PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Gerner

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Gerner.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Inhibition of Nav1.7 and Nav1.4 sodium channels by trifluoperazine involves the local anesthetic receptor.

The calmodulin (CaM) inhibitor trifluoperazine (TFP) can produce analgesia when given intrathecally to rats; however, the mechanism is not known. We asked whether TFP could modulate the Na(v)1.7 sodium channel, which is highly expressed in the peripheral nervous system and plays an important role in nociception. We show that 500 nM and 2 muM TFP induce major decreases in Na(v)1.7 and Na(v)1.4 current amplitudes and that 2 muM TFP causes hyperpolarizing shifts in the steady-state inactivation of Na(v)1.7 and Na(v)1.4. CaM can bind to the C-termini of voltage-gated sodium channels and modulate their functional properties; therefore we investigated if TFP modulation of sodium channels was due to CaM inhibition. However, the TFP inhibition was not replicated by whole cell dialysis of a calmodulin inhibitory peptide, indicating that major effects of TFP do not involve a disruption of CaM-channel interactions. Rather, our data show that TFP inhibition is state dependent and that the majority of the TFP inhibition depends on specific amino-acid residues in the local anesthetic receptor site in sodium channels. TFP was also effective in vivo in causing motor and sensory blockade after subfascial injection to the rat sciatic nerve. The state-dependent block of Na(v)1.7 channels with nanomolar concentrations of TFP raises the possibility that TFP, or TFP analogues, might be useful for regional anesthesia and pain management and could be more potent than traditional local anesthetics.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed2006

The role of sodium channels in chronic inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

UNLABELLED: Clinical and experimental data indicate that changes in the expression of voltage-gated sodium channels play a key role in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain and that drugs that block these channels are potentially therapeutic. Clinical and experimental data also suggest that changes in voltage-gated sodium channels may play a role in inflammatory pain, and here too sodium-channel blockers may have therapeutic potential. The sodium-channel blockers of interest include local anesthetics, used at doses far below those that block nerve impulse propagation, and tricyclic antidepressants, whose analgesic effects may at least partly be due to blockade of sodium channels. Recent data show that local anesthetics may have pain-relieving actions via targets other than sodium channels, including neuronal G protein-coupled receptors and binding sites on immune cells. Some of these actions occur with nanomolar drug concentrations, and some are detected only with relatively long-term drug exposure. There are 9 isoforms of the voltage-gated sodium channel alpha-subunit, and several of the isoforms that are implicated in neuropathic and inflammatory pain states are expressed by somatosensory primary afferent neurons but not by skeletal or cardiovascular muscle. This restricted expression raises the possibility that isoform-specific drugs might be analgesic and lacking the cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity that limit the use of current sodium-channel blockers. PERSPECTIVE: Changes in the expression of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels may play a key role in the pathogenesis of both chronic neuropathic and chronic inflammatory pain conditions. Drugs that block these channels may have therapeutic efficacy with doses that are far below those that impair nerve impulse propagation or cardiovascular function.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2006

Mitigation of direct neurotoxic effects of lidocaine and amitriptyline by inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in vitro and in vivo.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic-induced direct neurotoxicity (paresthesia, failure to regain normal sensory and motor function) is a potentially devastating complication of regional anesthesia. Local anesthetics activate the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) system, which is involved in apoptotic cell death. The authors therefore investigated in vitro (cultured primary sensory neurons) and in vivo (sciatic nerve block model) the potential neuroprotective effect of the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 administered together with a clinical (lidocaine) or investigational (amitriptyline) local anesthetic. METHODS: Cell survival and mitochondrial depolarization as marker of apoptotic cell death was assessed in rat dorsal root ganglia incubated with lidocaine or amitriptyline either with or without the addition of SB203580. Similarly, in a sciatic nerve block model, the authors assessed wallerian degeneration by light microscopy to detect a potential mitigating effect of MAPK inhibition. RESULTS: Lidocaine at 40 mm/approximately 1% and amitriptyline at 100 microm reduce neuron count, but coincubation with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 at 10 mum significantly reduces cytotoxicity and the number of neurons exhibiting mitochondrial depolarization. Also, wallerian degeneration and demyelination induced by lidocaine (600 mm/approximately 15%) and amitriptyline (10 mm/approximately 0.3%) seem to be mitigated by SB203580. CONCLUSIONS: The cytotoxic effect of lidocaine and amitriptyline in cultured dorsal root ganglia cells and the nerve degeneration in the rat sciatic nerve model seem, at least in part, to be mediated by apoptosis but seem efficiently blocked by an inhibitor of p38 MAPK, making it conceivable that coinjection might be useful in preventing local anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2006

Neurotoxicity of lidocaine involves specific activation of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, but not extracellular signal-regulated or c-jun N-terminal kinases, and is mediated by arachidonic acid metabolites.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic inhibition of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) leads to a reduction in lidocaine neurotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. The current study investigated in vitro the hypotheses that lidocaine neurotoxicity is specific for dorsal root ganglion cells of different size or phenotype, involves time-dependent and specific activation of the p38 MAPK, that p38 MAPK inhibitors are only effective if applied with local anesthetic, and that p38 MAPK activation triggers activation of lipoxygenase pathways. METHODS: The authors used primary sensory neuron cultures and pheochromocytoma cell line cultures to detect time-dependent activation of the p38 MAPK or related pathways such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases and c-jun N-terminal kinases. Cells were divided by size or by immunoreactivity for calcitonin gene-related peptide or isolectin B4, indicative of nociceptive phenotype. The authors also investigated whether arachidonic acid pathways represent a downstream effector of the p38 MAPK in local anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity. RESULTS: All types of dorsal root ganglion cells were subject to neurotoxic effects of lidocaine, which were mediated by specific activation of the p38 MAPK but not extracellular signal-regulated kinases or c-jun N-terminal kinases. Neuroprotective efficacy of p38 MAPK inhibitors declined significantly when administered more than 1 h after lidocaine exposure. Activation of p38 MAPK preceded activation of arachidonic acid pathways. Neurotoxicity of lidocaine, specific activation of p38 MAPK, and neuroprotective effects of a p38 MAPK inhibitor were further confirmed in pheochromocytoma cell line cultures. CONCLUSIONS: Specific and time-dependent activation of the p38 MAPK is involved in lidocaine-induced neurotoxicity, most likely followed by activation of lipoxygenase pathways.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2006

Doxepin by topical application and intrathecal route in rats.

The tricyclic antidepressant, doxepin, has been reported to be a potent local anesthetic in rat sciatic nerve blockade. We hypothesized that topical doxepin has significantly longer antinociception compared with control and intrathecally compared with bupivacaine. Solutions of 0.3 mL of doxepin at 50, 75, and 100 mM and control (only the vehicle solution) were applied as a patch to the shaved dorsal skin of rats. After a 2-h contact interval, the patch was removed, and the rats were tested by three sets of six pinpricks. Inhibition of withdrawal to pain and cutaneous trunci muscle reflex were graded. In the second investigation, 60 muL of doxepin at 10, 20, and 50 mM was injected through intrathecal catheters implanted in the lumbar region of rats, which were evaluated for motor function, proprioception, and nociception. Topical doxepin at concentrations of 75 mM and 100 mM was significantly more effective than control (P < 0.05). Complete recovery for the 100-mM concentration occurred at 60 h, although two of five rats demonstrated erythema and scarring. Intrathecally, 20 mM of doxepin was not significantly different for motor and proprioceptive function from 23 mM (0.75%) bupivacaine; however, neurotoxicity (defined as persistent neurological deficit) commenced at 50 mM.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2006

The neurotoxic effects of amitriptyline are mediated by apoptosis and are effectively blocked by inhibition of caspase activity.

Oral tricyclic antidepressants, widely used as adjuncts in the treatment of chronic pain, block sodium channels in vitro and nerve conduction in vivo. However, toxicity of amitriptyline has been observed after neural application. We therefore investigated the mechanism and possible prevention of amitriptyline neurotoxicity. To assess dose-dependent neurotoxicity of amitriptyline, we incubated neuron cultures from adult rat dorsal root ganglia with amitriptyline and quantified neuronal survival. Additionally, we investigated accepted markers of apoptosis (mitochondrial membrane potential, cytosolic cytochrome c, and activated caspase-3) and co-incubated amitriptyline with an inhibitor of caspase activity, z-vad-fmk, to assess the effect on cell survival. We found a dose-dependent neurotoxic effect of amitriptyline. Neurons incubated with amitriptyline exhibited loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c into the cytoplasm, and activation of caspase-3. Co-incubation with z-vad-fmk substantially improved neuronal survival in culture. In conclusion, amitriptyline-induced neurotoxicity is mediated by apoptosis and is attenuated by inhibition of caspase activity, suggesting that inhibition of apoptotic pathways may be efficient at alleviating local anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity. In vivo studies will have to corroborate whether the co-injection of anti-apoptotic drugs with local anesthetics decreases neurotoxic side effects.

Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones↗
PubMed2005

ERK is sequentially activated in neurons, microglia, and astrocytes by spinal nerve ligation and contributes to mechanical allodynia in this neuropathic pain model.

Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), a mitogen activated-protein kinase (MAPK), in dorsal horn neurons contributes to inflammatory pain by transcription-dependent and -independent means. We have now investigated if ERK is activated in the spinal cord after a spinal nerve ligation (SNL) and if this contributes to the neuropathic pain-like behavior generated in this model. An L5 SNL induces an immediate (<10 min) but transient (<6 h) induction of phosphoERK (pERK) restricted to neurons in the superficial dorsal horn. This is followed by a widespread induction of pERK in spinal microglia that peaks between 1 and 3 days post-surgery. On Day 10, pERK is expressed both in astrocytes and microglia, but by Day 21 predominantly in astrocytes in the dorsal horn. In the L5 DRG SNL transiently induces pERK in neurons at 10 min, and in satellite cells on Day 10 and 21. Intrathecal injection of the MEK (ERK kinase) inhibitor PD98059 on Day 2, 10 or 21 reduces SNL-induced mechanical allodynia. Our results suggest that ERK activation in the dorsal horn, as well as in the DRG, mediates pain through different mechanisms operating in different cells at different times. The sequential activation of ERK in dorsal horn microglia and then in astrocytes might reflect distinct roles for these two subtypes of glia in the temporal evolution of neuropathic pain.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Ephedrine blocks rat sciatic nerve in vivo and sodium channels in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The sympathomimetic drug ephedrine has been used intrathecally as the sole local anesthetic for labor and delivery. Because ephedrine may be a useful adjuvant to local anesthetics, the authors investigated the local anesthetic properties of ephedrine in a rat sciatic nerve block model and the underlying mechanism in cultured cells stably expressing Na channels. METHODS: After approval of the animal protocol, the sciatic nerves of anesthetized rats were exposed by lateral incision of the thighs, 0.2 ml ephedrine at 0.25, 1, 2.5, or 5% and/or bupivacaine at 0.125% was injected, and the wound was closed. Motor and sensory/nociceptive functions were evaluated by the force achieved by pushing against a balance and the reaction to pinch, respectively. The whole cell configuration of the patch clamp technique was used to record Na currents from human embryonal kidney cells stably transfected with Nav1.4 channels. RESULTS: The nociception blockade was significantly longer than the motor blockade at test doses of 2.5 and 5% of ephedrine, or when 1% ephedrine was combined with 0.125% bupivacaine (analysis of variance with repeated measures, P < 0.001, n = 8/group). In vitro, the 50% inhibitory concentrations of ephedrine at -150 and -60 mV were 1,043 +/- 70 and 473 +/- 13 mum, respectively. High-frequency stimulation revealed a use-dependent block of 18%, similar to most local anesthetics. CONCLUSIONS: Because ephedrine's properties are at least partly due to Na channel blockade, detailed histopathologic investigations are justified to determine the potential of ephedrine as an adjuvant to clinically used local anesthetics.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2004

Phase Ia and Ib study of amitriptyline for ulnar nerve block in humans: side effects and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: The antidepressant amitriptyline is used as an adjuvant in the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Among its many actions, this drug also blocks ion channels, such as Na channels. Preliminary animal studies suggested that amitripty-line would be a longer-lasting local anesthetic than bupivacaine, with potentially fewer side effects. Therefore, the authors investigated the adverse effects and effectiveness of this drug when given for ulnar nerve blockade in human volunteers. METHODS: After obtaining written institutional review board approval and informed consent, a typical phase Ia trial was conducted by administration to the ulnar nerve at the level of the wrist in an open-label, dose-escalating fashion. Amitripty-line hydrochloride, 4 ml, at concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 mM (n = 4-9/group) was used for each volunteer. If no major side effects and nerve block were encountered, comparison in a randomized, double-blinded trial of amitriptyline (20 mM) to placebo and bupivacaine (4 mM) (n = 4-9/group), was to follow. A blunt needle was used to grade the pain, and motor blockade was assessed by the Froment test. RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in terms of side effects (pain, swelling, erythema, and sedation) among any groups. The analgesic effects of 20 mM amitriptyline and 4 mm bupivacaine solution were significantly higher than those of the placebo solution. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the lack of evidence that amitripty-line provides better nerve blockade than current local anesthetics and the potential for neurotoxicity, its use for peripheral nerve blockade in humans seems limited.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Tricyclic antidepressants as long-acting local anesthetics.

Amitriptyline, nortriptyline, imipramine, doxepin, desipramine, protriptyline, trimipramine, and maprotiline are tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) used orally in treating major depressive disorders. Recent studies showed that amitriptyline is more potent in blocking the sciatic nerve functions in vivo by local injection than bupivacaine, a long-acting local anesthetic. We therefore tested whether various TCAs could likewise act as local anesthetics in vivo after single injection via the rat sciatic notch. The duration of complete sciatic nerve blockade by TCAs and the time to reach full recovery were measured with neurobehavioral assays and compared with results from bupivacaine. Amitriptyline, doxepin, and imipramine at 5mM elicited a longer complete sciatic nerve blockade than did bupivacaine at 15.4mM (0.5%), whereas trimipramine and desipramine at 5mM produced a shorter blockade. In contrast, nortriptyline, protriptyline, and maprotiline failed to elicit complete sciatic nerve blockade. Thus, TCAs have very different efficacy as local anesthetics in vivo. The duration of rat sciatic nerve blockade in vivo by TCAs is not well correlated with the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of TCAs in blocking human cardiac Nav1.5 Na(+) channels expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. With this in vitro expression system, TCAs appear more potent than bupivacaine as Na(+) channel blockers in Nav1.5 Na(+) channels. We suggest that the ability of TCAs to pass through various membrane barriers within peripheral nerve trunks is crucial to their local anesthetic efficacy in vivo. TCAs with a tertiary amine appear more effective in penetrating these membrane barriers than TCAs with a secondary amine.

Amines↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of differential blockade by amitriptyline and its N-methyl derivative in different species by different routes.

BACKGROUND: Increasing the duration of local anesthesia and/or creating greater differential blockade (i.e., selective block of pain-transmitting nerve fibers) has been attempted by modifying currently available agents. Most drugs show a different profile depending on the model or species studied. This study was designed to investigate the differential nerve-blocking properties of amitriptyline and its quaternary ammonium derivative in rats and sheep. METHODS: The Na+ channel-blocking properties of N-methyl amitriptyline were determined with the patch clamp technique in cultured GH(3) cells. Various functions (motor, nociception, proprioception-ataxia) were compared in rats (spinal and sciatic nerve blockade) and sheep (spinal blockade) with amitriptyline, N-methyl amitriptyline, lidocaine, and bupivacaine (partially from historical data). RESULTS: In vitro testing revealed N-methyl amitriptyline to be a potent Na+ channel blocker similar to amitriptyline but with a much longer duration of action. All drug concentrations tested in both the sciatic nerve model and the spinal block model produced no significant differential blockade in rats. Three of six rats in the 20-mM N-methyl amitriptyline group showed residual blockade 4 days after sciatic nerve injection. However, in the sheep spinal model, amitriptyline and in particular N-methyl amitriptyline displayed significant differential blockade at most time points. Sheep data for lidocaine and bupivacaine seemed to be more comparable to the clinical experience in humans than did rat data. CONCLUSIONS: Amitriptyline and N-methyl amitriptyline are potent Na+ channel blockers and show greater differential blockade in sheep than in rats. This differential blockade in sheep is greater than that produced by lidocaine or bupivacaine.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2003

Cutaneous analgesia after transdermal application of amitriptyline versus lidocaine in rats.

UNLABELLED: Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has potent local anesthetic properties. However, there is no report of cutaneous analgesic effects after transdermal application. We report here that transdermally applied amitriptyline is more potent than lidocaine in providing cutaneous analgesia in rats. Solutions of amitriptyline base in 50, 100, and 500 mM concentrations were applied as a patch to rats, and their effects were compared with those of lidocaine base at the same concentrations and of the vehicle alone (45% water, 45% isopropyl alcohol, and 10% glycerin). Rats in each test group developed a concentration-dependent cutaneous analgesic block in the areas to which the drugs were applied; however, amitriptyline produced a longer block than lidocaine at the same concentration. The development of amitriptyline as a longer-lasting topical analgesic may improve our ability to treat chronic pain, such as neuropathic pain and neuralgia, and to prevent pain in procedures such as venipuncture. IMPLICATIONS: The tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline, often used perorally for the management of chronic pain, is shown here to be more potent than lidocaine in providing cutaneous analgesia when applied transdermally with an occlusive dressing in rats.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed2003

The relative toxicity of amitriptyline, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine administered as rapid infusions in rats.

UNLABELLED: Intravascular injection of local anesthetics carries the risk of cardiovascular (CV) and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has local anesthetic potency that is more than that of bupivacaine. In this study, we compared the CV and CNS toxicity of the local anesthetics bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with that of amitriptyline. Twenty-nine Sprague-Dawley rats had their right external jugular vein and carotid artery cannulated under general anesthesia. On Day 2, rats were sedated with midazolam (0.375 mg/kg intraperitoneally) and received rapid infusions of either 1) bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, or amitriptyline at 2 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (5 mg/mL concentration) or 2) normal saline (400 micro L x kg(-1) x min(-1)) through an external jugular vein cannula. Electrocardiogram and arterial blood pressure were measured until the dose to cause impending death was reached (heart rate 50 bpm/asystole or apnea for >30 s). The mean dose required to cause apnea and impending death was significantly larger for amitriptyline (74.0 +/- 21 mg/kg and 74.5 +/- 21 mg/kg, respectively) than for levobupivacaine (32.2 +/- 20 mg/kg and 33.9 +/- 22 mg/kg, respectively) or bupivacaine (21.5 +/- 7 mg/kg and 22.7 +/- 7 mg/kg, respectively) (P < 0.05). A significantly larger dose of amitriptyline, given by rapid infusion, is required to cause CV and CNS toxicity in rats, when compared with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine. IMPLICATIONS: Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, has local anesthetic properties and is more potent than bupivacaine. Significantly larger doses of amitriptyline, given by rapid infusion, are required to cause cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity in rats, when compared with bupivacaine and levobupivacaine.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2002

Amitriptyline for prolonged cutaneous analgesia in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Amitriptyline has been reported to be a more potent local anesthetic than bupivacaine. In keeping with the objective of identifying drugs for prolonged cutaneous analgesia, the authors compared the cutaneous analgesic effectiveness of amitriptyline and bupivacaine in rats. METHODS: Rats were subcutaneously injected on shaved dorsal skin. The skin wheal raised after injection of 0.6 ml of various concentrations of either amitriptyline or bupivacaine with and without epinephrine (1:200,000) was marked. Inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex was evaluated quantitatively by the fraction of times a total of six pinpricks applied to the marked area failed to elicit a nocifensive motor response compared with control responses. No responses out of six pinpricks was defined as 100% maximum possible effect. RESULTS: Complete recovery from the cutaneous analgesia elicited by 0.05% and 0.5 amitriptyline versus 0.05 and 0.5% bupivacaine occurred in 9.9 +/- 0.2 and 19.3 +/- 0.4 h versus 2.2 +/- 0.1 and 16.1 +/- 0.2 h, respectively (mean +/- SE). Addition of epinephrine increased this duration to 14.1 +/- 0.1 and 21.4 +/- 0.2 h versus 3.2 +/- 0.1 and 17.0 +/- 0.3 h, respectively. Complete nociceptive blockade after coinjection of 0.25% amitriptyline, 0.25% bupivacaine, and epinephrine lasted 24 +/- 0.5 h, and complete recovery from this block took 33 +/- 0.5 h. Areas under the percent maximum possible effect versus time curve were 1,770 +/- 24 and 1,471 +/- 50% h for 0.5% amitriptyline and bupivacaine with epinephrine, respectively, whereas this value was 2,836 +/- 62% h for the coinjected 0.25% amitriptyline, 0.25% bupivacaine, and epinephrine admixture. CONCLUSION: Amitriptyline is a longer-acting local anesthetic compared with bupivacaine for cutaneous infiltration. Its analgesic effectiveness is significantly enhanced by epinephrine. Coinjection of amitriptyline and bupivacaine with epinephrine enhances the analgesic duration of both drugs.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2002

N-phenylethyl amitriptyline in rat sciatic nerve blockade.

BACKGROUND: The antidepressant amitriptyline is commonly used orally for the treatment of chronic pain, particularly neuropathic pain, which is thought to be caused by high-frequency ectopic discharge. Among its many properties, amitriptyline is a potent Na(+) channel blocker in vitro, has local anesthetic properties in vivo, and confers additional blockade at high stimulus-discharge rates (use-dependent blockade). As with other drug modifications, adding a phenylethyl group to obtain a permanently charged quaternary ammonium derivative may improve these advantageous properties. METHODS: The electrophysiologic properties of N-phenylethyl amitriptyline were assessed in cultured neuronal GH(3) cells with the whole cell mode of the patch clamp technique, and the therapeutic range and toxicity were evaluated in the rat sciatic nerve model. RESULTS: In vitro, N-phenylethyl amitriptyline at 10 microm elicits a greater block of Na(+) channels than amitriptyline (resting block of approximately 90% vs. approximately 15%). This derivative also retains the attribute of amitriptyline in evoking high-degree use-dependent blockade during repetitive pulses. In vivo, duration to full recovery of nociception in the sciatic nerve model was 1,932 +/- 72 min for N-phenylethyl amitriptyline at 2.5 mm (n = 7) versus 72 +/- 3 min for lidocaine at 37 mm (n = 4; mean +/- SEM). However, there was evidence of neurotoxicity at 5 mm. CONCLUSION: N-phenylethyl amitriptyline appears to have a narrow therapeutic range but is much more potent than lidocaine, providing a block duration several times longer than any clinically used local anesthetic. Further work in animal models of neuropathic pain will assess the potential use of this drug.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Neurologic and histopathologic evaluation after high-volume intrathecal amitriptyline.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Accumulating evidence indicates that amitriptyline decreases pain sensation when administered orally, intraperitoneally, or for sciatic nerve block. Previous reports of intrathecal administration of amitriptyline have yielded inconsistent results. The failure of amitriptyline to provide antinociception may partly be related to its high logP (octanol-water partition coefficient) and consequent poor spread within the cerebrospinal fluid. We evaluated spinal block after various concentrations of amitriptyline administered intrathecally in a fixed high volume. METHODS: We administered 100 microL of 5, 10, 15.9 (0.5%), 25, 50, or 100 mmol/L amitriptyline hydrochloride solution or 100 microL of 15.4 mmol/L (0.5%) bupivacaine hydrochloride solution intrathecally to rats. The neurologic deficit was evaluated by antinociceptive, motor, and proprioceptive responses, and the spinal cord was examined for histopathologic changes. RESULTS: Doses of 100 microL amitriptyline at 15.9 mmol/L (0.5%) and 25 mmol/L produced longer complete nerve block than did bupivacaine at 15.4 mmol/L (0.5%); 5 and 10 mmol/L amitriptyline produced only partial nerve block. However, with 100 microL intrathecal amitriptyline at 50 and 100 mmol/L, many rats did not fully recover from spinal block. Severe axonal degeneration, myelin breakdown, and replacement of neuronal structures by vacuoles were seen in the spinal root section of animals injected with concentrations higher than 25 mmol/L amitriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: At lower doses, intrathecal injection of high volumes of amitriptyline results in long-acting spinal block. At higher doses, intrathecal amitriptyline results in irreversible neurologic deficit. Therefore, we do not recommend the use of intrathecal amitriptyline because of a very low therapeutic index.

Amitriptyline↗