PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter G Michaelson

Publications and source records attributed to Peter G Michaelson.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Validations of a portable home sleep study with twelve-lead polysomnography: comparisons and insights into a variable gold standard.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate and timely diagnosis for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is imperative. Unfortunately, growing interest in this diagnosis has resulted in increased requests and waiting times for polysomnography (PSG), as well as a potential delay in diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluated the accuracy and viability of utilizing SNAP (SNAP Laboratories, LLC, Wheeling, Illinois), a portable home sleep test, as an alternative to traditional PSG in diagnosing OSA. METHODS: This prospective clinical trial included 59 patients evaluated at our institution's sleep laboratory. Concurrent PSG and SNAP testing was performed for 1 night on each patient. Independent, blinded readers at our institution and at an outside-accredited institution read the PSG data, and 2 independent, blinded readers interpreted the SNAP data at SNAP laboratories. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was used to compare the 2 testing modalities. The correlation coefficient, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and the Bland-Altman curves, as well as sensitivity, specificity, inter-reader variability, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, were used to compare SNAP and PSG. RESULTS: There is a definitive, statistically sound correlation between the AHIs determined from both PSG and SNAP. This relationship holds true for all measures of comparison, while displaying a concerning, weaker correlation between the different PSG interpretations. CONCLUSIONS: There is a convincing correlation between the study-determined AHIs of both PSG and SNAP. This finding supports SNAP as a suitable alternative to PSG in identifying OSA, while accentuating the inherent variation present in a PSG-derived AHI. This test expands the diagnostic and therapeutic prowess of the practicing otolaryngologist by offering an alternative OSA testing modality that is associated with not only less expense, decreased waiting time, and increased convenience, but also statistically proven accuracy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

West Nile virus: a primer for the otolaryngologist.

BACKGROUND: Since recognition in the United States with a 1999 New York City epidemic, West Nile virus has enduringly migrated westward, leaving few states unaffected. Infection rates are rising at an alarming rate, doubling every year since introduction, with more than 9800 cases in 2003 alone and more than 260 deaths. Patients may present with myriad symptoms including a maculopapular rash that affects the face and trunk and diffuse lymphadenopathy, both of which may result in the initial consultation of the otolaryngologist. We review the clinical history of West Nile virus and its epidemiology, laboratory findings, and variable clinical presentation, with an emphasis on otolaryngologic manifestations. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING COMPREHENSIVE: review of the literature over the past 50 years with an emphasis on what the present-day otolaryngologist needs to know concerning West Nile virus. Clinical manifestations of the head and neck such as encephalitis, meningitis, maculopapular rash, lymphadenopathy and dysphagia are discussed. RESULTS: To date, there are no articles in the otolaryngology literature discussing West Nile virus. These patients may present initially to multiple providers in diverse specialties because of multifarious initial signs and symptoms. The otolaryngologist must be educated on this quickly growing affliction and practice with a high index of suspicion. CONCLUSIONS: In this article we describe the clinical manifestations of West Nile virus, with an emphasis on the otolaryngologic manifestations. The otolaryngologist must become educated about this entity to facilitate preventative measures, adequately treat, and assist other providers in hopeful control and potential eradication of this infectious threat.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Seldinger-assisted videotelescopic intubation (SAVI): a common sense approach to the difficult pediatric airway.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the Seldinger-assisted videotelescopic intubation (SAVI) technique, a complementary method for aiding in difficult pediatric intubations that uses common equipment available to the practicing otolaryngologist. STUDY DESIGN: Technique description. METHODS: Detailed description of technique for use of a pediatric laryngoscope with video-assisted endotracheal tube (ETT) covered rigid tracheoscopy controlled intubation in difficult pediatric airways. RESULTS: In our practice, SAVI is vital in establishing a secure airway in the difficult-to-intubate child. After insertion of a laryngoscope, an appropriate sized endotracheal tube is delivered through the glottis under direct video-visualization from a rigid telescope using a variation of the well-established Seldinger technique. The telescope serves as the stable ETT stylet that also provides panoramic visualization. The ETT slides over the telescope to provide a secure airway directly visible to all in the operating room. Benefits of the SAVI technique to previously described video-assisted intubations with flexible or specially designed endoscope devices include decreased cost, employment of previously existing endoscopy skills, the benefit of rigid delivery of the endotracheal tube as well as innate versatility to a multitude of clinical situations. CONCLUSIONS: The SAVI technique offers an additional practical clinical solution to the difficult pediatric airway. Although ultimately establishing the airway depends on the skills of the operator, the SAVI technique has saved multiple lives by using common equipment through a common-sense approach. EBM RATING: D.

Child↗
PubMed2004

Popular snore aids: do they work?

OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to critically evaluate 3 popular noninvasive treatments for snoring: an oral spray lubricant applied before bedtime, a nasal strip designed to maintain nasal valve patency, and a head-positioning pillow. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized blinded clinical trial of 3 popular noninvasive snore aids using objective acoustic snoring analysis and subjective patient and bed-partner questionnaires in 40 snoring patients. A digital recorder allowed snoring analysis with data collected in the home environment over 1 week. RESULTS: There is neither objective nor subjective benefit to the use of tested popular noninvasive snore aids. Palatal snoring, palatal loudness, average loudness of snoring, averaged palatal flutter frequency, and respiratory disturbance index did not significantly change when comparing the 3 snoring aids with no treatment. Subjective comments and complications are reviewed as well. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective comparison trial of popular noninvasive snoring aids. There is no significant objective or subjective snoring improvement in the anti-snoring aids studied compared with the use of no aid. SIGNIFICANCE: Outcome studies aid in verifying or refuting claims made by popular noninvasive snore aids.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Primary branchiogenic carcinoma: the confusion continues.

As in many specialties, otolaryngology is not without diagnosis surrounded by controversy. This report discusses the entity known as the primary branchial cleft carcinoma, which has been argued by some to be no more than metastatic disease of the unknown primary. Although the disease is rare, the consideration of this diagnosis requires careful thought and analysis by the otolaryngologist, pathologist, and radiation oncologist so that a rational treatment plan can be offered to the patient.

Branchioma↗