PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Q Eichacker

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Q Eichacker.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Bacillus anthracis edema and lethal toxin have different hemodynamic effects but function together to worsen shock and outcome in a rat model.

INTRODUCTION: To better define the contribution of edema toxins (ETx) and lethal toxins (LeTx) to shock with Bacillus anthracis, recombinant preparations of each were investigated alone or together in rats. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lethal dose ranges (0%-100% lethality) of ETx (200-800 microg/kg as a 24-h infusion) were higher than those of LeTx (12.5-200 microg/kg) (P<.0001). However, compared with LeTx, similarly lethal ETx doses produced earlier and greater reductions in mean blood pressure (MBP) and increased, rather than decreased, heart rate (HR) (P<.05 for all). Combining either similar weight or lethal doses of ETx and LeTx increased the hazard ratio for death (log +/- standard error) similar to the sum calculated with the toxin's effects alone (2.6+/-1.1 observed vs. 2.9+/-1.0 calculated for similar weight and 3.1+/-1.0 vs. 3.9+/-1.5 for similar lethal doses; P=.5 for both). Early (< or =10 h) and late during infusion, ETx and LeTx together also altered MBP and HR in patterns consistent with the sum of their individual effects. CONCLUSIONS: ETx was approximately 10 times less lethal than LeTx but produced greater hypotension and added to the latter's harmful effects. These findings suggest that it may be appropriate for antitoxin therapies for B. anthracis to target both ETx and LeTx.

Animals↗

Lethal and edema toxins in the pathogenesis of Bacillus anthracis septic shock: implications for therapy.

Recent research regarding the structure and function of Bacillus anthracis lethal (LeTx) and edema (ETx) toxins provides growing insights into the pathophysiology and treatment of shock with this lethal bacteria. These are both binary-type toxins composed of protective antigen necessary for their cellular uptake and either lethal or edema factors, the toxigenic moieties. The primary cellular receptors for protective antigen have been identified and constructed and key steps in the extracellular processing and internalization of the toxins clarified. Consistent with the lethal factor's primary action as an intracellular endopeptidase targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases, growing evidence indicates that shock with this toxin does not result from an excessive inflammatory response. In fact, the potent immunosuppressive effects of LeTx may actually contribute to the establishment and persistence of infection. Instead, shock with LeTx may be related to the direct injurious effects of lethal factor on endothelial cell function. Despite the importance of LeTx, very recent studies show that edema factor, a potent adenyl cyclase, has the ability to make a substantial contribution to shock caused by B. anthracis and works additively with LeTx. Furthermore, ETx may contribute to the immunosuppressive effects of LeTx. Therapies under development that target several different steps in the cellular uptake and function of these two toxins have been effective in in vitro and in vivo systems. Understanding how best to apply these agents clinically and how they interact with conventional treatments should be goals for future research.

Animals↗

DTPA Fe(III) decreases cytokines and hypotension but worsens survival with Escherichia coli sepsis in rats.

OBJECTIVE: Nonselective inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) with NO synthase antagonists decreases hypotension but worsens outcome clinically. We investigated whether iron (III) complex of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid [DTPA Fe(III)], a scavenger of NO as well as other oxidant mediators, has similar divergent effects in E. coli challenged rats. METHODS: Animals with venous and arterial catheters and challenged with intrabronchial or intravenous E. coli were randomized to treatment with DTPA Fe(III) in doses from 3 to 800 mg/kg or placebo. Mean blood pressure (MBP) was measured in all animals and plasma NO, cytokines, and blood and lung leukocyte and bacteria counts in animals administered intrabronchial E. coli and DTPA Fe(III) 50 mg/kg or placebo. Animals received antibiotics and were observed 168 h. RESULTS: Independent of drug regimen or infection site, compared to placebo, DTPA Fe(III) increased MBP although this was greater with high vs. lower doses. Despite increased MBP, DTPA Fe(III) worsened the hazards ratio of survival . At 6 and 24 h DTPA Fe(III) decreased NO but not significantly and decreased four cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukins 1 and 10, and macrophage inflammatory protein 3alpha) and lung lavage neutrophils. From 6 to 24 h DTPA Fe(III) increased blood bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: DTPA Fe(III) while increasing blood pressure has the potential to worsen outcome in sepsis. Further preclinical testing is required before this agent is applied clinically.

Animals↗

Parthenolide has limited effects on nuclear factor-kappa beta increases and worsens survival in lipopolysaccharide-challenged C57BL/6J mice.

Parthenolide, a sesquiterpene lactone, inhibited lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated nuclear factor (NF)-kappabeta and cytokine production in vitro and in rats, and improved survival in LPS challenged Swiss albino mice. We investigated whether increased survival with parthenolide was associated directly with inhibition of NF-kappabeta and cytokines in LPS challenged C57BL/6J mice. In RAW 264.7 cells, parthenolide inhibited LPS-stimulated NF-kappabeta and cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1alpha, -1beta, -2, -4, -6, and -10, interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, migratory inhibitory protein-1 and -2alpha, JE, and RANTES). In mice (n = 366) receiving lethal intraperitoneal (i.p.) LPS (40 mg/kg), compared to placebo, each of 5 parthenolide doses (0.25 to 4 mg/kg i.p. following LPS) reduced survival at 168h and overall worsened the hazards ratio of survival (mean +/- S.E.M.) (1.29 +/- 0.12, p = 0.04). In other mice (241), compared to saline challenge, nonlethal LPS (2.5 mg/kg) increased NF-kappabeta in lung and kidney combined and 12 of 13 plasma cytokines early (1 and 3 h) and late (6, 9 and 12 h) (p < or = 0.002 for each). Compared to nonlethal LPS, lethal LPS increased NF-kappabeta and 12 of 13 cytokines early but not significantly and late significantly (p < or = 0.05 for each). With lethal LPS, compared to placebo, parthenolide (1 mg/kg) decreased NF-kappabeta and 10 of 13 cytokines early and increased NF-kappabeta and 11 of 13 cytokines late (p < or = 0.02 for early vs. late). Although parthenolide inhibits NF-kappabeta and cytokines in vitro, its effects on these mediators and survival in animal sepsis models vary. Theses differences must be understood before parthenolide or related agents are applied clinically for sepsis.

Animals↗

Sublethal doses of Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin inhibit inflammation with lipopolysaccharide and Escherichia coli challenge but have opposite effects on survival.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of the findings of previous in vitro studies, we hypothesized that anthrax lethal toxin (LeTx) would have anti-inflammatory effects in vivo. METHODS: We investigated the effects of sublethal doses of LeTx in rats receiving intravascular challenge with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or intratracheal challenge with Escherichia coli. RESULTS: In rats receiving 24-h infusions of LPS, compared with control rats, pretreatment with high or low sublethal doses of LeTx 3 h before infusion produced similar patterns of reduction in the hazards ratio (HR) of survival at 168 h (0.60 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.37-0.98]; P=.03, for the doses combined). LeTx increased mean arterial blood pressure throughout the period of LPS infusion (P=.001); decreased the levels of 10 of 13 cytokines assessed (i.e., interleukin [IL]-1 alpha , IL-1 beta , IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, interferon- gamma , tumor necrosis factor- alpha , granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, migratory inhibitory protein [MIP]-1 alpha , MIP-2, MIP-3 alpha , and RANTES) at 2 h; decreased all 13 cytokine levels at 8 h; decreased only 4 cytokine levels at 24 h; and decreased the plasma level of nitric oxide (NO) at 8 h and 24 h but not at 2 h (P< or =.02, for the effect of LeTx, across time, on both cytokine levels and the NO level). Although pretreatment with LeTx before challenge with E. coli altered mean arterial blood pressure, cytokine levels, and the NO level in a pattern similar to that noted in association with LPS infusion, it increased the HR in a pattern different from that associated with LPS (4.36 [95% CI, 0.3-63.4]; P=.04, for the effects of LeTx with LPS vs. E. coli). CONCLUSION: Inhibition of inflammation with LeTx can occur in vivo, and, although beneficial with noninfectious stimuli, it may be harmful with bacteria.

Animals↗

Effective dosing of lipid A analogue E5564 in rats depends on the timing of treatment and the route of Escherichia coli infection.

BACKGROUND: E5564, a competitive lipid A antagonist, inhibits endotoxin-stimulated inflammation and is under study in patients with sepsis. METHODS: We tested whether clinically relevant variables, including the timing of treatment and the route of infection, influenced the effective dosing of E5564 in Escherichia coli-challenged rats. RESULTS: All E5564 doses (0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg intravascular bolus followed by 10% of the bolus dose infused hourly for 24 h) administered 1 h before intravascular E. coli challenge similarly reduced the risk of death. Delaying the start of E5564 to 1 or 3 h after intravascular E. coli challenge significantly reduced the beneficial effect of the doses tested. However, increasing the dose of E5564 reversed some loss of efficacy for delayed treatment (P=.004, for increasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). During intrabronchial or intraperitoneal (extravascular) E. coli challenge, the pattern of effective E5564 dosing was the inverse of that for intravascular E. coli challenge (P=.001, for the interaction)--lower doses of E5564 were beneficial and higher doses were not (0.03, 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg bolus followed by infusion) (P=.05, for decreasing benefit with increasing dose at 1 h). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that, for maximal clinical benefit, E5564 should be given early and that dosing should be adjusted upward for intravascular infection and downward for extravascular infection.

Animals↗

Neutrophil inhibition with L-selectin-directed MAb improves or worsens survival dependent on the route but not severity of infection in a rat sepsis model.

Both route and severity of infection may influence immunomodulator agents in sepsis. We studied the effect of each variable on HRL-3, an L-selectin-directed MAb that inhibits neutrophil function, in a rat sepsis model. Animals (n = 800) were randomized to be treated with either HRL-3 or placebo and to receive Escherichia coli either intravenously (IV) or intrabronchially (IB) in doses producing low or high mortality rates. Animals received antibiotics and were observed for 168 h. Route but not dose of E. coli altered the effects HRL-3 on mortality rate (mean hazards ratio +/- SE). With IV E. coli, compared with control, HRL-3 was beneficial and reduced the hazards ratio both early (0 to 6 h; -0.75 +/- 0.23) and late (6 to 168 h; -0.72 +/- 0.36) (P = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively, over all E. coli doses). In contrast, with IB E. coli HRL-3 reduced the hazards ratio early (-1.1 +/- 0.36) but worsened it late (0.87 +/- 0.23) (P = 0.002 for both effects over all E. coli doses) in patterns significantly different from IV E. coli (P < 0.0001). Compared with control, although HRL-3 did not alter lung neutrophil numbers or injury score at 6 or 168 h with IV E. coli (P = ns for all), it reduced both early and increased them late with IB E. coli (P </= 0.05 for all comparing 6 with 168 h). Thus immunomodulators inhibiting neutrophil function, although potentially beneficial with sepsis due to intravascular infection, may be harmful with extravascular infection regardless of severity.

Animals↗

Neutrophil stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor worsens ventilator-induced lung injury and mortality in rats.

BACKGROUND: Based on the association between the neutrophil and ventilator-induced lung injury, the authors hypothesized that neutrophil inhibition with fucoidin would be beneficial and stimulation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) would be harmful in a rat model of lethal ventilator-induced lung injury. METHODS: Animals (n = 111) were randomly assigned to be pretreated with fucoidin, G-CSF, or placebo (control) before 4 h of low-tidal-volume (10 ml/kg) or high-tidal-volume (40 ml/kg) mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: All low-volume animals survived. With high volumes, compared with controls, fucoidin did not improve survival (3 of 20 control animals and 5 of 20 fucoidin animals died; P = 0.51) but G-CSF significantly worsened it (18 of 22 animals died; P < 0.001). Circulating neutrophils were increased early with G-CSF and late with fucoidin with low and high tidal volumes (P < 0.05 for each treatment and tidal volume). Fucoidin decreased lung neutrophils, but these were only significant with high tidal volumes, whereas G-CSF increased lung neutrophils but only significantly with low tidal volumes (P < or = 0.01 for each). Fucoidin did not alter any cardiopulmonary measure significantly. Compared with control, G-CSF increased airway pressures with high tidal volumes and worsened lung edema and arterial oxygen with both tidal volumes (P < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: In this model, neutrophil stimulation by G-CSF increased lung dysfunction and with high tidal volumes worsened survival rates. Extrapolated clinically, neutrophil stimulation either by agents such as G-CSF or conditions such as sepsis may aggravate ventilator-induced lung injury.

Animals↗

Novel therapies for sepsis: a review.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 30 years, efforts have been made to identify therapeutic targets in the host response to infection. METHODS: A review of the randomized controlled clinical sepsis trials and meta-analyses of glucocorticoids, mediator-specific anti-inflammatory agents, and anticoagulant agents was performed. RESULTS: The effects of glucocorticoids in sepsis appear to be dose-dependent, with high doses decreasing survival and low doses improving survival. As a class, the mediator-specific anti-inflammatory agents have a small beneficial effect on survival; however, no single agent has demonstrated significant benefit. The treatment effects of these agents appear to be related to the patient's risk of death. As a class, the anticoagulant agents do not improve survival; however, the efficacy of these agents may have been confounded by concurrent heparin therapy. Activated protein C demonstrated a beneficial effect on survival that was dependent on severity of illness. CONCLUSION: Trials of agents directed at altering the host's response during sepsis have had variable results, and it appears that several different factors may alter the efficacy of these agents.

Animals↗

Prophylactic high-dose N(omega)-monomethyl-L-arginine prevents the late cardiac dysfunction associated with lethal tumor necrosis factor-alpha challenge in dogs.

We investigated nitric oxide (NO) as a possible cause of the cardiac dysfunction associated with high, lethal doses of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in dogs. Eighty-seven awake, 2-year-old (10-12 kg), purpose-bred beagles were randomized to receive an infusion of saline or N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), a nonselective NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor, as a 40 mg kg bolus followed by a 40 mg kg(-1) h(-1) infusion for 3 to 6 h 3 h before (prophylactic) or 3 h after (therapeutic) challenge with TNF-alpha (60 microg kg(-1)) or vehicle. Serial radionuclide-heart scans and thermodilution pulmonary artery catheter hemodynamic measurements were performed. The effects of prophylactic L-NMMA on TNF-alpha-induced cardiac dysfunction as measured by decreases in mean left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and downward and rightward shifts of LV function plots (peak systolic pressure versus end systolic volume index and LV stroke work index versus end diastolic volume index) were significantly different comparing early (3-6 h) and delayed (24 h) time points (P = 0.02). Prophylactic L-NMMA therapy did not appear to fully prevent early (3-6 h) TNF-alpha-induced cardiac dysfunction, but at 24 h, complete protection was seen. Therapeutic L-NMMA did not appear to fully protect the heart from TNF-alpha-induced early or delayed cardiac dysfunction (P = NS). Similarly, L-NMMA given prophylactically, but not therapeutically, blocked TNF-alpha-induced increases in exhaled NO flow rates and plasma nitrite and nitrate concentrations (both P = 0.02). These data suggest that TNF-alpha initiates two phases of cardiac injury: an early (3-6 h) phase that may be partially NO independent and a delayed (24 h) phase that is NO dependent. The delayed, more persistent dysfunction can be completely blocked by high doses of a nonselective NOS inhibitor administered before TNF-alpha.

Animals↗

Late treatment with a protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody improves hemodynamic function and survival in a lethal toxin-infused rat model of anthrax sepsis.

BACKGROUND: In animal models, treatment with 5H3, a fully human protective antigen-directed monoclonal antibody (PA-MAb), improved survival when administered close to the time of Bacillus anthracis lethal toxin (LeTx) bolus or live bacterial challenge. However, treatment with PA-MAb would be most valuable clinically if it were beneficial even when administered after the onset of shock and lethality due to LeTx. METHODS: We investigated the effects of PA-MAb versus placebo administered in rats (n=324) at the time of or 3, 6, 9, or 12 h after the initiation of a 24-h LeTx infusion. RESULTS: In rats receiving placebo, mean arterial blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were decreased in nonsurvivors, compared with those in survivors, at 6 h and then worsened further, with lethality first evident at 8 h (median, 16 h; range, 8-152 h). At each treatment time, survival rates were greater for PA-MAb than for placebo, although improvement was decreased at later treatment times (P=.001, for the effect of time). Compared with placebo, PA-MAb significantly increased MBP during the 12 h after the initiation of treatment, but the increase was greatest for treatment at 3 h; similarly, PA-MAb significantly increased HR at all treatment times. CONCLUSION: In this rat model, improvements in outcome due to PA-MAb were significant when it was administered up to 6 h (and approached significance when administered up to 12 h) after initial exposure to LeTx. Clinically, PA-MAb may be beneficial even when administered after the onset of shock and lethality due to LeTx.

Animals↗

Differing effects of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and vasopressin on survival in a canine model of septic shock.

During sepsis, limited data on the survival effects of vasopressors are available to guide therapy. Therefore, we compared the effects of three vasopressors on survival in a canine septic shock model. Seventy-eight awake dogs infected with differing doses of intraperitoneal Escherichia coli to produce increasing mortality were randomized to receive epinephrine (0.2, 0.8, or 2.0 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)), norepinephrine (0.2, 1.0, or 2.0 microg.kg(-1).min(-1)), vasopressin (0.01 or 0.04 U/min), or placebo in addition to antibiotics and fluids. Serial hemodynamic and biochemical variables were measured. Increasing doses of bacteria caused progressively greater decreases in survival (P <0.06), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P <0.05), cardiac index (CI) (P <0.02), and ejection fraction (EF) (P=0.02). The effects of epinephrine on survival were significantly different from those of norepinephrine and vasopressin (P=0.03). Epinephrine had a harmful effect on survival that was significantly related to drug dose (P=0.02) but not bacterial dose. Norepinephrine and vasopressin had beneficial effects on survival that were similar at all drug and bacteria doses. Compared with concurrent infected controls, epinephrine caused greater decreases in CI, EF, and pH, and greater increases in systemic vascular resistance and serum creatinine than norepinephrine and vasopressin. These epinephrine-induced changes were significantly related to the dose of epinephrine administered. In this study, the effects of vasopressors were independent of severity of infection but dependent on the type and dose of vasopressor used. Epinephrine adversely affected organ function, systemic perfusion, and survival compared with norepinephrine and vasopressin. In the ranges studied, norepinephrine and vasopressin have more favorable risk-benefit profiles than epinephrine during sepsis.

Animals↗

Meta-analysis: the effect of steroids on survival and shock during sepsis depends on the dose.

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses demonstrated that high-dose glucocorticoids were not beneficial in sepsis. Recently, lower-dose glucocorticoids have been studied. PURPOSE: To compare recent trials of glucocorticoids for sepsis with previous glucocorticoid trials. DATA SOURCES: Systematic MEDLINE search for studies published between 1988 and 2003. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials of sepsis that examined the effects of glucocorticoids on survival or vasopressor requirements. DATA EXTRACTION: Two investigators independently collected data on patient and study characteristics, treatment interventions, and outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 5 included trials revealed a consistent and beneficial effect of glucocorticoids on survival (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.23, [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.50]; P = 0.036) and shock reversal (I2 = 0%; relative benefit, 1.71 [CI, 1.29 to 2.26]; P < 0.001). These effects were the same regardless of adrenal function. In contrast, 8 trials published before 1989 demonstrated a survival disadvantage with steroid treatment (I2 = 14%; relative benefit, 0.89 [CI, 0.82 to 0.97]; P = 0.008). In comparison with the earlier trials, the more recent trials administered steroids later after patients met enrollment criteria (median, 23 hours vs. <2 hours; P = 0.02), for longer courses (6 days vs. 1 day; P = 0.01), and in lower total dosages (hydrocortisone equivalents, 1209 mg vs. 23 975 mg; P = 0.01) to patients with higher control group mortality rates (mean, 57% vs. 34%; P = 0.06) who were more likely to be vasopressor-dependent (100% vs. 65%; P = 0.03). The relationship between steroid dose and survival was linear, characterized by benefit at low doses and increasing harm at higher doses (P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: We could not analyze time-related improvements in medical care and potential bias secondary to nonreporting of negative study results. CONCLUSIONS: Although short courses of high-dose glucocorticoids decreased survival during sepsis, a 5- to 7-day course of physiologic hydrocortisone doses with subsequent tapering increases survival rate and shock reversal in patients with vasopressor-dependent septic shock.

Adrenal Insufficiency↗