PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul S-H Park

Publications and source records attributed to Paul S-H Park.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Detecting molecular interactions that stabilize native bovine rhodopsin.

Using single-molecule force spectroscopy we probed molecular interactions within native bovine rhodopsin and discovered structural segments of well-defined mechanical stability. Highly conserved residues among G protein-coupled receptors were located at the interior of individual structural segments, suggesting a dual role for these segments in rhodopsin. Firstly, structural segments stabilize secondary structure elements of the native protein, and secondly, they position and hold the highly conserved residues at functionally important environments. Two main classes of force curves were observed. One class corresponded to the unfolding of rhodopsin with the highly conserved Cys110-Cys187 disulfide bond remaining intact and the other class corresponded to the unfolding of the entire rhodopsin polypeptide chain. In the absence of the Cys110-Cys187 bond, the nature of certain molecular interactions within folded rhodopsin was altered. These changes highlight the structural importance of this disulfide bond and may form the basis of dysfunctions associated with its absence.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Arrestin interaction with rhodopsin: conceptual models.

It is becoming increasingly apparent that G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can exist and function as oligomers. This notion differs from the classical view of signaling wherein the receptor has been presumed to be monomeric. Despite this shift in views, the interpretation of data related to GPCR function is still largely carried out within the framework of a monomeric receptor. Rhodopsin is a prototypical GPCR that initiates phototransduction. Like other GPCRs, the activity of rhodopsin is regulated by phosphorylation and the binding of arrestin. In the current investigation, we have explored by modeling methods the interaction of rhodopsin and arrestin under the assumption that either one or two rhodopsin molecules bind each arrestin molecule. The dimeric receptor framework may provide a more accurate representation of the system and is therefore likely to lead to a better and more accurate understanding of GPCR signaling.

Arrestins↗
PubMed2004

Oligomerization of G protein-coupled receptors: past, present, and future.

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signal transduction has been studied for more than a century. Despite the intense focus on this class of proteins, a molecular understanding of what constitutes the functional form of the receptor is still uncertain. GPCRs have traditionally been conceptualized as monomeric proteins, and this view has changed little over the years until relatively recently. Recent biochemical and biophysical studies have challenged this traditional concept, and point instead to a mechanistic view of signal transduction wherein the receptor functions as an oligomer. Cooperative interactions within such an oligomeric array may be critical for the propagation of an external signal across the cell membrane and to the G protein, and may therefore underlie the mechanistic basis of signaling.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Characterization of radioligand binding to a transmembrane receptor reconstituted into Lipobeads.

Lipobeads are hydrogel beads surrounded by a lipid bilayer membrane and have been developed to act as a cell analogue. The FLAG-tagged M(2) muscarinic receptor was incorporated onto the surface of the Lipobead by incubating pre-Lipobeads with proteoliposomes containing the receptor. Receptors reconstituted onto the surface of the Lipobeads were functional in that they bound the antagonists quinuclidinylbenzilate and scopolamine with characteristic muscarinic affinities. This demonstrates the feasibility of using Lipobeads to study the binding properties of the M(2) muscarinic receptor and offers a promising approach to the study of transmembrane protein biology in general.

Affinity Labels↗
PubMed2004

Oligomeric potential of the M2 muscarinic cholinergic receptor.

G protein-coupled receptors are known to exist as oligomers. Although such aggregates often are referred to as dimers, there is little direct evidence regarding their oligomeric size. In the present investigation, c-Myc-, FLAG-, and influenza hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged forms of the M2 muscarinic receptor have been coexpressed in Sf9 cells to probe for aggregates larger than a dimer. Immunochromatography, immunoprecipitation, and immunoblotting were carried out with various combinations of antibodies directed against the different epitopes to demonstrate that all three tagged forms of the receptor can be immunopurified within a single complex. Extracts of the M2 muscarinic receptor from Sf9 cells therefore contain aggregates that are at least trimeric, and the levels detected point to the existence of larger complexes. The data also suggest that the oligomers coexist with a sizeable population of monomers.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Monomers and oligomers of the M2 muscarinic cholinergic receptor purified from Sf9 cells.

G protein-coupled receptors are known to form oligomers. To probe the nature of such aggregates, as well as the role and prevalence of monomers, epitope-tagged forms of the M(2) muscarinic receptor have been isolated as oligomers and monomers from Sf9 cells. Membranes from cells coexpressing the c-Myc- and FLAG-tagged receptor were solubilized in digitonin-cholate, and the receptor was purified by successive passage through DEAE-Sepharose, the affinity resin 3-(2'-aminobenzhydryloxy)tropane (ABT)-Sepharose, and hydroxyapatite. Coimmunoprecipitation of the two epitopes indicated the presence of oligomers at each stage of the purification up to but not including the fraction eluted specifically from ABT-Sepharose. The affinity-purified receptor therefore appeared to be monomeric. The failure to detect coimmunoprecipitation was not due to an ineffective antibody, nor did the conditions of purification appear to promote disaggregation. Receptor at all stages of purification bound N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine and [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate with high affinity, but the capacity of receptors that were not retained on ABT-Sepharose was only 4% of that expected from densitometry of western blots probed with an anti-M(2) antibody. Similarly low activity was found with oligomers isolated by successive passage of coexpressed receptor on anti-c-Myc and anti-FLAG immunoaffinity columns. M(2) muscarinic receptors therefore appear to coexist as active monomers and largely or wholly inactive oligomers in solubilized extracts of Sf9 cells. A different pattern emerged when coinfected cells were treated with quinuclidinylbenzilate prior to solubilization, in that ABT-purified receptors from those cells exhibited coimmunoprecipitation. Treatment with the antagonist therefore led to oligomers in which at least some of the constituent sites were active and were retained by ABT-Sepharose.

Affinity Labels↗
PubMed2002

Effects of N-ethylmaleimide on conformational equilibria in purified cardiac muscarinic receptors.

Muscarinic receptors purified from porcine atria and devoid of G protein underwent a 9-27-fold decrease in their apparent affinity for the antagonists quinuclidinyl benzilate, N-methylscopolamine, and scopolamine when treated with the thiol-selective reagent N-ethylmaleimide. Their apparent affinity for the agonists carbachol and oxotremorine-M was unchanged. Conversely, the rate of alkylation by N-ethylmaleimide, as monitored by the binding of [(3)H]quinuclidinyl benzilate, was decreased by antagonists while agonists were without effect. The receptor also underwent a time-dependent inactivation that was hastened by N-ethylmaleimide but slowed by quinuclidinyl benzilate and N-methylscopolamine. The destabilizing effect of N-ethylmaleimide was counteracted fully or nearly so at saturating concentrations of each antagonist and the agonist carbachol. Similar effects occurred with human M(2) receptors differentially tagged with the c-Myc and FLAG epitopes, coexpressed in Sf9 cells, and extracted in digitonin/cholate. The degree of coimmunoprecipitation was unchanged by N-ethylmaleimide, which therefore was without discernible effect on oligomeric size. The data are quantitatively consistent with a model in which the purified receptor from porcine atria interconverts spontaneously between two states (i.e. R R*). Antagonists favor the R state; agonists and N-ethylmaleimide favor the comparatively unstable R* state, which predominates after purification. Occupancy by a ligand stabilizes both states, and antagonists impede alkylation by favoring R over R*. Similarities with constitutively active receptors suggest that R and R* are akin to the inactive and active states, respectively. Purified M(2) receptors therefore appear to exist predominantly in their active state.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Cooperativity and oligomeric status of cardiac muscarinic cholinergic receptors.

Muscarinic cholinergic receptors can appear to be more numerous when labeled by [(3)H]quinuclidinylbenzilate (QNB) than by N-[(3)H]methylscopolamine (NMS). The nature of the implied heterogeneity has been studied with M(2) receptors in detergent-solubilized extracts of porcine atria. The relative capacity for [(3)H]NMS and [(3)H]QNB was about 1 in digitonin-cholate, 0.56 in cholate-NaCl, and 0.44 in Lubrol-PX. Adding digitonin to extracts in cholate-NaCl increased the absolute capacity for both radioligands, and the relative capacity increased to near 1. The latency cannot be attributed to a chemically impure radioligand, instability of the receptor, an irreversible effect of NMS, or a failure to reach equilibrium. Binding at near-saturating concentrations of [(3)H]QNB in cholate-NaCl or Lubrol-PX was blocked fully by unlabeled NMS, which therefore appeared to inhibit noncompetitively at sites inaccessible to radiolabeled NMS. Such an effect is inconsistent with the notion of functionally distinct, noninterconverting, and mutually independent sites. Both the noncompetitive effect of NMS on [(3)H]QNB and the shortfall in capacity for [(3)H]NMS can be described quantitatively in terms of cooperative interactions within a receptor that is at least tetravalent; no comparable agreement is possible with a receptor that is only di- or trivalent. The M(2) muscarinic receptor therefore appears to comprise at least four interacting sites, presumably within a tetramer or larger array, and ligands appear to bind in a cooperative manner under at least some conditions.

Animals↗