PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pamela Kidd

Publications and source records attributed to Pamela Kidd.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Overcoming recruitment challenges in construction safety intervention research.

BACKGROUND: Recruiting workers in small construction companies and securing their participation in voluntary safety programs or safety research poses unique challenges. Worker turnover and worksite changes contribute to difficulties in locating and enrolling participants. Economic pressures and time demands potentially threaten ongoing participation. METHODS: Six simulation exercises designed to reduce back and fall injuries in small construction companies were developed based on data from focus groups of workers and company owners. Working with a workers' compensation insurer, we had access to owner-operators of general, heavy, and special trade construction companies reporting less than $10,000 in payroll expenses. Recruitment methods included a participation incentive, mailed invitations followed by phone contacts, and follow-up reminders. RESULTS: Despite using recruitment methods recommended in the literature, participation rates were low over a 2-year intervention period. Because of these difficulties, factors affecting participation or nonparticipation became an additional research focus. Owners' perceptions of already having a good safety record and of the time demands of participation were the most commonly cited reasons for not participating. CONCLUSIONS: Literature on recruitment emphasizes processes and procedures under investigator control rather than understanding potential participants' judgments about the adequacy of their existing practices and the potential benefits of intervention participation relative to potential time and productivity trade-offs. Greater attention to such judgments may enhance recruitment and participation in under-studied and difficult to access populations.

Accidental Falls↗

The transtheoretical model of change in adolescents: implications for injury prevention.

INTRODUCTION: Many injury prevention interventions require changes in human behavior to reduce self-risk or risk to others. Promising injury prevention interventions may be discarded if they lack power to create a significant difference in outcomes when judging their ability to "move a person from nonaction or negative action to positive action (safety)." The transtheoretical model of change (TMC) allows greater sensitivity in detecting along the change process where an intervention may be effective. The stages of change consist of precontemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, maintenance, and termination. Change is not viewed as an "all or none phenomenon." METHOD: Use of the TMC was examined using a quasiexperimental, cross-over design involving high school agriculture students enrolled in 21 schools in Kentucky (n=9), Iowa (n=7), and Mississippi (n=5). A series of physical and narrative simulations (safety training exercises) were developed with a focus on preventing amputation, spinal cord injury, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and noise-induced hearing loss. Contemplation and action, as part of the TMC, were measured using a 10-item, Likert-type, stages of change (SOC) instrument comprised of two subscales (reliability coefficients were.88 and.81, respectively). The final sample consisted of 790 students (373 treatment and 417 control). RESULTS: There was a significant group effect for both contemplation, F(1,732)=197.4; p<.0001, and action, F(1,730)=106.1; p<.0001. A convenience sample of 29 of the participating students was selected for follow-up farm visits 1 year postparticipation. Of these students, 25 (86%) had made safety behavior changes in their farm work. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: The use of the TMC model can provide researchers with greater precision in examining intervention effectiveness in promoting change.

Adolescent↗

Assessing recalibration as a response-shift phenomenon.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the difference between pretest and posttest scores is used as an estimate of change. This can be problematic when repeated self-report measures are used to assess change resulting from interventions intended to change beliefs, behaviors, attitudes, or values about health or safety. If the intervention is effective, participants may apply more stringent criteria in response to a posttest questionnaire than they did at the pretest. This kind of change has been termed a recalibration response shift. OBJECTIVES: To present scale recalibration as a measurable response shift, and to illustrate a method that can be used to estimate its magnitude and direction: the retrospective pretest. METHODS: In a quasi-experimental study investigating the effectiveness in small construction companies of narrative simulation exercises targeting back and fall injuries, a retrospective pretest was administered concurrently with a delayed posttest 4 months after the simulation exercises. RESULTS: : In the first intervention year, the results from a brief (two-item) retrospective pretest pertaining to safety climate were consistent with a recalibration response shift in the intervention group, but not in the control group. In the second intervention year, when all 10 items of the safety climate questionnaire were used for the retrospective pretest, no evidence of recalibration was found. CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence of recalibration was equivocal, the findings illustrate circumstances in which recalibration response shifts may occur and characteristic patterns of findings may suggest that recalibration has or has not occurred.

Back Injuries↗