Biomedical subjects

Paul W Dimmock

Publications and source records attributed to Paul W Dimmock.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

The effectiveness of GnRHa with and without 'add-back' therapy in treating premenstrual syndrome: a meta analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) with and without hormonal add-back therapy in the management of premenstrual syndrome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching multiple databases. SETTING: Exeter and North Devon Research and Development Support Unit and Keele University Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. POPULATION: Women with pre-diagnosed premenstrual syndrome and/or premenstrual dysphoric disorder. METHODS: A meta-analysis of published randomised placebo-controlled trials assessing the use of GnRHa in the management of premenstrual syndrome. The standardised mean difference for each individual study and subsequently an overall standardised mean difference were calculated after demonstrating the consistency or homogeneity of the study results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall improvement in premenstrual symptomatology and effectiveness of GnRHa with additional hormonal add-back therapy were the main outcome measures assessed in this analysis. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of GnRHa in treating physical and emotional symptoms. RESULTS: Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed the efficacy of GnRHa was -1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.88 to -0.51). The equivalent odds ratio was 8.66 (95% CI 2.52 to 30.26) in favour of GnRHa. GnRHa were more efficacious for physical than behavioural symptoms, although the difference was not statistically significant. The addition of hormonal add-back therapy to GnRHa did not appear to reduce the efficacy of GnRHa alone; standardised mean difference 0.12 (95% CI -0.35 to 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: GnRHa appear to be an effective treatment in the management of premenstrual syndrome. The addition of hormonal add-back therapy to reduce side effects does not reduce efficacy.

Female↗

PubMed2002

Prescribing patterns in premenstrual syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Over 300 therapies have been proposed for premenstrual syndrome. To date there has been only one survey conducted in the UK of PMS treatments prescribed by GPs, a questionnaire-based study by the National Association of Premenstrual Syndrome in 1989. Since then, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors have been licensed for severe PMS/PMDD, and governmental recommendations to reduce the dosage of vitamin B6 (the first choice over-the-counter treatment for many women with PMS) have been made. This study investigates the annual rates of diagnoses and prescribing patterns for premenstrual syndrome (1993-1998) within a computerised general practitioner database. METHODS: Retrospective survey of prescribing data for premenstrual syndrome between 1993-1998 using the General Practice Research Database for the West Midlands Region which contains information on 282,600 female patients RESULTS: Overall the proportion of women with a prescription-linked diagnosis of premenstrual syndrome has halved over the five years. Progestogens including progesterone were the most commonly recorded treatment for premenstrual syndrome during the whole study period accounting for over 40% of all prescriptions. Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors accounted for only 2% of the prescriptions in 1993 but rose to over 16% by 1998, becoming the second most commonly recorded treatment. Vitamin B6 accounted for 22% of the prescriptions in 1993 but dropped markedly between 1997 and 1998 to 11%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a yearly decrease in the number of prescriptions linked to diagnoses for premenstrual syndrome. Progestogens including progesterone, is the most widely prescribed treatment for premenstrual syndrome despite the lack of evidence demonstrating their efficacy.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2002

Menstrual symptometrics: a simple computer-aided method to quantify menstrual cycle disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To validate a menstrual symptometrics device that can quantify menstrual blood loss, dysmenorrhea, and the premenstrual syndrome against traditional methods of collecting data on symptoms. DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Academic research clinic for menstrual cycle disorders. PARTICIPANT(S): Women 18-50 years of age who presented with menstrual cycle disorders. Controls were recruited from lists of patients requesting sterilization and from hospital staff. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were asked to complete the menstrual symptometrics device and to record pain, blood loss, and premenstrual symptoms by using traditional methods (paper-based scales and the alkaline hematin method) for two cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Agreement between traditional methods of quantifying menstrual cycle disorders and data obtained from the menstrual symptometrics device, and acceptability of the latter technique to patients. RESULT(S): A high level of agreement was observed between the traditional methods and the menstrual symptometrics device in quantifying and diagnosing menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, and the premenstrual syndrome. Most patients preferred the menstrual symptometrics device as a data collection tool. CONCLUSION(S): The menstrual symptometrics device is a rapid and accurate method of quantifying blood loss, pain, and premenstrual symptoms. It has a high level of patient acceptability and can provide instant pictorial feedback on symptoms for patients and clinicians.

Adult↗