PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter G Lord

Publications and source records attributed to Peter G Lord.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Predictive toxicogenomics approaches reveal underlying molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenicity.

Toxicogenomics technology defines toxicity gene expression signatures for early predictions and hypotheses generation for mechanistic studies, which are important approaches for evaluating toxicity of drug candidate compounds. A large gene expression database built using cDNA microarrays and liver samples treated with over one hundred paradigm compounds was mined to determine gene expression signatures for nongenotoxic carcinogens (NGTCs). Data were obtained from male rats treated for 24 h. Training/testing sets of 24 NGTCs and 28 noncarcinogens were used to select genes. A semiexhaustive, nonredundant gene selection algorithm yielded six genes (nuclear transport factor 2, NUTF2; progesterone receptor membrane component 1, Pgrmc1; liver uridine diphosphate glucuronyltransferase, phenobarbital-inducible form, UDPGTr2; metallothionein 1A, MT1A; suppressor of lin-12 homolog, Sel1h; and methionine adenosyltransferase 1, alpha, Mat1a), which identified NGTCs with 88.5% prediction accuracy estimated by cross-validation. This six genes signature set also predicted NGTCs with 84% accuracy when samples were hybridized to commercially available CodeLink oligo-based microarrays. To unveil molecular mechanisms of nongenotoxic carcinogenesis, 125 differentially expressed genes (P<0.01) were selected by Student's t-test. These genes appear biologically relevant, of 71 well-annotated genes from these 125 genes, 62 were overrepresented in five biochemical pathway networks (most linked to cancer), and all of these networks were linked by one gene, c-myc. Gene expression profiling at early time points accurately predicts NGTC potential of compounds, and the same data can be mined effectively for other toxicity signatures. Predictive genes confirm prior work and suggest pathways critical for early stages of carcinogenesis.

Animals↗

Application of genomics in preclinical drug safety evaluation.

Understanding the response of biological systems to xenobiotics is fundamental to the evaluation of drug safety. Toxicologists have traditionally gathered pathological, morphological, chemical and biochemical information from in vivo studies of preclinical species in order to assess drug safety and to determine how new drugs can be safely administered to the human patient population. In recent years the emerging "-omics" technologies have been developed and integrated into preclinical studies in order to better assess drug safety by gaining information on the cellular and molecular events underlying adverse drug reactions. Genomics approaches in particular have become readily available and are being applied in several stages of drug development. The burgeoning literature on what has become known as "toxicogenomics" has for the most part highlighted successful applications of gene expression profiling in predictive toxicology, enabling decisions to be made on the developability of a compound early in the drug development process. It is also becoming apparent that toxicogenomic approaches are good starting points to develop experiments designed to gain a mechanistic insight into drug toxicities within and across species. Gene expression arrays permit the measurement of responses of essentially all the genes in the entire genome to be monitored, and knowledge of the function of the genes affected can identify the potential mechanisms to then be confirmed using conventional biochemical, toxicological and pathological approaches. As toxicologists put these technologies into practice they build up a knowledge base to better characterize toxicities at the molecular level and to make the search for much needed, novel biomarkers of toxicity more achievable.

Drug Evaluation, Preclinical↗

Progress in applying genomics in drug development.

Genomics has had an impact on two areas of drug development, "predictive" toxicology and mechanism-based risk assessment. Predictive toxicology studies are aimed at identifying the potential for a compound to be toxic. By developing databases of expression profiles for a wide variety of toxic compounds and toxic models it has been possible to create statistical and computational methods which provide an indication of the toxic potential of a drug from the pattern of gene expression changes it elicits in in vitro or in vivo systems. Because gene expression is central to many responses to xenobiotics, genomic approaches lend themselves very readily to mechanistic toxicology studies. By examining changes in gene expression in cells and tissues in response to drugs it is possible to generate hypotheses as to the underlying mechanism and in some cases it is possible to evaluate hypotheses of toxic mechanism. Some concerns remain about the use of the technology but toxicogenomics can no longer be regarded as "new" technology in drug development. The investments made in applying the technology are maturing and there is a determined effort to bring the full power of the technology into drug development.

Animals↗

Gene expression changes in rat liver following exposure to liver growth agents: role of Kupffer cells in xenobiotic-mediated liver growth.

Many xenobiotics are known to cause liver enlargement and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats, although the molecular mechanisms that underlie this effect remain largely undefined. Human exposure to several of these compounds, including glucocorticoids and peroxisome proliferators may be significant, due to their use in both pharmaceutical and industrial processes. It is therefore important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying this abnormal liver enlargement in rats, as this will enable more accurate extrapolation of the possible outcomes of human exposure. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were dosed with the peroxisome proliferator Wy-14,643 and changes in liver gene expression examined using subtractive suppression hybridisation examined either 12 of 24hr later. Twenty-five transcripts were identified which showed differential gene expression in liver following exposure to Wy-14,643. Biochemical indices of liver growth (DNA synthesis, apoptosis) showed that these changes correlated with the initiation of liver enlargement. Rats were next treated with either Wy-14,643, cyproterone acetate and dexamethasone, chemically and mechanistically-distinct hepatomegalic compounds. Carboxylesterase and Kupffer cell receptor mRNA levels were seen to alter in a qualitatively similar fashion for all three compounds, and in a liver specific fashion. In addition, these changes correlated with a decrease in the density of Kupffer cells within the liver, which are known to release mitogenic cytokines, and have been linked to Wy-14,643-induced cell proliferation. We therefore propose that Kupffer cells play a role in a general mechanism of xenobiotic-mediated liver enlargement.

Animals↗

Toxicogenomics in risk assessment: an overview of an HESI collaborative research program.

The value of genomic approaches in hypothesis generation is being realized as a tool for understanding toxicity and consequently contributing to an assessment of drug and chemical safety. In 1999 the membership of the International Life Sciences Institute Health and Environmental Sciences Institute formed a committee to develop a collaborative scientific program to address issues, challenges, and opportunities afforded by the emerging field of toxicogenomics. Experts and advisors from academia and government laboratories participate on the committee, along with approximately 30 corporate member organizations from the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, chemical, and consumer products industries. The committee has designed, conducted, and analyzed numerous toxicogenomic experiments within the broad fields of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and genotoxicity. The considerable body of data generated by these programs has been instrumental in increasing understanding of sources of biological and technical variability in the alignment of toxicant-induced transcription changes with the accepted mechanism of action of these agents and the challenges in the consistent analysis and sharing of the voluminous data sets generated by these approaches. Recognizing the importance of standardized microarray data formats and public repository databases as the mechanism by which microarray data can be compared and interpreted by the scientific community, the committee has partnered with the European Bioinformatics Institute to develop a database to house the data generated by its collaborative research.

Gene Expression Profiling↗

Protein expression changes in the Sprague Dawley rat liver proteome following administration of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha and gamma ligands.

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily and are intimately involved in lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis. Activation of these receptors in rodents can lead to hepatomegaly and ultimately hepatic carcinogenesis although the mechanisms by which these processes occur are poorly understood. To further our understanding of these processes and to discriminate between different PPAR mediated signalling pathways, a proteomic approach has been undertaken to identify changes in protein expression patterns in Sprague Dawley rat liver following dosing with a PPARalpha agonist (Wyeth 14643), a PPARgamma agonist (Troglitazone) and a compound with mixed PPARalpha/gamma agonist activity (SB-219994). Using one-and-two-dimensional electrophoresis of tissue lysates a diverse range of protein abundance changes was observed in these tissues. Whilst a number of these proteins have PPAR response elements (PPREs) in their respective promoters, another group was detected whose expression has been documented to be sensitive to peroxisome proliferator administration. Most notably within these groups, proteins involved in lipid catabolism displayed increased expression following drug administration. A further subset of proteins, with less obvious biological implications, also showed altered expression patterns. Where available, sequences upstream of the coding regions of genes not previously known to have PPREs were searched with positional consensus matrices for the presence of PPREs in an attempt to validate these changes. Using such an approach putative PPARgamma and PPARdelta response elements were discovered upstream of the tubulin beta coding region. There was limited overlap in observed protein abundance changes between the three groups, and where this was the case (cytosolic epoxide hydrolase, peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme, hydroxymethyl glutaryl CoA, synthase, long chain acyl-CoA thioesterase), expression of these proteins had previously been shown to be under the control of PPAR activity.

Animals↗

Protein expression analysis of drug-mediated hepatotoxicity in the Sprague-Dawley rat.

This study has investigated the protein changes in rat liver elicited by a group of model hepatotoxicants, methapyrilene, cyproterone acetate and dexamethasone and offers a compelling argument in support of the use of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry for the identification of compound specific biomarkers. The different treatments caused distinct changes to the rat liver proteome. Many of the protein changes could be associated with the known pharmacological and toxicological mechanisms of action of these drugs, whereas for other proteins, the rationale behind the alterations was less obvious. Furthermore, these changes can be used to classify the treatments with a view to utilising them as 'molecular signatures' to further our understanding of less well studied drugs such as SKF-106686 (an adrenoreceptor agonist). This approach has the potential for opening up new avenues for the exploration of molecular mechanisms of toxicity. This paper has explored the feasibility of proteomics to provide valuable information on the biochemical consequences elicited by hepatototoxic drugs.

Animals↗