PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Pekka Jartti

Publications and source records attributed to Pekka Jartti.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Enhancement of brain tumors in 0.23-T low-field MRI: comparison of edema attenuated inversion recovery (EDAIR) sequences with T1-weighted sequence.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore whether edema attenuated inversion recovery (EDAIR) sequences could be used to improve tumor contrast in contrast-enhanced low-field 0.23-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using 0.1 mmol/kg of gadolinium-based contrast agent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with brain tumors were examined by using the following contrast-enhanced sequences: T1-weighted spin echo, EDAIR with inversion time (TI) of 600 milliseconds, and EDAIR with TI of 800 milliseconds. Images were assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: Results suggest that tumor contrast enhancement in low-field MRI can be improved without increasing contrast agent dose. EDAIR 600 appears to be optimal in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: This inversion recovery sequence could be applicable as an additional sequence in the imaging of metastases in low-field MRI, as well as imaging of any other enhancing brain tumors or lesions in low-field MRI.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

A portable diagnostic workstation based on a Webpad: implementation and evaluation.

A wireless hand-held Webpad device was used to review a sample set of cranial computerized tomography (CT) studies to assess its diagnostic capabilities and its feasibility as a portable diagnostic workstation for radiology. The data-set consisted of 30 head CT studies of emergency cases. Two neuroradiologists and a senior radiologist participated in the evaluation of the portable workstation. They used a Web-based viewer that we developed, which provided all the major functionalities required for radiological image review. The reported radiological findings and diagnoses were compared with a gold standard, comprising a set of diagnoses previously formulated by a consensus panel of radiologists who had reviewed the original studies. The diagnoses made using the Webpad were correct (no major discrepancies) in 82 out of 90 interpretations (91%), which is comparable to the accuracy reported in image review with a conventional radiological workstation. The average total working time per diagnosis was 5 min 25 s (range 2-12 min). The simplicity of use of the system and its low cost make it suitable for distributing radiological studies within hospital facilities.

Adolescent↗