PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul Stanton

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Stanton.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Subchondral bone marrow edema in patients with degeneration of the articular cartilage of the knee joint.

PURPOSE: To retrospectively determine at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging the prevalence of subchondral bone marrow edema beneath arthroscopically proved articular cartilage defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed in compliance with HIPAA regulations, and a waiver of informed consent was obtained from the institutional review board before the study was performed. The study consisted of 132 patients (70 men, 62 women; average age, 53 years) with articular cartilage defects of the knee joint who underwent MR imaging of the knee and subsequent arthroscopic knee surgery. At the time of arthroscopy, each articular cartilage lesion was graded by using the Noyes classification system. MR examinations were retrospectively reviewed to determine the size, depth, and location of subchondral bone marrow edema without knowledge of the arthroscopic findings. Pairwise Fisher exact tests and two-sample t tests were used to correlate MR imaging findings of subchondral bone marrow edema with the arthroscopic grade of articular cartilage degeneration. RESULTS: Subchondral bone marrow edema was seen beneath 105 (19%) of 554 articular cartilage defects identified at arthroscopy. It was not observed beneath any of the six grade 1 cartilage defects but was observed beneath eight (4.9%) of 163 grade 2A defects, 40 (14.4%) of 278 grade 2B defects, 54 (55.1%) of 98 grade 3A defects, and three (33.3%) of nine grade 3B defects. Subchondral bone marrow edema was also seen beneath four (1.4%) of 238 articular surfaces that appeared normal at arthroscopy. The mean depth and cross-sectional area of subchondral bone marrow edema increased with increasing grade of the articular cartilage lesion. CONCLUSION: Higher grades of articular cartilage defects are associated with higher prevalence and greater depth and cross-sectional area of subchondral bone marrow edema.

Adult↗

Good management. Make boards work better.

Performance reviews for trust boards are rare, despite their strategic importance. Cohesion between executives and non-executives, and willingness for board members to challenge one another, are critical. Too much challenge and too little trust can suppress innovation.

Community-Institutional Relations↗

Management. Gently does it.

Soft intelligence is information gathered from conversations, observations and experiences that allow judgements to be made. Research by York University shows that less than one in four of those interviewed used hard data to inform their judgements of NHS trusts. Sources of soft information can be direct: based on first-hand experiences; and indirect: the accounts and views of colleagues, patients, public, friends, journalists.

Administrative Personnel↗

Effective boards. Born & bred.

If a board is to be effective its members must understand their roles and share trust with their colleagues. Members must be prepared to challenge colleagues, conventions and their own assumptions. Individual responsibility dissolves in large groups. Successful boards avoid this phenomenon.

Decision Making, Organizational↗