Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Paul Winner.
Migraine in the pediatric population remains substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated. The recently revised International Classification of Headache Disorders is a step in the right direction to improve our diagnostic accuracy. This article reviews the practical diagnostic issues related to migraine in the pediatric population.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan injection in the treatment of morning migraine. METHODS: In 2 multicenter (20 sites for study 1 and 25 sites for study 2), randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group studies, male and female patients aged 18 to 65 years with migraine meeting International Headache Society criteria received SC sumatriptan succinate injection 6 mg or inactive vehicle (control) for the outpatient treatment of a single morning migraine, defined as migraine with moderate or severe pain on awakening. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who achieved pain-free relief (moderate or severe pain reduced to no pain) at 2 hours after treatment. Tolerability was assessed using spontaneous reporting or noted by a clinician during the studies, assessed at the return visit. RESULTS: The efficacy analysis included, in the succinate group, 145 patients in study 1, 148 in study 2; control, 152 in study 1, 139 in study 2. The mean (SD) ages in the sumatriptan group were 40.2 (9.7) and 38.8 (10.1) years in studies 1 and 2, respectively; control, 41.4 (10.4) and 39.3 (9.7) years. The majority of patients in the 2 studies were female (sumatriptan, 84% and 93% in studies 1 and 2, respectively; control, 82% and 81%) and white (sumatriptan, 83% and 81%; control, 78% and 89%). Two hours after treatment, 48% and 57% of patients treated with sumatriptan injection compared with 18% and 19% of control patients reported pain-free relief in studies 1 and 2, respectively (both, P < 0.001). Two hours after treatment, 72% and 77% of patients treated with sumatriptan injection reported headache relief (moderate or severe pain reduced to mild or no pain) compared with 32% and 41% of control patients (both, P < 0.001). Onset of efficacy versus control (the first time point with statistical significance of pain relief) was observed beginning 10 minutes postdose (P < 0.05 sumatriptan injection vs placebo across pooled studies). Mean time to efficacy in the sumatriptan group was 10 minutes (P < 0.05 vs controls). The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (sumatriptan, 6% and 4%; control, 2% and 2%) and injection-site reaction (ie, burning or stinging at the injection site) (sumatriptan, 5 % and 5%; control, 2% and 1%). Injection-site reaction was also the only adverse event considered treatment related and reported in > or =5 % of all patients. CONCLUSION: The results of these 2 randomized, double-blind, controlled studies suggest that sumatriptan injection was effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of morning migraine in these adults.
The treatment of children and adolescents who suffer from migraine headaches must be individually tailored, flexible, and balanced with a blend of bio-behavioral measures, agents for acute treatment and, if needed, daily preventive medicines. While controlled data is limited, there is now enough evidence available to provide a rational framework to build treatment plans appropriate for the pediatric population. Essentially, the pharmacological management of pediatric migraine divides into agents for the acute attacks and agents used daily to prevent or reduce the frequency of attacks. For the acute treatment, the most rigorously studied agents are ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and the nasal spray forms of sumatriptan and zolmitriptan, all of which have shown both safety and efficacy in controlled trials. For preventive treatment the calcium channel blocker flunarezine has the best efficacy profile in controlled trials, but is not available in the U.S. A growing body of data, mostly uncontrolled, is emerging regarding the use of several anti-epileptic agents (e.g. topiramate, disodium valproate, levateracetam), as well as the antihistamine cyproheptadine and the anti-depressant amitriptyline.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the zolmitriptan conventional tablet at three different doses for the treatment of a single migraine attack in adolescents. BACKGROUND: Preliminary data from an open-label study suggested that the zolmitriptan conventional tablet could be effective in the treatment of acute migraine in adolescent patients. METHODS: Migraine patients aged 12 to 17 years (n = 850) were randomized to receive zolmitriptan 2.5, 5, or 10 mg, or placebo for treatment of a single migraine attack. Patients recorded migraine headache intensity before and after treatment using a 4-point scale. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant improvement between zolmitriptan 10 mg (2 x 5 mg tablet) and placebo for the primary efficacy variable, headache response at 2 hours, nor any of the secondary variables tested. Two-hour headache response rates were 54%, 53%, and 57% for zolmitriptan 10, 5, and 2.5 mg, respectively, and 58% for placebo. Two-hour pain-free rates were 25%, 19%, and 23% for zolmitriptan 10, 5, and 2.5 mg, respectively, and 20% for placebo. Zolmitriptan was well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to the pattern seen in adults. CONCLUSION: The similar efficacy between zolmitriptan and placebo appears to be the result of the high placebo response rate. This is a recognized issue in pediatric migraine studies and there is an ongoing debate on ways to address this problem. Since this study was initiated, there has been some debate on the appropriateness of the 2-hour endpoint for response rates in adolescent studies, given the shorter duration of headache pain in adolescents compared with adults. Furthermore, accurate information regarding the timeliness of treatment and reporting of headache-related information by adolescents is difficult.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan nasal spray (NS) (5, 20 mg) versus placebo in the acute treatment of migraine in adolescent subjects. BACKGROUND: Currently, no triptan is approved in the United States for the treatment of migraine in adolescent subjects (12 to 17 years). In a previous randomized, placebo-controlled study of 510 adolescent subjects, sumatriptan NS at 5, 10, and 20 mg doses was well tolerated. However, the primary efficacy analysis for headache relief with 20 mg at 2 hours did not demonstrate statistical significance (P = .059). A second study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of sumatriptan NS in this population. METHODS: This was a randomized (1:1:1), placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. Overall, 738 adolescent subjects (mean age: 14 years) with > or = 6-month history of migraine (with or without aura) self-treated a single attack of moderate or severe migraine. The primary endpoints were headache relief at 1 hour and sustained relief from 1 to 24 hours. Pain-free rates, presence/absence of associated symptoms, headache recurrence, and use of rescue medications were also assessed. Tolerability was based on adverse events (AEs) and vital signs. RESULTS: Sumatriptan NS 20 mg provided greater headache relief than placebo at 30 minutes (42% vs. 33%, respectively; P = .046) and 2 hours (68% vs. 58%; P = .025) postdose, but did not reach statistical significance at 1 hour (61% vs. 52%; P = .087) or for sustained headache relief from 1 to 24 hours (P = .061). Significant differences (P < .05) in favor of sumatriptan NS 20 mg over placebo were observed for several secondary efficacy endpoints including sustained relief from 2 to 24 hours. In general, sumatriptan NS 5 mg percentages were slightly higher than placebo but the differences did not reach statistical significance. Both doses of sumatriptan NS were well tolerated. No AEs were serious or led to study withdrawal. The most common event was taste disturbance (2%, placebo; 19%, sumatriptan NS 5 mg; 25%, sumatriptan NS 20 mg). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that sumatriptan may be beneficial to some adolescents and is generally well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine in this population.
The intranasal route of administration for antimigraine drugs offers many theoretical and practical advantages. A drug that is administered intranasally is absorbed by the highly vascular mucous membranes of the nose, which allows for rapid delivery of un-metabolized drug to the central nervous system. The onset of action is thus considerably earlier than with oral administration requiring gastrointestinal absorption. The intranasal route also provides several practical advantages, such as greater acceptability to patients because of the noninvasive mode of delivery, the ability to take medication when severe nausea or vomiting is present, and a better adverse event profile. Three antimigraine drugs are available in intranasal formulation: dihydroergotamine, sumatriptan, and zolmitriptan. This article reviews the pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and tolerability of these agents. All are well tolerated by patients and have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of migraine headache. Each of these drugs has a unique pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile, which may support a clinical preference for one intranasal agent over another in treating patients with specific headache features.
Migraine remains substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated in the pediatric population. The incidence and prevalence of migraine in the pediatric population is not fully appreciated. The recently revised International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, The International Classification of Headache Disorders, is a step in the right direction to improving our diagnostic accuracy. These criteria are the basis for scientific studies and serve as the foundation for future research and clinical care. In this article, the diagnostic issues related to migraine and childhood periodic syndromes in the IHS 2004 revisions are reviewed.
Headache in the pediatric population remains substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated. The recently revised International Headache Society (IHS) criteria, The International Classification of Headache Disorders, is a step in the right direction to improve our diagnostic accuracy. In this article, the diagnostic issues related to childhood periodic syndromes and migraine in the IHS 2004 revisions are reviewed.
BACKGROUND: In clinical trials evaluating sumatriptan in the treatment of moderate or severe migraine pain, the 50- and 100-mg doses have been comparably effective and well tolerated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the dose-efficacy relationship of sumatriptan tablets given early for mild pain, data from 6 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, early-intervention studies of sumatriptan tablets 50 mg and 100 mg (5 of which have been published) were pooled for analysis. These constitute all the studies conducted to date of sumatriptan tablets prospectively given early for mild pain. METHODS: The primary efficacy end point in all the studies was the proportion of patients reporting a pain-free result (ie, mild, moderate, or severe pain reduced to none) 2 hours postdose. Other efficacy end points included the proportion of patients who were migraine free (ie, no pain and no associated symptoms of nausea, vomiting, photophobia, or phonophobia) 2 hours postdose; the proportion reporting worsening of pain (ie, moderate or severe pain) 2 hours postdose; and the proportion with a sustained pain-free result (ie, pain free from 2-24 hours postdose with no use of a second dose of study medication or of rescue medication). Tolerability was assessed by evaluating the incidence of individual adverse events. The investigators assessed each adverse event's relationship to study medication. RESULTS: The number of patients in the intent-to-treat population was 2297 (771 sumatriptan 50 mg, 759 sumatriptan 100 mg, 767 placebo). Patients' mean age ranged from 39.4 to 39.8 years across groups, and most patients were female (90%-92%) and white (89%-90%). A pain-free result 2 hours post dose was reported by significantly more patients who took either dose of sumatriptan tablets compared with placebo and by significantly more patients who took the 100-mg dose compared with the 50-mg dose (50 mg, 49%; 100 mg, 58%; placebo, 24%; P < 0.001, both sumatriptan doses vs placebo, and 100 mg vs 50 mg). A similar pattern was observed for migraine-free results 2 hours postdose (50 mg, 42%; 100 mg, 47%; placebo, 20%; P < 0.05, both sumatriptan doses vs placebo, and 100 mg vs 50 mg), worsening of pain 2 hours postdose (50 mg, 26%; 100 mg, 21%; placebo, 46%; P < 0.05, both sumatriptan doses vs placebo, and 100 mg vs 50 mg), and sustained pain-free results from 2 through 24 hours postdose (50 mg, 30%; 100 mg, 35%; placebo, 12%; P < 0.05, both sumatriptan doses vs placebo, and 100 mg vs 50 mg). Both doses of sumatriptan were well tolerated, and no dose-related trends in the incidence of individual drug-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of pooled data from 6 clinical trials, sumatriptan tablets 50 mg and 100 mg administered early in a migraine attack while the pain was mild were well tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo. The 100-mg dose of sumatriptan was significantly more effective than the 50-mg dose.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The management of pediatric migraine requires a balance of biobehavioral measures coupled with agents for acute treatment and, if needed, daily preventive medicines. A recent American Academy of Neurology practice parameter has critically reviewed the limited data regarding the efficacy and safety of medicines for the acute and preventive therapy of pediatric migraine. The first step is to establish the headache frequency and degree to which the migraines impact upon lifestyle and performance. The next step is to institute nonpharmacologic measures such as regulation of sleep (improved sleep hygiene), moderation of caffeine, regular exercise, and identification of provocative influences (eg, stress, foods, social pressures). A wide variety of therapeutic options exist for patients whose migraine headaches occur with sufficient frequency and severity to produce functional impairment. The most rigorously studied agents for the acute treatment of migraine are ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and sumatriptan nasal spray, all of which have shown safety and efficacy in controlled trials. Daily preventive drug therapies are warranted in about 20% to 30% of young migraine sufferers. The particular drug selected for the individual patient requires an appreciation of comorbidities such as affective or anxiety disorders, co-existent medical conditions such as asthma or diabetes, and acceptability of potential toxicities such as weight gain, sedation, or tremor.
There is a high prevalence of headache disorders in children and adolescents. Headache in pediatric population is substantially underdiagnosed and undertreated. The recently revised International Headache Society criteria are a step in the right direction to improve our diagnostic accuracy. The recent increases in evidence-based data in the pediatric headache population will help to outline appropriate management strategies for acute and preventive treatment. In this article, diagnostic and treatment issues related to the pediatric headache patient will be reviewed.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the short- and long-term efficacy and tolerability of rizatriptan 5 mg in adolescents with migraine. METHODS: Two studies were conducted in patients aged 12 to 17 years. The first study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-attack study followed by a randomized, 1-year, open-label extension. The second study was a randomized, 1-year, open-label study. In the single-attack study, patients treated a moderate or severe migraine headache and up to two recurrences with rizatriptan 5-mg tablets (n = 234) or placebo (n = 242). Patients were instructed to use the study medication only on nonschool days. Headache severity, associated symptoms, and functional disability were assessed by the patient at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 hours after the initial dose. In the 1-year studies, patients treated up to 6 migraine attacks per month with rizatriptan 5-mg tablets (n = 273), rizatriptan 5-mg wafers (n = 281), or standard care therapy (n = 132). Headache severity was assessed by the patient at 2 hours after the initial dose. In all studies, the primary efficacy measure was pain relief at 2 hours post dose. RESULTS: In the single-attack study, the proportion of patients with pain relief at 2 hours was not significantly different between rizatriptan 5 mg (68.2%) and placebo (68.8%). Fewer patients than expected (about 30%) treated their migraine attacks on the weekend. Among these patients, the proportion with pain relief at 2 hours was significantly higher in the rizatriptan group than in the placebo group (74% vs. 58%, P = 0.022). In the multiple-attack studies, pain relief at 2 hours was achieved in significantly more attacks treated with rizatriptan 5-mg tablet (77%) or with rizatriptan 5-mg wafer (77%) than with standard care (64%). Rizatriptan 5 mg was well tolerated in both the studies, with an adverse event profile not significantly different from that of placebo or standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Rizatriptan 5 mg was not more effective than placebo in the treatment of a single migraine attack in adolescents, but appeared to be more effective than standard care for treating multiple attacks occurring over 1 year in these patients. Rizatriptan 5 mg was well tolerated in adolescents during short-term and long-term use.
Botulinum toxins are promising preventive treatments for patients with moderate to severe episodic and chronic migraine and chronic daily headache. The recommended indications for botulinum toxins as preventive therapy lend themselves to the following patient types: those who demonstrate a lack of improvement from preventive (prophylactic) pharmacotherapy; those who experience severe and intolerable adverse events from preventive medications; those who refuse to use daily medications; those who have contraindications to acute migraine therapy, and elderly patients with chronic migraine. Both open-label and double-blind placebo-controlled studies using fixed-site, "follow the pain." or a combination approach have demonstrated significant reduction in migraine frequency, severity, and duration, as well as decreased use of acute medications. The most prominent reductions have been noted in those with reportedly the most severe migraine headaches. Large, well-designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies are recommended to further clarify optimum dosage and location of injection, reduce treatment frequency and duration, and address other primary headache disorders that may benefit from this therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To confirm the efficacy advantage of eletriptan 40 mg over sumatriptan 100 mg. Background.-Eletriptan 80 mg has demonstrated significantly greater efficacy when compared to both sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg in two studies. Eletriptan 40 mg demonstrated significantly greater efficacy than sumatriptan 100 mg in one previous trial. METHODS: Two thousand one hundred thirteen patients with a diagnosis of migraine according to International Headache Society criteria were randomized using a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, and treated for a single migraine attack with either eletriptan 40 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was 2-hour headache response. Secondary endpoints included headache response rates at 1 hour, pain-free rates, absence of associated symptoms, functional response at 1 and 2 hours, and sustained headache response. RESULTS: Headache response rates at 2 hours postdose were significantly higher for eletriptan 40 mg (67%) than for sumatriptan 100 mg (59%; P <.001) and placebo (26%; P <.0001). Eletriptan 40 mg consistently showed significant (P <.01) efficacy over sumatriptan 100 mg across secondary clinical outcomes, including 1-hour headache response; 2-hour pain-free response; absence of nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia; functional improvement; use of rescue medication; treatment acceptability; and sustained headache response (P <.05). Overall, treatment-related adverse events were low, nausea being the only adverse event with an incidence of 2% or higher (4.9% with eletriptan, 4.2% sumatriptan, 2.8% placebo). CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed that eletriptan 40 mg offers superior efficacy in treating migraine pain and associated symptoms and in restoring patient functioning when compared with sumatriptan 100 mg.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan, 50-mg and 100-mg tablets, compared with placebo for treatment of migraine at the first sign of pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two identical multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-attack studies were conducted from May through November 2000 in adults (aged 18-65 years). Patients treated migraine at the first sign of pain, while pain was mild, but not more than 2 hours after onset with oral sumatriptan, 50 mg or 100 mg, or matching placebo. The primary end point was pain-free relief at 2 hours after treatment with 50 mg of sumatriptan compared with placebo. RESULTS: There were 354 patients in study 1 and 337 patients in study 2. Significantly more patients treated with sumatriptan, 50 mg and 100 mg, were completely free from pain 2 and 4 hours after treatment vs patients treated with placebo (at 2 hours, 50% and 57% vs 29%; at 4 hours, 61% and 68% vs 30%; for both, P < .001). Also, significantly more patients treated with sumatriptan, 50 mg and 100 mg, were migraine-free (no pain or associated symptoms) vs those treated with placebo at 2 and 4 hours after treatment (at 2 hours, 43% and 49% vs 24%; at 4 hours, 54% and 63% vs 28%; for both, P < .001). The incidence of overall adverse events was low with the 50- and 100-mg dose of sumatriptan (placebo, 7%; sumatriptan at 50 mg, 14%; sumatriptan at 100 mg, 16%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of migraine at the first sign of pain with sumatriptan, 50-mg and 100-mg tablets, provides superior pain-free relief at 2 and 4 hours after treatment compared with placebo. Results of these studies suggest that sumatriptan at 100 mg may be more efficacious than at 50 mg when used in the early treatment paradigm. Because these studies were not powered to detect statistical differences between active doses, studies to investigate this finding are warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the tolerability and efficacy of rizatriptan 5 mg in adolescent migraineurs. METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients aged 12 to 17 years received rizatriptan 5 mg (n = 149) or placebo (n = 147) for a moderate or severe headache and for up to two recurrences. Headache severity, presence or absence of associated symptoms, and functional disability were assessed over a 4-hour postdose period, and any adverse events were recorded. The primary efficacy measure was pain-free status at 2 hours postdose. RESULTS: Rizatriptan 5 mg was well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse events (all with incidence of 5% or less) among patients receiving rizatriptan were dry mouth, dizziness, asthenia/fatigue, nausea, and somnolence. The percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours was 32% for rizatriptan 5 mg versus 28% for placebo (P=.474). The percentage of patients with pain relief (reduction of predose pain intensity to mild or none) at 2 hours was 66% for rizatriptan versus 56% for placebo (P=.079). Placebo response rates were higher than those typically observed in previous studies of rizatriptan in adults. Compared with placebo, rizatriptan significantly improved functional disability at 1.5 and 2 hours, and nausea at 1 and 1.5 hours. Post hoc analysis showed a significant benefit of rizatriptan versus placebo in the percentage of patients who had pain relief when their migraine attacks were treated on weekends (65% versus 36%, P=.046) compared with weekdays (66% versus 61%, P=.365), and the weekend placebo response rate was similar to that seen in adults. CONCLUSIONS: Rizatriptan 5 mg was well tolerated and effective on some measures when used in adolescents for the treatment of a migraine attack.
Improving the quality of life of the patient presenting with chronic daily headache proves to be challenging both diagnostically and with regard to their short- and long-term management. Continued progress has been made in the classification of chronic daily headache. The extent to which an initial evaluation should be conducted to obtain a diagnosis is a paramount consideration for both the patient and the family. The introduction of disability tools targeted for this population, both in use and under evaluation, will assist in both the initial assessment and in guiding management. The chronic daily headache patient in most cases requires both a non-pharmacological and a pharmacological approach with clearly defined short- and long-term goals. The management of the expectations of both the patient and family are the key to a good outcome.