PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Panagiotis Angaridis

Publications and source records attributed to Panagiotis Angaridis.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Multinuclear Fe(III) complexes with polydentate ligands of the family of dicarboxyimidazoles: nuclearity- and topology-controlled syntheses and Magneto-structural correlations.

Two polydentate ligands of the family of dicarboxyimidazoles, H(2)MeDCBI (= 4,5-dicarboxy-1-methyl-1H-imidazole) and H(3)DCBI (= 4,5-dicarboxyimidazole), have been used in reactions with the [Fe(3,5-(t)()Bu(2)salpn)](+) species {3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn = the dianion of 1,3-bis-[(3,5-di-tert-butylsalicylidene)amino]propane} to synthesize selectively complexes of different nuclearities. Four complexes have been synthesized: the mononuclear complex [Fe(3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn)(HMeDCBI)] (1), the two binuclear but topologically different complexes [Fe(3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn)(MeDCBI)Fe(3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn)] (2) and {[Fe(3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn)](2)(HDCBI)} (3), and the trinuclear complex {[Fe(3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn)](2)(DCBI)Fe(3,5-(t)Bu(2)salpn)} (4). The structures of these complexes have been determined by X-ray crystallography. Variable-temperature direct-current magnetic susceptibility measurements were conducted for all compounds to obtain information about their electronic structure and to investigate the extent of magnetic communication among the Fe(III) centers. The results of these measurements allowed us to correlate the different structural motifs with the possible magnetic interactions that arise in multinuclear complexes of dicarboxyimidazoles. For 1, the room-temperature chi(M)T value reveals an S = (5)/(2) ground state. The data for the binuclear but topologically different complexes 2 and 3, and the trinuclear complex 4 suggest that weak intramolecular antiferromagnetic interactions are present, with interaction parameters ranging from -3.6 to -5.1 cm(-1). Differences in the extent of the magnetic communication between the metal centers through the two different interaction pathways of the ligands MeDCBI and DCBI (either through the imidazole ring or through the carboxylate groups) have been observed in complexes 2-4 that can be explained by the structural differences observed in the crystal structures of these compounds (the separation of the metal centers and the coplanarity of the metal ion orbitals with the pi system of the ligands). Cyclic voltammetry measurements for the mononuclear compound 1 show an irreversible reduction wave that is attributed to Fe(3+) + e(-) --> Fe(2+). The electrochemical behavior of the multinuclear complexes 2-4 is more complicated; however, it indicates that there is a degree of electronic communication between the Fe(III) centers.

Algorithms↗

Structural and magnetic evidence concerning spin crossover in formamidinate compounds with ru2 5+ cores.

The magnetic and structural properties of two Ru2(DArF)4Cl compounds, where DArF is the anion of a diaryl formamidine, are presented here. The compounds with Ar = p-anisyl and m-anisyl both show temperature dependence of chiT (chi = molar magnetic susceptibility), but for different reasons. For the para compound, there is a Boltzmann distribution between a pi*3 ground state and a delta*pi*2 upper state, and this is confirmed by a temperature dependence of the Ru-Ru bond length: 2.4471(5) A at 23 K and 2.3968(5) A at 300 K. For the meta compound, a delta*pi*2 configuration persists over the range of 23-300 K as shown by an invariant Ru-Ru bond length, but the chiT drops with decreasing temperature owing to zero-field splitting of a 4B2u ground state.

Journal Article↗

Tetra-mu-acetato-kappa8O:O'-bis[(N(1),N2-di-p-anisylformamidine-kappaN2)ruthenium(II)](Ru-Ru): an example of an axial bis-adduct of {Ru2}4+ tetracarboxylate with N-donor ligands.

The title compound, [Ru2(C2H3O2)4(C15H16N2O2)2], lies on a crystallographic inversion center and exhibits an Ru-Ru bond length of 2.2847 (8) A. There are weak intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions between the N1,N2-di-p-anisylformamidine (HDAniF) ligands and the bridging acetate ligands. The molecule is one of the few examples of a crystallographically characterized axial bis-adduct of a {Ru2}4+ complex with two N-donor ligands.

Journal Article↗

A paramagnetic precursor for polymeric supramolecular assemblies based on multiply bonded dimetal units: mu-acetato-acetonitriletris(mu-N,N'-diphenylformamidinato)diruthenium tetrafluoroborate dichloromethane hemisolvate.

The title compound, [Ru2(C13H11N2)3(C2H3O2)(C2H3N)]BF4.0.5CH2Cl2 or [Ru2(mu-DPhF)3(mu-O2CMe)(MeCN)]BF4.0.5CH2Cl2, where DPhF is N,N'-diphenylformamidinate, crystallized as dark-blue block-shaped crystals. In the unit cell, the diruthenium cation lies on a general position, and the BF4- anions reside on two independent special positions with crystallographic twofold symmetry. Disorder was observed for one of the phenyl groups in the formamidinate ligand, the axial acetonitrile molecule and the interstitial dichloromethane molecule. The compound, which exhibits a long Ru-Ru bond of 2.4131 (5) A, is the first {Ru2}5+ formamidinate species that is both equatorially and axially functionalized so that it can be used as a precursor for polymeric paramagnetic supramolecular assemblies.

Journal Article↗

Paramagnetic precursors for supramolecular assemblies: selective syntheses, crystal structures, and electrochemical and magnetic properties of Ru2(O2CMe)4-n(formamidinate)nCl complexes, n = 1-4.

Reactions of Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)Cl with two formamidines, HDXyl(2,6)F = N,N'-di(2,6-xylyl)formamidine and HDAniF = N,N'-di(p-anisyl)formamidine, have been investigated with the idea of synthesizing compounds with a mixed set of ligands having different labilities to be used as precursors of paramagnetic, higher-order assemblies. Depending on the formamidine and the reaction conditions, several Ru(2)(5+) compounds of the type Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)(-)(n)(DArF)(n)Cl (DArF = anion of an N,N'-diarylformamidine) have been isolated. With the bulky formamidine HXyl(2,6)F, the compounds Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(3)(DXyl(2,6)F)Cl (1) and trans-Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(2)(DXyl(2,6)F)(2)Cl (2) were obtained. From reactions with appropriate amounts of HDAniF in THF and in the presence of NEt(3) and LiCl, complexes of the general type Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)(-)(n)(DArF)(n)Cl (n = 1-4) were selectively obtained. For n = 2, only the cis isomer was obtained. The choice of solvent in reactions of Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)Cl and HDAniF is of great importance. Toluene favored the formation of the fully substituted Ru(2)(5+) complex Ru(2)(DAniF)(4)Cl (3), whereas MeOH resulted in a disproportionation reaction that gave the edge-sharing bioctahedral Ru(3+)Ru(3+) complex [trans-Ru(2)(mu-OMe)(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(2)(HDAniF)(4)]Cl(2) (6) and the Ru(2)(4+) complex Ru(2)(DAniF)(4) (7). Complexes 6 and 7 with an Ru(2)(6+) and Ru(2)(4+) core, respectively, are diamagnetic, whereas all Ru(2)(5+) complexes are paramagnetic with sigma(2)pi(4)delta(2)(pi*delta*)(3) ground-state electronic configurations and large zero-field splitting contributions. All compounds show rich and complex electrochemical behavior.

Journal Article↗

Molecular squares with paramagnetic diruthenium corners: synthetic and crystallographic challenges.

The reaction of Ru(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(4)Cl with approximately 2.5 equiv of HDAniF (HDAniF = N,N'-di(p-anisyl)formamidine) in refluxing THF resulted in the synthesis of cis-Ru(2)(mu-DAniF)(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(2)Cl (1). This Ru(2)(5+)complex, which has two labile acetate groups occupying two equatorial cisoid positions, was used for the construction of discrete paramagnetic supramolecular arrays. Subsequent reactions of 1 with HO(2)C-CO(2)H (oxalic acid) and 1,4-HO(2)C-C(6)H(4)-CO(2)H (terephthalic acid) followed by recrystallization from 1,2-C(2)H(4)Cl(2)/hexanes solutions containing wet MeCN or 4-Bu(t)py (4-tert-butylpyridine) gave crystals of [[is-Ru(2)(mu-DAniF)(2)Cl(H(2)O)]mu-oxalate)](4).MeCN.2(C(6)H(14)).12(H(2)O) (2) and [[is-Ru(2)(mu-DAniF)(2)Cl(0.646)(4-Bu(t)py)(1.354)]mu-terephthlate)](4)Cl(1.414).17(1,2-C(2)H(4)Cl(2)).C(6)H(14) (3), respectively. These are the first polygonal supramolecular assemblies consisting of paramagnetic M(2) units at each apex, where M(2) = Ru(2)(5+). Compounds 2 and 3 have been structurally characterized, and their electrochemistry and magnetic properties have been studied. These studies have confirmed that oxalate linkers are better than the terephthalate linkers in effecting electronic and magnetic coupling.

Journal Article↗