Biomedical subjects

Paolo Manca

Publications and source records attributed to Paolo Manca.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Integrated clinicogenomic analysis reveals the evolution and metastatic tropisms of advanced colorectal cancer.

We performed an integrated clinical and genomic analysis of over 7,000 consecutively sequenced colorectal cancer (CRC) samples to comprehensively characterize genetic drivers and metastatic tropisms of CRC. We find that genomic evolutionary changes, such as clonal mutations and oncogenic mutant allelic imbalance, selectively enhance the impact of recurrent oncogenic alterations. We identify the relative timing of organ-specific metastasis, showing sequential metastatic progression in microsatellite stable CRC with brain and adrenal metastases as late events; metastatic sites that cluster together, such as lung, bone, and brain metastases; and genomic events that enhance or decrease risk for each metastatic site, with WNT pathway activation as overall protective while RAS pathway activation increased risk for spread to all metastatic sites. Our data suggest that despite the heterogeneity in CRC, genomic evolution increases the impact of recurrent alterations, and integrating information about tumor primary location and genomics can be used to predict organ-specific metastasis risk.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Association of ctDNA RAS mutational status and clinical benefits in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer therapy with chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR (overall response rate and progression-free survival): a brief report of systematic review and meta-analysis.

Monitoring RAS mutations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly relevant in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In patients with tissue RAS wild-type (WT) tumors treated with first-line chemotherapy plus anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy (1LChT + anti-EGFR), some studies suggest that RAS WT ctDNA is associated with better outcomes, whereas others reported no differences according to ctDNA RAS mutational status. These inconsistencies may be related to small sample sizes, methodological heterogeneity, differences in assay sensitivity and tumor heterogeneity. We performed a systematic review in patients with tissue RAS WT treated with 1LChT + anti-EGFR. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched up to April 2026. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUIPS tool, and random-effect models were applied. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria (ten non-interventional studies and four clinical trials). Compared with ctDNA RAS mutated tumors, ctDNA RAS WT tumors showed significantly higher overall response rates [ORR: pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-3.4; P=0.002] and longer progression-free survival [PFS: pooled hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95% CI: 1.3-1.9; P<0.001] [non-interventional studies (NIS) + clinical trials (CT) data]. The pooled prevalence of ctDNA RAS mutations was 10.5% (95% CI: 6.2-14.8%). These findings support ctDNA RAS status as a potential biomarker of benefit from anti-EGFR-based therapy in mCRC, although methodological standardization and prospective validation remain necessary.

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)↗

PubMed2024

Clinicogenomic predictors of survival and intracranial progression after stereotactic radiosurgery for colorectal cancer brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) are associated with dismal prognosis. When BM-directed therapy is considered, better methods are needed to identify patients at risk of poor oncological outcomes in order to optimize patient selection for closer surveillance or escalated therapy. The authors sought to identify clinicogenomic predictors of survival and intracranial disease progression after CRC BM have been treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed CRC BM treated with SRS between 2009 and 2022 who had next-generation genomic sequencing data available were included. Frameless SRS was delivered in 1-5 fractions, alone or after neurosurgical resection. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression (IP), evaluated per patient treated with SRS, and local progression (LP), evaluated per BM. Associations between baseline clinicogenomic features and outcomes were evaluated with Cox regression and competing risk regression, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS: This analysis included 123 patients with 299 BM. At BM diagnosis, 111 patients (90%) had progressive extracranial disease, and 79 patients (64%) had ≥ 3 sites of extracranial metastasis. The median (IQR) number of BM was 2 (1-3) per patient. The median (IQR) biologically effective dose (BED) was 51.3 (51.3-65.1) Gy, corresponding to a prescription of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. OS, IP, and LP estimates at 1 year after SRS were 36%, 55%, and 12%, respectively. OS was independently associated with progressive extracranial disease (HR 4.26, 95% CI 1.63-11.2, p = 0.003) and ≥ 3 extracranial metastatic sites (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.12-3.01, p = 0.02). LP was less likely when BM received BED ≥ 51.3 Gy (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.78, p = 0.02), independent of BM diameter (HR 1.21/cm, 95% CI 0.8-1.84, p = 0.4). IP was independently associated with genomic alterations; TP53 driver alterations were associated with higher risk of IP (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.26-5.79, p = 0.01), whereas MYC pathway alterations were associated with lower risk (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.68, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The authors identified clinicogenomic features associated with adverse outcomes after SRS for CRC BM. Progressive and extensive extracranial metastases predicted worse OS. Insufficient SRS doses predicted greater risk of LP. Wild-type TP53 and alterations in the MYC pathway were independently associated with lower risk of IP. Patients at high risk of IP may be considered for closer surveillance or escalated therapy.

Humans↗

PubMed2024

Molecular and Clinical Determinants of Acquired Resistance and Treatment Duration for Targeted Therapies in Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: Targeted therapies have improved outcomes for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, but their impact is limited by rapid emergence of resistance. We hypothesized that an understanding of the underlying genetic mechanisms and intrinsic tumor features that mediate resistance to therapy will guide new therapeutic strategies and ultimately allow the prevention of resistance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We assembled a series of 52 patients with paired pretreatment and progression samples who received therapy targeting EGFR (n = 17), BRAF V600E (n = 17), KRAS G12C (n = 15), or amplified HER2 (n = 3) to identify molecular and clinical factors associated with time on treatment (TOT). RESULTS: All patients stopped treatment for progression and TOT did not vary by oncogenic driver (P = 0.5). Baseline disease burden (≥3 vs. <3 sites, P = 0.02), the presence of hepatic metastases (P = 0.02), and gene amplification on baseline tissue (P = 0.03) were each associated with shorter TOT. We found evidence of chromosomal instability (CIN) at progression in patients with baseline MAPK pathway amplifications and those with acquired gene amplifications. At resistance, copy-number changes (P = 0.008) and high number (≥5) of acquired alterations (P = 0.04) were associated with shorter TOT. Patients with hepatic metastases demonstrated both higher number of emergent alterations at resistance and enrichment of mutations involving receptor tyrosine kinases. CONCLUSIONS: Our genomic analysis suggests that high baseline CIN or effective induction of enhanced mutagenesis on targeted therapy underlies rapid progression. Longer response appears to result from a progressive acquisition of genomic or chromosomal instability in the underlying cancer or from the chance event of a new resistance alteration.

Humans↗