PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul Burns

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Burns.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Informed consent: a patients' perspective.

The medico-legal issues surrounding informed consent are highly topical and contentious. Current attitudes to consent emphasize the high level of 'good medical practice' expected by a 'reasonable patient/parent'. The authors' objectives were to assess the levels of knowledge and information expected by patients and parents, prior to signing consent forms for a surgical procedure. Each patient or parent was asked a series of questions prior to signing a consent form. Answers were recorded on a standard questionnaire. More than 80 per cent of respondents were happy with the information provided in out-patients, however, over half of these could not list even one complication of their operation. Two-thirds of those surveyed sought information elsewhere, while over half expected to be informed of all known complications, even if the rate of complications was less than one per cent. In conclusion, the information provided by surgeons might not meet the expectations of today's informed patients.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2004

Is off-pump revascularization better for patients with non-dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency?

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is a well-recognized complication following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been shown to minimize renal injury in patients with normal preoperative renal function who undergo elective procedures. The purpose of this study was to define the effect of an off-pump revascularization strategy on the incidence of postoperative renal failure and survival of patients with preexisting renal dysfunction. METHODS: From January 1, 1999, to December 1, 2002, a total of 371 patients were identified as having a preoperative creatinine concentration greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL. This number included 291 patients who did not need hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis to support renal function. These patients were subdivided into those undergoing traditional CABG with CPB (103 patients) and those undergoing off-pump revascularization (188 patients) whose demographic, operative, and outcome information was retrospectively reviewed and compared. RESULTS: The off-pump cohort was older than the on-pump cohort (70 +/- 9.6 versus 66 +/- 10.9 years; P =.002), had a lower prevalence of previous myocardial infarction (35% versus 50%; P =.008), and had a modestly higher mean left ventricular ejection fraction (0.47 +/- 0.01 versus 0.43 +/- 0.01; P =.017). Otherwise the groups were well matched. The mean preoperative serum creatinine and creatinine clearance values were not significantly different (1.8 +/- 0.5 versus 1.9 +/- 0.6 mg/dL [ P =.372] and 45.1 +/- 15.5 versus 46.8 +/- 17.2 mL/min [ P =.376] for the off-pump and on-pump cohorts, respectively). There was a significant reduction in postoperative renal failure (17% versus 9% of patients; P =.020) and need for new dialysis (10% versus 3% of patients; P =.022) when CPB was eliminated. Intermediate-term survival analysis revealed a survival benefit for the off-pump group (70% versus 57%) at 42 months, although this value did not reach statistical significance ( P =.143). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that patients with preoperative non-dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency have more favorable outcome when revascularization is done off pump. Avoidance of CPB results in (1) a reduction in the incidence of postoperative renal failure; (2) a reduction in the need for new dialysis; and (3) improved in-hospital and midterm survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of multivessel beating heart revascularization in a high-risk group of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction as well as to provide intermediate survival and quality of life data. METHODS: Our prospectively updated database was queried to extract all patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30% who underwent beating heart revascularization. Standard demographics, clinical profiles and outcomes were collected. Outcomes were compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) benchmarks for all coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. Telephone interviews were conducted and survival and quality of life data were tabulated. In addition, morbidity and mortality outcomes were compared with a concurrent cohort of patients with similarly impaired left ventricular function who underwent conventional coronary artery bypass. RESULTS: One hundred off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting patients were identified and follow-up was 93% complete in these patients. Mean age was 67+/-10.5 years and mean ejection fraction was 26+/-4%. Twenty-one percent were females. Balloon counterpulsation support was used liberally in the perioperative period. Patients received a mean of 3.5 grafts with 83% internal mammary artery use. Observed mortality was 3% with a predicted mortality of 5.3%. Observed to expected ratio was 0.56. Incidence of adverse events compared favorably with both that reported in the STS for all CABG patients regardless of left ventricular function, and also to a concurrent CABG cohort. One-year survival was 85%. Freedom from cardiac readmission was 88% and freedom from angina was 83%. No patient required repeat percutaneous or surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction is a safe and effective alternative to conventional grafting. Long-term follow-up is mandatory to confirm these encouraging intermediate outcomes.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

The prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with chronic venous leg ulceration.

BACKGROUND: Thrombophilia is increasingly recognized as a risk factor for deep venous thrombosis (DVT), which in turn is a major risk factor for chronic venous ulceration (CVU). However, the relationship between thrombophilia and CVU remains unknown. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of thrombophilia in patients with CVU and to determine whether this is associated with a history or duplex scan evidence of DVT. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with CVU were prospectively studied. The patients underwent clinical assessment and duplex ultrasound scanning. Blood was drawn for antithrombin, proteins C and S, activated protein C resistance, factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A, lupus anticoagulant, and anticardiolipin antibodies. RESULTS: The study included 35 men with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range, 45 to 72 years) and 53 women with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range, 69 to 82 years). Thirty-six percent of the patients had either a history or duplex scan evidence suggestive of previous DVT. The following abnormalities were detected: four, five, and six cases of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S deficiencies, respectively; 14 cases of activated protein C resistance; 11 cases of factor V Leiden mutation; three cases of prothrombin 20210A mutation; eight cases of lupus anticoagulant; and 12 cases of anticardiolipin antibodies. Thrombophilia was not significantly related to previous DVT, deep reflux, or disease severity. CONCLUSION: Patients with CVU have a 41% prevalence rate of thrombophilia. This rate is two to 30 times higher than the rate of the general population but is similar to that reported for patients with previous DVT. However, in patients with CVU, thrombophilia does not appear to be related to a history of DVT, a pattern of reflux, or severity of disease. Many patients with CVU may have unsuspected postthrombotic disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Patient, operative, and surgeon factors that influence the effect of superficial venous surgery on disease-specific quality of life.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Superficial venous surgery for CEAP 2 disease leads to an improvement in disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in the short term. However, which factors influence the magnitude of this improvement, how surgery affects QoL in patients with CEAP 4 to 6 disease, and whether this improvement is durable are not known. The objective of this study was to identify patient, operative, and surgeon factors that might influence the change in disease-specific QoL in the 2 years after superficial venous surgery. METHODS: This prospective study was comprised of 203 unselected, consecutive patients with CEAP 2 to 6 disease who underwent saphenous with or without subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery and who completed the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Symptoms Severity Score (AVVSSS) before surgery and at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 2 years after surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: At baseline, recurrent and ulcer (CEAP 5 and 6) diseases were associated with a higher (worse) AVVSSS. Surgery was associated with a significant improvement in median (interquartile range [IQR]) AVVSSS: baseline, 17.8 (11.8 to 27.2); 4 weeks, 13.8 (7.9 to 21.3); 6 months, 9.6 (4.2 to 15.8); and 2 years, 8.1 (4.0 to 14.7). One hundred seventy-five patients (86%) at 6 months and 177 patients (87%) at 2 years reported an improvement in AVVSSS. Postoperative AVVSSS at both 6 months and 2 years was most significantly influenced by preoperative score (P <.0001). After adjustment for baseline AVVSSS, the following factors were identified in multivariate analysis as having a significant and independent positive (+) or negative (-) impact on AVVSSS: at 6 months, (-) recurrent disease (P =.009), (-) CEAP 4 disease (P =.026); and at 2 years, (+) long saphenous surgery (P =.02), (-) CEAP 5 disease (P =.030). CONCLUSION: In this unselected series, saphenous surgery with or without subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery led to an improvement in disease-specific QoL in 87% of patients out to 2 years. Although univariate analysis results suggested that many baseline factors might be associated with outcome, multivariate analysis results suggested that only surgery for recurrent disease and for CEAP 4/5 disease remained as significant negative, and only long saphenous surgery as significant positive, independent prognostic factors. These data provide evidence of the medium-term clinical effectiveness of venous surgery across the full spectrum of CEAP clinical grades, show the importance of multivariate analysis, and reemphasize the importance of minimization of recurrence.

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with significant left main coronary artery stenosis: early and midterm outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of significant left main stenosis (> or =50%) has been considered a relative contraindication to the use of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) stemming from well-documented hemodynamic perturbations during the displacement of the heart. We examined our experience with patients with critical left main stenosis (LMS) to assess the safety and feasibility of OPCAB in this subgroup. METHODS: Our prospectively updated database was queried to identify all patients with severe left main disease who underwent isolated coronary revascularization between January 1, 1999 and May 31, 2002. This query yielded 234 on-pump and 420 off-pump patients with significant LMS whose clinical information was retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The groups were well matched with regard to gender, left ventricular function, surgical priority, and severity of angina. The conventional coronary artery bypass (CABG) group was significantly younger than the OPCAB group and had a higher incidence of a previous myocardial infarction. Patients in the CABG cohort were more likely than OPCAB patients to remain ventilated after 24 hours, require placement of intraoperative or postoperative intraaortic balloon pump, or suffer from postoperative renal failure. There was a decrease in mortality (6.4% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.006) when CPB was eliminated. Intermediate term survival analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the off-pump group (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left main disease is a safe and effective alternative to conventional bypass grafting and conveys a survival benefit.

Adult↗