Biomedical subjects

Peining Chen

Publications and source records attributed to Peining Chen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Expression profiling of rat femur revealed suppression of bone formation genes by treatment with alendronate and estrogen but not raloxifene.

The pharmacological preservation of bone in the ovariectomized rat by estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and bisphosphonates has been well described. However, comprehensive molecular analysis of the effects of these pharmacologically diverse antiresorptive agents on gene expression in bone has not been performed. This study used DNA microarrays to analyze RNA from the proximal femur metaphysis of sham and ovariectomized vehicle-treated rats, and ovariectomized rats treated for 35 days with maximally efficacious doses of 17-alpha ethinyl estradiol, the benzothiophene SERM, raloxifene, the benzopyran SERM, (S)-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-methyl-2-[4-[2-(1-piperidinyl)ethoxy]phenyl]-2H-1-benzopyran-7-ol (EM652), and the aminobisphosphonate, alendronate. Ovariectomy resulted in 644 significant probe set changes relative to sham control rats (p < 0.05), whereas E2, raloxifene, EM652, and alendronate regulated 613, 765, 652, and 737 probe sets, respectively, relative to ovariectomized control rats. An intersection of these data sets yielded 334 unique genes that were altered after ovariectomy and additionally changed by one or more antiresorptive treatment. Clustering analysis showed that the transcript profile was distinctly different for each pharmaceutical agent and that raloxifene maintained more genes at sham levels than any other treatment. In addition, E2 and alendronate suppressed a cluster of genes associated with bone formation activity below that of sham, whereas raloxifene had little effect on these genes. These data indicate stronger suppressive effects of E2 and alendronate on bone formation activity and that ovariectomy plus raloxifene resembles sham more closely than ovariectomized animals treated with E2, EM652, or alendronate.

Alendronate↗

PubMed2005

Pooling samples within microarray studies: a comparative analysis of rat liver transcription response to prototypical toxicants.

Combining or pooling individual samples when carrying out transcript profiling using microarrays is a fairly common means to reduce both the cost and complexity of data analysis. However, pooling does not allow for statistical comparison of changes between samples and can result in a loss of information. Because a rigorous comparison of the identified expression changes from the two approaches has not been reported, we compared the results for hepatic transcript profiles from pooled vs. individual samples. Hepatic transcript profiles from a single-dose time-course rat study in response to the prototypical toxicants clofibrate, diethylhexylphthalate, and valproic acid were evaluated. Approximately 50% more transcript expression changes were observed in the individual (statistical) analysis compared with the pooled analysis. While the majority of these changes were less than twofold in magnitude ( approximately 80%), a substantial number were greater than twofold (approximately 20%). Transcript changes unique to the individual analysis were confirmed by quantitative RT-PCR, while all the changes unique to the pooled analysis did not confirm. The individual analysis identified more hits per biological pathway than the pooled approach. Many of the transcripts identified by the individual analysis were novel findings and may contribute to a better understanding of molecular mechanisms of these compounds. Furthermore, having individual animal data provided the opportunity to correlate changes in transcript expression to phenotypes (i.e., histology) observed in toxicology studies. The two approaches were similar when clustering methods were used despite the large difference in the absolute number of transcripts changed. In summary, pooling reduced resource requirements substantially, but the individual approach enabled statistical analysis that identified more gene expression changes to evaluate mechanisms of toxicity. An individual animal approach becomes more valuable when the overall expression response is subtle and/or when associating expression data to variable phenotypic responses.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Molecular profile of catabolic versus anabolic treatment regimens of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in rat bone: an analysis by DNA microarray.

Teriparatide, human PTH (1-34), a new therapy for osteoporosis, elicits markedly different skeletal responses depending on the treatment regimen. In order to understand potential mechanisms for this dichotomy, the present investigation utilized microarrays to delineate the genes and pathways that are regulated by intermittent (subcutaneous injection of 80 microg/kg/day) and continuous (subcutaneous infusion of 40 microg/kg/day by osmotic mini pump) PTH (1-34) for 1 week in 6-month-old female rats. The effect of each PTH regimen was confirmed by histomorphometric analysis of the proximal tibial metaphysis, and mRNA from the distal femoral metaphysis was analyzed using an Affymetrix microarray. Both PTH paradigms co-regulated 22 genes including known bone formation genes (i.e., collagens, osteocalcin, decorin, and osteonectin) and also uniquely modulated additional genes. Intermittent PTH regulated 19 additional genes while continuous treatment regulated 173 additional genes. This investigation details for the first time the broad profiling of the gene and pathway changes that occur in vivo following treatment of intermittent versus continuous PTH (1-34). These results extend previous observations of gene expression changes and reveal the in vivo regulation of BMP3 and multiple neuronal genes by PTH treatment.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Transcriptional profiling of keratinocytes reveals a vitamin D-regulated epidermal differentiation network.

1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)D(3)] regulates mineral homeostasis and exhibits potent anti-proliferative, prodifferentiative, and immunomodulatory activities. It mediates these effects by binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), which belongs to the superfamily of steroid/thyroid hormone nuclear receptors. As a result of keratinocyte differentiation and anti-proliferation activities, 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) and its synthetic analogs are therapeutically effective in psoriasis and show promise for the treatment of actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma. To elucidate the VDR signaling pathway in keratinocytes, we examined the gene expression profile with 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) treatment using oligonucleotide microarrays. Out of the 12,600 genes investigated, 82 were upregulated and 16 were downregulated and many of these were involved in differentiation, proliferation, and immune response. We have identified three vitamin D-responsive chromosomal loci (1p36, 19q13, and 6p25) and show the induction of various class II tumor suppressor/growth-regulatory genes in response to 1,25(OH)(2)D(3). Finally, quantitative differences in gene expression revealed a vitamin D-regulated differentiation network and identified peptidylarginine deiminases, kallikreins, serine proteinase inhibitor family members, Kruppel-like factor 4, and c-fos as vitamin D-responsive genes, whose protein products may play an important role in epidermal differentiation in normal and diseased state.

Calcitriol↗

PubMed2004

SUM: a new way to incorporate mismatch probe measurements.

Affymetrix's high-density oligonucleotide arrays offer an exciting technology in biomedical research. With more and more statistical involvement in every step of the process, there has been a constant effort to make sure that the expression data are appropriately extracted in the first place. According to Affymetrix GeneChip technology, each gene is represented by 11-20 oligo probe pairs; the challenge is how to extract one meaningful number, expression, from the 11-20 pairs of numbers. More specifically, there is first a need to differentiate the components of specific binding, nonspecific binding, and optical background noise in both PM and MM probes, and then an expression measure that is proportional to the true abundance of transcripts is to be derived. A new method, SUM, which sums up PM and MM values and then follows a process similar to that of RMA, is considered. The performance of SUM is investigated and compared to the three most popular methods, MAS5, dChip, and RMA. The assessments are based on a well-controlled experiment dataset that is publicly available. The results show that in several respects the performance of SUM is comparable to that of RMA and dChip, and all three of these methods show some advantages over MAS5. There is some evidence showing that SUM has higher differential sensitivity than other methods in certain situations.

Algorithms↗