Biomedical subjects

Paul Statkevich

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Statkevich.

15 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Effects of ezetimibe on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects.

This single-center, open-label, 2-period crossover study investigated the effects of multiple-dose ezetimibe (EZE) on a single dose of cyclosporine (CyA). Healthy subjects received 2 treatments in random order with a 14-day washout: (1) CyA 100 mg alone and (2) EZE 20 mg for 7 days with CyA 100 mg coadministered on day 7; EZE 20 mg alone was administered on day 8. AUC(0-last) and Cmax geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for ([CyA + EZE]/CyA alone) were 1.15 (1.07, 1.25) and 1.10 (0.97, 1.26), respectively. Tmax (approximately 1.3 hours) was similar with and without EZE (P >.200). Mean CyA exposure slightly increased (approximately 15%) with multiple-dose EZE 20 mg; however, this value was contained within (0.80, 1.25). The implications for chronic EZE dosing within the usual clinical paradigm of chronic CyA dosing have not been established; caution is recommended when using these agents concomitantly. CyA concentrations should be monitored in patients receiving EZE and CyA.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Interaction of single-dose ezetimibe and steady-state cyclosporine in renal transplant patients.

This open-label, single-period study evaluated the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe (EZE) 10 mg in the setting of steady-state cyclosporine (CyA) dosing in renal transplant patients. A single 10-mg dose of EZE was coadministered with the morning dose of CyA (75-150 mg twice a day). Total EZE (sum of unconjugated, parent EZE and EZE-glucuronide; EZE-total) AUC(0-last) and Cmax were compared to values derived from a prespecified database of healthy volunteers. Geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) for (EZE + CyA)/EZE alone for EZE-total AUC((0-last)) and Cmax were 3.41 (2.55, 4.56) and 3.91 (3.13, 4.89), respectively. Compared to healthy controls, EZE-total AUC((0-last)) was 3.4-fold higher in transplant patients receiving CyA; similar exposure levels were seen in a prior multiple-dose study in which EZE 50 mg was administered to healthy volunteers without dose-related toxicity. Because the long-term safety implications of both higher EZE exposures and undetermined effect on CyA are not yet understood, the clinical significance of this interaction is unknown.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Phase II study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib with paclitaxel in patients with taxane-refractory/resistant nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of treatment using lonafarnib, a novel farnesyltransferase inhibitor (FTI), in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic (Stage IIIB/V), taxane-refractory/resistant nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with NSCLC who experienced disease progression while receiving previous taxane therapy or who had disease recurrence within 3 months after taxane therapy cessation were treated with continuous lonafarnib 100 mg orally twice per day beginning on Day 1 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours on Day 8 of each 21-day cycle. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were enrolled, 29 of whom were evaluable for response. Partial responses (PR) and stable disease (SD) were observed in 3 (10%) and 11 patients (38%), respectively. Thus, 48% (14 of 29) experienced clinical benefit (PR or SD). The updated and final median overall survival time was 39 weeks and the median disease progression-free survival time was 16 weeks. The combination of lonafarnib and paclitaxel was well tolerated with minimal toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (9%), diarrhea (6%), and dyspnea (6%). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in only 1 patient (3%). Grade 4 adverse events included respiratory insufficiency in 2 patients (6%) and acute respiratory failure in 1 patient (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Lonafarnib plus paclitaxel demonstrated clinical activity in patients with taxane-refractory/resistant metastatic NSCLC. In addition, the combination of lonafarnib and paclitaxel was well tolerated with minimal toxicity. Evaluation of this combination therapy in additional clinical trials is warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The effect of fluvastatin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ezetimibe.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects and safety of the co-administration of ezetimibe and fluvastatin in healthy hypercholesterolemic subjects at clinically-relevant doses and to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ezetimibe and fluvastatin. METHODS: In a single-center, evaluator-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel-group study 32 healthy subjects with hypercholesterolemia were randomized to 4 treatments administered once daily for 14 days: ezetimibe 10 mg plus ezetimibe placebo, fluvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe placebo, fluvastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg, and ezetimibe placebo. Blood samples were collected to measure serum lipids and to determine steady-state pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Ezetimibe 10 mg significantly (p < or = 0.01) decreased total-cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations compared to placebo at Day 14. Fluvastatin 20 mg also caused a significant (p = 0.01) reduction in total-cholesterol and a decrease in LDL-C at Day 14 compared to placebo, however, the decrease in LDL-C did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). The coadministration of ezetimibe 10 mg and fluvastatin 20 mg caused significantly (p < or = 0.01) greater mean percent reductions in LDL-C and total-cholesterol than fluvastatin 20 mg alone or placebo at Day 14. Fluvastatin had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe. On average, ezetimibe appeared to decrease the rate and extent of fluvastatin bioavailability. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of ezetimibe and fluvastatin was safe and well tolerated and caused significant incremental reductions in LDL-C and total cholesterol compared to fluvastatin administered alone. The pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe were not affected by coadministration with fluvastatin. The apparent decrease in fluvastatin exposure on administration with ezetimibe was likely to be due to the parallel study design and two pharmacokinetic outliers and is considered of no clinical significance.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Ezetimibe: a review of its metabolism, pharmacokinetics and drug interactions.

Ezetimibe is the first lipid-lowering drug that inhibits intestinal uptake of dietary and biliary cholesterol without affecting the absorption of fat-soluble nutrients. Following oral administration, ezetimibe is rapidly absorbed and extensively metabolised (>80%) to the pharmacologically active ezetimibe-glucuronide. Total ezetimibe (sum of 'parent' ezetimibe plus ezetimibe-glucuronide) concentrations reach a maximum 1-2 hours post-administration, followed by enterohepatic recycling and slow elimination. The estimated terminal half-life of ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide is approximately 22 hours. Consistent with the elimination half-life of ezetimibe, an approximate 2-fold accumulation is observed upon repeated once-daily administration. The recommended dose of ezetimibe 10 mg/day can be administered in the morning or evening without regard to food. There are no clinically significant effects of age, sex or race on ezetimibe pharmacokinetics and no dosage adjustment is necessary in patients with mild hepatic impairment or mild-to-severe renal insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for ezetimibe consists of glucuronidation of the 4-hydroxyphenyl group by uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase isoenzymes to form ezetimibe-glucuronide in the intestine and liver. Approximately 78% of the dose is excreted in the faeces predominantly as ezetimibe, with the balance found in the urine mainly as ezetimibe-glucuronide. Overall, ezetimibe has a favourable drug-drug interaction profile, as evidenced by the lack of clinically relevant interactions between ezetimibe and a variety of drugs commonly used in patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Ezetimibe does not have significant effects on plasma levels of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors commonly known as statins (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, simvastatin), fibric acid derivatives (gemfibrozil, fenofibrate), digoxin, glipizide, warfarin and triphasic oral contraceptives (ethinylestradiol and levonorgestrel). Concomitant administration of food, antacids, cimetidine or statins had no significant effect on ezetimibe bioavailability. Although coadministration with gemfibrozil and fenofibrate increased the bioavailability of ezetimibe, the clinical significance is thought to be minor considering the relatively flat dose-response curve of ezetimibe and the lack of dose-related increase in adverse events. In contrast, coadministration with the bile acid binding agent colestyramine significantly decreased ezetimibe oral bioavailability (based on area under the plasma concentration-time curve of total ezetimibe). Hence, ezetimibe and colestyramine should be administered several hours apart to avoid attenuating the efficacy of ezetimibe. Finally, higher ezetimibe exposures were observed in patients receiving concomitant ciclosporin, and ezetimibe caused a small but statistically significant effect on plasma levels of ciclosporin. Because treatment experience in patients receiving ciclosporin is limited, physicians are advised to exercise caution when initiating ezetimibe in the setting of ciclosporin coadministration, and to carefully monitor ciclosporin levels.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Phase I study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor lonafarnib with paclitaxel in solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To establish the maximum tolerated dose of lonafarnib, a novel farnesyltransferase inhibitor, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with solid tumors and to characterize the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of this combination regimen. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In a Phase I trial, lonafarnib was administered p.o., twice daily (b.i.d.) on continuously scheduled doses of 100 mg, 125 mg, and 150 mg in combination with i.v. paclitaxel at doses of 135 mg/m(2) or 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 h on day 8 of every 21-day cycle. Plasma paclitaxel and lonafarnib concentrations were collected at selected time points from each patient. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled; 21 patients were evaluable. The principal grade 3/4 toxicity was diarrhea (5 of 21 patients), which was most likely due to lonafarnib. dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia at dose level 3 (100 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel); grade 4 diarrhea and grade 3 peripheral neuropathy at dose level 3A (125 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel); and grade 4 neutropenia with fever and grade 4 diarrhea at level 4 (150 mg b.i.d. lonafarnib and 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel). The maximum tolerated dose established by the continual reassessment method was lonafarnib 100 mg b.i.d. and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel appeared to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of lonafarnib. The median duration of therapy was eight cycles, including seven cycles with paclitaxel. Six of 15 previously treated patients had a durable partial response, including 3 patients who had previous taxane therapy. Notably, two of five patients with taxane-resistant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer had partial responses. CONCLUSIONS: When combined with paclitaxel, the recommended dose of lonafarnib for Phase II trials is 100 mg p.o. twice daily with 175 mg/m(2) of paclitaxel i.v. every 3 weeks. Additional studies of lonafarnib in combination regimens appear warranted, particularly in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe.

OBJECTIVE: The cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe, significantly decreases low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia. The pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety profiles of ezetimibe and fenofibrate were evaluated alone and after co-administration in 32 subjects with primary hypercholesterolemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, evaluator (single)-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Subjects with untreated LDL-C > or = 130 mg/dL (3.37 mmol/L) were randomized to receive one of four oral treatments each morning for 14 days: fenofibrate 200 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg, fenofibrate 200 mg, ezetimibe 10 mg, or placebo. Serum lipids were assessed before drug administration on day 1, day 7, and day 14. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed on day 14. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary pharmacodynamic parameter was percentage change from baseline in LDL-C concentration following co-administration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate vs either drug alone, or placebo. A secondary outcome was the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and fenofibrate. RESULTS: Ezetimibe and fenofibrate co-administration was well tolerated and produced statistically significant mean percentage reductions from baseline in LDL-C (p < or = 0.05 vs either drug alone or placebo), total cholesterol and triglycerides (p < or = 0.05 vs either fenofibrate or placebo), apolipoprotein C-III (p < or = 0.05 vs placebo), and LDL-III (p < or = 0.05 vs either drug alone or placebo). Ezetimibe did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of fenofibrate. Concomitant fenofibrate administration significantly increased the mean C(max) and AUC of total ezetimibe approximately 64% and 48%, respectively. However, based on the established safety profile and flat dose-response of ezetimibe, this effect is not considered to be clinically significant. CONCLUSION: Co-administration of ezetimibe and fenofibrate produced significantly greater reductions in LDL-C than either drug alone and greater reductions in triglycerides than fenofibrate. These effects were accompanied by improvements in the lipid/lipoprotein profile, suggesting that co-administration therapy with ezetimibe and fenofibrate may be an effective therapeutic option for patients with mixed dyslipidemia.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Effects of ezetimibe on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of lovastatin.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe is a cholesterol absorption inhibitor which decreases low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with hypercholesterolemia. This study investigated the potential for pharmacodynamic and/or pharmacokinetic interactions between ezetimibe and lovastatin. METHODS: In a randomized, evaluator (single)-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 48 healthy men with hypercholesterolemia (screening LDL-C >or= 130 mg/dL) who were stabilized and maintained on a National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step I diet were randomized to one of the following six oral treatments once daily for 14 days: lovastatin 20 mg; lovastatin 20 mg plus ezetimibe 5, 10, or 20 mg; lovastatin 40 mg plus ezetimibe 10mg; or placebo. RESULTS: Reported adverse events were generally mild, nonspecific, and similar among treatments. There were no significant changes in safety laboratory test results, including those for enzymes indicative of muscle or liver injury. Coadministration of ezetimibe and lovastatin did not increase the plasma concentrations of lovastatin or beta-hydroxylovastatin. In this parallel comparison study there was an apparent decrease in lovastatin exposure, however, the reduction in lovastatin or beta-hydroxylovastatin concentrations was not related to the ezetimibe dose and is not considered to be clinically important. Ezetimibe 5, 10, or 20 mg combined with lovastatin 20 mg caused a significantly (p < 0.01) greater reduction in LDL-C than lovastatin 20 mg alone, with no apparent effect on HDL-C or triglycerides. LDL-C was reduced by 51.0% with ezetimibe 10 mg plus lovastatin 20 mg, 56.0% with ezetimibe 10 mg plus lovastatin 40 mg, 33.2% with lovastatin alone, and 17.3% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: The co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin was well tolerated and resulted in a significantly greater percentage reduction in serum LDL-C concentrations than with lovastatin alone, with an average incremental reduction of 16-18%. Ezetimibe 10mg appears to be the optimal dose when co-administered with lovastatin 20mg once daily. Further incremental reductions in LDL-C from the co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin are expected only when the dose of lovastatin is increased. The co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin has the potential to produce clinically significant reductions in LDL-C compared to either drug alone, with favorable safety and tolerability.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe is a lipid-lowering drug indicated for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia as co-administration with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) or as monotherapy. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects and safety of the co-administration of ezetimibe and the new statin rosuvastatin. A secondary objective was to examine the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. METHODS: This was a randomized, evaluator (single)-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy hypercholesterolemic subjects (untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] > or = 130 mg/dL [3.37 mmol/L]). After the outpatient screening and NCEP Step I diet stabilization periods, 40 subjects were randomized to one of the 4 following treatments: rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 12); rosuvastatin 10 mg plus placebo (matching ezetimibe 10 mg) (n = 12); ezetimibe 10 mg plus placebo (matching ezetimibe 10 mg) (n = 8); or placebo (2 tablets, matching ezetimibe 10 mg) (n = 8). All study treatments were administered once daily in the morning for 14 days as part of a 16-day inpatient confinement period. Fasting serum lipids were assessed pre-dose on days 1 (baseline), 7, and 14 by direct quantitative assay methods. Safety was evaluated by monitoring laboratory tests and recording adverse events. Blood samples were collected for ezetimibe and rosuvastatin pharmacokinetic evaluation prior to the first and last dose and at frequent intervals after the last dose (day 14) of study treatment. Plasma ezetimibe, total ezetimibe (ezetimibe plus ezetimibe-glucuronide) and rosuvastatin concentrations were determined by validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS) assay methods. RESULTS: All active treatments caused statistically significant (p < or = 0.02) decreases in LDL-C concentration versus placebo from baseline to day 14. The co-administration of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin caused a significantly (p < 0.01) greater reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol than either drug alone. In this 2-week inpatient study with restricted physical activity there was no apparent effect of any treatment on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglycerides. The co-administration of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin caused a significantly (p < 0.01) greater percentage reduction in mean LDL-C (-61.4%) than rosuvastatin alone (-44.9%), with a mean incremental reduction of -16.4% (95%CI -26.3 to -6.53). Reported side effects were generally mild, nonspecific, and similar among treatment groups. There were no significant increases or changes in clinical laboratory tests, particularly those assessing muscle and liver function. There was no significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of ezetimibe 10 mg with rosuvastatin 10 mg daily caused a significant incremental reduction in LDL-C compared with rosuvastatin alone. Moreover, co-administering ezetimibe and rosuvastatin was well tolerated in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and lovastatin in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe (Zetia) is a novel inhibitor of intestinal absorption of cholesterol that is approved for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. In a separate pilot study, co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin resulted in a significant pharmacodynamic interaction, leading to an additive reduction in LDL-C. The current study was designed to further investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and lovastatin. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study in 18 healthy adult volunteers. All subjects received the following treatments orally once daily for 7 days: ezetimibe 10 mg, lovastatin 20 mg, or ezetimibe 10 mg plus lovastatin 20 mg. Plasma samples obtained on day 7 were evaluated for steady-state pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe (unconjugated), total ezetimibe (ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide conjugate), lovastatin, and beta-hydroxylovastatin. RESULTS: Co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe. There were no significant differences in the exposure to total ezetimibe, ezetimibe-glucuronide and ezetimibe after co-administration with lovastatin vs. ezetimibe given alone. Co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin had no significant effect on the exposure to either lovastatin or beta-hydroxylovastatin. The point estimates based on the log-transformed Cmax and AUC values for lovastatin and beta-hydroxylovastatin were 113% and 119%, respectively, for co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin vs. lovastatin administration alone. Co-administration therapy with ezetimibe and lovastatin was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin or beta-hydroxylovastatin and vice versa. Co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin is unlikely to cause a clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Temozolomide in patients with advanced cancer: phase I and pharmacokinetic study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and potential antitumor activity of temozolomide administered as a single dose every 28 days. DESIGN: Open label, phase I, dose-escalation trial. SETTING: University-affiliated cancer center. PATIENTS: Eleven patients aged 33-73 years with a documented solid tumor or lymphoma who failed therapy of proven efficacy for their disease or had a disease for which no conventional therapy was available. INTERVENTION: Temozolomide 500 mg/m2 was administered as a single oral dose every 28 days. Doses were escalated to 750 or 1000 mg/m2. No intrapatient dose escalation was allowed. At least two patients were enrolled at each dose level. Patients who did not have progressive disease and did not experience a dose-limiting toxicity, or experienced a dose-limiting toxicity but were eligible for dose reduction, were eligible to continue on the study. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed for temozolomide and its active metabolite, 5-(3-methyltriazeno)-imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting at 1000 mg/m2. Temozolomide was absorbed rapidly (mean time to maximum concentration 1.4 hrs) and eliminated, with average half-life and apparent oral systemic clearance values of 1.8 hours and 97 ml/minute/m2, respectively. Mean systemic exposure to MTIC was 3.7% of temozolomide. No objective responses were observed. The maximum tolerated dose of temozolomide was 750 mg/m2. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide 750 mg/m2 administered orally every 28 days was well tolerated. Alternate temozolomide dosing schedules such as continuous daily administration may enhance antitumor activity through sustained depletion of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Treating cancer with PEG Intron: pharmacokinetic profile and dosing guidelines for an improved interferon-alpha-2b formulation.

BACKGROUND: PEG Intron (pegylated interferon-alpha-2b [IFN-alpha-2b]; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) has demonstrated delayed clearance and increased area under the curve compared with native IFN-alpha-2b. Studies in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and malignancies have demonstrated both biologic and clinical activity of PEG Intron and have provided empiric data to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of PEG Intron and IFN-alpha-2b. METHODS: The authors conducted a review of the available data comparing the PK and pharmacodynamic effects of PEG Intron and IFN-alpha-2b. Safety and efficacy data from Phase I/II studies of PEG Intron in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and solid tumors were also reviewed. RESULTS: Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C infection suggest that exposure to IFN at a PEG Intron dose of 0.25 microg/kg per week is similar to that observed after administration of IFN-alpha-2b at a dose of 3 million International Units, three times per week. PEG Intron at doses up to 6 microg/kg per week was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in patients with CML and solid tumors, including metastatic melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Dose intensification can be achieved safely in patients with CML and solid tumors using PEG Intron, which could improve efficacy. These results provide useful dosing guidelines to clinicians investigating the antitumor activity of PEG Intron in patients with malignancies. More data are needed to determine the optimal dose in various oncologic indications. However, these results provide a sound rationale for further investigation of PEG Intron.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2002

Pharmacodynamic interaction between the new selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe and simvastatin.

AIMS: The primary aims of these two single-centre, randomized, evaluator-blind, placebo/positive-controlled, parallel-group studies were to evaluate the potential for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe 0.25, 1, or 10 mg and simvastatin 10 mg (Study 1), and a pharmacodynamic interaction between ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 20 mg (Study 2). Evaluation of the tolerance of the coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin was a secondary objective. METHODS: Eighty-two healthy men with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >or=130 mg dl-1 received study drug once daily in the morning for 14 days. In Study 1 (n=58), five groups of 11-12 subjects received simvastatin 10 mg alone, or with ezetimibe 0.25, 1, or 10 mg or placebo. In Study 2 (n=24), three groups of eight subjects received simvastatin 20 mg alone, ezetimibe 10 mg alone, or the combination. Blood samples were collected to measure serum lipids in both studies. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its beta-hydroxy metabolite were evaluated in Study 1 only. RESULTS: In both studies, reported side-effects were generally mild, nonspecific, and similar among treatment groups. In Study 1, there were no indications of pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and ezetimibe. All active treatments caused statistically significant (P<0.01) decreases in LDL-C concentration vs placebo from baseline to day 14. The coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin caused a dose-dependent reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol, with no apparent effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglycerides. The coadministration of ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg caused a statistically (P<0.01) greater percentage reduction (mean -17%, 95% CI -27.7, -6.2, and -18%, -28.4, -7.4, respectively) in LDL-C than simvastatin alone. CONCLUSIONS: The coadministration of ezetimibe at doses up to 10 mg with simvastatin 10 or 20 mg daily was well tolerated and caused a significant additive reduction in LDL-C compared with simvastatin alone. Additional clinical studies to assess the efficacy and safety of coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin are warranted.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2002

Disposition of the selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe in healthy male subjects.

Ezetimibe [SCH 58235; 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3(R)-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-3(S)-hydroxypropyl]-4(S)-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-azetidinone], a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, is being developed for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. The absorption, metabolism, and excretion of ezetimibe were characterized in eight healthy male volunteers in this single-center, single-dose, open-label study. Subjects received a single oral 20-mg dose of [14C]ezetimibe (approximately 100 microCi) with 200 ml of noncarbonated water after a 10-h fast. Concentrations of radioactivity and/or ezetimibe (conjugated and unconjugated) were determined in plasma, urine, and fecal samples. Ezetimibe was rapidly absorbed and extensively conjugated following oral administration. The main circulating metabolite in plasma was SCH 60663 [1-O-[4-[trans-(2S,3R)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxo-3-[3(S)-hydroxy-3-(4-fluorophenyl)propyl]-2-azetidinyl]phenyl]-beta-D-glucuronic acid], the glucuronide conjugate of ezetimibe. Plasma concentration-time profiles of unconjugated and conjugated drug exhibited multiple peaks, indicating enterohepatic recycling. Approximately 78 and 11% of the administered [14C]ezetimibe dose were excreted in feces and urine, respectively, by 240 h after drug administration. Total recovery of radioactivity averaged 89% of the administered dose. The main excreted metabolite was the glucuronide conjugate of ezetimibe. The primary metabolite in urine (0- to72-h composite) was also the glucuronide conjugate (about 9% of the administered dose). Significant amounts (69% of the dose) of ezetimibe were present in the feces, presumably as a result of SCH 60663 hydrolysis and/or unabsorbed drug. No adverse events were reported in this study. A single 20-mg capsule of [(14)C]ezetimibe was safe and well tolerated after oral administration. The pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe are consistent with extensive glucuronidation and enterohepatic recirculation. The primary metabolic pathway for ezetimibe is by glucuronidation of the 4-hydroxyphenyl group.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Lack of clinically relevant interaction between desloratadine and erythromycin.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioavailability, cardiac safety and tolerability of desloratadine when given in combination with the CYP3A4 inhibitor erythromycin. DESIGN: A randomised, 2-way crossover, placebo-controlled, third party-blind, multiple dose study. PARTICIPANTS: 24 healthy volunteers (12 men, 12 women) aged 19 to 46 years. INTERVENTIONS: Oral desloratadine 7.5mg daily in combination with either placebo (n = 24) or erythromycin 500mg every 8 hours (n = 24) for 10 days. After a minimum 7-day washout period, participants crossed over to the alternative regimen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ECG parameters. RESULTS: Desloratadine/erythromycin did not induce clinically or statistically significant changes in any ECG parameter. The maximum corrected QT (QT(c)) interval was 445 msec for both treatments. The peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 hours of desloratadine were slightly increased by 1.2- and 1.1-fold by concomitant administration of erythromycin compared with desloratadine/placebo. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more frequent after desloratadine/erythromycin than desloratadine/placebo (46 vs 4%), reflecting the poor gastrointestinal tolerability of erythromycin. There were no reports of syncope. CONCLUSION: Combined desloratadine/erythromycin therapy was well tolerated and had no clinically relevant electrocardiographic effects at a dose that was 50% higher than the recommended dose of 5mg. Although coadministration of erythromycin slightly increased plasma concentrations of desloratadine, this change did not correlate with any prolongation of the QT(c) interval, and no toxicity was observed clinically.

Adult↗