Biomedical subjects

P Weidmann

Publications and source records attributed to P Weidmann.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1992

[Monotherapy with the ACE-inhibitor ramipril or the calcium antagonist nitrendipine in essential hypertension].

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium antagonists have, by reason of their potentially favourable pharmacological profile, become increasingly established in the treatment of hypertension in recent years. In a double-blind randomized study with an initial placebo phase, carried out by practising physicians and thus aimed at the "usual" practice patients with essential hypertension, we assessed (1) the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of an ACE inhibitor (ramipril, 5 mg/d) or a calcium antagonist (nitrendipine, 20 mg/d) given in a single daily dose, and (2) a possible age-dependent blood pressure (BP) effect of these therapies. In the 4 weeks' placebo phase, the two treatment groups were comparable as regards average age (49.6 and 49.4 years), age-range (27-67 and 25-64 years) and BP. Fifty-two patients completed the following 6 weeks' phase with active drug therapy. On ramipril (n = 26), the BP measured 24-25 hours after the last drug administration was reduced in the supine position from an average of 155/102 to 142/91 mmHg (mean reduction -10.1%) and in the upright position from 156/106 to 141/96 mmHg (-9.3%). Nitrendipine (n = 26) reduced the average BP from 155/102 to 147/94 mmHg (-6.8%) and from 155/106 to 146/99 mmHg (-6.6%) respectively. BP-lowering effects of both treatments were largely independent of age. Including the patients who discontinued the study prematurely because of side effects (1 on ramipril, 4 on nitrendipine), the "intention to treat analysis" shows BP normalization rates (diastolic < or = 90 mm Hg) of 55% (ramipril) and 30% (nitrendipine) respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1992

[Improved glucose regulation and microalbuminuria/proteinuria in diabetic patients treated with ACE inhibitors. A meta-analysis of published studies of 1985-1990].

In patients with diabetes mellitus, metabolic control, hypertension and kidney function are important prognostic factors. In this respect ACE inhibitors exhibit, according to previous publications, a potentially beneficial effect on diabetic patients. To further clarify this effect of ACE inhibitors, a meta-analysis of 21 studies of type I and II diabetics under therapy with ACE inhibitors was performed. Altogether 325 cases were analyzed. The duration of diabetes varied between 2.5 and 22 years. Therapy with ACE inhibitors under long-term treatment (up to 12 months) reduced diastolic blood pressure (-25%) and, both for type I and II diabetics, fasting blood sugar (-14%) and HbA1 (-9%). Microalbuminuria/proteinuria was reduced by 33% under short-term treatment with ACE inhibitors (up to 3 months) and by 66% under long-term treatment. Analysis of the subgroups with microalbuminuria (30-300 mg/day, n = 48) or clinical proteinuria (greater than 300-1500 mg/day, n = 9) showed similar results. The outcome of this meta-analysis shows that the treatment of diabetic patients with ACE inhibitors not only effectively reduces high blood pressure but also reduces microalbuminuria/proteinuria and, in addition, exhibits an anti-hyperglycemic effect by improving blood sugar levels.

Albuminuria↗

PubMed1992

[Diagnostic value of ambulatory daily blood pressure profile: comparison with measurements performed by a laboratory technician].

Office blood pressure measured by a physician is often higher than under the usual ambulatory conditions. Therefore, alternative methods such as self-assessment of blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure measurements are increasingly promoted. The purposes of this study, covering 613 referred patients, were (1) compare office blood pressure with continuous ambulatory blood pressure measurements, (2) compare office blood pressure with blood pressure values recorded by a trained technician in the absence of a physician and (3) analyze the interpretation of the blood pressure profiles by the referring physicians. Office blood pressure exceeded average ambulatory blood pressure in 94% of the patients and also the blood pressure values recorded by a technician in 88%. According to the office blood pressure there were 523 patients with elevated blood pressure, 20 with isolated increased systolic blood pressure and 70 with normal blood pressure. Office blood pressure was higher (systolic +17 +/- 18 and diastolic +9 +/- 12 mm Hg, p less than 0.0001) than the average value of the ambulatory blood pressure profile, whereas the latter did not differ significantly from blood pressure values measured by the technician (systolic -1 +/- 12 and diastolic -2 +/- 9 mm Hg). 190 of the 523 (36%) patients had white-coat hypertension according to the ambulatory blood pressure measurements. Conventional blood pressure measurements by the technician yielded a high sensitivity (84%) and specificity (87%) for distinguishing white coat hypertension. Analysis of the questionnaires showed that opinions about normal limits of ambulatory blood pressure vary considerably.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood Pressure Determination↗

PubMed1992

[Rational assessment procedure in hypertension].

Diagnosis of hypertension is based on a classification of blood-pressure values, determined by multiple blood-pressure measurements over a period of several weeks or months. However, possibility of a so-called 'white coat effect' has to be considered, i.e. a marked increase of blood-pressure values in the presence of medical persons. Multiple control-measurements by the patient himself or an ambulatory day profile may clarify the situation in suspicious cases. In the case of pure 'white coat' hypertension, no further investigation is necessary, since cardiovascular complications only correlate with the 'usual' ambulatory blood pressure. Persons with borderline (141-159/91-94 mmHg and intermittently lower, according to the WHO) or established hypertension usually present with further cardiovascular risk factors, like lack of physical exercise, smoking, hypercholesterolemia (elevated total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol), alone or accompanied by hypertriglyceridemia, disturbed tolerance of glucose or diabetes mellitus, or hypertrophy of the left ventricle. Therefore, in borderline as well as in established hypertension these additional risk factors have to be evaluated. Considering left ventricular hypertrophy electrocardiogram and chest X-ray are insensitive with regard to diagnosis and prognosis of this important and serious risk factor. Echocardiography that can meet both these criteria is for capacity reasons still limited to selected cases. In contrast to the investigation of the risk profile, only few patients will profit from an investigation of etiology of hypertension. It should be tailored to individual features and after thorough evaluation of all consequences, such as costs for the patient, chances for a positive result and possible therapeutical consequences. Usually, careful history taking, clinical investigation and routine laboratory provide an appropriate basis for further rational investigative procedures. Hypertension is a common and important risk factor. The challenge for the public health is great because prognosis can markedly be influenced by early diagnosis and therapy. Insufficient distinction between efficient diagnostic and therapeutical efforts and those that may be superfluous may not only influence psyche and somatic well-being of the patient but also socio-economic balance.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗

PubMed1992

[Antihypertensive therapy in the nineties].

The risk for cardiovascular complications is already substantially increased in persons with borderline elevation of arterial pressure (141-159/90-94 mmHg and transiently below). It increases progressively with higher grades of hypertension. The main aim of treatment is thus a significant improvement in survival for the patient. Persons with raised blood pressure (BP) have often additional cardiovascular risk factors such as deranged carbohydrate metabolism, dyslipidemia, left ventricular hypertrophy, smoking and others. Treatment of hypertensive patients should thus not only normalize BP but should at the same time reduce associated risk factors or at least not increase them. Conventional antihypertensive treatment based on thiazides in high doses or beta-blocking agents led to marked reduction of strokes and heart failure, but did not satisfactorily reduce coronary heart disease or sudden cardiac death. It has been suspected that other cardiac risk factors are insufficiently influenced or eventually even deteriorated by conventional therapy, thus counteracting partly a beneficial effect of lowered BP. Beta-blockers however have at least a secondary preventive effect after myocardial infarction. Newer antihypertensive drugs such as ACE-inhibitors, calcium antagonists and alpha 1-blockers reduce left ventricular hypertrophy and are at least neutral with regard to metabolism of lipids and carbohydrates. The non-thiazide diuretic indapamide and the serotonin (S2-) blocker ketanserin likewise are neutral with regard to glucose and lipid metabolism. The efficacy of these new drugs regarding long term survival is as yet undetermined. Persisting borderline or established hypertension should as a rule always be approached with basic non-pharmacologic measures: loss of overweight, reduction of alcohol intake, exercise, avoidance of high salt foods, abstention from smoking and withdrawal of BP-raising drugs. If antihypertensive medication is indicated, potential first line drugs are ACE-inhibitors, calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, thiazides at low dose, indapamide, ketanserin, the alpha 1-blocker prazosin and others; initially as monotherapy, if needed in combinations of 2 or 3. Older patients or those will with additional disturbances such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, nephropathy, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, claudication, asthma and others need problem-adjusted modifications of treatment.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed1992

Insulin sensitivity in normotensive subjects during angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with fosinopril.

The effect of the new ACE-inhibitor, fosinopril, on insulin sensitivity (SI), glucose homoeostasis and lipid profile has been examined in 24 young, healthy, normotensive men. SI, fasting plasma glucose and insulin, serum total triglycerides (Tg) and lipoprotein cholesterol (C) fractions, and ACE activity were assessed after subjects had taken placebo for 1 week and after 3 further weeks either on placebo (12 subjects) or fosinopril 20 mg daily (12 subjects), administered in a double-blind, randomized order. Measurements were made after 3 days on a standard diet (2500 kcal/d, 45% carbohydrates, 40% fat and 15% proteins) and after an overnight fast. Compared with control values at the end of the run-in placebo phase, fosinopril reduced plasma ACE activity (from 106 to 24 nmol.ml-1.min-1), Significantly increased plasma potassium and lowered upright systolic blood pressure. It also improved the k-value of the glucose disappearance rate after glucose load (from -1.70 to -1.88%.min-1) and tended to increase SI slightly although not significantly (from 10.2 to 12.0.10(-4).min-1.microU-1.ml-1). Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, serum total, high-, low-, and very-low density lipoprotein cholesterol fractions and total triglycerides were unchanged following fosinopril and placebo. The findings indicate that in healthy lean humans, ACE inhibition with fosinopril is neutral with regard to lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism, and that it may slightly enhance cellular glucose disposal. This calls for further evaluation in individuals at high risk of developing insulin resistance and in patients with impaired insulin sensitivity related to hypertension, obesity, decreased glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Plasma insulin during physiological and pathophysiological changes in atrial natriuretic factor.

Changes in plasma insulin in response to a physiological or pathophysiological elevation in circulating atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) have been investigated. Plasma insulin, glucose, immunoreactive (ir) ANF, effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), absolute and fractional excretion of sodium (FENa), have been measured in 14 volunteers before and during infusion of low doses of ANF or vehicle (V). Each subject received single-blind in a randomized sequence at 2 week-intervals: V alone, or ANF 4, 8 and 16 ng.kg-1.min-1, induced over 90 min. Plasma irANF was increased 2.5- to 11-fold during the ANF infusion as compared to the test with the vehicle. Plasma insulin did not change during V administration (baseline vs V: 22 vs 21 microU.ml-1) and was unchanged during ANF at 4, 8 and 16 ng.kg-1.min-1 (19, 19, 21 microU.ml-1, respectively). Blood pressure, ERPF and GFR were not affected, and diuresis, FENa and urinary Na excretion were increased significantly and dose-dependently during ANF, but not V infusion. Compared to baseline, ANF 4, 8 and 16 ng.kg-1.min-1 increased urinary Na excretion by 147,241 and 446 mumol.min-1, respectively. The findings indicate that, in normal humans, an acute increase in irANF within or slightly above the physiological range, which modified natriuresis and diuresis, did not alter circulating plasma insulin.

Atrial Natriuretic Factor↗

PubMed1992

Urodilatin, not nitroprusside, combined with dopamine reverses ischemic acute renal failure.

The present study was undertaken to: (a) clarify the comparative renal potency of bolus injection of the natriuretic peptides urodilatin and ANF99-126 in the rat; (b) establish whether or not intravenous (i.v.) infusion of urodilatin (200 ng/min) combined with dopamine (UD) to maintain mean arterial pressure could improve GFR or renal histology in established experimental ischemic acute renal failure (ARF) induced by 30 minutes of bilateral renal artery clamping; (c) assess comparative efficacies of nitroprusside, an activator of soluble guanylate cyclase, combined with dopamine (ND) or control infusions of dopamine alone (DA), under equivalent conditions; and (d) determine effects of intra-renal arterial infusions of the stable cGMP analogue dibutyryl-cGMP immediately after renal artery clamping (RAC). After initial dose finding studies, i.v. infusion of UD 24 hours after 30 minutes of RAC improved GFR over five hours from 0.24 +/- 0.04 to 1.0 +/- 0.16 ml/min in association with a threefold rise in plasma cGMP and a 13-fold increase in urinary cGMP excretion. Plasma creatinine dropped by 41% from 230 +/- 16 to 135 +/- 18 microM/liter and was still reduced 24 hours later with values averaging 106 +/- 14 compared to 274 +/- 53 microM/liter in non-treated animals. During infusion, UV and FENa+ increased from 1.4 +/- 0.2 to 8.3 ml/min, and from 2.9 +/- 0.5 to maximum values of 15.8 +/- 2.4%. ND or DA alone were less effective, increasing GFR only to 14 and 20%, respectively, of normal values, but improvements were not sustained; in contrast to UD, ND did not alter plasma or urinary cGMP. In addition, DBcGMP was ineffective in improving GFR during early ARF. Histologically UD, but not ND, markedly reduced the incidence of granular casts, tubular desquamation and tubular necrosis in cortical areas and increased the incidence of medullary mitoses.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed1992

Effect of prolonged bicarbonate administration on plasma potassium in terminal renal failure.

In hemodialysis patients with hyperkalemia, i.v. sodium bicarbonate has recently been found to be ineffective in lowering plasma potassium within one hour. In the present study the effect of a prolonged bicarbonate infusion on plasma potassium was investigated. Twelve patients with terminal renal failure who were on hemodialysis were infused i.v. with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (4 mmol/min) for one hour and with 1.4% (0.5 mmol/min) for five hours (total amount 390 mmol). Plasma bicarbonate rose from 17.5 at baseline to 28.4 and 29.6 mmol/liter, and blood pH from 7.32 to 7.46 and 7.48 at one and six hours, respectively. Plasma potassium did not change significantly after one and two hours (6.04 at baseline, 5.91 and 5.77 mmol/liter, respectively). Only at four and six hours did a moderate decline to 5.44 (P less than 0.05) and to 5.30 (P less than 0.01) occur, of which approximately half was calculated to be due to ECF volume expansion. However, no change or a very moderate decrease was observed in three patients even after six hours (+0.19, -0.32, -0.33 mmol/liter). Five patients with higher baseline plasma potassium (6.15 to 8.15 mmol/liter) behaved like seven with lower levels (5.25 to 5.87 mmol/liter). Tented T-waves in the ECG of seven patients disappeared after one hour only in one patient. Plasma aldosterone, norepinephrine and epinephrine were normal to elevated before and tended to fall during i.v. bicarbonate. Plasma dopamine and insulin were in the normal range.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Effect of diuretics on the plasma lipid profile.

Hypertension, dyslipidaemia, glucose intolerance (associated with insulin resistance and compensatory hyperinsulinaemia) and other abnormalities are complementary coronary risk factors which often occur in association. A familial trait for essential hypertension seems to coexist commonly with defects in carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism which can be detected before the appearance of hypertension. Diabetes mellitus as well as obesity promotes the development of hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Moreover, certain drugs used for antihypertensive therapy can further modify lipoprotein and glucose metabolism. Thiazides in high dosage and loop-diuretics can increase serum low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and/or very-LDL-C and the total C/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, while HDL-C is largely unchanged; triglycerides (Tg) are also often elevated. Premenopausal women may be protected from this side effect. Whether diuretic-induced dyslipidaemia is dose-dependent and low thiazide doses (i.e. hydrochlorothiazide < or = 12.5 mg daily) are less active, awaits clarification. The diuretic-antihypertensive agent, indapamide, given at a dose of 2.5 mg.day-1, seems to exert no relevant effect on serum lipoprotein or glucose metabolism. The potassium-sparing diuretic, spironolactone, also may be largely neutral with regard to lipids. Moreover, potassium sparing diuretics may possibly counteract, at least in part, a dyslipidaemic influence of potassium-loosing diuretics in medium dose. Drug-induced dyslipidaemia, as well as glucose intolerance, represent potentially adverse influences. In the hypertensive population, effective blood pressure control with traditional drug therapy based on thiazide-type diuretics in high dosage led to a distinct decrease in cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality, but a lesser decrease in coronary events.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Diuretics↗

PubMed1992

Left ventricular structure and determinants in normotensive offspring of essential hypertensive parents.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether currently normotensive offspring of essential hypertensive parents may have alterations in left ventricular mass (LVM) and function, and how these relate to some potential determinants. DESIGN AND METHODS: Echocardiographical indices of LVM (assessed by two-dimensional guided M-mode echocardiogram), 'clinic' blood pressure and daytime ambulatory blood pressure profiles, blood pressure responses to dynamic and isometric exercise testing, haematocrit, plasma and 24-h urinary electrolytes and catecholamines, and plasma angiotensin II were assessed on a defined Na+ intake in 31 normotensive lean sons of essential hypertensive parents (OHYP group) and 30 body mass index- and age-matched sons of normotensive parents (ONORM group). RESULTS: Clinic supine systolic blood pressure was higher in the OHYP than the ONORM group, but clinic diastolic and daytime ambulatory mean blood pressures, blood pressure loads and blood pressure during dynamic or isometric exercise did not differ significantly. LVM index (LVMI), interventricular septum thickness (IVST), posterior wall thickness (PWT), the IVST:PWT ratio, ejection fraction, fractional shortening, cardiac index and measured biochemical variables also did not differ significantly between groups. In the whole study population the LVMI correlated positively with the body mass index and negatively with plasma noradrenaline. CONCLUSIONS: In young lean men with one essential hypertensive parent and blood pressure still in the normal range, left ventricular structure and systolic function, as assessed by echocardiography, seem to be often unaltered and appropriate relative to the existing body habitus and blood pressure. Moreover, an early tendency for increasing resting blood pressure in genetically hypertension-prone humans may be more apparent under clinic than usual ambulatory conditions, whereas the blood pressure reactivity to physical stress seems to be largely normal at this stage.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Swiss hypertension treatment programme with verapamil and/or enalapril in diabetic patients.

The purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of diuretic-free antihypertensive therapy with a calcium antagonist and/or an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor in patients with diabetes mellitus. 54 hypertensive [blood pressure (BP) above 140/90mm Hg] patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (n = 7) or 2 (n = 47) and normal serum creatinine levels (mean 82 +/- 6 mumol/L) received either verapamil or enalapril after a 2-week washout and a 4-week placebo phase. If BP remained elevated, both agents were combined. Verapamil or enalapril alone normalised diastolic BP (to less than 90mm Hg) in 36 patients; verapamil decreased BP from 159/98 to 147/87mm Hg (n = 19, p < 0.001) and enalapril decreased BP from 166/99 to 146/88mm Hg (n = 17, p < 0.001). In 18 patients who remained hypertensive after 10 weeks of monotherapy, a combination of both drugs decreased BP from 169/104 to 151/90mm Hg (p < 0.001). Overall, 87% of patients achieved a target BP response at 30 weeks. Urinary albumin as related to creatinine excretion (UAE; micrograms albumin:mg creatinine) was on average not significantly changed after verapamil or enalapril treatment, alone or combined. Nevertheless, in patients with initial microalbuminuria, UAE decreased (p < 0.05) during enalapril treatment. Serum potassium, total lipids, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, glycosylated haemoglobin, serum C peptide and fructosamine levels were not significantly modified by treatment. Subjective tolerability of the drugs was also generally good. Thus, in hypertensive patients with diabetes, a diuretic-free therapy based on the calcium antagonist verapamil or the ACE inhibitor enalapril, alone or combined, can effectively decrease BP without adversely affecting carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Enhanced blood pressure response to mineralocorticoid stimulation in normotensive members of hypertensive families.

Currently normotensive offspring of essential hypertensive parents often have disturbances in blood pressure (BP) regulation such as abnormalities in electrolyte homoeostasis, increased salt-sensitivity and/or impaired renal Na(+)-excretion. Whether an altered reactivity to mineralocorticoids may also play a role is presently unknown. Therefore, we investigated BP (recorded during 24 h), plasma atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), aldosterone (PA) and renin activity (PRA), 24-h urine electrolyte and cGMP excretions measured on 4 consecutive days, as well as other variables, after 1 week on placebo and after 3 weeks of 9 alpha-fludrocortisone-acetate (9 alpha F) administration, 0.6 mg/d in 12 normotensive sons of essential hypertensive parents (SEH) and 12 body-mass-index- and age-matched (25 +/- 1[+/-SEM]yr) sons of normotensive parents (SN). On placebo, the 2 groups did not differ significantly in average 24 h BP (mean BP 95 +/- 2 vs 95 +/- 2 mmHg), plasma-ANF (40 +/- 7 vs 30 +5 pg/ml), cGMP (6 +/- 0.4 vs 6 +/- 0.5 nmol/l), PRA (1.3 +/- 0.1 vs 1.6 +/- 0.2 ng/ml/h), PA (9 +/- 0.5 vs 10 +/- 0.9 ng/dl), hematocrit (44 +/- 0.7 vs 44 +/- 0.4%) and 96-h urinary-Na+ (mean 205 +/- 13 vs 195 +/- 16 mmol/d), -K+ (69 +/- 6 vs 78 +/- 7 mmol/d) or -cGMP (461 +/- 35 vs 483 +/- 32 nmol/d). 9 alpha F significantly increased BP in SEH (p < 0.005) but not SN (107 +/- 2 vs 100 +/- 2 mmHg, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Antihypertensive therapy in diabetic patients.

Diabetes mellitus (DM)-linked metabolic alterations and hypertension concomitantly accelerate or precipitate cerebrovascular and coronary heart disease, nephropathy, retinopathy and widespread macroangiopathy, thereby conferring to diabetic patients a very high risk of morbidity, disability and early death. Therefore, the long-term care for diabetic patients should be aimed at concomitant metabolic and blood pressure (BP) control. Dietary measures are indispensable; a high fibre, low fat, low salt diet is recommended, complemented with caloric restriction and physical exercise when body weight is above the ideal. Antidiabetic pharmacotherapy involves an unresolved dilemma. The desired achievement of euglycemia necessitates effective levels of insulin, but hyperinsulinemia (due to parenteral [over]treatment in insulin-dependent DM) is suspected to promote atherogenesis and represents a coronary risk factor and perhaps even facilitates hypertension. Considering antihypertensive pharmacotherapy, thiazide-type or loop diuretics are problematic drugs in DM because they can aggravate metabolic alterations. These agents also seem to exert only a limited preventive or regressive effect on left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH); beta-blockers are also not considered ideal, since they decrease the awareness of hypoglycemia and tend to promote glucose intolerance. Unselective beta-blockers in particular promote peripheral ischemia and insulin-induced hypoglycemia, while beta-blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity lower serum HDL-cholesterol. Calcium antagonists and ACE inhibitors have equivalent antihypertensive efficacy, do not impair carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis or peripheral perfusion and can effectively improve LVH. Certain ACE inhibitors may even slightly ameliorate abnormal insulin sensitivity and plasma glucose levels. While alpha-blockers share most of these desirable properties, these agents are more prone to precipitate orthostatic hypotension in the diabetic patient. The non-thiazide diuretic indapamide and the serotonin2-antagonist ketanserin also combine antihypertensive efficacy with metabolic neutrality. The ultimate goal of therapy is to improve life prognosis. In essential hypertension, conventional drug treatment based on diuretics in high dosage satisfactorily reduced cerebrovascular but not coronary complications or sudden death. In diabetic patients, the influence of antihypertensive therapy on prognosis has not been assessed prospectively. Based on retrospective analyses, Warram et al reported a 3.8 times higher mortality in diabetics treated with diuretics alone, than in diabetics with untreated hypertension (Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1350). H. H. Parving calculated that effective BP control in patients with diabetic nephropathy might reduce 10 year-mortality from about 65 to 20 percent (J Hypertension. 1990; 8[Suppl 7]:187).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed1991

Antihypertensive agents, serum lipoproteins and glucose metabolism.

Effective blood pressure control with traditional high-dose diuretic therapy has led to a distinct decrease in cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality, but failed to achieve a satisfactory reduction of coronary complications and sudden death. The same applies also for beta blockers, although they have been shown to be effective in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. It is suspected that conventional antihypertensive treatment has an unfavorable effect on coronary risk factors other than hypertension. For instance, thiazide-type diuretics can impair glucose tolerance and increase the potentially atherogenic serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol fraction and triglycerides. Beta blockers without partial intrinsic sympathomimetic activity increase serum triglycerides and tend to lower the potentially antiatherogenic high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Certain beta blockers may also impair glucose tolerance, particularly when they are combined with diuretics. Calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitors and alpha 1-receptor blockers do not adversely affect lipoprotein or carbohydrate profiles. The latter two drug classes may even increase insulin sensitivity, and alpha 1 blockers may also slightly improve lipid metabolism. The prognostic relevance of drug-induced dyslipidemia and/or glucose intolerance awaits further clarification. In the meantime, it is of clinical interest that several of the generally available antihypertensive drugs seem to be metabolically neutral or sometimes perhaps even potentially beneficial with regard to the lipoprotein and carbohydrate metabolism.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

PubMed1991

[The treatment of orthostatic hypotension with metoclopramide].

The dopamine receptor antagonist metoclopramide (paspertin, primpéran, gastrosil, meclopran, gastro-timelets), used as monotherapy or in combination with an inhibitor of the cyclooxygenase enzyme, affords good results in orthostatic hypotension due to insufficiency of the sympathetic nervous system. The mechanism of action in these cases is unclear but is assumed to be elevation of vascular tone in the splanchnic vessels. A case is discussed which documents the effectiveness of metoclopramide therapy in orthostatic hypotension, even in absence of signs of autonomic dysfunction.

Aged↗

PubMed1991

Unaltered insulin sensitivity during calcium channel blockade with amlodipine.

The sensitivity of peripheral tissues to insulin is of pathophysiological, therapeutic and possibly also of prognostic relevance. Calcium channel blockers are widely used in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders that are commonly associated with decreased insulin sensitivity (SI). To evaluate the effects of calcium channel blokkade on SI, glucose homoeostasis and lipid profiles, studies were made of SI (determined by the Minimal Model Method of Bergman), basal glucose and insulin levels, serum total triglyceride (Tg) and lipoprotein cholesterol (C) fractions and certain other variables in 38 healthy young men (24 y) during placebo and after 3 weeks of calcium channel blockade with amlodipine 5 mg once daily. Measurements were made after 3 days on a standard diet (2200 kcal.day-1, 45% carbohydrates, 40% fat and 15% proteins) and after an overnight fast. Compared to placebo, amlodipine decreased supine systolic blood pressure (P less than 0.01). Heart rate, body weight and 24 h urinary sodium excretion were unaltered, and so were fasting plasma glucose (placebo vs amlodipine: 4.86 vs 4.83 mmol.l-1, respectively) and insulin levels (7.7 vs 7.9 microU.ml-1), SI (10.5 vs 9.6.10(-4) x min-1 pro microU.ml-1), serum total Tg, C and lipoprotein C fractions. The findings demonstrate unchanged insulin sensitivity and secretion, as well as lipoprotein regulation, during maintenance administration of 5 mg amlodipine daily to healthy young men.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Reproducibility of insulin sensitivity measured by the minimal model method.

Insulin resistance is a critical component underlying the altered glucose homeostasis in a variety of metabolic and non-metabolic disorders. Aging, body fat distribution, obesity, diabetes mellitus or hypertension are well recognized conditions associated with an impaired tissue sensitivity to insulin action. Apart from such constant factors, insulin sensitivity can be acutely modified by independent variables such as physical exercise, dietary factors, alcohol intake or harmless drugs. To evaluate the day-to-day intra-individual variation in insulin sensitivity, glucose homeostasis and lipid profiles, we investigated the insulin sensitivity index (S1) (determined by the minimal model method of Bergman), basal and post-glucose-load insulin and glucose levels, serum total triglyceride and lipoprotein cholesterol fractions in 15 healthy young men (24 +/- 1 year, mean +/- SEM), on two different occasions at an interval of 3 weeks (days 1 and 21), after 3 days of a standard dietary regimen and after an overnight fast. Blood pressure, heart rate, body weight and 24 h urinary sodium excretion were almost identical in the two phases. S1(day 1) varied from 4.2 to 15.8 x 10(-4).min-1 pro microU/ml (mean: 10.2 +/- 0.9) and correlated with S1(day 21) (11.2 +/- 1.2 x 10(-4).min-1 pro microU/ml, r = 0.78, p less than 0.0007). The slope of the relationship did not differ from 1 (1.01, p greater than 0.90), the intercept was close to the origin (0.8, p greater than 0.73) and the coefficient of variation was 14.4%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗