Biomedical subjects

Paolo Arnone

Publications and source records attributed to Paolo Arnone.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk reduction: oncologic or technical problem?

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the risks and benefits of nipple-sparing mastectomy in a multiinstitutional experience in the settings of risk-reducing surgery and breast cancer treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data on 123 patients who had undergone nipple-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction for prophylaxis (n=55), treatment of breast cancer (n=41), or both (n=27) at four large centers. RESULTS: Median patient age was 45 years (range 22 to 70 years). There were 192 procedures (69 bilateral, 54 unilateral). Forty-four patients had invasive cancer; 20 had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); 4 had phyllodes tumor. In all of these patients, the nipple tissue was cancer free on pathologic review. Median followup was 24.6 months (range 2.0 to 570.4 months). Local recurrence developed in two patients: one had DCIS in the upper-outer quadrant, with 71.8 months of followup; the other's cancer was invasive, in the upper-outer quadrant, with 6 months of followup. Distant metastasis developed in a third patient, who died 50 months after the procedure. Breast cancer developed in two patients after prophylactic mastectomy: one in the upper-outer quadrant at 61.8 months; one in the axillary tail at 24.4 months. No patients had recurrences in the nipple-areolar complex. Necrosis of the nipple was reported in 22 of 192 patients (11%) and it was judged minimal (less than one-third total skin of nipple) in 13 of 22 patients (59%). Overall cosmesis was judged by the patient and surgeon as good to excellent in the majority of patients. Level of satisfaction with cosmetic results was similar between prophylactic and treatment patients. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of local relapse was very low in our series of nipple-sparing mastectomies performed for DCIS or invasive cancer. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in the risk-reducing and breast cancer-treatment settings may be feasible in selected patients and should be the subject of additional prospective clinical trials.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The sentinel node biopsy after previous breast surgery: preliminary results on 543 patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an accurate alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. A previous breast biopsy has been considered a relative contraindication to SLNB. We examined the accuracy of SLNB by following the axillary relapses after the procedure in patients who had undergone a breast biopsy before SLNB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Up to December 2003, 4351 patients with the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer underwent SLNB at the European Institute of Oncology. Already, 543 of these patients had undergone a breast biopsy; from June 1997 to January 2004, these patients received SLNB by lymphoscintigraphy performed on the biopsy area. We followed these patients with a clinical assessment every 6 months and instrumental examinations every year, particularly focusing on the research of axillary relapse of disease. RESULTS: In 70.4% of cases, the sentinel node was negative, and only three cases underwent further axillary dissection. The sentinel node was identified in 99% of cases and this was the only positive node in 61.5% of cases with positive axillary nodes. The median follow-up was 2 years; 4 nodal recurrences were observed: 3 axillary lymph node relapses and 1 loco-regional. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB accuracy after a previous breast biopsy is comparable with the results obtained in validation studies. SLNB after a previous breast biopsy can be considered a standard procedure. Lymphoscintigraphy identifies the sentinel node in 99% of patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Sentinel lymph node metastasis in microinvasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a separate pathological entity, distinct from pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). DCISM is a true invasive breast carcinoma with a well-known metastatic potential. Currently, there is controversy regarding the indication for complete axillary dissection (CAD) to stage the axilla in patients with DCISM. The role of CAD is questioned given its morbidity and reported low incidence of axillary involvement. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may obviate the need for CAD in these patients without compromising the staging of the axilla and the important prognostic information. METHODS: From March 1996 to December 2002, 4602 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma underwent SLN biopsy. Of these, 41 patients with DCISM were selected. RESULTS: Metastasis in the SLN were detected in 4 of 41 (9.7%) patients. Two of the 4 patients had only micrometastasis in the SLN. In three patients, the SLN was the only positive node after CAD. CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy should be considered as a standard procedure in DCISM patients. SLNB can detect nodal micrometastasis and accurately stage the axilla avoiding the morbidity of a CAD. Complete AD may not be mandatory if only the SLN contains micrometastatic disease. Informed consent is very important in the decision not to undergo CAD.

Axilla↗

PubMed2002

Sentinel lymph node biopsy performed with local anesthesia in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma.

HYPOTHESIS: Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy performed with local anesthesia has a positive effect on patients' quality of life and on treatment management for early-stage breast carcinoma. This method represents an interesting development in breast-conserving surgery. DESIGN: We performed SN biopsy with local anesthesia in selected patients to test the feasibility of the technique and its impact on our organization and on patients' quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 2000 to December 2001, we studied 115 patients with a palpable breast tumor (maximum diameter, 2.5 cm). The axilla was clinically negative for metastasis in all cases. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (41.7%) had SNs that were positive for metastasis. In 20 cases (17.4%), the SN was macrometastatic and in 28 cases (24.3%), it was micrometastatic (diameter <2 mm). The SN was negative for metastasis in 66 cases (57.4%). In 1 case, the histologic examination revealed the presence of a non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma. The complete axillary dissection performed in the subgroup of patients with macrometastatic SNs showed that in 9 cases (45%), the SN was the only positive node. In another 9 cases (45%), patients had fewer than 4 positive axillary lymph nodes; more than 4 axillary nodes were metastatic in 2 cases (10%). Among the 28 patients with SN micrometastasis, 21 received complete axillary dissection: 15 patients (53.6%) had no other metastasis to the axillary nodes and 6 patients (21.4%) had cancer cells in other axillary nodes. In case of micrometastasis, we suggested that patients enter the International Breast Cancer Study Group 2301 trial (15 of them accepted and signed the informed consent), which compared completion of axillary dissection with no further surgical treatment of the axilla. Based on randomization, 7 patients (25%) in the group with micrometastasis to the SN received no axillary dissection. Patients' tolerance to this kind of treatment was excellent. CONCLUSION: Our experience indicates that SN biopsy performed with local anesthesia can be a suitable alternative to standard intraoperative evaluation with general anesthesia in patients with unifocal, early-stage breast carcinoma.

Anesthesia, Local↗

PubMed2002

Stage migration after biopsy of internal mammary chain lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Involvement of the internal mammary chain lymph nodes (IMNs) is associated with worsened prognosis in breast cancer. Use of lymphoscintigraphy to visualize sentinel nodes reveals that IMNs often receive lymph from the area containing the tumor. METHODS: We biopsied IMNs in 182 patients because there was radiouptake to the IMNs or because the tumor was located in the medial portion of the breast. After tumor removal, pectoralis major fibers were divided to expose intercostal muscle. A portion of intercostal muscle adjacent to the sternum was removed. Lymph nodes and surrounding fatty tissue in the intercostal space were freed, removed, and analyzed histologically. The pleural cavity was breached in four cases (2.2%), with spontaneous resolution. RESULTS: IMNs were found in 160 (88%) of 182 patients; 146 (94.4%) were negative and 14 (8.8%) were positive. The latter received internal mammary chain radiotherapy. The axilla was negative in 4 of 14 cases and positive in 10. CONCLUSIONS: IMNs can be quickly and easily removed via the breast incision with insignificant risk and no increase in postoperative hospitalization. The patients with a positive IMN migrated from N0 (4 cases) or N1 (10 cases) to N3, prompting modification of both local (radiotherapy to internal mammary chain) and systemic treatment; without IMN sampling, they would have been understaged.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2000

Sentinel Node Biopsy Interpretation: The Milan Experience.

From March 1996 to December 1999 we performed 1,266 sentinel node biopsies (SNBs) in patients with small breast cancers. The technique is to inject technetium 99m-labeled albumin particles close to the tumor, locate the sentinel node (SN) scintigraphically, and use a handheld gamma-detecting probe to guide its removal via a small incision during breast surgery. Our experience was divided into three phases. In the first phase, complete axillary dissection was performed to assess the accuracy of SNB in predicting axillary status. We also assessed safety, perfected tracer injection technique, determined optimal particle size and radioactivity levels, optimized lymphoscintigraphic scanning, and perfected the surgical technique. The SN was identified and removed in 98.7% of cases. Comparison with complete axillary dissection showed that the SN predicted axillary status in 96.8% of cases. However, use of an intraoperative frozen section method predicted axillary status in only 86.5% of cases. In the second phase we developed a new method for intraoperative histologic analysis. Extensive sampling (up to 60 sections/SN) and an experienced pathologist proved more important than use of antikeratin immunostaining in identifying tumor cells, and the new method has the accuracy of a definitive histologic examination. The third phase, a randomized trial, closed at the end of 1999. Trial objectives were to confirm that the SN predicts axillary status, to determine the number of axillary relapses, and to assess overall and disease-free survival. Patients were randomized in the operating room to complete axillary dissection or SNB. If the SN was positive, complete axillary dissection was performed; if the SN was negative, no further axillary treatment was given. We expect the trial to confirm our clinical experience that SNB is a safe and accurate procedure for staging patients with early breast cancer and a clinically negative axilla.

Journal Article↗