Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Peter R Cook.
Cellular structures are shaped by hydrogen and ionic bonds, plus van der Waals and hydrophobic forces. In cells crowded with macromolecules, a little-known and distinct force-the "depletion attraction"-also acts. We review evidence that this force assists in the assembly of a wide range of cellular structures, ranging from the cytoskeleton to chromatin loops and whole chromosomes.
The steady-state levels of all mature transcripts expressed in bacteria and yeast have been cataloged, but we do not yet know the numbers of nascent transcripts and so RNA polymerases engaged on all genes. Such catalogs are presented here. As mRNA levels depend on the balance between synthesis and degradation, we use published data to calculate the numbers of engaged polymerases required to maintain these levels in the face of the known rate of degradation. Most genes, including essential ones, prove not to be transcribed most of the time, and many produce only one message per cell cycle. Some cells even fail to produce an essential message during a cycle, and so must depend on their mother's messages and/or proteins for survival. We speculate that evolution sets the rate of message production so low to conserve energy, minimize transcription-induced mutation, and permit regulation over the widest range.
Although we have detailed information on the alterations occurring in steady-state levels of all cellular mRNAs during differentiation, we still know little about more global changes. Therefore, we investigated the numbers of molecules of RNA polymerase II that are active--and the way those molecules are organized--as two mouse cells (aneuploid F9 teratocarcinoma, and euploid and totipotent embryonic stem cells) differentiate into parietal endoderm. Quantitative immunoblotting shows the number of active molecules roughly halves. Transcription sites (detected by light and electron microscopy after allowing engaged polymerases to extend nascent transcripts in bromouridine-triphosphate) are uniformly distributed throughout the nucleoplasm. The numbers of such sites fall during differentiation as nuclei become smaller, but site density and diameter remain roughly constant. Similar site densities and diameters are found in salamander (amphibian) cells with 11-fold larger genomes, and in aneuploid HeLa cells. We conclude that active polymerases and their nascent transcripts are concentrated in a limited number of discrete nucleoplasmic sites or factories, and we speculate that the organization of transcription is conserved during both differentiation and evolution to a high C value.
DNA and RNA polymerases active on bacterial and human genomes in the crowded environment of a cell are modeled as beads spaced along a string. Aggregation of the large polymerizing complexes increases the entropy of the system through an increase in entropy of the many small crowding molecules; this occurs despite the entropic costs of looping the intervening DNA. Results of a quantitative cost/benefit analysis are consistent with observations that active polymerases cluster into replication and transcription "factories" in both pro- and eukaryotes. We conclude that the second law of thermodynamics acts through nonspecific entropic forces between engaged polymerases to drive the self-organization of genomes into loops containing several thousands (and sometimes millions) of basepairs.
There is now convincing evidence that genomes are organized into loops, and that looping brings distant genes together so that they can bind to local concentrations of polymerases in "factories" or "hubs." As there remains no systematic analysis of how looping affects the probability that a gene can access binding sites in such factories/hubs, we used an algorithm that we devised and Monte Carlo methods to model a DNA or chromatin loop as a semiflexible (self-avoiding) tube attached to a sphere; we examine how loop thickness, rigidity, and contour length affect where particular segments of the loop lie relative to binding sites on the sphere. Results are compared with those obtained with the traditional model of an (infinitely thin) freely jointed chain. They provide insights into the packing problem (how long genomes are packed into small nuclei), and action-at-a-distance (how firing of one origin or gene can prevent firing of an adjacent one).
We have previously suggested a model for the eukaryotic genome based on the structure of the bacterial nucleoid where active RNA polymerases cluster to loop the intervening DNA. This organization of polymerases into clusters--which we call transcription 'factories'--has important consequences. For example, in the nucleus of a HeLa cell the concentration of soluble RNA polymerase II is approximately 1 mM, but the local concentration in a factory is 1000-fold higher. Because a promoter can diffuse approximately 100 nm in 15 s, one lying near a factory is likely to initiate; moreover, when released at termination, it will still lie near a factory, and the movement and modifications (e.g. acetylation) accompanying elongation will leave it in an 'open' conformation. Another promoter out in a long loop is less likely to initiate, because the promoter concentration falls off with the cube of the distance from the factory. Moreover, a long tether will buffer it from transcription-induced movement, making it prone to deacetylation, deposition of HP1 (heterochromatin protein 1), and incorporation into heterochromatin. The context around a promoter will then be self-sustaining: productive collisions of an active promoter with the factory will attract factors increasing the frequency of initiation, and the longer an inactive promoter remains inactive, the more it becomes embedded in heterochromatin. We review here the evidence that different factories may specialize in the transcription of different groups of genes.
RNA polymerase II is responsible for transcription of most eukaryotic genes, but, despite exhaustive analysis, little is known about how it transcribes natural templates in vivo. We studied polymerase dynamics in living Chinese hamster ovary cells using an established line that expresses the largest (catalytic) subunit of the polymerase (RPB1) tagged with the green fluorescent protein (GFP). Genetic complementation has shown this tagged polymerase to be fully functional. Fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP) reveals the existence of at least three kinetic populations of tagged polymerase: a large rapidly-exchanging population, a small fraction resistant to 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB) but sensitive to a different inhibitor of transcription (i.e. heat shock), and a third fraction sensitive to both inhibitors. Quantitative immunoblotting shows the largest fraction to be the inactive hypophosphorylated form of the polymerase (i.e. IIA). Results are consistent with the second (DRB-insensitive but heat-shock-sensitive) fraction being bound but not engaged, while the third (sensitive to both DRB and heat shock) is the elongating hyperphosphorylated form (i.e. IIO).
Although it is frequently assumed that translation does not occur in eukaryotic nuclei, recent evidence suggests that some translation can take place and that it is closely coupled to transcription. The first evidence concerns the destruction of nuclear mRNAs containing premature termination codons by nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). Only ribosomes can detect termination codons, and as some NMD occurs within the nuclear fraction, active nuclear ribosomes could perform the required detection. The second evidence is the demonstration that tagged amino acids are incorporated into nascent polypeptides in a nuclear process coupled to transcription. The third evidence is that components involved in translation, NMD and transcription colocalize, coimmunoprecipitate and co-purify. All these results are simply explained if nuclear ribosomes scan nascent transcripts for premature termination codons at the site of transcription. Alternatively, the scanning needed for NMD might take place at the nuclear membrane, and contaminating cytoplasmic ribosomes might give the appearance of some nuclear translation. We argue, however, that the balance of evidence favours bona fide nuclear translation.
BACKGROUND: We analyzed the organization and function of mitochondrial DNA in a stable human cell line (ECV304, which is also known as T-24) containing mitochondria tagged with the yellow fluorescent protein. RESULTS: Mitochondrial DNA is organized in approximately 475 discrete foci containing 6-10 genomes. These foci (nucleoids) are tethered directly or indirectly through mitochondrial membranes to kinesin, marked by KIF5B, and microtubules in the surrounding cytoplasm. In living cells, foci have an apparent diffusion constant of 1.1 x 10(-3) microm2/s, and mitochondria always split next to a focus to distribute all DNA to one daughter. The kinetics of replication and transcription (monitored by immunolabelling after incorporating bromodeoxyuridine or bromouridine) reveal that each genome replicates independently of others in a focus, and that newly-made RNA remains in a focus (residence half-time approximately 43 min) long after it has been made. This mitochondrial RNA colocalizes with components of the cytoplasmic machinery that makes and imports nuclear-encoded proteins - that is, a ribosomal protein (S6), a nascent peptide associated protein (NAC), and the translocase in the outer membrane (Tom22). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that clusters of mitochondrial genomes organize the translation machineries on both sides of the mitochondrial membranes. Then, proteins encoded by the nuclear genome and destined for the mitochondria will be made close to mitochondrial-encoded proteins so that they can be assembled efficiently into mitochondrial complexes.
It is widely believed that translation occurs only in the cytoplasm of eukaryotes, but recent results suggest some takes place in nuclei, coupled to transcription. Support for this heterodoxy comes from studies of the nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) pathway; this pathway probably uses ribosomes to proofread messenger RNAs. We find components of the machineries involved in transcription, translation and NMD colocalise, interact and copurify, and that interactions between them are probably mediated by the C-terminal domain of the catalytic subunit of RNA polymerase II. These results are simply explained if the NMD machinery uses nuclear ribosomes to translate - and so proofread - newly made transcripts; then, faulty transcripts and any truncated peptides produced by nuclear translation would be degraded.
DNA replication in cells takes place in domains scattered throughout the nucleoplasm. We have characterized the dynamics of DNA synthesis in synchronized mid-S-phase HeLa cells. Saponin-permeabilized cells were allowed to elongate nascent DNA chains in presence of biotin-dUTP for 5, 15, and 30 min (a pulse experiment), or for 5 min followed by an incubation with unlabeled precursors for 10 or 25 min (a pulse-and-chase experiment). The replication foci were then identified in ultrathin sections using immunogold labeling of the incorporated biotin. Total number of particles per nucleus, total scanned area of the nucleus, size, shape, and gold particle number of each labeled cluster, and the density of clusters per nucleus were evaluated. We have demonstrated that as replication proceeds, the labeled sites increase in size up to 240 nm (30 min incorporation) while maintaining a broadly round shape. In pulse-and-chase experiments the labeled DNA was shown to spread to occupy DNA foci of approximately 400 nm in diameter. These results demonstrate that DNA replication is compartmentalized within cell nuclei at the level of DNA foci and support the view that the synthetic centers are spatially constrained while the chromatin loops are dynamic during DNA synthesis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The nuclear membrane is the defining feature of eukaryotes. It divides the cell into two functionally specialized compartments, and it is widely assumed that translation is restricted to only one: the cytoplasm. However, recent results suggest that some translation takes place in nuclei closely coupled to transcription. Various labeling techniques are described that enable nascent peptides to be labeled and then localized wherever they might be in the cell.
In eukaryotes, motifs such as silencers, enhancers and locus control regions act over thousands of base pairs to regulate adjacent genes; insulators limit such effects, and barriers confine repressive heterochromatin to particular chromosomal segments. Recent results show that many of these motifs are nongenic transcription units, and two of them directly contact their targets lying further down the chromosome to loop the intervening DNA: the barriers (scs and scs') flanking the 87A7 heat-shock locus in the fly contact each other, and a locus control region touches the beta-globin gene in the mouse. I hypothesize that the act of transcription underlies the function of these regulators; active polymerizing complexes tend to cluster into 'factories' and this facilitates molecular contact between the transcribed regulator and its distant (and transcribed) target.
One of the ultimate goals of biological research is to understand mechanisms of cell function within living organisms. With this in mind, many sophisticated technologies that allow us to inspect macromolecular structure in exquisite detail have been developed. Although knowledge of structure derived from techniques such as X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance is of vital importance, these approaches cannot reveal the remarkable complexity of molecular interactions that exists in vivo. With this in mind, this review focuses on the use of microscopy techniques to analyze cell structure and function. We describe the different basic microscopic methodologies and how the routine techniques are best applied to particular biological problems. We also emphasize the specific capabilities and uses of light and electron microscopy and highlight their individual advantages and disadvantages. For completion, we also comment on the alternative possibilities provided by a variety of advanced imaging technologies. We hope that this brief analysis of the undoubted power of microscopy techniques will be enough to stimulate a wider participation in this rapidly developing area of biological discovery.
RNA polymerase II transcribes most eukaryotic genes. Its catalytic subunit was tagged with green fluorescent protein and expressed in Chinese hamster cells bearing a mutation in the same subunit; it complemented the defect and so was functional. Photobleaching revealed two kinetic fractions of polymerase in living nuclei: approximately 75% moved rapidly, but approximately 25% was transiently immobile (association t1/2 approximately 20 min) and transcriptionally active, as incubation with 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole eliminated it. No immobile but inactive fraction was detected, providing little support for the existence of a stable holoenzyme, or the slow stepwise assembly of a preinitiation complex on promoters or the nuclear substructure. Actinomycin D decreased the rapidly moving fraction, suggesting that engaged polymerases stall at intercalated molecules while others initiate. When wild-type cells containing only the endogenous enzyme were incubated with [3H]uridine, nascent transcripts became saturated with tritium with similar kinetics (t1/2 approximately 14 min). These data are consistent with a polymerase being mobile for one half to five sixths of a transcription cycle, and rapid assembly into the preinitiation complex. Then, most expressed transcription units would spend significant times unassociated with engaged polymerases.
Underphosphorylated retinoblastoma (Rb) protein inhibits progression around the cell cycle by binding to transcription factors like E2F; subsequent hyperphosphorylation of Rb protein releases E2F from the complex so that it can then drive the cell into S phase. We immunolocalized Rb protein in human cells during the cell cycle. Rb protein translocated into nucleoli after DNA replication completed, and the nucleolar Rb was shown to be in the hyperphosphorylated form by immunoblotting. This form, but not its underphosphorylated counterpart, interacted with the nucleolar protein nucleophosmin/B23. The two formed a salt-resistant complex in vitro, and the two could be immunoprecipitated together from nucleolar extracts. These results suggest that hyperphosphorylated Rb protein is imported into nucleoli late in S or G2 phase with nucleophosmin/B23. Analysis of the nucleolar location of Rb protein using various deletion mutants tagged with the green fluorescent protein implicated pocket A of Rb protein as the region responsible for nucleolar targeting; this region also interacted with nucleophosmin/B23. Nucleolar translocation of Rb mutant was inhibited by introducing nucleophosmin/B23 antisense oligomer. These results suggest that nucleolar translocation of Rb protein is promoted by the binding with nucleophosmin/B23 via the pocket A region.
2001 was the year of the human genome, but the new information has had little immediate impact on the field of nuclear structure. Rather, functional studies - especially on transcription - are leading us to a better understanding of how genomes might organise themselves into structures we call nuclei.