PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul Calès

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Calès.

22 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Hemodynamic and antifibrotic effects of losartan in rats with liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the effects of the early and chronic administration of losartan--a specific angiotensin II receptor antagonist--in the prevention of hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension. METHODS/RESULTS: (1) In CCl(4) rats, losartan at 5 and 10 mg/kg per day significantly decreased portal pressure (-11, -18%, respectively), splenorenal shunt blood flow (-60, -80%) and liver fibrosis (liver hydroxyproline and area of fibrosis) without significant changes in mortality and mean arterial pressure (MAP). (2) In bile duct ligated (BDL) rats, losartan at 5 mg/kg per day significantly decreased portal pressure (-14%), splenorenal shunt blood flow (-70%) and liver fibrosis. Losartan at 10 mg/kg per day significantly worsened liver and renal functions, mortality and liver fibrosis, without significant changes in portal pressure and splenorenal shunt blood flow. Losartan at 5 and 10 mg/kg per day significantly decreased MAP (-24, -30%). (3) In portal vein ligated (PVL) rats, losartan significantly decreased MAP (-12%) but did not change portal pressure or splenorenal shunt blood flow. CONCLUSIONS: In BDL and CCl(4) rats, losartan has beneficial effects on splanchnic hemodynamics and liver fibrosis. Losartan might decrease hepatic resistances in fibrotic liver. Losartan decreased MAP except in CCl(4) rats. Higher dosage of losartan had deleterious effects in BDL rats.

Alanine Transaminase↗
PubMed2002

Fractal dimension can distinguish models and pharmacologic changes in liver fibrosis in rats.

Fractal analysis measures the complexity of geometric structures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of fractal analysis in liver fibrosis. A total of 77 rats were included: 10 sham, 46 with fibrosis secondary to bile duct ligation (BDL), and 21 with fibrosis due to CCl(4) intoxication. Measurements included the fractal dimension of Kolmogorov (D(k)), histologic lesions, the area of fibrosis by image analysis, liver hydroxyproline content, messenger RNA fibronectin, serum hyaluronate level, and portal pressure. Fibrotic rats were given placebo, octreotide, or O(2)-vinyl 1-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (V-PYRRO/NO). Intraobserver agreement of D(k) was excellent with the intraclass (ic) correlation coefficient r(ic) = 0.91 (P <.0001) as well as the interobserver agreement with r(ic) = 0.88 (P <.001). D(k) was correlated with other measurements or markers of fibrosis: the area of fibrosis (r = 0.75; P <.0001), hydroxyproline content (r = 0.51; P <.001), serum hyaluronate level (r = 0.52; P <.001), and portal pressure (r = 0.52; P <.01). D(k) was significantly different between the 2 models of fibrosis (P <.0001), unlike the area of fibrosis, and this relationship was independent of other histologic lesions. The significant decrease in fibrosis observed with octreotide or V-PYRRO/NO was similarly reflected by D(k) or the area of fibrosis. The diagnostic accuracy for the fibrosis model was 97% with the 5 main measurements or markers of fibrosis studied, with D(k) isolated at the first step by stepwise analysis. In conclusion, fractal analysis is suitable for analyzing liver fibrosis and has excellent reproducibility. This is the only quantitative morphometric method that can discriminate among the models of fibrosis and is sensitive enough to detect pharmacologically induced changes in liver fibrosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Prothrombin index is an indirect marker of severe liver fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: The non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is based mainly on biochemical markers. The main aim was to validate whether the prothrombin index is an indirect marker of the severity of liver fibrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The predictive value of the prothrombin index for liver fibrosis was first assessed in 243 patients with chronic liver disease, then validated in 193 other patients with chronic liver disease. The reproducibility of measurement of the prothrombin index in different laboratories was evaluated in 82 other patients. RESULTS: In the first group, the prothrombin index was predicted accurately by serum hyaluronate (R(2)= 0.67 at the first step by multiple regression). The relationship between the prothrombin index and the area of fibrosis was not influenced significantly by non-fibrotic pathological lesions. The prothrombin index began to decrease when the Metavir fibrosis score was 2 versus 3 for albumin. In the second group, the prothrombin index and the histological fibrosis score were well correlated (r= -0.70, P< 10(-4)). Prothrombin index < or =80% or < or =70% diagnosed severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, respectively, and prothrombin index > or =105% or > or =100% excluded a diagnosis of severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, respectively, at the 95% probability level. The prothrombin indices measured in different laboratories were similar (78+/-18% v. 78+/-14%) and well correlated (r= 0.91, P< 10(-4)). CONCLUSIONS: The prothrombin index was well correlated with pathological liver fibrosis score, had a high diagnostic accuracy for severe fibrosis or cirrhosis especially due to alcohol, and was not influenced by other pathological lesions. The prothrombin index was reproducible. Thus, the prothrombin index expressed as a percentage is an accurate, reproducible, inexpensive and easily available marker of severe liver fibrosis.

Biomarkers↗