PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paola Sergi

Publications and source records attributed to Paola Sergi.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The Milan Project: a newborn hearing screening programme.

AIM: Since 1997 a newborn hearing screening programme has been implemented by the U.O. Neurologia-Neurofisiopatologia and Dipartimento di Neonatologia of the Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento ICP in Milan for both babies with no risk and those at risk of hearing impairment. This programme was named the Milan Project. METHODS: The protocol for no-risk babies consisted of three stages: in the first two stages, newborns were tested with transient click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), in the third one with conventional auditory brainstem responses (ABR). The first TEOAE test was performed by 36 h of age, before discharge, the second one after 15-30 d in case of referral, and the third one, by ABR, for those babies who failed the second TEOAE stage. Newborns at audiological risk were submitted to conventional ABR before the third month of corrected age. Some of this latter population was also submitted to the TEOAE test. The entire tested population (no-risk babies and newborns at audiological risk) consisted of 19 777 babies: 19 290 without risk ("no risk") and 487 at risk ("at risk"). RESULTS: During the course of the Milan Project, hearing impairment (ABR threshold equal to or greater than 40 dB nHL) was identified in 63 newborns (19 from the no-risk and 44 from the at-risk population), with a prevalence of 0.32%. Bilateral hearing impairment (BHI) was found in 33 newborns (10 from the no-risk and 23 from the at-risk population), corresponding to 0.17%. Among infants with bilateral hearing impairment, 30.3% had no risk factors. The prevalence of hearing impairment was determined on days 15-30 after birth. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the implementation of a hospital-based, universal neonatal hearing screening programme for babies with and without audiological risk is feasible and effective. The effectiveness of the programme has increased as a function of the years since its inception, with a strong decrease in the referral rate. Further improvement is obtained if the TEOAE measurements are repeated in cases of referral scoring before discharge.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

A wider role for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic problems in identifying congenital infection cases in infancy have thus far impaired the assessment of the role of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the etiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of congenital infection in children with SNHL by detection of CMV DNA in stored samples of neonatal dried blood (dried blood spots test). METHODS: The Guthrie cards of 130 children with hearing loss >40 dB hearing loss were retrieved from the regional screening center. CMV DNA was extracted by thermal shock and amplified by PCR. RESULTS: The percentage of SNHL cases attributable to congenital CMV infection was 10% (9 of 87) in infants whose SNHL had been diagnosed in their first 2 months of life and 34.2% (13 of 38) in children with deafness of unidentified cause that was diagnosed in early childhood. In the latter group 42.7% (12 of 28) of the children with a hearing loss of >70 dB were CMV-positive. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that congenital CMV infection has a more relevant role in the etiology of SNHL than previously reported. The data obtained in both groups suggest that 20 to 30% of all deafness cases are caused by CMV. The percent of congenital CMV cases alone appears to account for all the cases previously attributed to all congenital infections. More than 40% of deafness cases with an unknown cause, needing rehabilitation, are caused by congenital CMV.

Child, Preschool↗

Comparison of two methods of TEOAE recording in newborn hearing screening.

This paper summarizes the results of trials performed in two hospitals, comparing the scoring of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) on the same neonates and within the same test session, recorded by the fully automatic device EchoScreen (Madsen Electronics/Fischer-Zoth GmbH) and ILO Otodynamics Ltd system. These trials form part of a larger project (Project Sentinel), whose primary aim is to stimulate the creation of new neonatal hearing screening programmes. Four thousand two hundred and forty-eight neonates were tested with both devices (8494 ears), in randomized order. The response scores obtained with the two devices are in full agreement in 98.72% of the tested ears. Considering the recording time, the fully automatic Echo Screen was, on average, about 3.6 times faster than the ILO88, bearing in mind, however, that when using ILO88, the end of the recording is decided by the operator on the basis of some mandatory decision rules.

Acoustic Stimulation↗