PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Paula Ingram

Publications and source records attributed to Paula Ingram.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Quality improvement report: Learning from adverse incidents involving medical devices.

PROBLEM: The NHS is perceived to have a poor record of learning from incidents. Despite efforts of the Medical Devices Agency, which issues safety warnings, adverse incidents with medical devices continue to occur, some of which result in serious injury or death through device failures, user errors, and organisational problems. DESIGN: Introduction of feedback notes on a supportive investigation that seeks to determine latent factors, immediate triggers, causes, and positive actions taken by staff that minimised adverse consequences. BACKGROUND AND SETTING: Medical physics department providing equipment management services in a major NHS teaching trust. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Reduction in repetitions of adverse incidents and improved staff competency in using devices. STRATEGY FOR CHANGE: A feedback note was developed to describe the incident and generic details of the equipment, summarise the investigation (focusing on latent causes and immediate triggers), and describe lessons to be learnt and positive actions by staff. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Feedback notes have been used in teaching sessions and given to ward link nurses. Despite being new, the positive supportive approach has encouraged an open reporting culture. LESSONS LEARNT: Adverse incidents are typically caused by alignment of different factors, but good practice can prevent errors becoming incidents. Careful analysis of incidents reveals both the multifactorial causes and the good practices that can help minimise repetitions.

Clinical Competence↗

Learning from adverse incidents involving medical devices.

While an adverse event involving a medical device is often ascribed to either user error or device failure, the causes are typically multifactorial. A number of incidents involving medical devices are explored using this approach to investigate the various causes of the incident and the protective barriers that minimised or prevented adverse consequences. User factors, including mistakes, omissions and lack of training, conspired with background factors--device controls and device design, storage conditions, hidden device damage and physical layout of equipment when in use--to cause the adverse events. Protective barriers that prevented or minimised the consequences included staff vigilance, operating procedures and alarms.

Clinical Competence↗