PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Patrick Raboisson

Publications and source records attributed to Patrick Raboisson.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Phenyl ureas of creatinine as mGluR5 antagonists. A structure-activity relationship study of fenobam analogues.

Fenobam (1) was developed by McNeil Laboratories as an anxiolytic agent with an unknown molecular target in the late 1970s. In a recent publication, it was revealed that fenobam is a non-competitive mGluR5 antagonist. Herein, we present the structure-activity relationship of fenobam and its analogues and similarities between the SAR of mGluR5 antagonism and the SAR of CNS properties originally reported by McNeil are discussed.

Amides↗

Recent advances in non-competitive mGlu5 receptor antagonists and their potential therapeutic applications.

Extensive research into the functions of glutamate and glutamate receptors in the central nervous system (CNS) has shown an essential role of metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors in normal brain functions, but also in neurological and psychiatric disorders. The precise functions of these receptors remain undefined, and progress toward understanding their functions has been hampered by the lack of selective ligands with appropriate pharmacokinetic properties. The Group I mGlu receptor, mGlu5, is well positioned to regulate and fine-tune neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission through its modulation of various signal transduction pathways and interactions with other transmitter systems. Therefore, the mGlu5 receptor may be an important therapeutic target for the treatment of disorders of the central nervous system. The discovery of MPEP 3, a non-competitive mGlu5 receptor antagonist, provided a potent, selective, systemically active tool compound for proof of concept studies in animal models of various disease states. These studies have led to greater understanding of possible therapeutic applications of mGlu5 receptor antagonists in recent years, suggesting their use in a number of disease states, including chronic pain, various psychiatric and neurological disorders, substance abuse and withdrawal, obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Together, these findings have intensified efforts to find other non-competitive mGlu5 receptor antagonists and have led to the discovery of several second-generation compounds, a few of which are in preclinical evaluations. There have been several recent reviews on mGlu receptor. This article highlights recent efforts on the design, synthesis and development of novel, non-competitive mGlu5 receptor antagonists and studies to understand their in vitro mechanisms of action and in vivo pharmacological profiles. Emphasis is also given to recent advances in the potential therapeutic applications of non-competitive mGlu5 receptor antagonists.

Animals↗

Organization of parabrachial projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis: an anterograde tracing study in the rat.

In recent years, we have accumulated data showing that the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis (Sp5O) contributes to the processing of somatosensory inputs from the orofacial region. Although the parabrachial area (PB) represents the main brainstem relay for autonomic, nociceptive, and gustatory afferents, few data are available regarding the topographical distribution of the efferent projections from the Sp5O to the PB. We have addressed this question with the rat, by using the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. A dense trigeminoparabrachial pathway from the Sp5O toward, predominantly, the ipsilateral PB was revealed. Projections come mainly from the dorsal part of the Sp5O that was found to innervate densely the medial, external medial, and ventral lateral subnuclei. In contrast, the ventral part of the Sp5O projected almost exclusively to an as yet not formally described region, located dorsally and laterally to the lateral tip of the brachium conjunctivum, close to the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus. These results suggest that distinct regions within the Sp5O may be involved in the processing of gustatory and nociceptive information.

Animals↗

The orofacial formalin test.

The subcutaneous injection of formalin into the rat upper lip generates behavioral responses that last several minutes. The time course of the response is similar to what is observed following formalin injection into the paw, i.e. biphasic, with an early and short-lasting first phase followed, after a quiescent period by a second, prolonged (tonic) phase. The applied chemical stimulus (formalin) can be qualified as noxious since it produces tissue injury, activates Adelta and C nociceptors as well as trigeminal and spinal nociceptive neurons and is felt as painful in man. In addition, increasing the concentration of formalin causes a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. The measured behavioral response (face rubbing) is a relevant end-point: prolonged face rubbing is evoked by formalin but not saline injection and a positive relationship between the amplitude of the response and the formalin concentration is observed, at least up to 2.5%. At higher formalin concentrations, the use of other or additional end-points should be considered. Finally, the behavioral response in the orofacial formalin test is sensitive to various opioid and non-opioid analgesics. The orofacial formalin test can then be considered as a reliable way of producing and quantifying nociception in the trigeminal region of the rat.

Animals↗

Evidence for a peripheral origin of the tonic nociceptive response to subcutaneous formalin.

The orofacial formalin test in the rat is a valid and reliable model of nociception and is sensitive to various classes of analgesic drugs. The noxious stimulus consists in an injection of diluted formalin (2.5% in saline) into the upper lip. The behavioural nociceptive response is measured in terms of the amount of time the animal spends rubbing the injected area. Two distinct periods of intense rubbing activity can be identified, a first phase occurring in the first 3 min and a second phase lasting from 12 to 39 min after formalin injection. The present study verified the peripheral origin of the first phase of the formalin response and examined whether the second phase is produced by peripheral activation of afferent fibres and/or by a phenomenon of central facilitation induced by the neural activity that occurs during the first phase. This was determined by assessing the effect of a local anaesthetic agent (lidocaine) administered into the formalin injection site, before or after the first phase of the formalin response. Local injection of 50 microliters of lidocaine prior to formalin completely abolished the first phase of the formalin response but this blockade did not significantly influence the appearance and development of the second phase. Thus, the primary afferent activity that normally occurs during the first phase of the formalin response is not a prerequisite for the expression of the second phase. A higher dose of lidocaine (150 microliters) induced, in addition, inhibition of the first part of the second phase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Afferent Pathways↗

The orofacial formalin test in rats: effects of different formalin concentrations.

In this study of the orofacial formalin test in rats, the effects of different formalin concentrations (0.2%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, 5% and 10%) on the behavioural nociceptive response (face rubbing) was investigated. The histological responses of the skin were also evaluated. Increasing the concentration of formalin caused a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. All concentrations provoked an early phase of nociceptive response, but its intensity was not concentration-dependent. The 2nd phase of response to formalin only occurred for concentrations of 1.5% and higher. A positive relationship between the formalin concentration and the amplitude of the rubbing activity measured between 12 and 45 min after injection could be observed until 2.5% but with the highest concentrations (5 and 10%), the amplitude of the response decreased. Our findings indicate that the orofacial formalin test should be carried out using concentration between 0.5 and 2.5%. This is essential to assess increase as well as decrease in pain intensity. Moreover, this will have the effect of minimizing the suffering of the experimental animal.

Animals↗