PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paul Van Royen

Publications and source records attributed to Paul Van Royen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The male factor in cervical carcinogenesis: a questionnaire study of men's awareness in primary care.

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of testing for human papillomavirus into protocols for cervical cancer screening has far-reaching consequences for counseling patients. The sexual transmission of HPV implies the recognition of sexual behavior of both men and women as a risk factor for cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate which knowledge men have of the relation of HPV and cervical cancer. METHODS: A patient questionnaire was developed in which 20 possible risk factors for cervical cancer development were suggested. In a family practice setting in Flanders, Belgium in 2004, male patients were asked to rate the importance of these factors on a five-point scale. RESULTS: Participants (n=121) rated genetic factors highest (mean score 4.03) regardless of age or educational level. Not having cervical smears regularly (3.76), smoking (3.75) and infections were also perceived as important risk factors (3.69 for bacterial and 3.34 for viral infections). Sexual behavior of the male partner was scored much lower (2.63). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that awareness of HPV and its sexually transmitted nature is low among male general practice attendees. Promoting safe sex to reduce HPV transmission for primary prevention of cervical cancer should target at both male and female patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The effect of giving influenza vaccination to general practitioners: a controlled trial [NCT00221676].

BACKGROUND: No efficacy studies of influenza vaccination given to GPs have yet been published. Therefore, our purpose was to assess the effect of an inactivated influenza vaccine given to GPs on the rate of clinical respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and proven influenza cases (influenza positive nose and throat swabs and a 4-fold titre rise), while adjusting for important covariates. METHODS: In a controlled trial during two consecutive winter periods (2002-2003 and 2003-2004) we compared (77 and 100) vaccinated with (45 and 40) unvaccinated GPs working in Flanders, Belgium. Influenza antibodies were measured immediately prior to and 3-5 weeks after vaccination, as well as after the influenza epidemic. During the influenza epidemic, GPs had to record their contact with influenza cases and their own RTI symptoms every day. If they became ill, the GPs had to take nose and throat swabs during the first 4 days. We performed a multivariate regression analysis for covariates using Generalized Estimating Equations. RESULTS: One half of the GPs (vaccinated or not) developed an RTI during the 2 influenza epidemics. During the two influenza periods, 8.6% of the vaccinated and 14.7% of the unvaccinated GPs had positive swabs for influenza (RR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.28 - 1.24). Multivariate analysis revealed that influenza vaccination prevented RTIs and swab-positive influenza only among young GPs (ORadj: 0.35; 95%CI: 0.13 - 0.96 and 0.1; 0.01 - 0.75 respectively for 30-year-old GPs). Independent of vaccination, a low basic antibody titre against influenza (ORadj 0.57; 95%CI: 0.37 - 0.89) and the presence of influenza cases in the family (ORadj 9.24; 95%CI: 2.91 - 29) were highly predictive of an episode of swab-positive influenza. CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccination was shown to protect against proven influenza among young GPs. GPs, vaccinated or not, who are very vulnerable to influenza are those who have a low basic immunity against influenza and, in particular, those who have family members who develop influenza.

Belgium↗
PubMed2006

Serum antibodies against circulating influenza strains among vaccinated and unvaccinated general practitioners during two consecutive years (2002-2003).

Efficacy studies have not answered the question whether influenza vaccination among general practitioners (GPs) has a substantial additive effect on their immunity. To evaluate this effect the influenza antibody titres in vaccinated and unvaccinated GPs were compared in a controlled trial during two consecutive winter periods (2002-2003 and 2003-2004). The seroprotection rates against the circulating A/H3N2 influenza virus amount to 80% and 42% in the unvaccinated group in 2002 and 2003, respectively. In the vaccinated GPs the seroprotection rate increases from 91% to 96% in 2002 and from 70% to 83% in 2003 after vaccination. Besides vaccination, the (high) basic antibody titre before vaccination and working in a child and family preventive medicine unit were predicting a protective antibody level in GPs.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed2006

The profile of emergency contraception users in a chlamydia prevalence study in primary care in Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: We describe the use of emergency contraception (EC) and its association with sociodemographic, contraceptive and behavioural characteristics in a sample of family practice attendants in Belgium. METHODS: The study was part of a large Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) prevalence study in general practice. Sexually active women under 40 who consulted their general practitioner for routine gynaecological care were enrolled in the study. Participants completed a questionnaire on sociodemographic variables, urogenital symptoms, sexual history and sexual behaviour, and delivered a sample for CT testing. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify determinants of a history of EC use in women in this sample. RESULTS: Of 815 questioned women, 23.5% had ever used EC. EC users were a heterogeneous group with respect to educational level, age and ethnicity. The use of emergency contraception was associated with the level of urbanisation, condom use, not having children yet, young age of first sexual intercourse, having had multiple partners in the past year, a history of unintended pregnancy, and current or previous STI. DISCUSSION: Information on availability and correct use of EC, and on the need for additional testing for STI, are necessary to help primary care attendees to preserve their future reproductive health.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Antibiotic prescribing for acute cough: the effect of perceived patient demand.

BACKGROUND: GPs decide whether or not to prescribe antibiotics for acute cough. Apart from clinical signs and symptoms, non-medical reasons influence this decision as well. AIM: To obtain a valid estimate of the effect of perceived patient demand. DESIGN OF STUDY: Secondary analysis of cluster randomised controlled trial data. SETTING: Eighty-five Flemish GPs. METHOD: GPs completed a preprinted form with medical as well as non-medical information and their prescription for 20 consecutive adult patients consulting with acute cough in the periods February to April 2000 and 2001. The effect of perceived patient demand on antibiotic prescribing was estimated by performing alternating logistic regression analysis. A hierarchical backwards elimination procedure, described by Kleinbaum, was used. RESULTS: Seventy-two GPs participated, including 1448 patients eligible for analysis; 500 (34.5%) were prescribed an antibiotic and, according to the GP, 218 (15.1%) asked for an antibiotic. In cases of perceived patient demand antibiotics were prescribed significantly more often (odds ratio [OR] = 4.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.96 to 7.26). In the final model (n = 819; OR = 4.60, 2.59 to 8.17); Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit P = 0.72), the effect of perceived patient demand for an antibiotic depended on the outcome of the lung auscultation. When patient demand was perceived, antibiotics were prescribed significantly more often only in the case of a normal lung auscultation or in the case of only one abnormal auscultatory finding (adjusted OR = 20.83, 95% CI = 8.86 to 48.99; adjusted OR = 4.79; 95% CI = 2.16 to 10.60, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Perceived patient demand has a significant, independent and clinically relevant effect on antibiotic prescribing for acute cough with negative findings on the lung auscultation. Practice guidelines and interventions to optimise antibiotic prescribing have to take this effect into account.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Combined Pap and HPV testing in primary screening for cervical abnormalities: should HPV detection be delayed until age 35?

In 2003, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved the Hybrid Capture 2 assay for use with a Pap test to adjunctively screen women of 30 years and older for the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. Although the predictive power of a negative test is strong, the number of false-positives may still be high. We investigated HPV prevalence in relation to age in a group of 2293 women, aged between 20 and 50, with normal cytology. Overall HR-HPV prevalence was 6.9% (95%CI=5.9-8.0%). Regression analysis using 5-year intervals showed that the HR-HPV prevalence did not significantly decline up to age 34, whereas it declined significantly after age 35. This would suggest that postponing HPV detection in primary screening from age 30 to 35 would result in a decrease of almost 50% of the number of women with normal cytology and a transient HPV infection. However, larger scale studies are required to confirm this finding.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

GPs' perspectives of type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment: A qualitative analysis of barriers and solutions.

BACKGROUND: The problem of poor compliance/adherence to prescribed treatments is very complex. Health professionals are rarely being asked how they handle the patient's (poor) therapy compliance/adherence. In this study, we examine explicitly the physicians' expectations of their diabetes patients' compliance/adherence. The objectives of our study were: (1) to elicit problems physicians encounter with type 2 diabetes patients' adherence to treatment recommendations; (2) to search for solutions and (3) to discover escape mechanisms in case of frustration. METHODS: In a descriptive qualitative study, we explored the thoughts and feelings of general practitioners (GPs) on patients' compliance/adherence. Forty interested GPs could be recruited for focus group participation. Five open ended questions were derived on the one hand from a similar qualitative study on compliance/adherence in patients living with type 2 diabetes and on the other hand from the results of a comprehensive review of recent literature on compliance/adherence. A well-trained diabetes nurse guided the GPs through the focus group sessions while an observer was attentive for non-verbal communication and interactions between participants. All focus groups were audio taped and transcribed for content analysis. Two researchers independently performed the initial coding. A first draft with results was sent to all participants for agreement on content and comprehensiveness. RESULTS: General practitioners experience problems with the patient's deficient knowledge and the fact they minimize the consequences of having and living with diabetes. It appears that great confidence in modern medical science does not stimulate many changes in life style. Doctors tend to be frustrated because their patients do not achieve the common Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) objectives, i.e. on health behavior and metabolic control. Relevant solutions, derived from qualitative studies, for better compliance/adherence seem to be communication, tailored and shared care. GPs felt that a structured consultation and follow-up in a multidisciplinary team might help to increase compliance/adherence. It was recognized that the GP's efforts do not always meet the patients' health expectations. This initiates GPs' frustration and leads to a paternalistic attitude, which may induce anxiety in the patient. GPs often assume that the best methods to increase compliance/adherence are shocking the patients, putting pressure on them and threatening to refer them to hospital. CONCLUSION: GPs identified a number of problems with compliance/adherence and suggested solutions to improve it. GPs need communication skills to cope with patients' expectations and evidence based goals in a tailored approach to diabetes care.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Adolescents demanding a good contraceptive: a study with standardized patients in general practices.

To assess how Flemish general practitioners (GPs) are handling the first contraception consultation, we used standardized patients (SPs) as the best method to assess the performance of GPs in daily practice. Thirty GPs got a visit from one of the three SPs. Based on a validated checklist, the SPs scored the performance of GPs and they registered the circumstances and the duration of the consultation. Twenty-eight consultations were analyzed. General practitioners scored moderately on the content level of the consultation. Rarely, GPs asked about attitude regarding safe sex, took gynecological history or discussed contraindications. None of the GPs took a personal history to exclude pregnancy. The SPs received enough information about correct pill use, but there was minimal discussion on factors associated with pill intake and interactions with other medications. Few GPs (6/28) gave a prescription corresponding to the Flemish guidelines. The others were influenced by the pharmaceutical representatives. The girls felt, however, very satisfied with the consultation with the GPs.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

A short educational intervention on communication skills improves the quality of screening for Chlamydia in GPs in Belgium: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

An accurate algorithm for screening for chlamydial infections is available in general practice, but GPs experience numerous barriers to sexually transmitted infections (STI) counselling. In this study we assessed if a short educational package, under the form of a commented video footage on communication skills, was helpful in implementing the screening strategy. A cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out in 36 general practitioners in Antwerp, Belgium. Main outcome measures were: number of patients included in the risk assessment, number of patients tested, and proportion of appropriately tested patients. The results show that GPs in the intervention group did not include more patients overall, but that the quality of the screening process was significantly better (81.6% versus 56.2% appropriate tests, P = 0.02). Conclusively, GPs who participated in a short educational package on communication skills, selected eligible candidates for screening more accurately and decreased the risk of overscreening.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Optimizing antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in general practice: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a tailored professional intervention, including academic detailing, on antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. METHODS: In a cluster-randomized controlled before and after study 85 Flemish GPs included adult patients with acute cough consulting in the periods February-April 2000 and 2001. The intervention consisted of a clinical practice guideline for acute cough, an educational outreach visit and a postal reminder to support its implementation in January 2001. Antibiotic prescribing rates and patients' symptom resolution were the main outcome measures. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 42 GPs received the intervention and 35 of 43 GPs served as controls; 1503 patients were eligible for analysis. Only in the intervention group were patients less likely to receive antibiotics after the intervention [OR(adj) (95% CI)=0.56 (0.36-0.87)]. Prescribed antibiotics were also more in line with the guideline in the intervention group [1.90 (0.96-3.75)] and less expensive from the perspective of the National Sickness and Invalidity Insurance Institute [MD(adj) (95% CI)= Euro -6.89 [-11.77-(-2.02)]]. No significant differences were found between the groups for the time to symptom resolution. CONCLUSIONS: An (inter)actively delivered tailored intervention implementing a guideline for acute cough is successful in optimizing antibiotic prescribing without affecting patients' symptom resolution. Further research efforts should be devoted to cost-effectiveness studies of such interventions.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Can cervical cancer screening be stopped at 50? The prevalence of HPV in elderly women.

Although the relation between cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus (HPV) has been established beyond doubt, the introduction of HPV detection in cervical cancer screening is halted, primarily by the high rate of false positivity in relation to morbidity, since the majority of women infected with HPV will not develop lesions. To counteract overconsumption of cervical cancer screening in elderly women, we wanted to test the hypothesis that women of 50 years or older who are HPV-negative and have a cytologically normal smear might be encouraged to refrain from further screening. As a first step, the prevalence of high-risk HPV in a population of 1,936 women of 50 years and older was investigated. After an initial decline, a slightly higher prevalence can be seen with increasing age. There is a decrease in the prevalence of multiple infections with age, paralleled by an increase in single infections, especially of HPV type 16 in the eldest-age group. However, neither the decrease in multiple infections nor the increase in single infections is statistically significant. The data obtained in this study show that, even in the presence of a slight increase in the HPV prevalence in elderly women, approximately 94% of the elderly women can be withdrawn from the cervical cancer screening. However, a follow-up study will be necessary to determine the frequency of (re)infection as well as the course of an HPV infection in elderly women.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

The prevalence of the human papillomavirus in cervix and vagina in low-risk and high-risk populations.

Concordance of HPV between vagina and cervix may be influenced by sample taking and by differences in flow of cervical epithelial cells. To investigate the latter aspect, from 96 women visiting their general practitioner, and 63 sex workers visiting a STI clinic, both vaginal and cervical samples for HPV detection were obtained by the doctor to standardize sample taking. To identify factors that may influence the flow of cervical epithelial cells to the vagina, a questionnaire on intimate hygiene was obtained. The overall HPV prevalence was 22.8%; 14.3% in the general population (14.3% in the cervix, 11.9% in the vagina), compared with 34.4% in sex workers (31.1% in the cervix, 27.9% in the vagina). There was excellent agreement between HPV prevalence in vaginal and cervical samples. The overall agreement was 94.5% (kappa = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89); in the general population agreement reached 97.6%, compared with 90.0% in sex workers. Vaginal infection may influence concordance, but for validation of this finding larger studies are necessary. The high concordance found between HPV prevalence in vagina and cervix warrants further study of the applicability of self-sampling to improve coverage rates by attracting women who would otherwise not obtain a pap test.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Performance of a screening algorithm for chlamydial infection in 2 samples of patients in general practice.

This paper evaluates the performance of an algorithm developed for opportunistic, selective screening of women for chlamydial infection in general practice in Antwerp, Belgium. Its performance was examined in 2 independent sets of patients: A) a cohort of 326 women participating in a pilot screening study, and B) a sample of 25 Chlamydia positive women, identified from the records of a laboratory of clinical microbiology. For group A, positive and negative predictive values were calculated and the accuracy of the algorithm was assessed. For group B, we examined the proportion of patients complying with the algorithm. In group A, the screening algorithm would have detected 73% of the cases in 35.6% of the population. The positive and negative predictive values were 7.7% and 98.4%, respectively. In group B, 84% of patients complied with the algorithm. The screening algorithm worked reasonably well in 2 datasets from a similar population studied 2 y later, but needs further validation.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Management of acute cough: comparisons between Belgian and Dutch GPs.

OBJECTIVES: In Europe there are large variations in overall outpatient antibiotic use, even between two neighbouring countries as Belgium and the Netherlands. We aimed to compare the management of acute cough between Belgian and Dutch general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: In cross-sectional studies in Belgium and the Netherlands, 71 Belgian and 84 Dutch GPs included adult patients consulting for acute cough. Differences in antibiotic prescription rates, the percentage of first-choice antibiotics (i.e. tetracyclines and broad-spectrum penicillins) and bronchodilator prescription rates were assessed by using Generalised Estimates Equations to adjust for clustering of patients within GPs. RESULTS: In Belgium 324/810 patients (40%) were prescribed an antibiotic compared with 101/309 (33%) in the Netherlands (adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.28 (0.91-1.83)). Belgian GPs prescribed fewer first-choice antibiotics compared with Dutch GPs: 124/324 (38%) versus 67/101 (66%) (adjusted OR (95% CI) 0.39 (0.22-0.72)). In both countries, 17% of the patients were prescribed a bronchodilator. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prescription rates for adult patients with acute cough were not significantly higher in Belgian than in Dutch general practice at the 5% significance level. Dutch GPs' antibiotic prescriptions were more in line with national guidelines. Bronchodilator prescription rates were similar. Because Dutch GPs probably encountered more severe cases of acute cough compared with their Belgian colleagues, the observed prescribing differences might be underestimated.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Implementation of a pilot programme for screening for chlamydial infection in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, based on a selective screening, algorithm, is possible in general practice in Belgium; to assess feasibility of the screening strategy with respect to workload, acceptability, and organisational aspects. METHODS: Implementation of a pilot screening programme by 37 GPs for a period of 15 weeks. GPs' screening practices were registered and compared with the guidelines they had received. Outcome measures were: the number of patients included in the risk assessment, uptake of screening by eligible patients, prevalence of previously unidentified infection, and uptake of treatment. After the study period GPs evaluated a number of feasibility issues on a scoring form. RESULTS: 326 women underwent the risk assessment and 214 were tested by an amplification assay on a urine sample. Prevalence in woman at risk was 6.4%. Overall effective screening rate was 77.6%; 9 of 11 positives took up treatment. Participating GPs found the strategy feasible and perceived that it was well accepted by their patients. DISCUSSION: The screening strategy was easily implemented by most GPs but some of them dropped out. The guidelines were followed relatively well and there were no major logistic problems. The uptake of treatment wat suboptimal. Efforts must be made to stimulate and educate more GPs to perform screening; laboratory and storage conditions should be optimised; refunding criteria should be revised; and overscreening must be avoided.

Adult↗