Biomedical subjects

Peter C Gay

Publications and source records attributed to Peter C Gay.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Treatment of complex sleep apnea syndrome: a retrospective comparative review.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Some patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) develop problematic central apneas or Cheyne-Stokes pattern with acute application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), herein called complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS). This response makes it difficult to be certain that CPAP will be a successful treatment strategy. We sought to compare treatments between patients with CompSAS vs. OSAS and hypothesized that CompSAS patients would find CPAP less effective and have more problems with adherence than patients with OSAS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients studied in our sleep disorders center over 1 month. RESULTS: There were 133 patients with OSAS (mean age=57.6+/-12.2 years; males=63.9%) and 34 with CompSAS (mean age=54.4+/-16 years; males=82.35%). CPAP was prescribed in 93.7 and 87.9% of OSAS and CompSAS patients, respectively (P=0.284), with no significant difference in required CPAP pressures (P=0.112). There was no difference in prescription frequency of alternative therapies. Mean time to the first follow-up was shorter in CompSAS patients (46.2+/-47.3 vs. 53.8+/-36.8 days; P=0.022). CPAP compliance in OSAS and CompSAS patients (5.1+/-1.6 vs. 6.1+/-1.5h, P=0.156) and improvement in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) (-4.6+/-4.8 vs. -5.9+/-6.9, P=0.483) was similar. However, interface problems were more common in CompSAS patients, especially air hunger/dyspnea (0.8 vs. 8.8%) and inadvertent mask removal (2.6 vs. 17.7%) (all P<0.050). CONCLUSION: CompSAS patients have more CPAP interface problems and require more follow-up than OSAS patients but with intervention may have similar treatment results compared to patients with OSAS.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

PubMed2006

Failure of non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute lung injury: observational cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The role of non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) is controversial. We sought to assess the outcome of ALI that was initially treated with NIPPV and to identify specific risk factors for NIPPV failure. METHODS: In this observational cohort study at the two intensive care units of a tertiary center, we identified consecutive patients with ALI who were initially treated with NIPPV. Data on demographics, APACHE III scores, degree of hypoxemia, ALI risk factors and NIPPV respiratory parameters were recorded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for NIPPV failure. RESULTS: Of 79 consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria, 23 were excluded because of a do not resuscitate order and two did not give research authorization. Of the remaining 54 patients, 38 (70.3%) failed NIPPV, among them all 19 patients with shock. In a stepwise logistic regression restricted to patients without shock, metabolic acidosis (odds ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 0.07 per unit of base deficit) and severe hypoxemia (odds ratio 1.03, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.05 per unit decrease in ratio of arterial partial pressure of O2 and inspired O2 concentration--PaO2/FiO2) predicted NIPPV failure. In patients who failed NIPPV, the observed mortality was higher than APACHE predicted mortality (68% versus 39%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: NIPPV should be tried very cautiously or not at all in patients with ALI who have shock, metabolic acidosis or profound hypoxemia.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the intensive care unit: a concise review.

OBJECTIVE: To critically assess available high-level clinical studies regarding use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in varied intensive care unit settings. DATA SOURCE: Search of pertinent articles within Ovid MEDLINE from 1975 to 2005, CINAHL from 1982 to 2005, EMBASE from 1988 to 2005, and Web of Science from 1993 to 2005. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies and observational studies the authors consider important or novel. DATA EXTRACTION/SYNTHESIS: Performed equally by both authors with the use of an Excel data spreadsheet. CONCLUSION: There is abundant level I evidence supporting the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in such critical care settings as acute hypercapnic respiratory failure, particularly related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. We also report on other clinical scenarios in which the data may be somewhat less compelling, but evidence favors a noninvasive positive pressure ventilation trial. Some well designed studies suggest that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation is not an appropriate intervention for patients who have failed endotracheal extubation.

Critical Care↗

PubMed2004

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and sleep.

The control of breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) follows the same basic principles as in normal subjects, both awake and asleep, with an expected lower feedback response during sleep. This impacts nocturnal gas exchange and sleep quality most profoundly in patients with more severe COPD, as multiple factors come into play. Hypoventilation causes the most important gas-exchange alteration in COPD patients, leading to hypercapnia and hypoxemia, especially during rapid-eye-movement sleep, when marked respiratory muscle atonia occurs. The hypoxia leads to increased arousals, sleep disruption, pulmonary hypertension, and higher mortality. The primary mechanisms for this include decreased ventilatory responsiveness to hypercapnia, reduced respiratory muscle output, and marked increases in upper airway resistance. In the presence of more profound daytime hypercapnia, polysomnography should be considered (over nocturnal pulse oximetry) to rule out other co-existing sleep-related breathing disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea (overlap syndrome) and obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Present consensus guidelines provide insight into the proper use of oxygen, continuous positive airway pressure, and nocturnal noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for those conditions, but several issues remain contentious. In order to provide optimal therapy to patients, the clinician must take into account certain reimbursement and implementation-process obstacles and the guidelines for treatment and coverage criteria.

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed2003

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing continuous positive airway pressure with a novel bilevel pressure system for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To obtain efficacy, objective compliance, and self-assessment data from obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or a novel bilevel (NBL) therapy. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING: Home treatment after diagnosis and titration by split-night polysomnography (PSG) in a sleep laboratory. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven adults (22 men) newly referred for suspected OSAS but without concomitant medical or sleep disorders. INTERVENTIONS: If the subject's apnea-hypopnea index was greater than 10 and less than 100, the CPAP was titrated during PSG and then followed by NBL titration. Treatment was randomly and blindly set to either CPAP or NBL mode for 1 month. MEASUREMENTS & RESULTS: There were no significant baseline group differences in age, body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index (mean +/- SD, CPAP group vs NBL group of 46.1 +/- 23.1/hour vs 41.8 +/- 25.8), CPAP requirement, or scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire. Treatment with CPAP and NBL equivalently reduced the apnea-hypopnea index during the laboratory titration (7.6 +/- 11.9/hour vs. 3.7 +/- 4.4, respectively). At 1 month, there were no significant group compliance differences as determined by percentage of nights with at least 4 hours of use (CPAP, 80.5 +/- 24 vs NBL, 77.6 +/- 24.8) and hours of use per night (CPAP, 5.6 +/- 1.4 hours/night vs NBL, 5.6 +/- 1.7). Similar improvements were seen in scores on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The NBL appeared to be as effective as CPAP for the treatment of OSAS but offered no advantages in patients receiving first-time therapy for OSAS.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

A meta-analysis of nocturnal noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with stable COPD.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The potential benefits of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for patients with COPD remains inconclusive, as most studies have included only a small number of patients. We therefore undertook a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared nocturnal NIPPV with conventional management in patients with COPD and stable respiratory failure. DESIGN: RCTs were identified from several sources, such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL. In addition, records were identified through hand searching of abstracts from meetings of the American Thoracic Society, the American College of Chest Physicians, and the European Respiratory Society. PATIENTS: Patients with COPD according to the definition of the American Thoracic Society. INTERVENTIONS: NIPPV applied via a nasal or facemask for at least 5 h/d for at least 3 weeks. Patients in the actively treated group continued to receive the usual management for COPD. The control group received the same management as the study group but did not receive NIPPV. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: PaCO(2), PaO(2), 6-min walking distance (6MWD), respiratory muscle function, FEV(1), vital capacity, and sleep efficiency (time asleep as a percentage of total time in bed) were used as outcome measures. The publications were reduced to 10 potentially eligible articles from 164 publications retrieved from computer searches and 8 further abstracts. Four trials were finally included in the meta-analysis. The only outcome for which the confidence intervals excluded zero was maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax). The confidence intervals for the other outcomes included zero. The mean treatment effects for FEV(1) and PImax were small, whereas it was moderate for the 6MWD. Small negative effects were found for the outcomes of vital capacity, PaCO(2), and sleep efficiency. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 3 months of NIPPV in patients with stable COPD showed that ventilatory support did not improve lung function, gas exchange, or sleep efficiency. The high upper limit of the confidence interval for the 6MWD suggested that some people do improve their walking distance. The small overall sample size precluded a clear clinical direction regarding the effects of NIPPV in patients with COPD.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is characterized by repetitive episodes of airflow reduction (hypopnea) or cessation (apnea) due to upper airway collapse during sleep. Increasing recognition and a greater understanding of the scope of this condition have substantially affected the practices of many clinicians. This review provides practical information for physicians assessing patients with OSAHS. It discusses complications, clinical recognition, the polysomnographic report, and treatment of OSAHS, including strategies for troubleshooting problems associated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

Humans↗

PubMed2002

Respiratory complications of poliomyelitis and multiple sclerosis.

Years after suffering from poliomyelitis and completely recuperating from any of its acute complications, patients can develop postpolio syndrome (PPS), thought to be caused by progressive neuronal loss. The symptoms and manifestations of PPS vary in intensity and distribution, but many patients have respiratory involvement and will require a pulmonary evaluation for new or increased dyspnea, fatigue, or symptoms suggestive of sleep-related disordered breathing. The diagnosis, evaluation, and management of this complex problem are discussed in the first part of this article. In the second part, pulmonary complications of multiple sclerosis are described. This common neurological disease affects young adults and often requires evaluation by a pulmonologist. This review centers on the acute respiratory manifestations of multiple sclerosis and also describes the chronic effects.

Journal Article↗