Biomedical subjects

Peter Bult

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Bult.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Risk factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastases in patients with breast cancer. The outcome of a multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: In this multi-institutional prospective study, we evaluated whether we could identify risk factors predictive for non-sentinel lymph node (non-SN) metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SN). METHODS: In this multi-institutional study, 541 eligible breast cancer patients were included prospectively. RESULTS: The occurrence of non-SN metastases was related to the size of the SN metastasis (P = .02), primary tumor size (P = .001), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .07). The adjusted odds ratio was 3.1 for SN micro-metastasis compared with SN isolated tumor cells, 4.0 for SN macro-metastasis versus SN isolated tumor cells, 3.1 for tumor size (>3.0 cm compared with </=3.0 cm), and 2.0 for lymphovascular invasion (yes versus no). There were no positive non-SNs when the primary tumor size was </=1.0 cm (n = 24) [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0%-14.0%]. The proportion of positive non-SNs ranged in a prognostic logistic regression model from 9.7% (95% CI 4.0%-23.0%) for patients with SN isolated tumor cells, tumor size of 1.1-3.0 cm, and without vessel invasion, to 72.6% (95% CI 47.0%-89.0%) for patients with SN macro-metastasis, tumor size >3.0 cm, and with vessel invasion. CONCLUSION: We identified three predictive factors for non-SN metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive SN: size of the SN metastasis; primary tumor size; and vessel invasion. We were not able to identify a specific group of patients with a positive SN in whom the risk for non-SN metastases was less than 5%.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Differences in sentinel lymph node pathology protocols lead to differences in surgical strategy in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Internationally, there is no consensus on the pathology protocol to be used to examine the sentinel lymph node (SN). At present, therefore, various hospitals use different SN pathology protocols of which the effect has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that differences between hospitals in SN pathology protocols affect subsequent surgical treatment strategies. METHODS: Patients from four hospitals (A-D) were prospectively registered when they underwent an SN biopsy. In hospitals A, B, and C, three levels of the SN were examined pathologically, whereas in hospital D, at least seven additional levels were examined. In the absence of apparent metastases with hematoxylin and eosin examination, immunohistochemical examination was performed in all four hospitals. RESULTS: In total, 541 eligible patients were included. In hospital D, more patients were diagnosed with a positive SN (P < .001) as compared with hospitals A, B, and C, mainly because of increased detection of isolated tumor cells. This led to more completion axillary lymph node dissections in hospital D (66.3% of patients (P < .0001), compared with 29.0% in hospitals A, B, and C combined). Positive non-SNs were detected in 13.9% of patients in hospital D, compared with 9.7% in hospitals A, B, and C (P = .70). That is, in 52.4% of patients in hospital D, a negative completion axillary lymph node dissection was performed, compared with 19.3% of patients in hospitals A, B, and C combined. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in SN pathology protocols between hospitals do have a substantial effect on SN findings and subsequent surgical treatment strategies. Whether ultrastaging and, thus, additional surgery can offer better survival remains to be determined.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

The value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and size assessment of in situ and small invasive breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis and size assessment of ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) and DCIS with small (<10 mm) invasive carcinoma was evaluated. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with DCIS and 12 patients with DCIS and small invasive carcinoma were included. Mammographic (N = 64) and MRI (N = 22) images were retrospectively reviewed. Correlation coefficients were calculated to assess differences in size between imaging and histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Mammographic rate of detection for DCIS was 48/52 (92%) and for DCIS with small invasive carcinoma, 10/12 (83%). MRI revealed 1 false negative case and the rate of detection for DCIS was 16/17 (94%). Correlation of mammographic size with histopathologic size was r = .44 (P < .01) and r = 0.49 (P = .03) for MRI. Mammography underestimated lesion size by 5 mm or more in 47%, whereas with MRI size was adequately assessed in 43% and overestimated in 38%. CONCLUSIONS: DCIS can be visualised on MRI with high sensitivity, although tumor size can be overestimated.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The role of MRI in invasive lobular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of MR imaging in the detection and measurement of tumor size in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) compared to mammography and ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 36 cases of ILC in 34 patients who were surgically treated, the pre-operative imaging measurements, being mammography, ultrasound and contrast enhanced MR, were retrospectively re-evaluated for tumor detection and size. Findings were compared with pathology. Two radiologists were used for evaluation of the mammograms, the other imaging modalities were only evaluated by one radiologist. The Pearsons correlation test was used to determine the correlation between histopathological and imaging measurements for each imaging modality. RESULTS: For mammography, ultrasound and MRI the false negative scores were respectively 14%, 3% and 0%. The percentage for underestimated, correctly estimated and overestimated measurements on imaging were 56%, 33% and 11% for radiologist 1 and 50%, 33% and 17% for radiologist 2 on mammography. For ultrasound and MRI these percentages were respectively 53%, 47%, 0% and 14%, 75%, 11%. The correlation coefficients for mammography were respectively r = 0.34 (p < 0.05) and r = 0.27 (p > 0.05) for both radiologists, for Ultrasound r = 0.24 (p > 0.05) and for MRI r = 0.81 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Of the three imaging modalities contrast enhanced MR has the lowest false negative rate in detecting ILC and has the highest accuracy in measuring the size of the ILC. MR could play a key role in the pre-operative work-up for accurate tumor size determination.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Stage migration in breast cancer: surgical decisions concerning isolated tumour cells and micro-metastases in the sentinel lymph node.

AIMS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy has replaced the axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in primary surgery for breast cancer in many hospitals and is expected to become the standard of care in due time. Since the sentinel lymph node is subjected to more extensive pathologic examination than the lymph nodes in the axillary dissection specimen, more patients are found to be node positive (N+); however many of them contain micro-metastases (<or=2mm). The consequence may be an overshoot of therapy: additional surgery for non-metastatic lymph nodes or systemic adjuvant therapy. METHODS: We examined 34 (out of a series of 38) clinically T1 (cT1) patients who had a SLN biopsy with or without ALND and compared them to a matched historical control group. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 34 (62%) patients showed tumour cells in their SLN's. From these 21 patients in 13 (62%) the SLNs contained isolated tumour cells, of which 10 (77%) were detected only by immunohistochemistry (IHC), in four (19%) the SLNs contained micrometastases, and in four (19%) macrometastases. From 16 patients with isolated tumour cells or micrometastases in the SLN who underwent a regular ALND one had an H&E detected isolated tumour cell in a non-SLN and one patient with isolated tumour cells in the SLN who did not get a regular ALND developed an axillary recurrence 11 months after the primary treatment. On the other hand, three of four (75%) patients with macrometastases in the SLN had pathologically involved non-SLNs. In the majority (70%) of patients of the historical control group no lymph node involvement was seen. The percentage of macrometastases staged as lymph node positive in the control group was the same as in the studied group. CONCLUSION: Most patients with cT1 breast cancer with isolated tumour cells or micrometastases in the SLN will not benefit from additional axillary dissection; 88% had a negative ALND. Since we cannot select the group that will benefit from ALND, this is still indicated in case of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases in the SLN. Since most of the affected SLNs show isolated tumour cells and are classified as pN0(i+), stage migration due to more meticulous pathologic examination does not occur according to the TNM classification. However some patients do not benefit from the introduction of the SLN, due to the high incidence of isolated tumour cells or micrometastases in the SLN. Many more patients than expected still end up with an ALND.

Axilla↗