PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P W Crozier

Publications and source records attributed to P W Crozier.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Trace level analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface waters by solid phase extraction (SPE) and gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry (GC-ITMS).

Ontario Provincial Water Quality Objectives for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in surface waters require low parts per trillion (ng L(-1))/high parts per quadrillion (pg L(-1)) detection limits. To meet these monitoring requirements, a solid phase extraction-gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry (SPE-GC-ITMS) method was developed. Seventeen priority PAHs commonly monitored in surface and drinking waters were examined using an external ionization ion trap mass spectrometer operated in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode. Under 70 eV electron ionization (El) conditions, both the quantitative [M]+* ion and confirmatory [M - 2H]+* ion were formed in classical abundance ratios. Each of these ion species was isolated in the ion trap using a specific scan function. However, to overcome poor levels of confirmatory ion abundance which otherwise restrict PAH method detection limits (MDLs), the abundance of [M - 2H]+* ions was augmented during isolation by causing the dissociation of [M]+* with the broad-band waveform used for high mass ion ejection. Augmenting the [M - 2H]+* signal intensity facilitated the achievement of MDLs of approximately 1 ng L(-1). PAHs in surface water samples that were not detected by current Ontario Ministry of the Environment high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-fluorescence and GC-single-stage quadrupole mass spectrometry methods were detected and quantified using the ion trap mass spectrometry SIM method. The data produced by all three methods on natural water samples fortified at sub-parts per billion (ppb) levels were comparable. When applied to Standards Council of Canada/Canadian Association for Environmental Analytical Laboratories (SCC/CAEAL, www.CAEAL.ca) accreditation audit samples, the SPE-GC-ITMS method results met all performance evaluation criteria.

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry↗

Characterization of nonyl phenol ethoxylates in sewage treatment plants by combined precursor ion scanning and multiple reaction monitoring.

A novel rapid screening technique for the profiling of nonyl phenol ethoxylates (NPEs) in sewage treatment plant (STP) influent/effluent was developed using flow injection with atmospheric pressure ionization coupled to mass spectrometric analysis by combined precursor ion scanning and multiple reaction monitoring. The technique allows for total NPE concentrations as low as 50 parts-per-trillion to be detected in STP samples.

Environmental Monitoring↗

Determination of diquat and paraquat in water by liquid chromatography-(electrospray ionization) mass spectrometry.

A method for the determination of the herbicides diquat and paraquat in water was developed using liquid chromatography-(electrospray ionization) mass spectrometry [LC-(ESI)MS]. The analytes were isolated on an ENVI-8 DSK solid phase extraction (SPE) disk and eluted with 5-M trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). The eluate was evaporated to dryness and the analytes were redissolved in the mobile phase (7% methanol/93% water/25-mM TFA). The extract was analyzed by liquid chromatography (C1 column) with postcolumn addition of propionic acid/methanol followed by (ESI)MS. Diquat was detected using the [M(2+)-H+] ion (M2+ = dication) at m/z 183, whereas paraquat was detected using the mono-trifluoroacetate ion pair [M2 +/- OOCCF3] at m/z 299. Quantitation was done by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using d4-diquat and d8-paraquat and the corresponding ions [M(2+)-D+] and [M2 +/- OOCCF3] at m/z 186 and m/z 307, respectively. Detection limits of 0.1 and 0.2 microgram/L, respectively (based on the dications), were adequate to meet the Ontario Drinking Water Objectives of 70 and 10 micrograms/L, respectively, and the Ontario Provincial Water Quality Objective for diquat of 0.5 microgram/L. Precision and accuracy were 14% and 6% for diquat and 12% and 3% for paraquat.

Chromatography, Liquid↗