PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Leong-Sit

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Leong-Sit.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

The impact of common and rare genetic variants on bradyarrhythmia development.

To broaden our understanding of bradyarrhythmias and conduction disease, we performed common variant genome-wide association analyses in up to 1.3 million individuals and rare variant burden testing in 460,000 individuals for sinus node dysfunction (SND), distal conduction disease (DCD) and pacemaker (PM) implantation. We identified 13, 31 and 21 common variant loci for SND, DCD and PM, respectively. Four well-known loci (SCN5A/SCN10A, CCDC141, TBX20 and CAMK2D) were shared for SND and DCD, while others were more specific for SND or DCD. SND and DCD showed a moderate genetic correlation (rg = 0.63). Cardiomyocyte-expressed genes were enriched for contributions to DCD heritability. Rare-variant analyses implicated LMNA for all bradyarrhythmia phenotypes, SMAD6 and SCN5A for DCD and TTN, MYBPC3 and SCN5A for PM. These results show that variation in multiple genetic pathways (for example, ion channel function, cardiac developmental programs, sarcomeric structure and cellular homeostasis) appear critical to the development of bradyarrhythmias.

Humans↗
PubMed2007

The expectation effect and cardiac pacing for refractory vasovagal syncope.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of pacing for vasovagal syncope have shown conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether permanent pacemaker therapy prevents refractory vasovagal syncope. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing pacemaker therapy with medical therapy, usual care, placebo, or different pacing algorithms in the prevention of recurrent vasovagal syncope were considered. The primary endpoint was first recurrence of syncope. RESULTS: Nine randomized trials (2 double blind, 7 open label or single blind) were included. There was significant heterogeneity when all 9 trials were pooled (P=.0009 and I(2)=69.6%), reflecting methodological diversity in blinding and the nature of the control therapy. When pooled by trial methodology, heterogeneity was no longer apparent. Permanent pacing reduced the risk of recurrent syncope in unblinded studies (odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.22) and in studies comparing pacemaker algorithms (OR 0.04, 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.23). No effect was seen in double-blinded trials (OR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.70). Awareness that a permanent pacemaker was implanted and functional was associated with a significant 'expectation' effect, which itself reduced the risk of recurrent syncope (OR 0.16, 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.40, P=.0001). Results were similar when restricted to patients with a marked cardioinhibitory response on baseline tilt table testing. CONCLUSION: The results of small, preliminary trials have overestimated the treatment effect of pacemakers due to a lack of blinding of physicians and patients. Blinded trials suggest that the apparent response is due to a strong expectation response to pacing.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗
PubMed2006

A novel pacing maneuver to localize focal atrial tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Although focal atrial tachycardias cannot be entrained, we hypothesized that atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) can be an effective adjunct to localize the focus of these tachycardias at the site where the post-pacing interval (PPI) is closest to the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). METHODS: Overdrive pacing was performed in nine patients during atrial tachycardia, and in a comparison group of 15 patients during sinus rhythm. Pacing at a rate slightly faster than atrial tachycardia in group 1 and sinus rhythm in group 2 was performed from five standardized sites in the right atrium and coronary sinus. The difference between the PPI and tachycardia or sinus cycle length (SCL) was recorded at each site. The tachycardia focus was then located and ablated in group 1, and the atrial site with earliest activation was mapped in group 2. RESULTS: In both groups the PPI-TCL at the five pacing sites reflected the distance from the AT focus or sinus node. In group 1, PPI-TCL at the successful ablation site was 11 +/- 8 msec. In group 2, PPI-SCL at the site of earliest atrial activation was 131 +/- 37 msec (P < 0.001 for comparison). In groups 1 and 2, calculated values at the five pacing sites were proportional to the distance from the AT focus or sinus node, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The PPI-TCL after-AOP of focal atrial tachycardia has a direct relationship to proximity of the pacing site to the focus, and may be clinically useful in finding a successful ablation site.

Cardiac Pacing, Artificial↗
PubMed2006

Effect of defibrillation testing on management during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.

BACKGROUND: Verification of defibrillation efficacy by defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing during implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation is the current standard. Generally, defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation at 10 J below the maximum output of a device is felt to establish an adequate safety margin. Nonetheless, DFT testing adds to cost and carries some potential for morbidity, whereas its impact on outcomes in the modern era of defibrillator technology is unclear. We aimed to determine the frequency that DFT testing resulted in a change at device implant and to identify clinical and echocardiographic predictors of the need for DFT testing. METHODS: We reviewed all implantable cardioverter-defibrillators that were implanted at the London Health Sciences Centre (Ontario, Canada) from June 1999 to August 2003 and used multivariate analysis to determine variables associated with DFT test failures and elevated DFT values. When a defibrillation failure was not observed, a lowest energy to defibrillate (LED) was recorded. RESULTS: Among 168 implants, DFT testing was successful with a minimum 10-J safety margin in 152 (90%), whereas the remaining 16 required changes at device implant. In a multivariate analysis, use of amiodarone was independently associated with DFT failure (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-17.0). Significantly higher mean DFT/LED values were observed among patients on amiodarone (1.36 J; P = .0041). Those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy had a higher mean DFT/LED compared with those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (1.44 J; P = .028). CONCLUSIONS: Use of amiodarone is associated with a 4-fold increase in risk of DFT failure and subsequent need for changes at implant to achieve a safe threshold. Defibrillation threshold testing appears to be most useful for patients taking amiodarone.

Amiodarone↗