Paul D Root | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Dynamic monitoring of glutathione in erythrocytes, without a separation step, in the presence of an oxidant insult.

A method for the quantitative determination of the antioxidant form of glutathione (GSH) in red blood cells (RBCs) is described that does not require separation of the analyte of interest from the complex cellular matrix. The measurement portion of the analysis is performed using fluorescence spectrophotometry after monochlorobimane (a recognized probe for GSH) is added to a mixture containing RBCs and glutathione transferase (GST). This method was employed to determine the GSH concentration (0.042 +/- 0.002 mM) in a solution of 1% RBCs obtained from rabbits (n = 6). When spiked with authentic GSH (0.50 micromol), 99.8% of the GSH was recovered. Addition of GST to the sample mixture enabled most measurements to be made after 5-10 min of reaction time. Importantly, a decrease in GSH was measured upon the addition of a recognized oxidant (diamide) to the RBC sample followed by a subsequent return to normal levels of GSH. The ability of the GSH to recover from the oxidant attack occurred in a dose-dependent manner, requiring 30 and 90 min to recover from oxidant insults of 20 and 40 microM diamide, respectively. The antioxidant capabilities of the GSH were able to be monitored in real time, thus providing a method to dynamically monitor the ability of the RBC to maintain homeostasis in a complex matrix.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Microfluidic technologies as platforms for performing quantitative cellular analyses in an in vitro environment.

Quite often, important cellular events occur in environments that are either not amenable to implanted sensors or other types of molecular probes. In such cases, a viable alternative to taking the sensor or probe to the biological sample of interest is to bring the sample of interest out of its natural environment to one that is more conducive to the measurement scheme. The disadvantage of the latter approach is that the sample may not behave in the same manner in vitro as it does in vivo, or that the agonists and other stimuli to which the sample is subjected to in vivo are no longer present. In this Tutorial Review, the authors attempt to provide some guidance, based on their own experiences and those of other scientists, to performing cellular measurements in a quantitative manner under in vitro conditions. Due to the expansive literature on analyses involving cells, the authors have limited this Tutorial Review to those methods involving microfluidic technologies, both in microbore tubing and in microfabricated channels. Initial reports of analyses involving cells in microbore tubing were first reported nearly two decades ago, while those in microfabricated fluidic devices appeared over a decade ago. However, more recently, the complexity of cell analyses using fabricated microfluidic devices (as opposed to microbore tubing) has increased due in part to the improvements in fabrication technologies, fluid handling and delivery capabilities, advances in coatings of the channels within the microfluidic device, and integrated detection schemes. Examples of cellular analyses in microbore tubing and in fabricated microfluidic devices will be given, as well as associated advantages and challenges. Finally, the authors' thoughts on cellular analyses are presented here using the classical steps in an analysis as a guide.

Animals↗