PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Patrick R Pfau

Publications and source records attributed to Patrick R Pfau.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Criteria for the diagnosis of dysplasia by endoscopic optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic optical coherence tomography provides images of the GI mucosa and submucosa in microscopic detail. It is unknown whether endoscopic optical coherence tomography can reliably detect dysplasia. Colon polyps were used as a model to determine whether dysplasia in GI tissue has characteristic optical coherence tomography imaging features. METHODS: Endoscopic optical coherence tomography images of colon polyps and normal colon tissue were obtained at colonoscopy. In real time, endoscopists compared tissue organization and light scattering for polyps and normal mucosa with endoscopic optical coherence tomography. Imaged polyps were removed and evaluated histopathologically. Organization and light scattering, as assessed by endoscopic optical coherence tomography at colonoscopy, were compared for adenomas versus hyperplastic polyps. A computer program also quantified and compared the degree of light scattering for hyperplastic polyps and adenomas. RESULTS: A total of 44 polyps were imaged in 24 patients (30 adenomas, 14 hyperplastic polyps). Endoscopic optical coherence tomography images of adenomas had significantly less structure (p = 0.0005) and scattered light to a lesser degree than hyperplastic polyps (p = 0.0007). Hyperplastic polyps were significantly closer in organization (p = 0.0003) and light scattering (p = 0.0006) to normal mucosa as compared with adenomas. By digital image analysis, the light-scattering property of hyperplastic polyps was closer to normal mucosa compared with adenomas (14.86 vs. 45.81; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Real-time endoscopic optical coherence tomography imaging differentiated adenomas, hyperplastic polyps, and normal colon tissue. By using the colon adenoma as a model, the endoscopic optical coherence tomography characteristics of dysplasia are loss of tissue organization and reduced light scattering.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2002

Accuracy of a narrow-diameter battery-powered endoscope in sedated and unsedated patients.

BACKGROUND: Esophagoscopy with a portable battery-powered endoscope could provide a safe, inexpensive, and minimally invasive way to screen for Barrett's esophagus or esophageal varices. The use of such an instrument in an unsedated fashion has not been previously evaluated. METHODS: Patients referred for an EGD were recruited to undergo an additional examination with the battery-powered endoscope before EGD. In phase 1, (n = 42) patients received conscious sedation before the battery-powered endoscopic examination. In phase 2, (n = 56) patients were not sedated and were given the option of a peroral (n = 43) or transnasal (n = 13) endoscopy. Examiners were blinded to patient history and procedure indications. Esophageal findings, ease of intubation, optical quality, and patient comfort for the battery-powered endoscope and standard EGD were recorded by the endoscopist. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (60 men, 38 women, mean age 53 years) were recruited. The sensitivity for detecting Barrett's esophagus, esophageal tumors, and esophageal varices was 54.5%, 66.7%, and 80%, respectively. Ease of intubation and patient comfort as perceived by the endoscopist were not significantly different between the battery-powered endoscope and EGD. Optical quality was ranked as less than 4 (on a 5-point scale with 5 = standard EGD and 1 = poor) in 42% of battery-powered endoscopic examinations. There were no complications. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of esophageal examination with a 3.1-mm endoscope is substantially inferior to standard EGD. Thus, the battery-powered endoscope would not be useful for screening patients for Barrett's esophagus or varices unless improvements in optical quality and visualization are made.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Unsedated endoscopy has not gained wide acceptance in the United States. Factors that may predict tolerance and acceptance of unsedated endoscopy are ill defined. METHODS: Outpatients referred for standard EGD were recruited to undergo unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy (UUE) with a new 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope before sedated EGD. They rated preprocedure and postprocedure anxiety levels with the Profile of Mood States Tension/Anxiety subscale (POMS-SF T/A). They also rated symptoms and overall acceptability and listed procedural preference between EGD and UUE. Patients who refused UUE noted a reason for refusal and also completed the anxiety questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 98 patients recruited agreed to participate, and underwent both UUE and EGD. Patients who refused UUE were significantly more anxious (mean anxiety score, 8.2 vs. 4.5, p < 0.005). Participants reported no significant difference between preprocedural (4.6 vs. 5.3) or postprocedural (3.5 vs. 2.6) anxiety for UUE versus standard EGD. After undergoing both procedures, only 46% stated they would prefer UUE to EGD in the future. Patients who chose the peroral approach were more likely to prefer UUE than those who chose the transnasal approach (58% vs. 23%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patient acceptance of unsedated endoscopy even with an ultrathin instrument is limited. Anxiety assessment by the POMS-SF T/A can identify patients willing to undergo UUE. Patients who choose transoral UUE may be more willing to repeat the procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is becoming a more frequently used diagnostic and therapeutic tool in children. We sought to determine the indications, feasibility, safety, and effect on patient management of ERCP in pediatric patients of varying age. METHODS: All ERCPs performed during a 4-year period in patients aged 18 years or less at an academic hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The indications, type of anesthesia administered, type of duodenoscope used, diagnostic findings, therapeutic interventions, complication rate, and effect on management were compared between children (age 0-12 years) and adolescents (age 13-18 years). RESULTS: A total of 53 procedures were performed in 43 patients whose median age was 13.5 years. ERCP was successful in 50 of 53 cases (94%) with a complication rate of 6%. Endoscopic therapy was provided in 24 of 53 cases (45%). Compared with adolescents (n = 28), children (n = 25) were more likely to receive general anesthesia (96% vs. 29%; P < 0.001) and undergo ERCP with a pediatric duodenoscope (0% vs. 40%). ERCP affected management in 73% of cases, equally in both groups. CONCLUSION: ERCP is a successful and safe diagnostic and therapeutic modality in a variety of pancreatobiliary disorders that directly affects management in children of all ages.

Adolescent↗