PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul J Nietert

Publications and source records attributed to Paul J Nietert.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Attitudes towards screening for lung cancer among smokers and their non-smoking counterparts.

BACKGROUND: There has been resurgence of interest in lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography. The implications of directing a screening programme at smokers has been little explored. METHODS: A nationwide telephone survey was conducted. Demographics, certain clinical characteristics and attitudes about screening for lung cancer were ascertained. Responses of current, former and never smokers were compared. RESULTS: 2001 people from the US were interviewed. Smokers were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely than never smokers to be male, non-white, less educated, and to report poor health status or having had cancer, and less likely to be able to identify a usual source of healthcare. Compared with never smokers, current smokers were less likely to believe that early detection would result in a good chance of survival (p < 0.05). Smokers were less likely to be willing to consider computed tomography screening for lung cancer (71.2% (current smokers) v 87.6% (never smokers) odds ratio (OR) 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.71). More never smokers as opposed to current smokers believed that the risk of disease (88% v 56%) and the accuracy of the test (92% v 71%) were important determinants in deciding whether to be screened (p < 0.05). Only half of the current smokers would opt for surgery for a screen-diagnosed cancer. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that there may be substantial obstacles to the successful implementation of a mass-screening programme for lung cancer that will target cigarette smokers.

Adult↗

Demographic and biologic influences on survival in whites and blacks: 40 years of follow-up in the Charleston Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, life expectancy is significantly lower among blacks than whites. We examined whether socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors may help explain this disparity. METHODS: Forty years (1961 through 2000) of all-cause mortality data were obtained on a population-based cohort of 2,283 subjects in the Charleston Heart Study (CHS). We examined the influence of SES and CVD risk factors on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Complete data were available on 98% of the original sample (647 white men, 728 white women, 423 black men, and 443 black women). After adjusting for SES and CVD risk factors, the hazard ratios (HRs) for white ethnicity were 1.14 (0.98 to 1.32) among men and 0.90 (0.75 to 1.08) among women, indicating that the mortality risk was 14% greater for white men and 10% lower for white women compared to their black counterparts. However the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: While there are marked contrasts in mortality among blacks and whites in the CHS, the differences can be largely explained by SES and CVD risk factors. Continued focus on improving and controlling cardiovascular disease risk factors may reduce ethnic disparities in survival.

Journal Article↗

Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Terminal digit preference in blood pressure (BP) measurement has been reported in both clinical and research settings. This article examines the prevalence of terminal digit preference (TDP) in primary care practices and the effect that a practice's level of TDP influences patients' BP measurements and management. METHODS: Data were obtained in cross-sectional fashion from the electronic medical records of active patients from 85 practices around the United States. The TDP prevalence was calculated, and statistical techniques were used to examine the influence of a practice's TDP on patients' BP measurements and on the likelihood that patients had an active prescription for selected antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: The TDP was common, with zero being recorded 44.6% and 47.5% of the time for systolic BP and diastolic BP, respectively. Patients belonging to practices with higher TDP levels had significantly (P < .01) lower systolic BP measurements than patients in practices with lower TDP levels. Patients belonging to practices with higher TDP levels also had significantly lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.85, 0.99], P = .036) of having an active prescription for an antihypertensive medication, an association that was stronger in women (OR = 0.91, P = .023) than in men (OR = 0.95, P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: The TDP for BP measurements is common. Although TDP effects on patients' BP measurements may appear modest, treatment of patients, especially women, with antihypertensive medication may be systematically affected by this preference.

Adult↗

The logic behind a multimethod intervention to improve adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices.

The gap between evidence-based guidelines for clinical care and their application in medical settings is well established and widely discussed. Effective interventions are needed to help health care providers reduce this gap. Whereas the development of clinical practice guidelines from biomedical and clinical research is an example of Type 1 translation, Type 2 translation involves successful implementation of guidelines in clinical practice. This article describes a multimethod intervention that is part of a Type 2 translation project aimed at increasing adherence to clinical practice guidelines in a nationwide network of primary care practices that use a common electronic medical record (EMR). Practice performance reports, site visits, and network meetings are intervention methods designed to stimulate improvement in practices by addressing personal and organizational factors. Theories and evidence supporting these interventions are described and could prove useful to others trying to translate medical research into practice. Additional theory development is needed to support translation in medical offices.

Biomedical Research↗

Initial steps taken by nine primary care practices to implement alcohol screening guidelines with hypertensive patients: the AA-TRIP project.

Many medical conditions are caused or exacerbated by heavy drinking, necessitating alcohol screening and discussion in primary care practices. This is particularly true of hypertension, the most common primary diagnosis in the United States, which has been linked to the regular consumption of 3 or more standard alcoholic beverages a day. The Accelerating Alcohol Screening-Translating Research into Practice (AA-TRIP) project was designed to improve detection and management of alcohol problems in primary care patients with hypertension. Medical providers are being trained using the Practice Partner Research Network's- Translating Research into Practice (PPRNet-TRIP) quality improvement model. This includes a multi-method intervention (electronic medical records, on-site academic detailing, practice feedback reports and annual network meetings) to help practices increase adherence to clinical guidelines. Qualitative analyses of initial steps taken by nine primary care practices toward the routine implementation of alcohol screening guidelines are presented. Organizational factors and provider and patient characteristics all influenced the method and consistency of alcohol screening and intervention. Perceived time constraints, patient sensitivity to questions about alcohol, and possible stigma associated with a diagnosis of alcoholism were also relevant barriers requiring problem solving.

Alcohol-Related Disorders↗

Racial variation in clinical and immunological manifestations of systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify which racial differences in disease manifestations can be attributed to differences in other factors such as gender, education, disease classification, and disease duration. METHODS: The study included white and black patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) treated at a university hospital rheumatology clinic between November 1997 and April 2003. Demographic, clinical, and immunological measurements were obtained on each subject. Using multivariable statistical techniques we assessed differences in disease manifestations between white and black patients after adjusting for gender and classification and duration of disease. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-three patients (199 whites, 64 blacks) were enrolled in the study. Blacks experienced an earlier age at disease onset than whites and were significantly more likely to have diffuse disease, digital ulcers, digital pitting, impaired lung function, and anti-RNP, and anti-Ro antibodies. Whites were significantly more likely to have anti-centromere antibodies. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for gender, disease classification, and disease duration, whites and blacks with SSc differ in some clinical and immunological manifestations of disease. Whether these differences can be attributed to genetic or environmental factors remains unknown.

Adult↗

Quality improvement for prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke in an academic family medicine center: do racial differences in outcome exist?

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether a one-year, multifaceted quality improvement intervention improved adherence to 13 clinical guidelines for lipid screening, hypertension management, and diabetes management among White and African-American adult patients. SETTING: An academic family medicine center. PARTICIPANTS: Six faculty physicians and a clinical pharmacist participated between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2003. Data from 2860 patients' electronic medical records were abstracted. INTERVENTIONS: Performance reports and lists of patients eligible for each guideline measure were generated. Interventions targeted patients who needed improvement. Statistical analyses used generalized estimating equations to determine the intervention effect. RESULTS: Significant improvements occurred in blood pressure control for all adults (OR= 1.44) and those with hypertension (OR=1.82), measures of total cholesterol (OR=1.10) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR= 1.27) for all patients, and measure of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR=2.01) and blood pressure control (OR=1.71) for patients with diabetes mellitus. Significant decline was seen in measures of blood pressure for all patients (OR=.60). After adjusting for patient demographic factors, provider variability, and comorbidities, race was not associated with the change observed in any of the measures from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Even though a multifaceted intervention can improve process of care measures for Whites and African Americans, further studies are needed to improve outcome measures, especially in African Americans.

Academic Medical Centers↗

What to wear today? Effect of doctor's attire on the trust and confidence of patients.

PURPOSE: There are very few studies about the impact of physicians' attire on patients' confidence and trust. The objective of this study was to determine whether the way a doctor dresses is an important factor in the degree of trust and confidence among respondents. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study using survey methodology was conducted of patients and visitors in the waiting room of an internal medicine outpatient clinic. Respondents completed a written survey after reviewing pictures of physicians in four different dress styles. Respondents were asked questions related to their preference for physician dress as well as their trust and willingness to discuss sensitive issues. RESULTS: Four hundred respondents with a mean age of 52.4 years were enrolled; 54% were men, 58% were white, 38% were African-American, and 43% had greater than a high school diploma. On all questions regarding physician dress style preferences, respondents significantly favored the professional attire with white coat (76.3%, P <.0001), followed by surgical scrubs (10.2%), business dress (8.8%), and casual dress (4.7%). Their trust and confidence was significantly associated with their preference for professional dress (P <.0001). Respondents also reported that they were significantly more willing to share their social, sexual, and psychological problems with the physician who is professionally dressed (P <.0001). The importance of physician's appearance was ranked similarly between male and female respondents (P=.54); however, female physicians' dress appeared to be significantly more important to respondents than male physicians' dress (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Respondents overwhelmingly favor physicians in professional attire with a white coat. Wearing professional dress (ie, a white coat with more formal attire) while providing patient care by physicians may favorably influence trust and confidence-building in the medical encounter.

Adult↗

The impact of an innovative reform to the South Carolina dental medicaid system.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative reform in 2000 to the Dental Medicaid program in South Carolina. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: South Carolina Medicaid enrollment data and dental services utilization data from 1998, 1999, and 2000. STUDY DESIGN: The study was observational and retrospective in nature. Quarterly data were used in general linear regression models to examine time trends in the percent of Medicaid enrollees ages 21 and younger who received dental services. Trends in the total number of dental procedures provided per Medicaid enrollee were also analyzed, with sub-analyses performed on the four most frequent categories of procedures. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Data were provided by the state's Quality Improvement Organization. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From 1998 to 1999, there was a downward trend in the number and percent of Medicaid enrollees ages 21 and younger receiving dental services and in the total number of services provided. This trend was dramatically reversed in 2000. CONCLUSIONS: The January 2000 dental Medicaid reform in South Carolina had marked impact on Medicaid enrollees' access to dental services.

Adolescent↗

Variation in training for interventional pulmonary procedures among US pulmonary/critical care fellowships: a survey of fellowship directors.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The American College of Chest Physicians has published guidelines recommending minimum competency requirements for 17 interventional pulmonary procedures. Our aim was to assess what procedures are offered to fellows in US pulmonary/critical care fellowships and to determine whether the recommended competency numbers are being met. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to 122 pulmonary/critical care fellowship directors in the United States, and fellowship demographics, the types of procedures offered, and the average number of procedures performed were recorded. The presence of a dedicated interventional pulmonologist (IP) was ascertained, and procedural offerings and volume were compared with programs that did not have an IP. RESULTS: The response rate of the survey was 77%. There was wide variation in the procedures offered by different programs. The presence of an IP was associated with an increased likelihood of advanced procedural training in brachytherapy (p < 0.05), electrocautery/argon plasma coagulation (p < 0.001), stents (p < 0.001), laser therapy (p < 0.01), rigid bronchoscopy (p < 0.001), and cryotherapy (p < 0.05). For only 3 of the 17 procedures did > 50% of the programs reach the targeted numbers to obtain competency. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large variation in the spectrum of pulmonary procedures offered to trainees. Programs with a dedicated IP are more likely to offer training in advanced therapeutic procedures. When interventional procedures are offered by fellowships, < 30% of programs meet the competency recommendations. These findings have implications for training, delivery of care, and research. An extra year of fellowship in interventional pulmonology might be desirable if one is to reach the desired competency numbers. An alternative to reaching the recommended numbers for select procedures would be to consider regionalizing care at centers that perform many procedures. Finally, to provide justification for the current competency recommendations, clinical outcomes should be correlated with physicians' procedural volume, as has been done in other subspecialties.

Brachytherapy↗

Depression and all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality among adults with and without diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of depression on all-cause and coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality among adults with and without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We studied 10,025 participants in the population-based National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study who were alive and interviewed in 1982 and had complete data for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Four groups were created based on diabetes and depression status in 1982: 1) no diabetes, no depression (reference group); 2) no diabetes, depression present; 3) diabetes present, no depression; and i4) diabetes present, depression present. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of death for each group compared with the reference group. RESULTS: Over 8 years (83,624 person-years of follow-up), 1,925 deaths were documented, including 522 deaths from CHD. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years of follow-up was highest in the group with both diabetes and depression. Compared with the reference group, HRs for all-cause mortality were no diabetes, depression present, 1.20 (95% CI 1.03-1.40); diabetes present, no depression 1.88 (1.55-2.27); and diabetes present, depression present, 2.50 (2.04-3.08). HRs for CHD mortality were no diabetes, depression present, 1.29 (0.96-1.74); diabetes present, no depression 2.26 (1.60-3.21); and diabetes present, depression present, 2.43 (1.66-3.56). CONCLUSIONS: The coexistence of diabetes and depression is associated with a significantly increased risk of death from all causes, beyond that due to having either diabetes or depression alone.

Adult↗

Adjunctive risperidone in generalized anxiety disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Although significant advances have been made in recent years in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), many patients remain symptomatic despite ongoing treatment, underscoring the need for adjunctive new treatments to help improve response. METHOD: Forty patients with a primary diagnosis of DSM-IV GAD, who continued to experience GAD symptoms despite current anxiolytic treatment of at least 4 weeks' duration, as evidenced by Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) total score > or = 18 and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale score of moderate or greater, completed a 1-week screening phase and were then randomly assigned to 5 weeks of double-blind adjunctive treatment with placebo or risperidone at flexible doses of 0.5 to 1.5 mg/day. Patients continued to take their anxiolytics throughout the study. The study was conducted from June 2001 through March 2003. RESULTS: Adjunctive risperidone was associated with statistically significant improvements in core anxiety symptoms, as demonstrated by greater reductions in HAM-A total scores (p = .034) and HAM-A psychic anxiety factor scores (p = .047) compared with placebo. Although change scores on other outcome variables, including response rates, were higher in the risperidone group, differences did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that risperidone at low doses may represent a useful tool in the management of symptomatic GAD patients.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗

Correlates of depression, including overall and gastrointestinal functional status, among patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) may develop psychological problems in addition to physiologic symptoms. We investigated whether demographic and clinical factors are associated with comorbid depression. METHODS: From a university hospital's rheumatology clinic, 72 SSc patients who completed 3 questionnaires [Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, an abbreviated version of a functional status instrument, the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), and the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI)] during an examination were recruited into the study. Correlations among scores on the 3 questionnaires [including upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract subscales of the GIQLI] were calculated, and associations between CES-D scores and a variety of demographic and clinical characteristics were examined using stepwise linear regression. RESULTS: Higher CES-D scores (i.e., more depression symptoms) were significantly correlated with upper (r = -0.48, p < 0.0001) and lower (r = -0.41, p < 0.001) GI tract dysfunction and worse overall functional status (r = 0.51, p < 0.0001). Stepwise regression indicated that higher levels of depression were independently associated with lower levels of education (p < 0.01), worse upper GI tract functioning (p = 0.019), worse functional status (p = 0.34), current corticosteroid use (p = 0.061), and cardiac involvement (p = 0.086). CONCLUSION: Decreased functional status and abnormal GI functioning are significantly correlated with depression among patients with SSc. Other demographic and clinical indicators are also associated with depression.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

Demographic and clinical factors associated with in-hospital death among patients with systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine demographic and clinical predictors of in-hospital death of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and determine to what extent apparent racial differences may be attributed to socioeconomic factors. METHODS: Data were obtained on all hospitalizations in South Carolina for patients who were ever hospitalized between 1996 and 2000 with a diagnosis of SSc. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine predictors of in-hospital death among whites, blacks, and other patients. RESULTS: Proportions of in-hospital deaths among blacks (23.0%) and others (27.7%) were higher than among whites (15.6%), a finding that remained after adjustment for other sociodemographic and clinical factors (black/white odds ratio: 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.86; other/white OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.04-4.09). Other factors associated with in-hospital death included transfer status, emergency admission, length of stay, number of hospitalizations during the time period, and presence of congestive heart failure (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.06-3.03) or hypertension (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23-0.71). CONCLUSION: Black and other non-white patients with SSc appear to experience an elevated risk of death during their hospital stays. Further research is necessary to understand the reasons for these disparities.

Adult↗

The effect of ethnicity on outcomes in a practice-based trial to improve cardiovascular disease prevention.

BACKGROUND: Health disparities are a growing concern. Recently, we conducted a practice-based trial to help primary care physicians improve adherence with 21 quality indicators relevant to the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke. Although the primary concern in that study was whether patients in intervention practices outperformed those in control practices, we were also interested in determining whether minority patients were more, less, or just as likely to benefit from the intervention as non-minorities. METHODS: Baseline (fourth quarter 2000) and follow-up (fourth quarter 2002) data were obtained from 3 intervention practices believed to have at least 10% minority representation. Two practices had a black (non-Hispanic) population sufficient for analysis, while the other had a sufficient Hispanic population. Within each practice, changes in the 21 indicators were compared between the minority patient population and the entire patient population. The proportion of measures in which minority patients exhibited greater improvement was calculated for each practice and for all 3 practices combined, and comparisons were made using non-parametric methods. RESULTS: For all black patients, the observed improvement in 50% of 22 eligible study indicators was better than that observed among all white patients in the same practices. The average changes in the study indicators observed among the black and white patients were not significantly different (p = 0.300) from one another. Likewise for all minority patients in all 3 practices combined, the observed improvement in 14 of 29 (43.3%) eligible study indicators was better than that observed among all white patients. The average changes in the study indicators among all minority patients were not significantly different from the changes observed among the white patients (p = 0.272). CONCLUSIONS: Among 3 intervention practices involved in a quality improvement project, there did not appear to be any significant disparity between minority and non-minority patients in the improvement in study indicators.

Journal Article↗

A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Research is needed to validate effective and practical strategies for improving the provision of evidence-based medicine in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a multimethod quality improvement intervention was more effective than a less intensive intervention for improving adherence to 21 quality indicators for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke. DESIGN: 2-year randomized, controlled clinical trial with the practice as the unit of randomization. SETTING: 20 community-based family or general internal medicine practices in 14 states. All used the same electronic medical record. PARTICIPANTS: 44 physicians, 17 midlevel providers, and approximately 200 staff members; data from the electronic medical records of 87,291 patients. INTERVENTIONS: All practices received copies of practice guidelines and quarterly performance reports. Intervention practices also hosted quarterly site visits to help them adopt quality improvement approaches and participated in 2 network meetings to share "best practice" approaches. MEASUREMENTS: The percentage of indicators at or above predefined targets and the percentage of patients who had achieved each clinical indicator. RESULTS: Intervention practices improved 22.4 percentage points (from 11.3% to 33.7%) in the percentage of indicators at or above the target; control practices improved 16.4 percentage points (from 6.3% to 22.7%). The 6.0-percentage point absolute difference between the intervention and control group was not statistically significant (P > 0.2). Patients in intervention practices had greater improvements than those in control practices for diagnoses of hypertension (improvement difference, 15.7 percentage points [95% CI, 5.2 to 26.3 percentage points]) and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension (improvement difference, 8.0 percentage points [CI, 0.0 to 16.0 percentage points]). LIMITATIONS: The study involved a small number of practices and lacked a pure control group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care practices that use electronic medical records and receive regular performance reports can improve their adherence to clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease and stroke prevention.

Adult↗

Hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and their combinations increased health care utilization and decreased health status.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For individuals with hypertension, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia, the relative magnitude of cardiovascular risk factors and the effect of multiple risk factors remains controversial and both treatment practices and health care usage vary. We sought to determine the effect of hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and their combinations on health care utilization and health status through analysis of data from a large national survey. METHODS: We applied the Anderson model to a cross-sectional representative sample (n=15,107) of the U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population (the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey). RESULTS: For diabetes, additional risk factors did not increase the likelihood of emergency room (ER) visits or hospitalizations but were associated with increased outpatient visits and poorer health status. For hypertension, additional risk factors increased the likelihood of hospitalization (but not ER visits), the number of outpatient visits, and poorer health status. For hypercholesterolemia, additional risk factors were associated with increased likelihood of ER visits, hospitalizations, and poorer health status but not more outpatient visits. Diabetes had the largest effect on health care utilization and health status. CONCLUSION: These findings re-emphasize the magnitude of diabetes as a major risk factor associated with increased ER visits, hospitalizations, outpatients visits, and lower health status.

Adult↗

Incidental epidermolytic hyperkeratosis and focal acantholytic dyskeratosis in common acquired melanocytic nevi and atypical melanocytic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EH) and focal acantholytic dyskeratosis (FAD) are distinct histologic patterns that have been observed incidentally in a variety of benign and malignant skin lesions, including melanocytic lesions. OBJECTIVE: Our motivation for this study was to determine whether FAD and/or EH was significantly associated with atypical melanocytic lesions. METHODS: Skin biopsy specimens of melanocytic lesions diagnosed at our facility over a 3-month period were examined for the occurrence of FAD and EH. RESULTS: Whereas both FAD and EH are uncommon findings, FAD was statistically increased in atypical melanocytic lesions (P =.0172). EH was not found to differ significantly in common acquired melanocytic nevi vs atypical melanocytic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Although both can be found in association with nonneoplastic skin diseases, as well as cutaneous neoplasms, FAD, but not EH, might serve as a marker for melanocytic atypia. Taken together with findings in the literature, FAD might serve as marker for atypical cutaneous proliferations as a whole.

Acantholysis↗