PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Haddawy

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Haddawy.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Anatomical sketch understanding: recognizing explicit and implicit structure.

OBJECTIVE: Sketching is ubiquitous in medicine. Physicians commonly use sketches as part of their note taking in patient records and to help convey diagnoses and treatments to patients. Medical students frequently use sketches to help them think through clinical problems in individual and group problem solving. Applications ranging from automated patient records to medical education software could benefit greatly from the richer and more natural interfaces that would be enabled by the ability to understand sketches. In this paper we take the first steps toward developing a system that can understand anatomical sketches. METHODS: Understanding an anatomical sketch requires the ability to recognize what anatomical structure has been sketched and from what view (e.g. parietal view of the brain), as well as to identify the anatomical parts and their locations in the sketch (e.g. parts of the brain), even if they have not been explicitly drawn. We present novel algorithms for sketch recognition and for part identification. We evaluate the accuracy of the recognition algorithm on sketches obtained from medical students. We evaluate the part identification algorithm by comparing its results to the judgment of an experienced physician. RESULTS: The sketch recognition algorithm achieves a recognition accuracy of 75.5%, far above the baseline random classification accuracy of 6.7%. Comparison of the results of the part identification algorithm with the judgment of an experienced physician shows close agreement in terms of location, orientation, size, and shape of the identified parts. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of our prototype in terms of accuracy and running time provides strong evidence that development of robust sketch understanding systems for medical domains is an attainable goal. Further work needs to be done to extend the approach to sketches containing multiple and partial anatomical structures, as well as to be able to interpret sketch annotations.

Algorithms↗

The development of a computer based learning (CBL) program in diabetes management.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a computer based learning (CBL) program in diabetes management for health care providers and academic staff MATERIAL AND METHOD: A CBL program was developed using "Authorware Professional ver. 6. 0" software. Content validation, computer background survey and investigation of the usability of the program, was conducted as part of the production of this program. The involved participants were university staff hospital care providers (e.g., doctors, nurses and pharmacists) and nursing & pharmacy students. RESULTS: Overall, the results were positive. Some limitations regarding computer background were revealed Few of the participants were familiar with self-learning materials. The usability of the CBL program was generally encouraging however some comments were made regarding program function, such as the duration of the program, and minor problems with the audiovisual effects. All comments were noted and addressed for future implementation. CONCLUSION: The CBL program was found to be a user-friendly, interactive multimedia program for diabetes management.

Computer-Assisted Instruction↗

A Bayesian approach to generating tutorial hints in a collaborative medical problem-based learning system.

OBJECTIVES: Today a great many medical schools have turned to a problem-based learning (PBL) approach to teaching. While PBL has many strengths, effective PBL requires the tutor to provide a high degree of personal attention to the students, which is difficult in the current academic environment of increasing demands on faculty time. This paper describes intelligent tutoring in a collaborative medical tutor for PBL. The main contribution of our work is the development of representational techniques and algorithms for generating tutoring hints in PBL group problem solving, as well as the implementation of these techniques in a collaborative intelligent tutoring system, COMET. The system combines concepts from computer-supported collaborative learning with those from intelligent tutoring systems. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The system uses Bayesian networks to model individual student clinical reasoning, as well as that of the group. The prototype system incorporates substantial domain knowledge in the areas of head injury, stroke and heart attack. Tutoring in PBL is particularly challenging since the tutor should provide as little guidance as possible while at the same time not allowing the students to get lost. From studies of PBL sessions at a local medical school, we have identified and implemented eight commonly used hinting strategies. In order to evaluate the appropriateness and quality of the hints generated by our system, we compared the tutoring hints generated by COMET with those of experienced human tutors. We also compared the focus of group activity chosen by COMET with that chosen by human tutors. RESULTS: On average, 74.17% of the human tutors used the same hint as COMET. The most similar human tutor agreed with COMET 83% of the time and the least similar tutor agreed 62% of the time. Our results show that COMET's hints agree with the hints of the majority of the human tutors with a high degree of statistical agreement (McNemar test, p=0.652, kappa=0.773). The focus of group activity chosen by COMET agrees with that chosen by the majority of the human tutors with a high degree of statistical agreement (McNemar test, p=0.774, kappa=0.823). CONCLUSION: Bayesian network clinical reasoning models can be combined with generic tutoring strategies to successfully emulate human tutor hints in group medical PBL.

Artificial Intelligence↗