PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

P Whaley

Publications and source records attributed to P Whaley.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Processing of cues for stop consonant voicing by young hearing-impaired listeners.

To assess whether young hearing-impaired listeners are as sensitive as normal-hearing children to the cues for stop consonant voicing, we presented stimuli from along VOT continua to young normal-hearing listeners and to listeners with mild, moderate, severe, and profound hearing impairments. The response measures were the location of the phonetic boundaries, the change in boundaries with changes in place of articulation, and response variability. The listeners with normal hearing sensitivity and those with mild and moderate hearing impairments did not differ in performance on any response measure. The listeners with severe impairments did not show the expected change in VOT boundary with changes in place of articulation. Moreover, stimulus uncertainty (i.e., the number of possible choices in the response set) affected their response variability. One listener with profound impairment was able to process the cues for voicing in a normal fashion under conditions of minimum stimulus uncertainty. We infer from these results that the cochlear damage which underlies mild and moderate hearing impairment does not significantly alter the auditory representation of VOT. However, the cochlear damage underlying severe impairment, possibly interacting with high signal presentation levels, does alter the auditory representation of VOT.

Adolescent↗

Identification and discrimination of a synthesized voicing contrast by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired children.

The identification and discrimination of a stop-consonant voicing contrast (/da/--/ta/) was assessed in children and adolescents who had moderate, severe, and profound sensorineural hearing losses. The location of the perceptual boundary between /da/ and /ta/ did not differ between normal listeners and listeners with moderate losses. Of the ten listeners with severe losses, five evidenced normal boundaries, three evidenced longer-than-normal boundaries, and two could not identify the stimuli at all. Of the three listeners with profound hearing losses, one could identify normally, and two could not identify at all. For the most part, discrimination data mirrored identification data. However, in some instances listeners were able to discriminate between stimuli they could not differentially identify. These subjects appeared to have the auditory capacity to resolve differences in voice-onset-time but could not use this capacity to make phonetic identification.

Adolescent↗

Two home births.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Australia↗