Biomedical subjects

Peter A Fasching

Publications and source records attributed to Peter A Fasching.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical Relevance of Post-Treatment Circulating Tumor DNA Detection in Early Breast Cancer Using a Tissue-Free Epigenomic Assay: A 2-Year Landmark Analysis.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a biomarker to facilitate early identification of asymptomatic distant tumor spread in patients with breast cancer. The primary objective of this study was to assess clinical validity and prognostic value of post-treatment tissue-free ctDNA detection by evaluating its sensitivity for distant metastatic recurrence and its association with long-term outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Plasma samples were prospectively collected from patients with stage I-III early breast cancer who participated in the adjuvant SUCCESS-A phase III clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02181101). In this study, plasma samples collected approximately 2 years after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy from 313 SUCCESS A patients without evidence of prior disease recurrence were retrospectively analyzed using a tissue-free epigenomic ctDNA assay (Guardant Reveal). Survival analyses were performed using a landmark approach based on the time of sample collection. RESULTS: Overall, ctDNA was detected in 18 of 313 samples (5.8%). Of all ctDNA detected samples, 94% (17/18) were from patients who subsequently developed a distant recurrence, with ctDNA detected at a median interval of 7.9 months before recurrence. ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with a significantly shorter distant recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio [HR], 33.3 [95% CI, 4.12 to 268]; P < .0001) and poorer overall survival (HR, 27.3 [95% CI, 1.15 to 647]; P < .0001). The sensitivity for distant recurrence in patients who had a sample collected within 1 year before recurrence was 73% (11/15). The specificity in nonrecurred patients was 99.6% (267/268). CONCLUSION: Tissue-free detection of ctDNA 2 years after adjuvant chemotherapy was highly prognostic in an early-stage breast cancer cohort, and can be used to stratify patients with early-stage breast cancer at high risk for recurrence during follow-up who may benefit from early interventions.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab in participants in Asia with early triple-negative breast cancer: An updated subgroup analysis of the KEYNOTE-522 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), addition of perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). pCR and EFS results in participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population. We report OS, updated EFS, and safety outcomes in participants enrolled in Asia. METHODS: Participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, early-stage TNBC (T1c [N1‒N2] or T2‒T4 [N0‒N2] per AJCC 7th edition) were randomized 2:1 to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo plus chemotherapy. After definitive surgery, participants received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo for ≤9 cycles. Primary endpoints were pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and EFS. OS was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 1174 randomized participants, 216 were enrolled in Asia. At data cutoff (March 22, 2024), EFS events occurred in 18/136 participants (13.2%) in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy group versus 22/80 (27.5%) in the placebo + chemotherapy group (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23‒0.81]); 60-month EFS rates (95% CIs) were 87.4% (80.6%‒92.0%) and 72.1% (60.7%‒80.6%), respectively. In the respective groups, 12/136 (8.8%) and 16/80 participants (20.0%) died (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19‒0.86]); 60-month OS rates (95% CIs) were 91.9% (85.8%‒95.4%) and 81.1% (70.5%‒88.1%). Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 19/136 participants (14.0%) with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and 7/79 (8.9%) with placebo + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: OS and updated EFS outcomes in KEYNOTE-522 participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population and support use of perioperative pembrolizumab + neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard-of-care treatment in this setting.

Adjuvant↗

PubMed2026

Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide Followed by Docetaxel Versus an Anthracycline-Free Regimen With Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide-Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains an important side effect despite new antiemetic drugs. This study tried to understand the occurrence of CINV in patients receiving two different chemotherapy regimens. As part of the randomized controlled clinical trial SUCCESS C (NCT00847444), 1582 of the 3463 patients completed CINV diaries. Patients were randomized to receive either chemotherapy with FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) or TC (docetaxel, cyclophosphamide). CINV was evaluated hourly using a specially designed questionnaire. Endpoints of the study were complete response (no emesis) and total control (no nausea and no emesis) and were assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses over three chemotherapy cycles. Eight hundred fourteen patients received FEC and 768 received TC; patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients receiving FEC had significantly more nausea and vomiting, with the main difference in the first 12 h. In the first cycle, the 0-12-h nausea/emesis-free rates were 70%/41% for FEC and 91/76% for TC. By 24 h after chemotherapy, the rates were 65%/33% (FEC) and 85%/60% (TC). The differences were similar in cycles 2 and 3. The detailed analysis of CINV in the study is unique and paves the way for modern CINV analysis of new therapeutics such as antibody-drug conjugates.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Clinical and Molecular Evaluation of HER2-Low and HER2-Ultralow Breast Cancer in the Penelope-B Clinical Trial Cohort.

The DestinyBreast (DB)04 and DB06 trials have shown clinical activity of trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer. The identification of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer is therefore essential for personalized therapy with T-DXd. We evaluated 723 residual tumors from the Penelope-B trial (NCT01864746) and correlated different levels of HER2 protein expression with prognosis and messenger RNA (mRNA) profiles, including HER2 transcripts. In Penelope-B, 57.68% (n = 417) of 723 residual tumors were HER2 low. The HER2-ultralow category was assigned to 109 (15.08%) tumors, and 197 (27.25%) tumors were completely HER2 negative (HER2 0). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, there were no survival differences among these 3 subgroups. There was no significant difference in HER2 mRNA expression between HER2-0 and HER2-ultralow tumors (P = .08). In contrast, there was a highly significant difference in HER2 mRNA expression between HER2-ultralow and HER2-low tumors (P < .0001) and between HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors (P < .0001). The extracellular protease cathepsin L, which has been suggested as a biomarker for extracellular cleavage of T-DXd, was detectable in all HER2-related subgroups and was a negative prognostic factor for invasive disease-free survival and overall survival (P = .0001) in preneoadjuvant core biopsies. In our study, we were able to characterize HER2 low as a clinically relevant and molecular defined tumor group with significantly increased HER2 expression. In contrast, for HER2 ultralow, we did not observe a defined molecular phenotype, despite the clinically relevant regulatory approval of T-DXd also in the ultralow subgroup. Additional investigations are needed to identify biomarkers beyond HER2 for T-DXd response as a basis for refined criteria for treatment eligibility.

Adult↗

PubMed2025

A Swedish genome-wide haplotype association analysis identifies novel candidate loci associated with endometrial cancer risk.

Genome-wide association studies [GWAS] have identified a limited number of endometrial cancer risk loci by analyzing single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs]. We hypothesized that analyzing haplotypes rather than SNPs could provide novel and more detailed information on genetic cancer susceptibility loci. To examine the association of a SNP or haplotype with endometrial cancer risk we performed a two-stage haplotype GWAS. The discovery GWAS included a sub-cohort of 1,116 Swedish endometrial cancer cases and 5,021 controls from previously published GWAS data. A sliding window analysis was employed with window sizes of 1-25 SNPs using a logistic regression model. The Swedish haplotype analysis identified 15 novel candidate risk loci (2q31.1, 4p16.1, 4p15.31, 6q13, 7p21.1, 9p13.3, 10q26.3, 11q21, 12q13.11, 13q12.11, 15q13.3, 16q24.3, 19q13.32, 20p12.3 and 22q13.2) with OR ranging from 1.6 to 3.3 and p-values from 4.25 × 10-8 to 9.86 × 10-15. A second replication haplotype analysis of the Swedish novel loci was performed using two cohorts from Belgium and Germany. In spite of small sample sizes in the replication cohorts, there was still support for most loci with positive ORs. In addition, the findings in the two European cohorts motivates further studies to search for founder haplotypes. These novel findings suggested that endometrial cancer loci, identified through haplotype analysis, conferred a higher risk compared to previous single-variant GWAS.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Genome-Wide Association Analyses of HPV16 and HPV18 Seropositivity Identify Susceptibility Loci for Cervical Cancer.

Infection by high-risk human papillomavirus is known to exacerbate cervical cancer development. The host immune response is crucial in disease regression. Large-scale genetic association studies for cervical cancer have identified few susceptibility variants, mainly at the human leukocyte antigen locus on chromosome 6. We hypothesized that the host immune response modifies cervical cancer risk and performed three genome-wide association analyses for HPV16, HPV18 and HPV16/18 seropositivity in 7814, 7924, and 7924 samples from the UK Biobank, followed by validation genotyping in the German Cervigen case-control series of cervical cancer and dysplasia. In GWAS analyses, we identified two loci associated with HPV16 seropositivity (6p21.32 and 15q26.2), two loci associated with HPV18 seropositivity (5q31.2 and 14q24.3), and one locus for HPV16 and/or HPV18 seropositivity (at 6p21.32). MAGMA gene-based analysis identified HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 as genome-wide significant (GWS) genes. In validation genotyping, the genome-wide significant lead variant at 6p21.32, rs9272293 associated with overall cervical disease (OR = 0.86, p = 0.004, 95% CI = 0.78-0.95, n = 3710) and HPV16 positive invasive cancer (OR = 0.73, p = 0.005, 95% CI = 0.59-0.91, n = 1431). This variant was found to be a robust eQTL for HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQB1-AS1, C4B, HLA-DRB5, HLA-DRB6, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DPB1 in a series of cervical epithelial tissue samples. We additionally genotyped twenty-four HPV seropositivity variants below the GWS threshold out of which eleven variants were found to be associated with cervical disease in our cohort, suggesting that further seropositivity variants may determine cervical disease outcome. Our study identifies novel genomic risk loci that associate with HPV type-specific cervical cancer and dysplasia risk and provides evidence for candidate genes at one of the risk loci.

Humans↗