Biomedical subjects

Paul A Trainor

Publications and source records attributed to Paul A Trainor.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Manipulation of protein translation and stem cell self-renewal by CRISPR activation of rRNA transcription.

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) transcription rates vary during development, and their dysregulation is linked to diseases such as cancer and ribosomopathies. Owing to their high abundance and genomic redundancy, the functional significance of rRNA levels remains unclear. We developed TAPIR (Targeted Activation of Protein Translation), a CRISPR-based approach to elevate rRNA levels by inducing 47S ribosomal DNA transcription. TAPIR increased nucleolar size and enhanced protein synthesis, even in rapidly proliferating cells. In neural stem cells, elevated translation promoted self-renewal and proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, TAPIR enabled the modeling and partial rescue of associated disease phenotypes. Our findings reveal that rRNA levels directly regulate translational output and that protein synthesis capacity can act as a key determinant of mammalian stem cell behavior.

Animals↗

PubMed2025

Oogenesis and germinal bed morphology of the brown anole (A. sagrei).

BACKGROUND: The brown anole is a model species of the genus Anolis, a squamate (encompassing lizards and snakes) group widely studied in evolutionary, behavioral, and developmental biology. Full genome annotation, the establishment of gene editing techniques, and comprehensive description of reproductive tract morphology and embryogenesis in this species, has laid the foundation for functional studies. However, analysis of brown anole oogenesis is still required and vital to optimize genome modification, mutant line establishment, and analyses of the evolution of reproductive developmental mechanisms. RESULTS: Here, we characterize ovary morphology and gametogenesis in the female brown anole, A. sagrei using brightfield imaging, microCT, histology staining, electron microscopy, and confocal imaging. We define 10 stages of oocyte maturation which commences inside the oogonial nest within the germinal bed and concludes with the mature follicle ready to ovulate based on follicle size, yolk-acquisition, and follicular, cellular, and basement membrane architecture. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the complete oogenesis of the brown anole in 10 stages and report that oogenesis is highly conserved within iguanids, a suborder of lizards. With our staging framework, we lay the foundation for functional studies of oogenesis and optimized gene-editing.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2025

Genomic evolution of EGF-CFC genes in deuterostomes.

BACKGROUND: EGF-CFC proteins are a bilaterian innovation, but they are best known for their roles in Nodal signaling during gastrulation and left-right patterning in vertebrates. Species with multiple family members show evidence of functional specialization. For example, in mouse, Cripto is required for gastrulation, whereas CFC1 is involved in left-right patterning. However, members of the EGF-CFC family across model organisms exhibit limited sequence conservation beyond the EGF-CFC domain, posing challenges for determining their evolutionary history and functional conservation. RESULTS: In this study, we describe the evolutionary history of the EGF-CFC family of proteins across several branches of deuterostomes, with a particular focus on vertebrates. We trace the EGF-CFC gene family from a single gene in the deuterostome ancestor through its expansion and functional specialization in tetrapods, and subsequent gene loss and translocation in eutherian mammals. Mouse Cripto and CFC1, zebrafish Tdgf1, and each Xenopus EGF-CFC gene (Tdgf1, Tdgf1.2 and Cripto.3) are all descendants of the ancestral deuterostome Tdgf1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that subsequent to EGF-CFC family expansion in tetrapods, Tdgf1B (Xenopus Tdgf1.2) acquired specialization in the left-right patterning cascade, and then after its translocation in eutherians to a different chromosomal location, CFC1 has maintained that specialization.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Tcof1/Treacle is required for neural crest cell formation and proliferation deficiencies that cause craniofacial abnormalities.

Neural crest cells are a migratory cell population that give rise to the majority of the cartilage, bone, connective tissue, and sensory ganglia in the head. Abnormalities in the formation, proliferation, migration, and differentiation phases of the neural crest cell life cycle can lead to craniofacial malformations, which constitute one-third of all congenital birth defects. Treacher Collins syndrome (TCS) is characterized by hypoplasia of the facial bones, cleft palate, and middle and external ear defects. Although TCS results from autosomal dominant mutations of the gene TCOF1, the mechanistic origins of the abnormalities observed in this condition are unknown, and the function of Treacle, the protein encoded by TCOF1, remains poorly understood. To investigate the developmental basis of TCS we generated a mouse model through germ-line mutation of Tcof1. Haploinsufficiency of Tcof1 leads to a deficiency in migrating neural crest cells, which results in severe craniofacial malformations. We demonstrate that Tcof1/Treacle is required cell-autonomously for the formation and proliferation of neural crest cells. Tcof1/Treacle regulates proliferation by controlling the production of mature ribosomes. Therefore, Tcof1/Treacle is a unique spatiotemporal regulator of ribosome biogenesis, a deficiency that disrupts neural crest cell formation and proliferation, causing the hypoplasia characteristic of TCS craniofacial anomalies.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Neural crest cell plasticity. size matters.

Patterning and morphogenesis of neural crest-derived tissues within a developing vertebrate embryo rely on a complex balance between signals acquired by neural crest cells in the neuroepithelium during their formation and signals from the tissues that the neural crest cells contact during their migration. Axial identity of hindbrain neural crest is controlled by a combinatorial pattern of Hox gene expression. Cellular interactions that pattern neural crest involve signals from the same key molecular families that regulate other aspects of patterning and morphogenesis within a developing embryo, namely the BMP, SHH and FGF pathways. The developmental program that regulates neural crest cell fate is both plastic and fixed. As a cohort of interacting cells, neural crest cells carry information that directs the axial pattern and species-specific morphology of the head and face. As individual cells, neural crest cells are responsive to signals from each other as well as from non-neural crest tissues in the environment. General rules and fundamental mechanisms have been important for the conservation of basic patterning of neural crest, but exceptions are notable and relevant. The key to furthering our understanding of important processes such as craniofacial development will require a better characterization of the molecular determinants of the endoderm, ectoderm and mesoderm and the effects that these molecules have on neural crest cell development.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Neural crest stem and progenitor cells.

Neural crest cells are a multipotent, migratory cell population that generates an astonishingly diverse array of cell types during vertebrate development. These include bones; tendons; neurons; glia; melanocytes; and connective, endocrine, and adipose tissue. With a limited capacity for self-renewal and a wide range of differentiation fates, neural crest cells bear many of the hallmarks of stem cells and persist throughout embryonic and adult development. But are all neural crest cells true stem cells, or do the majority of neural crest cells more closely resemble progenitor cells? In this review we discuss recent advances in characterizing the properties of neural crest cells, together with their potential for tissue-specific repair.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Role of morphogens in neural crest cell determination.

The neural crest is a transient, migratory cell population found in all vertebrate embryos that generate a diverse range of cell and tissue derivatives including, but not limited, to the neurons and glia of the peripheral nervous system, smooth muscle, connective tissue, melanocytes, craniofacial cartilage, and bone. Over the past few years, many studies have provided tremendous insights into understanding the mechanisms regulating the induction and migration of neural crest cell development. This review highlights the surprising and perhaps unexpected roles for morphogens in these distinct processes. A comparison of studies performed in several different vertebrates emphasizes the requirement for coordination between multiple signaling pathways in the induction and migration of neural crest cells in the developing embryo.

Amphibians↗

PubMed2005

Specification of neural crest cell formation and migration in mouse embryos.

Of all the model organisms used to study human development, rodents such as mice most accurately reflect human craniofacial development. Collective advances in mouse embryology and mouse genetics continue to shape our understanding of neural crest cell development and by extrapolation the etiology of human congenital head and facial birth defects. The aim of this review is to highlight the considerable progress being made in our understanding of cranial neural crest cell patterning in mouse embryos.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Relations and interactions between cranial mesoderm and neural crest populations.

The embryonic head is populated by two robust mesenchymal populations, paraxial mesoderm and neural crest cells. Although the developmental histories of each are distinct and separate, they quickly establish intimate relations that are variably important for the histogenesis and morphogenesis of musculoskeletal components of the calvaria, midface and branchial regions. This review will focus first on the genesis and organization within nascent mesodermal and crest populations, emphasizing interactions that probably initiate or augment the establishment of lineages within each. The principal goal is an analysis of the interactions between crest and mesoderm populations, from their first contacts through their concerted movements into peripheral domains, particularly the branchial arches, and continuing to stages at which both the differentiation and the integrated three-dimensional assembly of vascular, connective and muscular tissues is evident. Current views on unresolved or contentious issues, including the relevance of head somitomeres, the processes by which crest cells change locations and constancy of cell-cell relations at the crest-mesoderm interface, are addressed.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Specification and patterning of neural crest cells during craniofacial development.

Craniofacial evolution is considered fundamental to the origin of vertebrates and central to this process was the formation of a migratory, multipotent cell population known as the neural crest. The number of cell types that arise from the neural crest is truly astonishing as is the number of tissues and organs to which the neural crest contributes. In addition to forming melanocytes as well as many neurons and glia in the peripheral nervous system, neural crest cells also contribute much of the cartilage, bone and connective tissue of the face. These multipotent migrating cells are capable of self renewing decisions and based upon these criteria are often considered stem cells or stem cell-like. Rapid advances in our understanding of neural crest cell patterning continue to shape our appreciation of the evolution of neural crest cells and their impact on vertebrate craniofacial morphogenesis.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Gene expression and regulation of hindbrain and spinal cord development.

The formation of the central nervous system is one of the most fascinating processes in biology. Motor coordination, sensory perception and memory all depend on the complex cell connections that form with extraordinary precision between distinct nerve cell types within the central nervous system. The development of the central nervous system and its intricate connections occurs in several steps. During the first step known as neural induction, the neural plate forms as a uniform sheet of neuronal progenitors. Neural induction is followed by neurulation, the process in which the two halves of the neural plate are transformed into a hollow tube. Neurulation is accompanied by regionalisation of the neural tube anterior-posteriorly into the brain and spinal cord and dorso-ventrally into neural crest cells and numerous classes of sensory and motor neurons. The proper development of the vertebrate central nervous system requires the precise, finely balanced control of cell specification and proliferation, which is achieved through the complex interplay of multiple signaling systems. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), retinoic acid (RA) fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), Wnt and Hedgehog proteins are a few key factors that interact to pattern the developing central nervous system. In this review, we detail our current knowledge of the roles of these signaling factors in the development of the vertebrate nervous system in terms of the mechanisms underlying the formation and specification of the hindbrain and spinal cord.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Comparative analysis of neural crest cell death, migration, and function during vertebrate embryogenesis.

Cranial neural crest cells are a multipotent, migratory population that generates most of the cartilage, bone, connective tissue and peripheral nervous system in the vertebrate head. Proper neural crest cell patterning is essential for normal craniofacial morphogenesis and is highly conserved among vertebrates. Neural crest cell patterning is intimately connected to the early segmentation of the neural tube, such that neural crest cells migrate in discrete segregated streams. Recent advances in live embryo imaging have begun to reveal the complex behaviour of neural crest cells which involve intricate cell-cell and cell-environment interactions. Despite the overall similarity in neural crest cell migration between distinct vertebrates species there are important mechanistic differences. Apoptosis for example, is important for neural crest cell patterning in chick embryos but not in mouse, frog or fish embryos. In this paper we highlight the potential evolutionary significance of such interspecies differences in jaw development and evolution. Developmental Dynamics 229:14-29, 2004.

Ambystoma↗

PubMed2004

Developmental biology is "Cruzing".

The 2004 Santa Cruz Developmental Biology Meeting took place August 5th-8th and covered a diverse range of current topics in developmental biology. This report discusses some of the highlights.

Body Patterning↗

PubMed2004

The therapeutic potential of stem cells in the treatment of craniofacial abnormalities.

Anomalies associated with the vertebrate head and face account for a third of all reported major birth defects. Of the principle cell populations that participate in formation of the craniofacial complex, the neural crest is central, generating much of the peripheral nervous system and constituting the predominant connective tissue-forming mesenchyme of the facial skeleton. Many craniofacial anomalies are, therefore, largely attributed to defects in neural crest cell development. Neural crest cells exhibit many of the features of stem cells; they are multipotent, remarkably plastic and have a limited capacity for self-renewal. This article will review recent studies that demonstrate the ability of stem cells to generate neural crest cell populations that form appropriate neural crest derivatives in the developing craniofacial complex, and will discuss the potential application for stem cells in the treatment of craniofacial disorders.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Somitogenesis: breaking new boundaries.

Segmentation is a fundamental process in vertebrate embryogenesis, and one of the earliest manifestations of segmental patterning is the generation of transient, serially repeated blocks of mesodermal cells known as somites. Disruption of the normal segmentation process in humans leads to vertebral abnormalities such as spondylocostal dysostosis. In this minireview, we discuss recent advances in the dynamic molecular and cellular mechanisms governing segmentation.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Making headway: the roles of Hox genes and neural crest cells in craniofacial development.

Craniofacial development is an extraordinarily complex process requiring the orchestrated integration of multiple specialized tissues such as the surface ectoderm, neural crest, mesoderm, and pharyngeal endoderm in order to generate the central and peripheral nervous systems, axial skeleton, musculature, and connective tissues of the head and face. How do the characteristic facial structures develop in the appropriate locations with their correct shapes and sizes, given the widely divergent patterns of cell movements that occur during head development? The patterning information could depend upon localized interactions between the epithelial and mesenchymal tissues or alternatively, the developmental program for the characteristic facial structures could be intrinsic to each individual tissue precursor. Understanding the mechanisms that control vertebrate head development is an important issue since craniofacial anomalies constitute nearly one third of all human congenital defects. This review discusses recent advances in our understanding of neural crest cell patterning and the dynamic nature of the tissue interactions that are required for normal craniofacial development.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Origins and plasticity of neural crest cells and their roles in jaw and craniofacial evolution.

The vertebrate head is a complex assemblage of cranial specializations, including the central and peripheral nervous systems, viscero- and neurocranium, musculature and connective tissue. The primary differences that exist between vertebrates and other chordates relate to their craniofacial organization. Therefore, evolution of the head is considered fundamental to the origins of vertebrates (Gans and Northcutt, 1983). The transition from invertebrate to vertebrate chordates was a multistep process, involving the formation and patterning of many new cell types and tissues. The evolution of early vertebrates, such as jawless fish, was accompanied by the emergence of a specialized set of cells, called neural crest cells which have long held a fascination for developmental and evolutionary biologists due to their considerable influence on the complex development of the vertebrate head. Although it has been classically thought that protochordates lacked neural crest counterparts, the recent identification and characterization of amphioxus and ascidian genes homologous to those involved in vertebrate neural crest development challenges this idea. Instead it suggests thatthe neural crest may not be a novel vertebrate cell population, but could have in fact originated from the protochordate dorsal midline epidermis. Consequently, the evolution of the neural crest cells could be reconsidered in terms of the acquisition of new cell properties such as delamination-migration and also multipotency which were key innovations that contributed to craniofacial development. In this review we discuss recent findings concerning the inductive origins of neural crest cells, as well as new insights into the mechanisms patterning this cell population and the subsequent influence this has had on craniofacial evolution.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Role of the isthmus and FGFs in resolving the paradox of neural crest plasticity and prepatterning.

Cranial neural crest cells generate the distinctive bone and connective tissues in the vertebrate head. Classical models of craniofacial development argue that the neural crest is prepatterned or preprogrammed to make specific head structures before its migration from the neural tube. In contrast, recent studies in several vertebrates have provided evidence for plasticity in patterning neural crest populations. Using tissue transposition and molecular analyses in avian embryos, we reconcile these findings by demonstrating that classical manipulation experiments, which form the basis of the prepatterning model, involved transplantation of a local signaling center, the isthmic organizer. FGF8 signaling from the isthmus alters Hoxa2 expression and consequently branchial arch patterning, demonstrating that neural crest cells are patterned by environmental signals.

Animals↗