PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Per Fink

Publications and source records attributed to Per Fink.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

[Multiple chemical sensitivity, a well-defined illness?].

Some people react to smells or chemicals at levels far below toxicological thresholds with nonspecific symptoms, fear and social isolation. They may be diagnosed with multiple chemical sensitivity. There is no empirical evidence indicating that this condition is explained by toxicological mechanisms, even though a number of theories have been proposed. The authors of this review conclude that this is a functional condition. These patients need information and treatment in accordance with this fact. Instead of being advised how to avoid exposure to chemicals, they should be properly trained in appropriate confrontation with the chemicals encountered in everyday life.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Screening for common mental disorders: who will benefit? Results from a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of studies on mental health screening in primary care are conflicting. A feasible and effective case-finding approach could benefit both GPs and their patients. OBJECTIVES: (1) to examine the effect of using a composite screening questionnaire (SQ) on GPs' recognition and provision of care, and (2) to outline useful strategies for case-finding. METHODS: 38 GPs in Aarhus County, Denmark, volunteered to participate in this trial. 1785 consecutive patients aged 18-65 years consulting with new health problems were included. Patients were screened before consultation using an SQ including scales for somatisation, anxiety, depression and alcohol abuse. Patients were randomised into one of two groups: 900 questionnaires were disclosed to and scored by GPs, 885 were blinded. Number of diagnoses, subjects of conversation, and actions taken were analysed. Additional analyses aimed to identify GP and patient factors that could predict improved outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, disclosure of SQ results increased GPs' recognition of mental disorders by 3.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.5% to 8.0%], and 6.6% (95% CI 1.2% to 12.0%) for patients screened positive. There was a marked variation in GPs' detection rates, and for GPs with moderate or low recognition rates increases were significant (P = 0.001). Conversation on psychological topics increased by 3.2% (95% CI -0.7% to 7.1%), and by 7.0% (95% CI 1.8% to 12.3%) for patients screened positive. Rates of planned follow-up consultations increased by 3.9% (95% CI 0.6% to 7.3%) and by 4.9% (95% CI 0.7% to 9.1%) for patients screened positive. GPs' self-reported benefit from screening was related to better outcomes. A range of patient and GP factors suggesting added value from using SQs were identified. CONCLUSION: GPs' recognition and provision of mental health care can be influenced by the use of composite SQs. Perceived benefit from screening may serve as a useful predictor of better patient management. Pragmatic case-finding approaches need further evaluation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

A randomised controlled trial of brief training in assessment and treatment of somatisation: effects on GPs' attitudes.

BACKGROUND: Somatising patients frequently present in primary care but GPs often express frustration in dealing with them. A negative attitude may result in missed diagnoses and ineffective treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a novel, multifaceted training programme on GPs' attitudes towards somatisation. METHODS: The study was performed as a cluster randomised controlled trial with practices as randomisation unit and with a follow-up period of 12 months. Forty-three GPs from 27 practices in Vejle County, Denmark participated. The intervention consisted of a cognitive-oriented educational programme on assessment, treatment and management of somatisation (The Extended Reattribution and Management Model). Outcome measures were GPs' attitudes toward somatoform disorder and somatisation in general measured by the means of questionnaires at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcome was a change in response. RESULTS: Baseline values confirmed previous findings that GPs find it difficult to deal with somatising patients. Compared with the control doctors, intervention doctors' attitudes towards patients with somatoform disorders had changed significantly 12 months after training on the parameters enjoyment (P = 0.008) and anxiety (P = 0.002). Doctors also felt more comfortable in dealing with somatising patients in general (P = 0.002). Attitudes about other parameters related to the doctors feelings, aetiology and course of somatisation changed in the expected direction, but these changes were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A brief multifaceted training programme focussing on somatisation was accompanied by a significant change in GPs' attitude towards patients with somatoform disorders.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A brief case-finding questionnaire for common mental disorders: the CMDQ.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to validate a new case-finding instrument for common mental disorders (CMDQ). METHODS: A cross-sectional, stratified, two-phase study was carried out in 28 general practices in Aarhus County, Denmark. 1785 consecutive patients, 18-65 years old, consulting 38 GPs with a new health problem participated. Patients were screened before consultation using a one-page screening questionnaire including subscales for somatisation (SCL-SOM and Whiteley-7), anxiety (SCL-ANX4), depression (SCL-DEP6) and alcohol abuse (CAGE). A stratified subsample of 701 patients was interviewed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview. We tested the external validity of the scales using the SCAN interview as gold standard. All data were analysed using appropriate weighted procedures to control for the two-phase sampling design and non-response bias. RESULTS: Estimates of sensitivity and specificity for relevant ICD-10 diagnoses at theoretical optimal cut-off points on subscales: Depressive disorder: 78/86 (SCL-DEP6); Alcohol abuse or dependence: 78/97 (CAGE); Severe anxiety disorder: 77/85 (SCL-ANX4); Somatisation disorder: 83/56 (SCL-SOM); and 75/52 (Whiteley-7); any mental disorder: 72/72 (SCL-8). At the theoretical optimal cut-off points the CMDQ demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy than GPs on any diagnosis evaluated. CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that the CMDQ has excellent external validity for use as a diagnostic aid in primary care settings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Mental disorders in primary care: prevalence and co-morbidity among disorders. results from the functional illness in primary care (FIP) study.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence and co-occurrence of mental disorders is high among patients consulting their family general practitioner (GP) for a new health problem, but data on diagnostics and socio-demographics are sketchy. METHOD: A cross-sectional two-phase epidemiological study. A total of 1785 consecutive patients with new complaints, aged 18-65 years, consulting 28 family practices during March-April 2000 in Aarhus County, Denmark were screened, in the waiting room, for mental and somatic symptoms with SCL-8 and SCL-Somatization questionnaires, for illness worry with Whitely-7 and for alcohol dependency with CAGE. In a stratified random sample of 701 patients, physician interviewers established ICD-10 diagnoses using the SCAN interview. Prevalence was calculated using weighted logistic regression, thus correcting for sample skewness. RESULTS: Half of the patients fulfilled criteria for an ICD-10 mental disorders and a third of these for more than one group of disorders. Women had higher prevalence of somatization disorder and overall mental disorders than men. Men had higher prevalence of alcohol abuse and hypochondriasis than women. Psychiatric morbidity tended to increase with age. Prevalence of somatoform disorders was 35.9% (95% CI 30.4-41.9), anxiety disorders 164% (95% CI 12.7-20.9), mood disorders 13.5% (95% CI 11.1-16.3), organic mental disorders 3.1% (95% CI 1.6-5.7) and alcohol abuse 2.2% (95% CI 1.5-3.1). Co-morbidities between these groups were highest for anxiety disorders, where 89% also had another mental diagnosis, and lowest for somatoform disorders with 39%. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-10 mental disorders are very prevalent in primary care and there is a high co-occurrence between most disorders. Somatoform disorders, however, more often than not exist without other mental disorders.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Somatization, heartsink patients, or functional somatic symptoms? Towards a clinical useful classification in primary health care.

Several definitions of somatization exist and try to deal with the fundamental problem that a large group of patients present with physical symptoms for which a conventional pathology cannot be identified. However, the concept remains somewhat confusing. The prevalence of somatization is high in general practice. Nevertheless, patients do not receive proper treatment and risk iatrogenic somatic fixation and harm, the doctor-patient relationship is often negatively affected and the overall healthcare system suffers from high expenditure on unnecessary physical investigations and treatments. During the last decade research has shown that somatization may be treated effectively in specialist care. Little is known about effective treatment in primary care but the Reattribution Model and the Extended Reattribution and Management Model have shown promising results. The development and evaluation of new treatment strategies is, however, hampered by the confusion of definitions and concepts. In this article an overview is presented of the various concepts relevant to the clinical work and research in primary health care. It is important to realize that somatizing patients in primary health care present a broader spectrum of severity than patients seen in a specialist setting. Hence, primary care cannot apply definitions from specialist care directly but needs a definition that also includes the mild cases. We need classifications and agreed definitions applicable in primary health care in order to develop appropriate management strategies, to predict prognosis, and to enable rigorous research concerning the large group of somatizing patients in primary health care.

Concept Formation↗
PubMed2005

Classification of somatization and functional somatic symptoms in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: A substantial proportion of patients found in primary care complain of physical symptoms not attributable to any known conventionally defined disorder, that is, medically unexplained or functional somatic symptoms. The objective of this paper is to outline the problems with the current classification and propose a classification more suitable for primary health care. METHOD: We refer to and discuss relevant literature including papers on our own research on the topic in the light of our experiences from major projects on somatizing patients in primary health care. RESULTS: Functional somatic symptoms may impose severe suffering on the patient and are costly for society because of high health-care utilization, lost working years and social expenses. At present, studies on functional somatic symptoms and disorders and their treatment are hampered by lack of a valid and reliable diagnostic classification. The diagnostic categories of somatoform disorders are overlapping. Thus, the present situation is that patients with identical symptoms and clinical pictures may receive different diagnostic labels depending on the focus of interests of the assessing physician. A particular problem in primary care is that the somatoform diagnostic categories only include persistent cases and do not offer the opportunity for classification of the patients with short-symptom duration found in this setting. We present a framework for a new descriptive classification of functional somatic symptoms and unfounded illness worrying, and outline a new classification that covers the whole spectrum of severity seen in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: A precondition for an appropriate management of patients with functional somatic symptoms is a valid taxonomy common for all medical specialties facilitating cooperative care. Classification systems as outlined in this paper may be a candidate for such a system, but it should be subject to further evaluation in research.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Physical, mental and social factors associated with frequent attendance in Danish general practice. A population-based cross-sectional study.

Knowledge of which factors are prompting patients to seek primary care is important to the ongoing effort to improve management in general, and management of frequent attenders (FAs) in particular. We conducted a cross-sectional population-based study with the aim at examining associations between physical, mental and social factors and frequent attendance in general practice. We collected questionnaire and registry data in the County of Aarhus (630,000 inhabitants), Denmark. Half of the county general practices (132 practices, 220 GPs) were selected randomly. FAs were defined as the top 10% attenders over the past 12 months. A questionnaire including SF-36 and questions about physical and mental health and social conditions was sent to age and gender stratified samples of FAs and non-FAs from these practices. Impairments (SF-36) associated with frequent attendance were physical in 54-71% (prevalence difference (PD): 16-33%, adjusted prevalence ratio (adj. PR): 1.1-1.7), mental in 58-70% (PD: 17-25%, adj. PR:1.1-1.4) and social in 40-59% (PD: 13-28%, adj. PR:0.9-1.5). Among FAs, 46-88% had used three or more different drugs (PD: 26-39%, adj. PR:1.5-2.3) and 27-41% had been referred one or more times to outpatient specialists (PD: 4-19%, adj. PR:1.2-2.5). Although our data cannot determine the direction of causality, they clearly demonstrate that FAs carry a large burden of physical, mental and social impairments which underpins the complexity and heterogeneity of the problems which they present. The results make clear that biopsychosocial management is a core issue in FA management in general practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Detecting mental disorders in general hospitals by the SCL-8 scale.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to validate the eight-item dichotomised version of the Symptoms Check List (SCL-8d) as a screening tool for psychiatric disorders. METHODS: The study population included 198 consecutive new neurological inpatients and outpatients and 294 consecutive internal medical inpatients, aged 18 or older. All patients received the SCL-8d questionnaire, and a stratified subsample was interviewed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview. We tested the external SCL-8d validity using the SCAN interview as gold standard. The test was performed based on weighted data to correct for the skewness introduced by stratification. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of the SCL-8d was excellent in the internal medical setting but not quite as good in the neurological sample. It performed better among the older compared with the younger patients, whereas the scale was not affected by gender. In the combined sample at the cut point 0/1, the sensitivity (SE) of the SCL-8d was 0.73 (confidence interval [CI](95%): 0.60-0.82), the specificity (SP) 0.61 (CI(95%): 0.53-0.68) and the positive predictive value (PPV) 0.42 (CI(95%): 0.34-0.50), using any International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) psychiatric disorder, excluding somatoform and substance abuse disorders, as gold standard. The risk of a patient having a mental disorder (except phobia, substance abuse or somatoform disorder) was less than 6% in case of a negative screening test. In patients with a current depressive disorder, 87.1% (27/31) were screening positive, and all except 1 (93.0%) of the 14 patients with a modest to severe depression scored 1 or higher on the SCL-8d. All 17 patients with an anxiety disorder, excluding phobias, were screening positive. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that the SCL-8d is a valid, brief screening tool for use in nonpsychiatric medical settings, especially to detect emotional psychiatric disorders (EPDs).

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

A brief diagnostic screening instrument for mental disturbances in general medical wards.

OBJECTIVE: Mental illness is prevalent among general hospital ward patients but often goes unrecognised. The aim of this study was to validate the SCL-8d as a brief questionnaire for mental disturbances for use in general hospitals. METHODS: The study included 2040 patients, 18 years or older, consecutively admitted to 11 general internal medicine wards in seven European countries. All patients were screened on admission by means of the SCL-8d questionnaire. The psychometric performance (i.e., the internal validity) of the SCL-8d scale was tested using modern item response theory (IRT) in the form of the Rasch model. RESULTS: Differences between sample characteristics were considerable. Even so, the SCL-8d scale showed a remarkable, statistically significant fit in terms of internal homogeneity (P>.01) in all individual settings, except in Spain and Germany where the item "Everything is an effort" had to be excluded to obtain a fit. When pooling data from all centres, an excellent statistical significance of fit (P>.05) was obtained by exclusion of the "Effort" item. The scale was homogeneous as to gender (P>.05), but not age as it performed better among young patients than among patients older than 60 years (P<.01). In these two patient groups both internal and external homogeneity (gender, median age) was achieved. The SCL-8d sum score showed a marked correlation with current and previous treatment for mental illness. CONCLUSION: Apart from the "Effort" item ranking differently on the latent severity dimension as to age, the SCL-8d seems very robust from a psychometric point of view. Besides being short, the SCL-8d scale contains only emotional symptoms. It would therefore seem to be an excellent diagnostic tool for use in medical settings.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The prevalence of somatoform disorders among internal medical inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: To find the prevalence of somatoform disorders (SDs) among internal medical inpatients and to study the comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders. METHODS: Of 392 eligible consecutive medical inpatients, 294 (75%) accepted to participate and, using a two-phase design, were assessed for ICD and DSM-IV somatoform diagnoses and for ICD-10 psychiatric diagnoses. RESULTS: A total of 18.1% (95% CI: 12.8-24.9%) of the patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for an ICD-10 disorder, and 20.2% (95% CI:14.7-27.2% ) for a DSM-IV SD. The prevalence of specified disorders revealed marked differences between the two diagnostic systems, e.g., concerning somatisation disorder (SD), which was more prevalent in the ICD-10 (5%) than in the DSM-IV (1.5%) equivalent. Quite the contrary was found in undifferentiated SD (0.7% in ICD-10 and 10% in DSM-IV). According to ICD-10 criteria, 3.5% had hypochondriasis, 2.6% a dissociative disorder, 3.2% a somatoform autonomic dysfunction, 1.5% had neurasthenia or persistent somatoform pain disorder, and 5% had an SD, unspecified. SDs were more prevalent among younger females. Thirty-six percent of the patients with SDs also had another psychiatric disorder, 11% a depression, and 25% an anxiety disorder. The physicians detected about 1/3 of the cases. CONCLUSION: Somatoform disorders were prevalent among internal medical inpatients especially among younger women.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A new, empirically established hypochondriasis diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: The narrow ICD-10 and DSM-IV definition of hypochondriasis makes it rarely used yet does not prevent extensive diagnosis overlap. This study identified a distinct hypochondriasis symptom cluster and defined diagnostic criteria. METHOD: Consecutive patients (N=1,785) consulting primary care physicians for new illness were screened for somatization, anxiety, depression, and alcohol abuse. A stratified subgroup of 701 patients were interviewed with the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry and questions addressing common hypochondriasis symptoms. Symptom patterns were analyzed by latent class analysis. RESULTS: Patients fell into three classes based on six symptoms: preoccupation with the idea of harboring an illness or with bodily function, rumination about illness, suggestibility, unrealistic fear of infection, fascination with medical information, and fear of prescribed medication. All symptoms, particularly rumination, were frequent in one of the classes. Classification allowed definition of new diagnostic criteria for hypochondriasis and division of the cases into "mild" and "severe." The weighted prevalence of severe cases was 9.5% versus 5.8% for DSM-IV hypochondriasis. Compared with DSM-IV hypochondriasis, this approach produced less overlap with other somatoform disorders, similar overlap with nonsomatoform psychiatric disorders, and similar assessments by primary care physicians. Severe cases of the new hypochondriasis lasted 2 or more years in 54.3% of the subjects and 1 month or less in 27.2%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that rumination about illness plus at least one of five other symptoms form a distinct diagnostic entity performing better than the current DSM-IV hypochondriasis diagnosis. However, these criteria are preliminary, awaiting cross-validation in other subject groups.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Use of complementary therapy among internal medical inpatients. Prevalence, costs and association with mental disorders and physical diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of complementary therapy/medicine (CT) use among internal medical inpatients. Furthermore, to examine the association between the use of CT and (a) mental disorders, (b) physical diseases, and (c) use of health care. METHODS: A total of 294 consecutive medical inpatients were interviewed about their use of CT. A stratified subsample of 157 people was assessed for current mental disorders, using an extensive, standardized, semistructured interview (Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry version 2.1 [SCAN]). Health care use was assessed by use of national patient registers. RESULTS: There were 22.5% CT utilizers. More females than males used CT (P=.033). CT utilization was not associated with age, mental disorders, life-threatening or chronic physical diseases or with use of health care services. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CT is common among medical inpatients. More research is needed to understand why a significant proportion of patients seeks CT.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The FIP study: a randomised, controlled trial of screening and recognition of psychiatric disorders.

BACKGROUND: Research on questionnaires as screening tools for psychiatric disorders has yielded conflicting results. AIM: To examine the effect of a routinely administered questionnaire on recognition of common psychiatric disorders in general practice. DESIGN OF STUDY: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty-eight general practices in Aarhus County, Denmark. METHOD: Thirty-eight general practitioners (GPs) and 1785 consecutive patients, aged 18-65 years old, presenting with a new health problem, participated. Before consultation, patients were screened using a brief screening questionnaire (SQ) including somatisation, anxiety, depression, and alcohol abuse scales. Patients were randomised to one of two groups: 900 questionnaires were disclosed and scored by the GPs, 885 were blinded. A stratified subsample of 701 patients was interviewed after the consultation using a standardised psychiatric research interview (SCAN). RESULTS: Overall the GPs' recognition rates were 14% (95% confidence interval [CI] = -2 to 30) better for depression and 35% (95% CI = 2 to 68) better for alcohol problems when SQs were disclosed. Recognition rates for anxiety improved 8% (95% CI = -9 to 26) overall. In the case of somatoform disorders, disclosure showed no effect overall. Among those with high SQ scores, however, disclosure increased recognition rates on any mental disorder evaluated. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated limited usefulness for routine screening for common psychiatric disorders. However, findings suggest that the SQ may be useful for case-finding among a subgroup of patients with high SQ scores.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Diagnosis of somatisation: effect of an educational intervention in a cluster randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Somatisation is highly prevalent in primary care (present in 25% of visiting patients) but often goes unrecognised. Non-recognition may lead to ineffective treatment, risk of iatrogenic harm, and excessive use of healthcare services. AIM: To examine the effect of training on diagnosis of somatisation in routine clinical practice by general practitioners (GPs). DESIGN OF STUDY: Cluster randomised controlled trial, with practices as the randomisation unit. SETTING: Twenty-seven general practices (with a total of 43 GPs) in Vejle County, Denmark. METHOD: Intervention consisted of a multifaceted training programme (the TERM [The Extended Reattribution and Management] model). Patients were enrolled consecutively over a period of 13 working days. Psychiatric morbidity was assessed by means of a screening questionnaire. GPs categorised their diagnoses in another questionnaire. The primary outcome was GP diagnosis of somatisation and agreement with the screening questionnaire. RESULTS: GPs diagnosed somatisation less frequently than had previously been observed, but there was substantial variation between GPs. The difference between groups in the number of diagnoses of somatisation failed to reach the 5% significance (P = 0.094). However, the rate of diagnoses of medically unexplained physical symptoms was twice as high in the intervention group as in the control group (7.7% and 3.9%, respectively, P = 0.007). Examination of the agreement between GPs' diagnoses and the screening questionnaire revealed no significant difference between groups. CONCLUSION: Brief training increased GPs' awareness of medically unexplained physical symptoms. Diagnostic accuracy according to a screening questionnaire remained unaffected but was difficult to evaluate, as there is no agreement on a gold standard for somatisation in general practice.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Special status consultation for frequent attenders. Who are the candidates?

BACKGROUND: The need to optimize frequent attender (FA) care and to economize on scarce resources in primary care has given rise to calls for intervention. However, precise knowledge of the specifics of this need is scarce, as is knowledge of how best to orchestrate intervention vis-à-vis particular FA groups. The aim of the study was to analyse the need for a special FA status consultation and to analyse if such need springs from physical, mental or social factors among FAs. METHOD: Half of the 270 general practices in the County of Aarhus, Denmark, were randomly allocated to the study group (in total 132 practices; 220 general practitioners (GPs)). From these practices age- and gender-stratified samples of FAs were drawn. FAs were defined as the top 10 per cent attenders in 12 months. Questionnaires were used to elicit FA and GP attitudes to the introduction of a status consultation and to obtain GPs' evaluation of their FAs' physical, mental and social status. The special FA consultation was introduced as a reimbursed half-hour consultation where the FA and the GP could discuss the patient's current and future care status. RESULTS: Over three-quarters of the FAs would accept the offer to have the status consultation, and the GPs would recommend it for one-fourth of their FAs. The expressed need was highly associated with an expected positive effect on health (prevalence ratio (PR) for GPs: 11.7 (8.9-15.5), PR for FAs: 1.6 (1.5-1.8)) and a decrease in attendance (PR for FAs: 1.4 (1.3-1.5)). The GPs quoted physical, mental and social indications for the consultation. The FAs who had high levels of functional symptoms were most likely to accept the consultation. CONCLUSIONS: There was an expressed need for an FA status consultation, which may lead to a positive effect on health and attendance. The GPs pointed to physical, mental and social indicators for a special FA consultation.

Adult↗