PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pat Hoddinott

Publications and source records attributed to Pat Hoddinott.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Men's experiences of multiple long-term conditions and/or disability in the UK Game of Stones weight management trial: a mixed-methods evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To explore experiences, health outcomes and retention of men with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and/or disability within the Game of Stones weight management randomised controlled trial (RCT). DESIGN: Mixed-methods process evaluation within an RCT where secondary outcomes included the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire, EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), EQ-5D-5L anxiety and depression subscale, Patient Health Questionnaire-4 and retention. Semistructured interviews were conducted at 12 months and analysed using the framework method. SETTING: Conducted across three UK trial centres: Belfast, Bristol and Glasgow. PARTICIPANTS: 585 men with obesity (mean (SD) age, 50.7 (13.3) years) were randomised to one of three groups: behavioural text messages with financial incentives, texts alone or waiting-list control. Interviews were conducted with 54 participants from the two intervention groups. RESULTS: 235 (40%) participants lived with MLTCs, 181 (31%) had a single condition, 167 (29%) had no conditions and 165 (29%) had a disability. Of those with MLTCs, 99 were disabled and 93 were living in deprived areas. Participants with MLTCs and/or disability were older, fewer had a degree-level qualification and fewer were in full-time work. Retention at 12 months was higher for men with disability (76%) or no long-term conditions (75%) and lower for men with diabetes (65%). Self-reported weight stigma, well-being and quality-of-life scores improved or stayed the same for men living with MLTCs in the intervention groups; however, results for anxiety and depression screening scores were inconsistent. Participant experiences indicated complex dynamic health, social and life situations which could provide motivation to lose weight for some but not others. Hospitalisation and poor mobility, with inability to exercise, were demotivating for making changes to reach weight loss targets. CONCLUSIONS: Men living with MLTCs and/or disability varied from very successful weight loss and improved health to not prioritising or feeling helped by the programme or disengagement due to immobility or diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN91974895.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Health professionals, implementation and outcomes: reflections on a complex intervention to improve breastfeeding rates in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To understand why a complex breastfeeding coaching intervention, which offered health professional-facilitated breastfeeding groups for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers and personal peer coaches, was more effective at improving breastfeeding rates in some areas than others. METHODS: This controlled intervention study was designed, implemented and evaluated using principles from action research methodology. We theoretically sampled 14 health professionals with varying levels of involvement and 12 consented to be interviewed. We analysed data from 266 group diaries kept by health professionals, 31 group observations, 10 audio-recorded steering group meetings and field notes. Women's perspectives were obtained by analysing qualitative data from one focus group, 21 semi-structured qualitative interviews and responses to open-survey questions. RESULTS: The intervention was more effective at improving breastfeeding rates in areas where health visitors and midwives were committed to working together to implement the intervention, where health professionals shared group facilitation and where inter- and intra-professional relationships were strong. The area where the intervention was ineffective had continuity of a single group facilitator with breastfeeding expertise and problematic relationships within and between midwife and health visitor teams. No one style of group suited all women. Some preferred hearing different views, others valued continuity of help from a facilitator with breastfeeding expertise. CONCLUSIONS: We hypothesise that involving several local health professionals in implementing an intervention may be more effective than a breastfeeding expert approach. Inter- and intra-health professional relationships may be an important determinant of outcome in interventions that aim to influence population behaviours like breastfeeding.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Recruitment issues when primary care population clusters are used in randomised controlled clinical trials: climbing mountains or pushing boulders uphill?

Cluster randomised controlled trials for health promotion, education, public health or organisational change interventions are becoming increasingly common to inform evidence-based policy. However, there is little published methodological evidence on recruitment strategies for primary care population clusters. In this paper, we discuss how choosing which population cluster to randomise can impact on the practicalities of recruitment in primary care. We describe strategies developed through our experiences of recruiting primary care organisations to participate in a national randomised controlled trial of a policy to provide community breastfeeding groups for pregnant and breastfeeding mothers, the BIG (Breastfeeding in Groups) trial. We propose an iterative qualitative approach to recruitment; collecting data generated through the recruitment process, identifying themes and using the constant comparative method of analysis. This can assist in developing successful recruitment strategies and contrasts with the standardised approach commonly used when recruiting individuals to participate in randomised controlled trials. Recruiting primary care population clusters to participate in trials is currently an uphill battle in Britain. It is a complex process, which can benefit from applying qualitative methods to inform trial design and recruitment strategy. Recruitment could be facilitated if health service managers were committed to supporting peer reviewed, funded and ethics committee approved research at national level.

Cluster Analysis↗
PubMed2006

Effectiveness of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention in rural Scotland.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding initiation in Scotland in 2000 was 63 percent, compared with over 90 percent in Norway and Sweden. Although peer support is effective in improving exclusivity of breastfeeding in countries where over 80 percent of women initiate breastfeeding, the evidence for effectiveness in countries with lower initiation is uncertain. Our primary aim was to assess whether group-based and one-to-one peer breastfeeding coaching improves breastfeeding initiation and duration. METHODS: Action research methodology was used to conduct an intervention study in 4 geographical postcode areas in rural northeast Scotland. Infant feeding outcomes at birth and hospital discharge; at 1, 2, and 6 weeks; and at 4 and 8 months were collected for 598 of 626 women with live births during a 9-month baseline period and for 557 of 592 women with live births during a 9-month intervention period. Groups met in 5 locations, with 266 groups meeting in the period when intervention women were eligible to attend. Data on place of birth and length of postnatal hospital stay were also collected. Control data from 10 other Health Board areas in Scotland were compared. An intention-to participate survey about coaching participation was completed by 206 of 345 women initiating breastfeeding. Group attendance data were collected by means of 266 group diaries. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in any breastfeeding of 6.8 percent from 34.3 to 41.1 percent (95% CI 1.2, 12.4) in the study population at 2 weeks after birth compared with a decline in any breastfeeding in the rest of Scotland of 0.4 percent from 44 to 43.6 percent (95% CI -1.2, 0.4). Breastfeeding rates increased compared with baseline rates at all time points until 8 months. However, the effect was not uniform across the 4 postcode areas and was not related to level of deprivation. Little difference was seen in receipt of information and knowledge about the availability of coaching among areas. All breastfeeding groups were well attended, popular, and considered helpful by participants. A minority of women (n = 14/206) participated in formal one-to-one coaching. Women who received antenatal, birth, and postnatal care from community midwife-led units were more likely to be breastfeeding at 2 weeks (p = 0.007) than women who received some or all care in district maternity units. CONCLUSIONS: Group-based and one-to-one peer coaching for pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers increased breastfeeding initiation and duration in an area with below average breastfeeding rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

One-to-one or group-based peer support for breastfeeding? Women's perceptions of a breastfeeding peer coaching intervention.

BACKGROUND: Studies reporting one-to-one peer support interventions have been successful in some countries with high breastfeeding initiation rates, but less so in Great Britain, where low uptake of peer support has occurred. We conducted a peer coaching intervention study in rural Scotland that improved breastfeeding initiation and duration. This study reports qualitative data about participants' perceptions of the coaching intervention. The aim was to investigate why group-based peer support was more popular than one-to-one peer support. METHODS: Qualitative data were collected and analyzed from an initial focus group; 21 semi-structured interviews; and 31 coaching group observations and respondents (n = 105/192) in response to an open question about reasons for not choosing a personal coach in a survey of breastfeeding experiences. We developed a coding frame, identified themes, and constructed charts for analysis and interpretation of data. RESULTS: Analysis revealed that groups were more popular because they normalized breastfeeding in a social environment with refreshments, which improved participants' sense of well-being. Groups provided flexibility, a sense of control, and a diversity of visual images and experiences, which assisted women to make feeding-related decisions for themselves, and they offered a safe place to rehearse and perform breastfeeding in front of others, in a culture where breastfeeding is seldom seen in public. Women often felt initial anxiety when attending a group for the first time, and they expressed doubt that one set of "breastfeeding rules" would suit everyone. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers will voluntarily engage in an activity to support breastfeeding if there is a net interactional (verbal, visual, emotional and gustatory) gain and a minimum risk of a negative experience. One-to-one peer coaching was perceived as a greater risk to confidence and empowerment than group- based peer coaching.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2003

Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland.

OBJECTIVES: To explore how general practitioners operate the sickness certification system, their views on the system, and suggestions for change. DESIGN: Qualitative focus group study consisting of 11 focus groups with 67 participants. SETTING: General practitioners in practices in Glasgow, Tayside, and Highland regions, Scotland. SAMPLE: Purposive sample of general practitioners, with further theoretical sampling of key informant general practitioners to examine emerging themes. RESULTS: General practitioners believed that the sickness certification system failed to address complex, chronic, or doubtful cases. They seemed to develop various operational strategies for its implementation. There appeared to be important deliberate misuse of the system by general practitioners, possibly related to conflicts about roles and incongruities in the system. The doctor-patient relationship was perceived to conflict with the current role of general practitioners in sickness certification. When making decisions about certification, the general practitioners considered a wide variety of factors. They experienced contradictory demands from other system stakeholders and felt blamed for failing to make impossible reconciliations. They clearly identified the difficulties of operating the system when there was no continuity of patient care. Many wished either to relinquish their gatekeeper role or to continue only with major changes. CONCLUSIONS: Policy makers need to recognise and accommodate the range and complexity of factors that influence the behaviour of general practitioners operating as gatekeepers to the sickness certification system, before making changes. Such changes are otherwise unlikely to result in improvement. Models other than the primary care gatekeeper model should be considered.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2000

A qualitative study of women's views about how health professionals communicate about infant feeding.

OBJECTIVE: To look at how communication by health professionals about infant feeding is perceived by first time mothers. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured interviews early in pregnancy and 6-10 weeks after birth. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Twenty-one white, low income women expecting their first baby were interviewed mostly at home, often with their partner or a relative. RESULTS: The personal and practical aspects of infant feeding which were important to women were seldom discussed in detail in ante-natal interviews. In post-natal interviews women described how words alone encouraging them to breastfeed were insufficient. Apprenticeship style learning of practical skills was valued, particularly time patiently spent watching them feed their baby. Women preferred to be shown skills rather than be told how to do them. Some felt pressure to breastfeed and bottle feeding mothers on post-natal wards felt neglected in comparison. Women preferred their own decision-making to be facilitated rather than being advised what to do. Some women experienced distress exposing their breasts and being touched by health professionals. Continuity of care and forming a personal relationship with a health professional who could reassure them were key factors associated with satisfaction with infant feeding communication. CONCLUSIONS: The infant feeding goal for many women is a contented, thriving baby. In contrast, women perceive that the goal for health professionals is the continuation of breastfeeding. These differing goals can give rise to dissatisfaction with communication which is often seen as 'breastfeeding centred' rather than 'woman centred.' Words alone offering support for breastfeeding were often inadequate and women valued practical demonstrations and being shown how to feed their baby. Spending time with a caring midwife with whom the woman had developed a personal, continuing relationship was highly valued. Women were keen to maintain ownership, control and responsibility for their own decision-making about infant feeding.

Journal Article↗