation is one of the more widely used tools for assessing prognosis. However, additional research in this field is warranted because today there are several methodological procedures available for monitoring cell kinetics and it has still not been established which is the most reliable marker of proliferation and which possesses the greatest prognostic value. We performed this study in a series of primary invasive breast cancers to compare the prognostic value of S-phase fraction (SPF) by flow cytometry, the most widely used method for detecting proliferation at present, with that of antibodies to Ki-67 and PC-10 to proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) detected by immunocytochemical methods. A significant linear relationship was observed only between SPF and Ki-67. In univariate analysis SPF and Ki-67 values, nodal status, histological grading and peritumoral lymphatic-vessel invasion were significant predictors of relapse-free survival (RFS). As far as overall survival (OS) is concerned, only SPF, Ki-67 and nodal status were significantly associated with the risk of death. PCNA had no prognostic value for either RFS or OS. In multivariate analysis only SPF and nodal status retained a significant and independent prognostic value. Neither the cell-kinetics parameters assessed by immunocytochemistry (i.e. Ki-67 and PCNA) nor histological grading were independent prognosticators. In conclusion, our results provide evidence that the determination of SPF by flow cytometry was the strongest cell-kinetics marker used to assess prognosis in this series of breast cancers. However, different and novel markers of cell kinetics need to be compared in larger series in order to identify the best one.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reliability and accuracy in reporting CIN in 14 laboratories. Developing new indices of diagnostic variability in an interlaboratory study. The Working Group for External Quality Control in Cervical Cytopathology.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of the second phase of a pilot study of an Italian national external quality evaluation program (EQA) aimed at assessing whether participation in the first phase had increased the reliability and accuracy of diagnoses and to what extent. STUDY DESIGN: In the second phase, two sets of cervical smears (similar to the ones examined in the first phase) were circulated among the 14 participating cytologic laboratories throughout Italy. Responses were recorded on a standardized form. Participants were asked to judge the adequacy of each smear and to formulate a diagnosis. They were also asked to recommend management of the patient on the basis of the smear report and to evaluate the degree of diagnostic difficulty of each slide. The results were discussed in workshops, and it was possible to reach a consensus diagnosis on 37 of 40 smears. In the statistical analysis, new indices of diagnostic variability were developed and calculated; a gross index of agreement, unweighted and weighted kappas, analysis of exchangeability, sensitivity and specificity were also estimated. RESULTS: The results of the second phase are similar to those of the first phase and no substantial improvement in accuracy and little reduction in variability were observed. The interventions carried out in this study (discussion between representatives of laboratories of diagnostic differences and reassessment of the most controversial slides) were aimed at increasing consensus among the participating pathologists but were insufficient to change the diagnostic routines in their laboratories. CONCLUSION: It may be advisable to promote two kinds of interlaboratory quality programs with two separate but integrated components: (1) a core component with slides having clear-cut diagnoses, and (2) a continuing education component.

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Quality control for biomarker determination in oncology: the experience of the Italian Network for Quality Assessment of Tumor Biomarkers (INQAT).

Biomarker analysis and evaluation in oncology is the product of a number of processes (including managerial, technical and interpretation steps) which need to be monitored and controlled to prevent and correct errors and guarantee a satisfactory level of quality. Several biomarkers have recently moved to clinical validation studies and successively to clinical practice without any definition of standard procedures and/or quality control (QC) schemes necessary to guarantee the reproducibility of the laboratory information. In Italy several national scientific societies and single researchers have activated -- often on a pilot level -- specific external quality assessment protocols, thereby potentially jeopardizing the clinical reality even further. In view of the seriousness of the problem, in 1998 the Italian Ministry of Health sponsored a National Survey Project to coordinate and standardize the procedures and to develop QC programs for the analysis of cancer biomarkers of potential clinical relevance. Twelve QC programs focused on biomarkers and concerning morphological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, molecular, and immunoenzymatic assays were coordinated and implemented. Specifically, external QC programs for the analytical phase of immunohistochemical p53, Bcl-2, c-erb-2/neu/HER2, and microvessel density determination, of morphological evaluation of tumor differentiation grade, and of molecular p53 analysis were activated for the first time within the project. Several hundreds of Italian laboratories took part in these QC programs, the results of which are available on the web site of the Network (www.cqlaboncologico.it). Financial support from the Italian Government and the National Research Council (CNR) will guarantee the pursuit of activities that will be extended to new biomarkers, to preanalytical phases of the assays, and to revision of the criteria of clinical usefulness for evaluating the cost/benefit ratio.

Autoradiography↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Statistical diagnostics emerging from external quality control of real-time PCR.

Besides the application of conventional qualitative PCR as a valuable tool to enrich or identify specific sequences of nucleic acids, a new revolutionary technique for quantitative PCR determination has been introduced recently. It is based on real-time detection of PCR products revealed as a homogeneous accumulating signal generated by specific dyes. However, as far as we know, the influence of the variability of this technique on the reliability of the quantitative assay has not been thoroughly investigated. A national program of external quality assurance (EQA) for real-time PCR determination involving 42 Italian laboratories has been developed to assess the analytical performance of real-time PCR procedures. Participants were asked to perform a conventional experiment based on the use of an external reference curve (standard curve) for real-time detection of three cDNA samples with different concentrations of a specific target. In this paper the main analytical features of the standard curve have been investigated in an attempt to produce statistical diagnostics emerging from external quality control. Specific control charts were drawn to help biochemists take technical decisions aimed at improving the performance of their laboratories. Overall, our results indicated a subset of seven laboratories whose performance appeared to be markedly outside the limits for at least one of the standard curve features investigated. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the approach presented here for monitoring the heterogeneity of results produced by different laboratories and for selecting those laboratories that need technical advice on their performance.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Tumor angiogenesis predicts clinical outcome of node-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy or chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Experimental studies suggest that angiogenesis is necessary for breast cancer progression and metastasis and that it may play a role in responsiveness to some chemotherapeutic agents and to tamoxifen. To investigate whether angiogenesis predicts the clinical outcome of patients with node-positive breast cancer, we determined intratumoral microvessel density in a series of patients treated with either adjuvant hormone therapy (n=84) or chemotherapy (n= 107). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We monitored 191 patients for a median of 62 months. Intratumoral microvessel density was measured using light microscopy, and microvessels were immunostained using the anti-CD31 antibody. Microvessels were carefully counted (per 200x field) in the most vascularized area of each tumor. The results of intratumoral microvessel density were analyzed by both univariate and multivariate statistical analysis and were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, intratumoral microvessel density was significantly associated with relapse-free survival and overall survival, both in patients who received adjuvant hormone therapy and those who received chemotherapy. In the group treated with adjuvant hormone therapy, estrogen receptor status was also predictive for both relapse-free and overall survival. The number of involved nodes was predictive for overall survival. In patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the number of involved nodes, tumor size, and progesterone receptor status were significantly predictive for relapse-free and overall survival. Multivariate analysis showed that intratumoral microvessel density was the strongest independent predictor of outcome in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral microvessel density is an independent predictive indicator in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with either adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant hormone therapy. Assessment of tumor angiogenesis may therefore be useful in selection of those patients who are more likely to benefit from conventional adjuvant therapies (i.e., those with minimally vascularized tumors) from those with highly vascularized and more aggressive tumors, for whom novel forms of systemic therapy are advocated.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Reproducibility and accuracy of the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in 15 Italian laboratories: a national pilot project. Development of new indices of diagnostic variability. National Work Group for the expert quality control in cervico-vaginal cytopathology].

OBJECTIVES: To assess reliability and accuracy of cervical smear diagnoses, to evaluate the effectiveness of the participation in a programme of slide exchange in increasing reliability and to re-examine the agreement in discriminating between CIN 2 and CIN 3 (merged in High grade SIL in the Bethesda System). SETTING: 15 laboratories participating on a voluntary basis throughout Italy, for a period of 1 year. METHOD: Phase one: circulation of 40 slides including all main diagnostic categories; discussion of results by representatives of participating centres. Phase two: circulation of another 40 similar slides. For each slide, not only a diagnosis but also recommendations for further examinations and a judgment on diagnostic difficulty were asked. Common measures of reliability and accuracy and (the latter only for slides on which a consensus diagnosis was reached corresponding to the histological diagnosis) were calculated; three new indices of diagnostic variability were also computed. RESULTS: Consensus diagnosis among representatives of participating laboratories on about 90% of the slides was reached both in the first and in the second phase. On 3 slides it was impossible to reach a consensus diagnosis even among external referees. In both phases, the study showed a marked variability among diagnoses, recommendations and judgment on diagnostic difficulty and, on some slides, a worrying lack of reliability in the determination of precancerous lesions. The agreement on discrimination between CIN 1 and CIN 2 was low, but it was slightly better between CIN 2 and CIN 3. No significant relationship between accuracy and workload was found. External quality control or better said, continuous quality improvement activities are essential but should be conducted in a more systematic way with greater involvement of cytotechnicians.

Adenocarcinoma↗