Biomedical subjects

Patrick M Reilly

Publications and source records attributed to Patrick M Reilly.

30 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Initial care of the patient with blunt polytrauma.

The initial care of the patient with blunt polytrauma involves a systematic search for causes of hemodynamic instability. Bleeding most often occurs in the pleural space, peritoneal cavity, and retroperitoneum. Orthopaedic injuries also can contribute to instability after blunt trauma. Blood loss from open fractures may be substantial, and exposure with direct vessel control should be performed early. Pelvic fractures can be associated with severe retroperitoneal bleeding. The treatment of patients with complex pelvic fractures includes closing the pelvic space with a binding device, and early pelvic angiography with embolization. Care of patients with multiple organ and bone injuries requires coordination by one trauma team leader. This physician oversees the resuscitation and sets treatment priorities, including the type and amount of time allowed for fracture stabilization. In many cases, nonorthopaedic injuries will need to be addressed before definitive fracture care. However, optimal care typically involves a coordinated multispeciality approach that sometimes includes concurrent operative procedures. Patients with severe physiologic derangements may require damage control techniques to decrease blood loss and operative time. Understanding the overall care of patients who are injured critically will facilitate the integration of the orthopaedic surgeon into the trauma team.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2004

Formalized radiology rounds: the final component of the tertiary survey.

BACKGROUND: An important objective of organized trauma care is to minimize delayed diagnoses and missed injuries. Discrepant interpretations of radiographs initially read by trauma surgeons represent a unique source of delayed diagnoses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of formalized radiology rounds as a component of the tertiary survey. METHODS: Over an 18-month period, 432 consecutive patients admitted to the trauma service at a Level II trauma center were studied prospectively. Radiographs obtained as part of the initial evaluation were initially interpreted by an attending trauma surgeon. All radiographs from the previous 24-hour admissions were reviewed by the trauma team with an attending radiologist at radiology rounds. New diagnoses (NDx) were defined as radiographic findings identified at radiology rounds that were not recorded by the trauma surgeon at the time of initial evaluation. The clinical significance of any NDx was described as follows: level 1, NDx resulted in significant morbidity/mortality; level 2, NDx resulted in alteration in care/no morbidity; level 3, NDx resulted in no alteration in care; level 4, NDx was an incidental finding by the radiologist; level 5, NDx by radiologist not definite. RESULTS: Forty-seven NDx were identified in 42 patients (9.7%). Of the 47 NDx, 19 (40.4%) were level 3 and 28 (59.6%) were level 2. No level 1 NDx were identified. Forty-four changes in clinical management were documented in the level 2 group. Eight new consults were ordered in seven patients (16.7%): orthopedic surgery (n = 6), neurosurgery (n = 1), and physical therapy (n = 1). Seventeen additional diagnostic procedures were required in 16 patients (38.1%): plain radiographs (n = 11) and computed tomographic scans (n = 6). Nineteen therapeutic changes were required in 16 patients (38.1%): splint/immobilization device (n = 7), modified level of activity (n = 6), surgical procedures (n = 4), transfer (n = 1), and home equipment (n = 1). CONCLUSION: A small number of radiographic findings are not detected by trauma surgeons during the initial evaluation. Although these findings are not of major clinical significance, the majority required some alteration in care plan. Formalized radiology rounds promotes clinical efficiency through early identification of these injuries, which facilitates any necessary alteration in the care plan.

Early Diagnosis↗

PubMed2004

Cerebral cortical oxygenation: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral hypoxia (cerebral cortical oxygenation [Pbro2] < 20 mm Hg) monitored by direct measurement has been shown in animal and small clinical studies to be associated with poor outcome. We present our preliminary results observing Pbro2 in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was performed. Institutional review board approval was obtained. All patients with TBI who required measurement of intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and Pbro2 because of a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 8 were enrolled. Data sets (ICP, CPP, Pbro2, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pao2, and Paco2) were recorded during routine manipulation. Episodes of cerebral hypoxia were compared with episodes without. Results are displayed as mean +/- SEM; t test, chi2, and Fisher's exact test were used to answer questions of interest. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one data sets were abstracted from 20 patients. Thirty-five episodes of regional cerebral hypoxia were identified in 14 patients. Compared with episodes of acceptable cerebral oxygenation, episodes of cerebral hypoxia were noted to be associated with a significantly lower mean Pao2 (144 +/- 14 vs. 165 +/- 8; p < 0.01) and higher mean PEEP (8.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 7.1 +/- 0.3; p < 0.01). Mean ICP and CPP measurements were similar between groups. In a univariate analysis, cerebral hypoxic episodes were associated with Pao2 < or = 100 mm Hg (p < 0.01) and PEEP > 5 cm H2O (p < 0.01), but not ICP > 20 mm Hg, CPP < or = 65 mm Hg, or Pac2 < or = 35 mm Hg. CONCLUSION: Cerebral oxymetry is confirmed safe in the patient with multiple injuries with TBI. Occult cerebral hypoxia is present in the traumatic brain injured patient despite normal traditional measurements of cerebral perfusion. Further research is necessary to determine whether management protocols aimed at the prevention of cerebral cortical hypoxia will affect outcome.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Cumulative radiation dose caused by radiologic studies in critically ill trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Critically ill trauma patients undergo many radiologic studies, but the cumulative radiation dose is unknown. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cumulative effective dose (CED) of radiation resulting from radiologic studies in critically ill trauma patients. METHODS: The study group was composed of trauma patients at an urban Level I trauma center with surgical intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) greater than 30 days. The radiology records were reviewed. A typical effective dose per study for each type of plain film radiograph, computed tomographic scan, fluoroscopic study, and nuclear medicine study was used to calculate CED. RESULTS: Forty-six patients met criteria. The mean surgical intensive care unit and hospital LOS were 42.7 +/- 14.0 and 59.5 +/- 28.5 days, respectively. The mean Injury Severity Score was 32.2 +/- 15.0. The mean number of studies per patient was 70.1 +/- 29.0 plain film radiographs, 7.8 +/- 4.1 computed tomographic scans, 2.5 +/- 2.6 fluoroscopic studies, and 0.065 +/- 0.33 nuclear medicine study. The mean CED was 106 +/- 59 mSv per patient (range, 11-289 mSv; median, 104 mSv). Among age, mechanism, Injury Severity Score, and LOS, there was no statistically significant predictor of high CED. The mean CED in the study group was 30 times higher than the average yearly radiation dose from all sources for individuals in the United States. The theoretical additional morbidity attributable to radiologic studies was 0.78%. CONCLUSION: From a radiobiologic perspective, risk-to-benefit ratios of radiologic studies are favorable, given the importance of medical information obtained. Current practice patterns regarding use of radiologic studies appear to be acceptable.

Accidents, Traffic↗

PubMed2004

Integrating emergency general surgery with a trauma service: impact on the care of injured patients.

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable discussion on the national level on the future of trauma surgery as a specialty. One of the leading directions for the field is the integration of emergency general surgery as a wider and more attractive scope of practice. However, there is currently no information on how the addition of an emergency general surgery practice will affect the care of injured patients. We hypothesized that the care of trauma patients would be negatively affected by adding emergency general surgery responsibilities to a trauma service. METHODS: Our institution underwent a system change in August 2001, where an emergency general surgery (ES) practice was added to an established trauma service. The ES practice included emergency department and in-house consultations for all urgent surgical problems except thoracic and vascular diseases. There were no trauma staff changes during the study period. Trauma registry data (demographics, injuries, injury severity, and procedures) and performance improvement data (peer-review judgments for all identified errors, denied days, audit filters, and deaths) were abstracted for two 15-month periods surrounding this system change. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t tests provided between-group comparisons. RESULTS: The trauma staff evaluated a total of 5,874 patients during the 30-month study. There were 1,400 (51%) trauma admissions in the pre-ES group and 1,504 (48%) in the post-ES group, of which 1,278 and 1,434, respectively, met severity criteria for report to our statewide database (Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study [PTOS]). There were 163 (12.7% of PTOS) deaths in the pre-ES group compared with 171 (11.9% PTOS) deaths in the post-ES group (p = not significant [NS]). There was one death determined to be preventable by the peer review process for the pre-ES group, and none in the post-ES group. Both groups had 10 potentially preventable deaths, with the remaining mortalities being categorized as nonpreventable (p = NS). Unexpected deaths by TRISS methodology were 36 (2.8%) and 41 (2.9%) for the two groups, respectively (p = NS). There was no difference in the number of provider-specific complications between the groups (23, [1.8%] vs. 19 [1.3%], p = NS). The addition of emergency surgery has resulted in an additional average daily workload of 1.3 cases and 1.2 admissions. CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in trauma volume over the study period, the addition of emergency surgery to a trauma service did not affect the care of injured patients. The concept of adding emergency surgery responsibilities to trauma surgeons appears to be a valid way to increase operative experience without compromising care of the injured patient.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗

PubMed2003

Training in trauma surgery: quantitative and qualitative aspects of a new paradigm for fellowship.

OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes from a clinical trauma surgical education program that places the board-eligible/board-certified fellow in the role of the attending surgeon (fellow-in-exception [FIE]) during the latter half of a 2-year trauma/surgical critical care fellowship. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: National discussions have begun to explore the question of optimal methods for postresidency training in surgery. Few objective studies are available to evaluate current training models. METHODS: We analyzed provider-specific data from both our trauma registry and performance improvement (PI) databases. In addition, we performed TRISS analysis when all data were available. Registry and PI data were analyzed as 2 groups (faculty trauma surgeons and FIEs) to determine experience, safety, and trends in errors. We also surveyed graduate fellows using a questionnaire that evaluated perceptions of training and experience on a 6-point Likert scale. RESULTS: During a 4-year period 7,769 trauma patients were evaluated, of which 46.3% met criteria to be submitted to the PA Trauma Outcome Study (PTOS, ie, more severe injury). The faculty group saw 5,885 patients (2,720 PTOS); the FIE group saw 1,884 patients (879 PTOS). The groups were similar in respect to mechanism of injury (74% blunt; 26% penetrating both groups) and injury severity (mean ISS faculty 10.0; FIEs 9.5). When indexed to patient contacts, FIEs did more operations than the faculty group (28.4% versus 25.6%; P < 0.05). Death rates were similar between groups (faculty 10.5%; FIEs 10.0%). Analysis of deaths using PI and TRISS data failed to demonstrate differences between the groups. Analysis of provider-specific errors demonstrated a slightly higher rate for FIEs when compared with faculty when indexed to PTOS cases (4.1% versus 2.1%; P < 0.01). For both groups, errors in management were more common than errors in technique. Twenty-one (91%) of twenty-three surveys were returned. Fellows' feelings of preparedness to manage complex trauma patients improved during the fellowship (mean 3.2 prior to fellowship versus 4.5 after first year versus 5.8 after FIE year; P < 0.05 by ANOVA). Eighty percent rated the FIE educational experience "great -5" or "exceptional- 6." Eighty-five percent consider the current structure of the fellowship (with FIE year) as ideal. Ninety percent would repeat the fellowship. CONCLUSION: The educational experience and training improvement offered by the inclusion of a FIE period during a trauma fellowship is exceptional. Patient outcomes are unchanged. The potential for an increased error rate is present during this period of clinical autonomy and must be addressed when designing the methods of supervision of care to assure concurrent senior staff review.

Colonic Pouches↗

PubMed2002

Brachial plexopathy after prone positioning.

Two cases of brachial plexus injury after prone position in the intensive care unit are described. Mechanisms of brachial plexus injury are described, as are methods for prevention of this unusual complication.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Hepatic angiography in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing damage control (DC) laparotomy require intensive and aggressive resuscitation, and may require additional maneuvers to control parenchymal bleeding. Those patients suffering significant liver injury are at high risk for arterial bleeding deep within the liver, and many require hepatic angiography in addition to hepatic packing. We reviewed our experience with hepatic angiography, and sought to determine its safety in the DC population of penetrating and blunt trauma patients. METHODS: A 3-year (June 1997-May 2000) retrospective review generated 37 DC patients. Patients sustaining hepatic trauma constituted the study group. Patients undergoing angiography in addition to DC laparotomy were compared with the group of patients not undergoing angiography. Data regarding mechanism of injury, patient demographics, extent of hepatic injury, and presence of associated injuries were collected. Physiologic parameters including vital signs at admission, lowest pH and base excess in the operating room, and lactate levels in the intensive care unit, as well as volumes of fluid resuscitation throughout all phases of DC were examined. Complications including death, intra-abdominal processes, acute respiratory distress syndrome and/or multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and acute renal failure were reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (51%) had hepatic trauma and underwent perihepatic packing as a part of DC laparotomy. Eleven had sustained penetrating injury and 8 had blunt injury. There was 1 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade I, 5 grade II, 3 grade III, and 10 grade IV injuries. Nine patients in the study population underwent angiography, and eight of these were hepatic artery angiograms. One hepatic angiogram was obtained before operation and seven were obtained in the immediate postoperative period. Six underwent embolization of bleeding hepatic vessels, for a therapeutic liver angiography rate of 75%. There was no statistical difference in physiologic parameters or fluid requirements between the patients who underwent angiography and those who did not. There were no mishaps or complications from angiography or while in the angiography suite. CONCLUSION: Hepatic angiography is a safe adjunct to the principles of damage control. It has a high therapeutic ratio, with no significant untoward effect in this small study population.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Evaluation of the lower spine after blunt trauma using abdominal computed tomographic scanning supplemented with lateral scanograms.

BACKGROUND: Patients at risk for thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) and lumbar spine (LS) injury after blunt trauma are classically evaluated using conventional radiographs. Frequently, these patients also undergo abdominal and pelvic computed tomographic (CT) scanning to exclude the presence of associated intra-abdominal injuries. Standard abdominal and pelvic CT scan usually includes an anteroposterior (AP) scout film (scanogram) obtained before the cross-sectional imaging. The objective of this study was to determine whether a lateral CT scanogram and axial CT views would provide adequate imaging to allow for evaluation of the TLJ and LS and therefore eliminate the need for conventional screening computed lumbar spine radiographs (CLSRs). METHODS: Patients who sustained blunt injury and required both CLSRs as well as abdominal and pelvic CT scans were prospectively identified. The study protocol (CT + S) added lateral CT scanograms to all helical abdominal and pelvic CT scan studies. The AP and lateral CT scanograms were included with the axial images, and these views were reviewed together during final radiographic interpretation and diagnosis. The results of CT + S were compared with readings of the CLSRs (AP and lateral) in a blinded fashion by a trauma radiologist. RESULTS: Lateral scanograms were generated for 71 patients. All scanograms were technically adequate, with image quality equal or superior to computed plain radiographs. Ten patients were found to have 20 fractures, 19 acute and 1 chronic. All abnormalities identified by plain radiographs were seen using CT + S (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Eight transverse process and two spinous process fractures not seen on CLSRs were identified using CT + S. CONCLUSION: Our CT + S protocol (axial CT images plus AP and lateral scanograms) outperformed screening CLSRs in the detection of fractures of the lower spine (TLJ + LS) after blunt trauma. In addition, scanogram imaging is less dependent on body habitus and adds no additional cost or time to abdominal and pelvic CT scanning. Further study is required to determine whether CT + S can routinely replace conventional radiographs of the lower spine after blunt trauma.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2002

Pelvic radiography in blunt trauma resuscitation: a diminishing role.

BACKGROUND: An anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (PXR) continues to be recommended by Advanced Trauma Life Support protocol as an early diagnostic adjunct in the resuscitation of blunt trauma patients. At the same time, computed tomographic (CT) scanning has become a practice standard for diagnosis of most abdominal and pelvic injury. The objective of this study was to determine the necessity of obtaining an early PXR in stable trauma patients who will undergo CT scanning during the initial resuscitation. METHODS: A retrospective review of all blunt trauma patients undergoing immediate abdomen and pelvic CT scanning was performed from July 2000 until June 2001 at an urban Level I trauma center. These patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they also received a PXR (group I) or not (group II). At the time of the study, there was no formal protocol to determine which patients underwent pelvic radiography. Radiology reports of all PXRs and CT scans were reviewed. Patient demographics and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) were abstracted from our trauma registry. The data were analyzed using Student's test. RESULTS: A total of 686 patients with blunt trauma underwent CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis. Group I consisted of 311 (45%) patients with an average ISS of 12.3 +/- 0.7. In group I, 56 (10%) patients were found to have at least one pelvic fracture on CT scan, 38 of which were also identified on the PXR. Defining CT scanning as the definitive test, the sensitivity and specificity of the PXR in group I was 68% and 98%, respectively. The false-negative rate for pelvic radiography was 32%. In all patients with a positive PXR, the majority (55%) had either additional fractures or an increase in the Young and Burgess grade of fracture diagnosed on CT scan. Group II consisted of 375 patients, with 16 fractures noted in 13 (3%) patients, none of which required treatment. The mean ISS of group II was 8.0 +/- 0.5. CONCLUSION: The PXR has limited sensitivity for detecting pelvic fractures compared with CT scanning. Selected hemodynamically stable patients who undergo CT scanning during their immediate resuscitation do not need a routine PXR. The PXR may continue to be beneficial in unstable patients, those with positive physical findings, or those who cannot undergo CT scanning because of other clinical priorities.

Abdominal Injuries↗

PubMed2002

Incidence and natural history of below-knee deep venous thrombosis in high-risk trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolic disease remains a difficult problem in the trauma patient population. The purpose of this study was to delineate the incidence and natural history of below-knee deep venous thrombosis (BKDVT) in high-risk trauma patients. METHODS: Patients were stratified into risk categories (low, high, or very high) for deep venous thrombosis on the basis of an institutional practice management guideline and known risk factors. All at-risk patients received either sequential compression devices (SCDs) or subcutaneous heparin (SQH) compounds, and high-risk patients also underwent weekly surveillance by duplex scanning. Very-high-risk patients had prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement. This prospective, observational study examines the duplex results on all high-risk patients. Data regarding method of prophylaxis, the incidence of proximal propagation on serial duplex examinations, and changes in management (anticoagulation or IVC filter placement) were collected on the high-risk patients who developed a BKDVT. RESULTS: Between March 1997 and June 2001, 601 patients were stratified into the high-risk category and underwent a total of 1,109 duplex examinations. Eighty-five patients (14.1%) had 113 BKDVTs. These patients underwent a total of 212 duplex examinations; all patients developed their BKDVTs within 34 days. Weekly incidence was 40 (47.1%), 25 (29.4%), 15 (17.6%), 1 (1.2%), and 4 (4.7%) for weeks 1 through 5, respectively. SCDs, SQH compounds, and SCDs with SQH compounds were used on 73, 3, and 9 patients, respectively. In 4 of 85 (4.7%) patients, the BKDVT propagated proximally to an above-knee location in 4 to 8 days. Two of these patients were anticoagulated, and two underwent placement of an IVC filter. One patient (1.2%) with a BKDVT that had not propagated on duplex study developed a pulmonary embolus. CONCLUSION: Patients identified as high-risk by our practice management guideline had a 14.1% incidence of a BKDVT; 94.1% were diagnosed within the first 3 weeks of hospitalization. Proximal propagation occurred in 4.7% and led to changes in management. Serial duplex examination of the BKDVT alone, rather than systemic anticoagulation or IVC filter placement, appears to be a reasonable treatment alternative.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

The role of positive examinations in training for the focused assessment sonogram in trauma (FAST) examination.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the inclusion of known positive patients to the practical portion of a Focused Assessment Sonogram in Trauma (FAST) training course improves overall training and increases FAST accuracy. This is a prospective double-blind design. Original course participants (PRE) underwent a 2-hour didactic session and practicum with ten normal volunteers. Modified course participants (POST) additionally imaged five peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to simulate positive examinations. The practitioners (six PRE and five POST) were compared as to their ability to detect and quantify intraperitoneal fluid (0-2000 cc) in nine PD patients during a double-blind prospective examination. Test results were reported as positive or negative. Positive results were further quantified by volume. Each practitioner performed ten examinations. Data for inexperienced clinicians are presented. Sensitivity for detecting < or = 750 cm3 was 45 per cent PRE and 87 per cent POST (P = 0.02). Accuracy in quantifying volume within 250 cm3 was 38 per cent PRE and 44 per cent POST (not significant). FAST accuracy for inexperienced sonographers--particularly in diagnosing smaller volumes--can be improved significantly by including positive studies in training. Exposure to positive FAST examinations during training improves the learning curve. With the growing dependency on FAST to accurately triage blunt abdominal trauma safe and effective FAST training should consist of didactic education and a practical portion that includes positive studies. When screened properly PD patients can be used effectively to demonstrate positive FAST studies.

Abdominal Injuries↗