PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paula Burns

Publications and source records attributed to Paula Burns.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Educating providers of mechanical ventilation: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, research has led to changes in the practice of mechanical ventilation that are associated with improved patient outcome. Unfortunately, many of these recommendations have not been consistently translated to the bedside. Education is an important component of change management, and thus a review of successful education practices, including those that incorporate advances in technology, is timely. RECENT FINDINGS: We are failing to adequately teach important concepts in mechanical ventilation to those healthcare providers in training and to those currently in practice. There are few explicit links between phases of training that ensure achievement of learning objectives related to mechanical ventilation. Targeted multifaceted education initiatives, however, have been shown to reduce the incidence of suboptimal mechanical ventilation care. Advances in simulation technology (table-top simulators, personal computer-based simulators, and high-fidelity patient simulators) have created new educational tools, although it has not been demonstrated how to effectively integrate ventilation simulation into a curriculum map. SUMMARY: A coordinated approach to education about mechanical ventilation should be considered to ensure optimal patient care in a wide variety of clinical settings. Further research is necessary to determine the important characteristics inherent in successful education initiatives, particularly those incorporating new technology such as simulation.

Computer Simulation↗

A training program for certified asthma educators: assessing performance.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based asthma guidelines identify asthma education as an essential element of care. In Canada, a process for certifying asthma educators was established to help provide asthma education to patients. A critical component to certifying asthma educators is their training and evaluation. The purpose of the study was to identify an approach to evaluate participants and to determine if specific characteristics influenced participants' success. METHODS: Participants completed a questionnaire that collected demographic, practice, and learner characteristics. Assessment strategies and criteria used to determine the level of success included 1) a written asthma knowledge score; 2) a written educational theory score, and 3) a practice teaching skill score based on three encounters with standardized patients. Standardized patient encounters were scored by using a standard checklist of essential teaching functions. RESULTS: Participants (n = 73) represented a broad range of health professions (respiratory therapists, nurses, pharmacists, and physiotherapists). The average score for written asthma knowledge, educational theory, and practice skill assessment was 82.0 +/- 8.0%, 68.6 +/- 16.2%, and 80.3 +/- 9.7%, respectively. Moderate interrelationships were observed between the practice teaching skills score and years of practice in asthma (r = 0.35; p < 0.01) and percentage of workdays dedicated to asthma care (r = 0.30; p < 0.05). Moderately strong relationships were observed among the three standardized patient encounters. However, there were no associations between participant scores on the written asthma or educational theory examination and the practice skill assessment scores. CONCLUSIONS: Participants of an asthma educator training program represent a wide range of disciplines, practice settings, and experience. It is important that asthma educator training programs assess both written knowledge and practice assessments to evaluate participants.

Adult↗