PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peer Tfelt-Hansen

Publications and source records attributed to Peer Tfelt-Hansen.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Treatment with sumatriptan 50 mg in the mild phase of migraine attacks in patients with infrequent attacks: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Most migraine patients with infrequent attacks are currently not treated with migrainespecific medication such as triptans. The response of these patients to triptans is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sumatriptan 50 mg vs. placebo in migraine patents with infrequent migraine attacks when medication is taken during the mild phase of an attack. The study design was double-blind, placebocontrolled, parallel-group and randomised. Migraine patients were recruited by general practitioners and referred to one of 4 study centres. Additional patients were recruited by advertising. The patients were eligible for the study if they had between 6 and 12 migraine attacks with or without aura per year. The patients were instructed to take the medication during the mild phase of a single attack. The primary efficacy measure was the percentage of patients pain-free after 2 h. Fortysix percent of treated attacks were moderate or severe. In the intention-to-treat analysis, sumatriptan was superior (20/51 patients were pain-free) to placebo (8/47 patients pain-free) (p=0.03). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more frequently after sumatriptan (40%) than after placebo (13%) (p=0.003) and most AEs were mild or moderate. In this migraine population with infrequent attacks, sumatriptan was superior to placebo and was generally well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

[Cluster headache (Horton's headache)].

A cluster headache is an attack of half-sided very strong pain in or behind an eye, lasting for up to a few hours with tearing and rhinorrhea and sometimes Horner's syndrome. The attacks occur in clusters of weeks' to some months' duration. A cluster headache is a neurovascular primary headache which seems to involve the hypothalamus. The clinical picture, diagnosis and investigations are reviewed. The attack can be treated with oxygen or subcutaneous sumatriptan, and verapamil, ergotamine and prednisolone can be successfully used for prophylaxis. Early diagnosis and specific treatment are emphazised.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Understanding clinical trials in migraine.

The following points are covered in this review. (1) How a randomised clinical trial in migraine is performed. The whole process from idea to publication of an article is reviewed. (2) How to understand a paper on clinical trials in migraine. The aim of the study, design of study, efficacy measures and presentation of results are reviewed. The aim of the study is often stated vaguely and it is suggested to look at the power calculations in order to understand the aim of the study. The aims and the results of the trial programmes of the triptans are reviewed. Results of the study should be presented with 95%CI. (3) How to understand meta-analyses in migraine. Relationship between meta-analyses and head-to-head comparative trials is reviewed; and it is concluded that head-to-head comparisons remain the "golden standard" with meta-analyses as a useful supplement.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

Rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of rofecoxib and ibuprofen for acute migraine treatment. BACKGROUND: Rofecoxib was effective and well tolerated in a previous study of treatment of a single migraine attack. We sought to replicate these findings for a single attack and also study the clinical profile of rofecoxib in the acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks. Ibuprofen was included as a reference nonselective NSAID. METHODS: Adult migraineurs (n = 783) treated one migraine attack with either rofecoxib (25 or 50 mg), ibuprofen 400 mg, or placebo in a randomized, double-blind study. Patients could elect to enroll in a 3-month double-blind extension phase. RESULTS: In the single-attack phase, headache relief at 2 hours postdose was reported by 59.4%, 62.2%, and 57.7% of patients who took rofecoxib 25 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, and ibuprofen 400 mg, respectively, versus 30.5% for placebo (all P < .001 vs placebo). The active drugs were statistically superior to placebo on a variety of additional measures. In the extension phase, the mean percentage of patients' attacks with headache relief at 2 hours postdose was 61.8% for rofecoxib 25 mg, 65.4% for rofecoxib 50 mg, and 59.3% for ibuprofen 400 mg. The mean percentage of patients' attacks with 24-hour sustained headache relief was greater for rofecoxib 50 mg (52.0%) than for rofecoxib 25 mg (47.8%, P < .050) or ibuprofen (39.0%, P < .010). In the single-attack phase, the adverse event rate was higher for rofecoxib 50 mg (37.8%) than placebo (27.8%, P < .050); rates were similar to placebo for rofecoxib 25 mg (32.0%, n.s.) and ibuprofen 400 mg (28.1%, n.s.). In the extension phase, treatment groups had similar adverse event rates. CONCLUSIONS: Rofecoxib 25 and 50 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were effective and generally well tolerated in the acute treatment of migraine.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Methodological issues in systematic reviews of headache trials: adapting historical diagnostic classifications and outcome measures to present-day standards.

Recent efforts to make headache diagnostic classification and clinical trial methodology more consistent provide valuable advice to trialists generating new evidence on effectiveness of treatments for headache; however, interpreting older trials that do not conform to new standards remains problematic. Systematic reviewers seeking to utilize historical data can adapt currently recommended diagnostic classification and clinical trial methodological approaches to interpret all available data relative to current standards. In evaluating study populations, systematic reviewers can: (i) use available data to attempt to map study populations to diagnoses in the new International Classification of Headache Disorders; and (ii) stratify analyses based on the extent to which study populations are precisely specified. In evaluating outcome measures, systematic reviewers can: (i) summarize prevention studies using headache frequency, incorporating headache index in a stratified analysis if headache frequency is not available; (ii) summarize acute treatment studies using pain-free response as reported in directly measured headache improvement or headache severity outcomes; and (iii) avoid analysis of recurrence or relapse data not conforming to the sustained pain-free response definition.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis--results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control.

Topiramate (TPM) has shown efficacy in migraine prophylaxis in two large placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trials. We conducted a randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of topiramate vs placebo for migraine prophylaxis, with propranolol (PROP) as an active control. Subjects with episodic migraine with and without aura were randomised to TPM 100 mg/d, TPM 200 mg/d, PROP 160 mg/d (active control), or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the change in mean monthly migraine frequency from the baseline phase relative to the double-blind treatment phase. Five hundred and seventy-five subjects were enrolled from 61 centres in 13 countries. TPM 100 mg/d was superior to placebo as measured by reduction in monthly migraine frequency, overall 50% responder rate, reduction in monthly migraine days, and reduction in the rate of daily rescue medication use. The TPM 100 mg/d and PROP groups were similar with respect to reductions in migraine frequency, responder rate, migraine days, and daily rescue medication usage. TPM 100 mg/d was better tolerated than TPM 200 mg/d, and was generally comparable to PROP. No unusual or unexpected safety risks emerged. These findings demonstrate that TPM 100 mg/d is effective in migraine prophylaxis. TPM 100 mg/d and PROP 160 mg/d exhibited similar efficacy profiles.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor cilostazol dilates large cerebral arteries in humans without affecting regional cerebral blood flow.

Cilostazol, an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase (PDE) type 3, is used clinically in peripheral artery disease. PDE3 inhibitors may be clinically useful in the treatment of delayed cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. The authors present the first results on the effect of cilostazol on cerebral hemodynamics in normal participants. In this double-blind, randomized, crossover study, 200 mg cilostazol or placebo was administered orally to 12 healthy participants. Cerebral blood flow was measured using 133Xe inhalation and single photon emission computerized tomography. Mean flow velocity in the middle cerebral arteries (VMCA) was measured with transcranial Doppler, and the superficial temporal and radial arteries diameters were measured with ultrasonography. During the 4-hour observation period, there was no effect on systolic blood pressure (P = 0.28), but diastolic blood pressure decreased slightly compared with placebo (P = 0.04). VMCA decreased 21.5 +/- 5.7% after cilostazol and 5.5 +/- 12.2% after placebo (P = 0.02, vs. placebo), without any change in global or regional cerebral blood flow. The superficial temporal artery diameter increased 17.6 +/- 12.3% (P < 0.001 vs. baseline) and radial artery diameter increased 12.6 +/- 8.6% (P < 0.001 vs. baseline). Adverse events, especially headache, were common. The findings suggest that cilostazol is an interesting candidate for future clinical trials of delayed cerebral vasospasm.

3',5'-Cyclic-AMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2003

Endothelium-dependent relaxant responses to selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists in the isolated middle cerebral artery of the rat.

The vasomotor effects of triptans in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) of rats were studied using the pressurised arteriography method and in vitro vessel baths. Using the arteriograph, MCAs from Sprague-Dawley rats were mounted on two glass micropipettes, pressurised to 85 mm Hg and luminally perfused. Luminally added 5- hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), sumatriptan and rizatriptan induced maximal dilatations of 22 +/- 4, 10 +/- 2 and 13 +/- 5%, respectively, compared to the resting diameter. The relaxant effect of sumatriptan was blocked by the 5- HT(1B/1D) receptor selective antagonist GR 55562 (10(-6)M). The use of N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine and charybdotoxin revealed that the dilatation involved both nitric oxide and endothelially derived hyperpolarising factor. Thus, the earlier demonstrated expression of 5-HT(1B/1D) immunoreactivity in the endothelium may well translate into a relaxant response to 5-HT and triptans. Using the vessel bath technique, MCA segments were mounted on two metal wires. The relaxant responses to sumatriptan could not be reproduced using this model; instead, weak contractile responses (6 +/- 3% of submaximal contractile capacity) were observed. The difference in observations between the experimental models may be related to the maintenance of shear stress in the arteriograph.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

The effect of rizatriptan, ergotamine, and their combination on human peripheral arteries: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in normal subjects.

AIMS: To compare the peripheral vasoconstrictor effects of ergotamine, rizatriptan, and their combination, in normal subjects. METHODS: This was a double-blind, four-way, crossover study. Sixteen young male volunteers, selected as responders to the vasoconstrictor effect of 0.5 mg ergotamine i.v., were administered 10 mg oral rizatriptan, 0.25 mg i.v. ergotamine, 10 mg oral rizatriptan+0.25 mg i.v. ergotamine, and placebo. The vasoconstrictor effect on peripheral arteries was measured with strain gauge plethysmography up to 8 h after dosing. The 8 h assessment period was divided into two 4 h intervals to assess the immediate (0-4 h) vs sustained effect (4-8 h) of treatment. RESULTS: For the 0-4 h interval, the decreases in peripheral systolic blood pressure gradients were: placebo (-1 mmHg [95% CI: -3, 1])<rizatriptan (-5 mmHg [95% CI: -7, -3])<ergotamine (-15 mmHg [95% CI: -16, -13])=rizatriptan+ergotamine (-15 mmHg [95% CI: -17, -13]). For the 4-8 h interval, the decreases were: placebo (-5 mmHg [95% CI: -8, -3])=rizatriptan (-8 mmHg [95% CI: -11, -5])<ergotamine (-26 mmHg [95% CI: -29, -24])=rizatriptan+ergotamine (-28 mmHg [95% CI: -31, -26]). CONCLUSIONS: In normal subjects, rizatriptan 10 mg orally had only a small transient vasoconstrictor effect on peripheral arteries compared with the sustained and more pronounced effect of 0.25 mg i.v. ergotamine. Furthermore, rizatriptan exerted no additional effect on ergotamine-induced constriction of peripheral arteries when the two drugs were given in combination.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Intravenous nitroglycerin as an experimental model of vascular headache. Basic characteristics.

To develop a reliable experimental model of vascular headache, we studied the dose-response relationship between headache and i.v. nitroglycerin (NTG) in 10 healthy subjects. NTG was infused intravenously over periods of 10 min separated by wash-out periods. Doses of 0.25, 0.50, 1.00 and 2.00 micrograms/kg/min were applied successively with one placebo infusion and wash-out period inserted randomly and double blindly. The subjects scored their headache intensity on a scale 0-10. After 1-8 weeks a retest was performed. Nine subjects developed headache already at 0.25 microgram/kg/min, whereas one had no headache at any dose. Headache severity did not increase with doses above 0.5 microgram/kg/min. This ceiling effect was reproducible. The headache was moderate, usually throbbing, bifrontal and not associated with other migrainous features. It reached maximum within 2.5-5.5 min (medians) at various doses and declined rapidly after NTG discontinuation. Wash-out periods of 10-20 min were sufficient. The reproducibility of headache intensity and character was satisfactory in the retest experiment. There were no unpleasant side effects and no visible flushing. Thus blindness was maintained. I.v. NTG is suitable as an experimental headache model. A constant infusion of 0.5 microgram/kg/min will be suitable for studies of arterial diameter, pulsations, blood flow, etc. Comparative studies of sensitivity should use the present infusion schedule but with the two highest doses substituted by 0.06 and 0.125 microgram/kg/min.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Action of some pericranial muscles during provoked attacks of common migraine.

In this electromyographic study the activity in the temporal, masseter, sternocleidomastoid and nuchal muscles was recorded bilaterally in 2 males and 2 females during attacks of common migraine precipitated with specific beverages. Muscle activity continuously picked up with bipolar surface electrodes was supplemented by pain ratings at regular intervals, and registrations of similar duration were obtained with the patients free of headache. Recordings were divided into sections of 10 min, and during the last 2 min of each section the average level and the peak of the mean voltage were assessed with intervals of 5 sec. The average of these measurements in per cent of maximal activity was used to characterize the activity in a section. The time course of muscle activity varied between patients and muscles. In general, the migraine attack was characterized by a rise of activity from control level shortly before the patients experienced maximal pain, and location of the hyperactivity corresponded reasonably well with the spatial distribution of pain and tenderness. In two patients activity was sufficiently strong to account for a substantial part of their pain.

Adult↗