PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter R Carroll

Publications and source records attributed to Peter R Carroll.

118 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Patterns of failure after primary local therapy for prostate cancer and rationale for secondary therapy.

The timing and type of treatment for patients with biochemical disease recurrence after local therapy for prostate cancer remains controversial. This is because of many unresolved issues surrounding the natural history of disease progression in such patients, including the limited ability of clinical measures to accurately define local versus distant disease recurrence. Clinicians generally rely on clinical tumor characteristics, such as tumor stage, grade, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) kinetics after local therapy, to distinguish local from distant recurrence. This determination is important, because patients with local recurrence may be candidates for a second, potentially curative treatment, whereas those with distant recurrence are generally treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Data from a national disease registry of patients with prostate cancer, the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), suggest that the use of secondary cancer treatment after local therapy for prostate cancer is common. For patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy, secondary treatment appears to be nearly equally divided between postoperative radiation and ADT, whereas >90% of patients receiving a secondary treatment after radiation are treated with ADT. Serum PSA at diagnosis, Gleason score, and type of initial treatment appear to be predictors of secondary treatment use in this setting. Patient age, lymph node status, and margin status appear to be predictors of secondary treatment with ADT or radiation for patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2002

A review of measurement of patient preferences for treatment outcomes after prostate cancer.

The diagnosis of early-stage prostate cancer cases creates dilemmas for many men diagnosed with the disease each year. Treatment interventions are all associated with significant treatment morbidity, including impotence and incontinence. The basic concept behind patient preferences, or utilities, is to ask patients to make judgments about the value of particular health outcomes. Several preference-based instruments are available, including the visual analog rating scale, the time trade-off utility assessment, and the standard gamble. These assessments result in scores or weights assigned to different health states. From the perspective of the patient with prostate cancer, the treatment that produces optimal outcomes will depend on the relative importance of several domains, which may include pain, urinary functioning, sexual functioning, and general physical health. Patients with similar diagnoses and overlapping clinical characteristics may have markedly different preferences for treatment outcomes.

Disease Progression↗
PubMed2002

Surgery for prostate cancer: rationale, technique and outcomes.

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men and poses a substantial risk to the life and health of patients. Treatment options for patients with prostate cancer are plentiful. Radical prostatectomy is one option that can be performed using several different surgical approaches. It can be performed with limited risk of complications and is likely to be curative in patients with organ-confined disease and those with limited extracapsular extension.

Humans↗
PubMed2002

Neoadjuvant strategies for prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy.

Although definitive therapy with either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy can be effective, the optimal treatment for prostatic adenocarcinoma remains controversial. Patients may be at significant risk for primary treatment failure even with apparent clinically localized disease. Thus, there has been increased interest in initial multimodal therapy in order to maximize the potential for cure. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy has been used for several decades and a large body of literature discusses its use; nevertheless, the current data suggest that it only decreases rates of positive surgical margins without improving prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-free or disease-free survival. Novel neoadjuvant hormonal and chemotherapeutic regimens are under investigation and may improve outcomes for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Prostate cancer tumor volume: measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging.

PURPOSE: To determine accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) and three-dimensional (3D) MR spectroscopic imaging in prostate cancer tumor volume measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endorectal MR and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging were performed in 37 patients before radical prostatectomy. Two independent readers recorded peripheral zone tumor nodule location and volume. Results were analyzed with step-section histopathologic tumor localization and volume measurement as the standard. Accuracy of tumor volume measurement was assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient. P values were calculated with a random effects model. Bland-Altman regression analysis was used to evaluate systematic bias between tumor volumes measured with MR imaging and true tumor volumes. Analyses were performed for all nodules and nodules greater than 0.50 cm(3). RESULTS: Mean volume of peripheral zone tumor nodules (n = 51) was 0.79 cm(3) (range, 0.02-3.70 cm(3)). Two readers detected 20 (65%) and 23 (74%) of 31 peripheral zone tumor nodules greater than 0.50 cm(3). For these nodules, measurements of tumor volume with MR imaging, 3D MR spectroscopic imaging, and a combination of both were all positively correlated with histopathologic volume (Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.49, 0.59, and 0.55, respectively); only measurements with 3D MR spectroscopic imaging and a combination of MR and 3D MR spectroscopic imaging demonstrated statistical significance (P <.05). Tumor volume estimation with all three methods was more accurate for higher tumor volumes. CONCLUSION: Addition of 3D MR spectroscopic imaging to MR imaging increases overall accuracy of prostate cancer tumor volume measurement, although measurement variability limits consistent quantitative tumor volume estimation, particularly for small tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

How well does the Partin nomogram predict pathological stage after radical prostatectomy in a community based population? Results of the cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor.

PURPOSE: The Partin nomogram uses preoperative Gleason grade, serum prostate specific antigen and clinical stage to predict pathological outcome after radical prostatectomy. It was developed and validated in a select population of patients at 3 academic institutions. Although the nomogram is widely used, it has yet to be validated in a community based population. We assessed the performance of the nomogram in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor, a nationwide, community based observational disease registry of men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in the cohort were 1,162 men in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor who underwent radical prostatectomy. Using various probability thresholds the nomogram was used to predict outcomes in each patient. Using different probability thresholds receiver operating characteristics curves were then used to assess test performance. RESULTS: Of the men 860 (74%) had organ confined disease, 179 (15%) had established capsular penetration, 95 (8%) had seminal vesicle involvement and 37 (3%) had lymph node involvement. Calculated receiver operating characteristics curve area was 0.684 for predicting organ confined disease, 0.614 for predicting capsular penetration, 0.726 for predicting seminal vesicle involvement and 0.766 for predicting lymph node involvement. These values were lower than in previously published reports. CONCLUSIONS: While the Partin nomogram performs adequately in a community based cohort of men who undergo radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer, it does not attain the success demonstrated in previous studies in select academic cohorts. This result was likely due to differences in the distribution of pathological outcomes in the community based cohort, in which more men had organ confined disease.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Sextant prostate biopsies predict side and sextant site of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We examined the ability of sextant prostate biopsies in combination with other preoperative data to predict side and sextant site of prostate cancer extracapsular extension in a large cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 223 contemporary cases of prostate cancer managed by radical prostatectomy. Using logistic regression analysis, we determined whether patient age, Gleason score, clinical stage, prostate specific antigen, number of positive sextants, biopsy location or percent of biopsy cores positive for cancer in a sextant site, side and overall gland was predictive of location of pathological extracapsular extension into periprostatic tissue. RESULTS: Of 41 of the 223 (18%) patients with nonorgan confined disease extracapsular extension was localized to 45 sextant sites in 36 (apex 8, mid 22, base 15) while only side of extension was known in 5. In a multivariate analysis the best predictors of the risk of extracapsular extension on a side were average percent biopsy cores positive for cancer overall 15 or greater (odds ratio 8.4, p <0.0001) and average from 3 ipsilateral biopsies 15 or greater (odds ratio 7.4, p <0.0001). When used in combination these 2 factors yielded a model with a positive predictive value of 37% and a negative predictive value of 95%. Sextant specific percent biopsy cores positive for cancer was predictive of risk of extracapsular extension in a sextant (odds ratio 2.5, p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that average overall and per side percent biopsy cores positive for cancer is a significant predictor of risk of extracapsular extension on a side. Sextant specific percent biopsy cores positive for cancer is predictive of sextant site of extension. The high negative predictive value of the side specific model identifies patients who are good candidates for nerve sparing surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Contemporary trends in imaging test utilization for prostate cancer staging: data from the cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor.

PURPOSE: Previous investigators have reported widespread overuse of imaging tests for staging clinically localized prostate cancer. In this study imaging test utilization rates were analyzed in a contemporary group of patients, and clinical and demographic predictors of testing were identified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were abstracted from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), a longitudinal registry of men with various stages of prostate cancer. A total of 4,966 men met study inclusion criteria of available treatment and staging data. The rates of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scans performed between the dates of diagnosis and primary treatment were analyzed in patients at 3 levels of clinical risk based on serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason sum and T stage. Time trends in test utilization were analyzed by linear regression. Contemporary rates were compared with those identified in a previous analysis of an earlier CaPSURE cohort. Demographic and clinical predictors of utilization were identified using generalized linear model analysis. RESULTS: Since June 1997, the overall use of staging tests has decreased 63%, 25.9% and 11.4% in patients at low, intermediate and high risk, respectively. The most precipitous decrease was noted for bone scan but the use of cross-sectional imaging also decreased in all groups. Utilization rates were lower in 2001 than in any other year studied in CaPSURE. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of testing decreased significantly in all risk groups. However, in the absence of established clinical practice guidelines many patients at low and intermediate risk continue to undergo unnecessary testing, while a growing number of those at high risk are proceeding to treatment without previous imaging.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients receiving local therapy for prostate cancer: data from cancer of the prostate strategic urologic research endeavor.

PURPOSE: Secondary cancer treatment is common after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer and it may be an indicator of the efficacy and cost of primary local treatment. We determined predictors of secondary cancer treatment in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 2,336 patients in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor, a longitudinal registry of patients with prostate cancer, who underwent initial treatment with radical prostatectomy (1,744) or external beam radiation (592). Patients had at least 1 month of followup and all pretreatment information was available. The percent of patients receiving secondary cancer treatment, time to secondary treatment and type of secondary treatment delivered was determined. Multivariate analysis was done to determine independent predictors of secondary cancer treatment. In patients initially treated with prostatectomy a similar analysis was performed to identify predictors of receiving androgen deprivation versus radiation. RESULTS: A total of 590 patients (25%) received secondary cancer treatment, including prostatectomy in 391 (22%) and radiation in 199 (34%). Secondary cancer treatment was equally divided between radiation and androgen deprivation in 52% and 47%, respectively, of those initially treated with prostatectomy, while 92% initially treated with radiation received androgen deprivation. Predictors of any secondary treatment included patient age, biopsy Gleason score and prostate specific antigen at diagnosis. There was a trend toward increased secondary treatment more than 6 months after local therapy in patients initially treated with radiation. Increased age and lymph node metastases were independent predictors of receiving androgen deprivation after prostatectomy, while there was increased use of radiation in patients with positive surgical margins or extracapsular disease extension. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary treatment differs in patients initially treated with radical prostatectomy and radiation. Pretreatment factors can be used to counsel patients regarding the likelihood of secondary treatment, while age and prostatectomy results appear to determine the type of secondary treatment in those initially treated with prostatectomy.

Aged↗