PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Rutherford

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Rutherford.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Capacity planning. Knowing the score.

The modified early warning score can be used to help predict how long a patient will stay in hospital. MEWS is a validated tool and can be calculated relatively easily from routine data. A MEWS score of 5 (high risk) had a median length stay of eight days, compared with a score of 0-2 (low risk) of three days; however, there were variations according to age groups and gender.

Evaluation Studies as Topic↗

Clinical experience with two physiologic bicarbonate/lactate peritoneal dialysis solutions in automated peritoneal dialysis.

UNLABELLED: Clinical experience with two physiologic bicarbonate/lactate peritoneal dialysis solutions in automated peritoneal dialysis. BACKGROUND: Patients on automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) usually receive larger volumes of dialysis solution and more frequent, shorter exchanges than patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and therefore are likely to derive greater benefit from more physiologic solutions. METHODS: Peritoneal dialysis solutions containing 25 mmol/L bicarbonate and either 10 or 15 mmol/L lactate were compared with standard lactate solutions (35 or 40 mmol/L) in two prospective, open-label studies of patients on APD. Each study included a 2-week baseline period (lactate solution), a 6-week treatment period (bicarbonate/lactate solution), and a 2-week follow-up period (same lactate solution as baseline). Biochemical analyses and assessments of vital signs and safety parameters were conducted at baseline, every 2 weeks during treatment, and at the end of the follow-up period. A product use questionnaire was administered in one study at the end of treatment. RESULTS: A statistically significant rise in plasma bicarbonate (approximately 2 mmol/L) occurred when patients switched from a lactate solution to the bicarbonate/lactate solution with equimolar buffer concentration (P < 0.001 for each solution). Plasma bicarbonate decreased by 1.16 mmol/L after a switch from lactate 40 mmol/L to bicarbonate/lactate 35 mmol/L (P < 0.001). When patients switched to bicarbonate/lactate 35, the majority of individual venous plasma bicarbonate values were in the normal range. A switch from a lower calcium (1.25 mmol/ L) lactate solution to a higher calcium (1.75 mmol/L) lactate/bicarbonate solution resulted in a statistically significant rise in serum calcium (0.06 mmol/L, P < 0.018). The product use questionnaire revealed improvements in symptoms, including reduced pain on infusion. CONCLUSION: Bicarbonate/lactate solutions may be used safely and effectively in patients on APD. The availability of 2 formulations with different buffer and calcium content provides flexibility for the control of acidosis as well as calcium balance.

Automation↗

Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: the European APD Outcome Study.

The European APD Outcome Study (EAPOS) is a 2-yr, prospective, multicenter study of the feasibility and clinical outcomes of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in anuric patients. A total of 177 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 yr (range, 21 to 91 yr). Previous median total time on dialysis was 38 mo (range, 1.6 to 259 mo), and 36% of patients had previously been on hemodialysis for >90 d. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease were present in 17% and 46% of patients, respectively. The APD prescription was adjusted at physician discretion to aim for creatinine clearance (Ccrea) >/=60 L/wk per 1.73 m(2) and ultrafiltration (UF) >/=750 ml/24 h during the first 6 mo. Baseline solute transport status (D/P) was determined by peritoneal equilibration test. At 1 yr, 78% and 74% achieved Ccrea and UF targets, respectively; median drained dialysate volume was 16.2 L/24 h with 50% of patients using icodextrin. Baseline D/P was not related to UF achieved at 1 yr. At 2 yr, patient survival was 78% and technique survival was 62%. Baseline predictors of poor survival were age (>65 yr; P = 0.006), nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment grade C; P = 0.009), diabetic status (P = 0.008), and UF (<750 ml/24 h; P = 0.047). Time-averaged analyses showed that age, Subjective Global Assessment grade C and diabetic status predicted patient survival with UF the next most significant variable (risk ratio, 0.5/L per d; P = 0.097). Baseline Ccrea, time-averaged Ccrea, and baseline D/P had no effect on patient or technique survival. This study shows that anuric patients can successfully use APD. Baseline UF, not Ccrea or membrane permeability, is associated with patient survival.

Adult↗

Successful development and application of a strategic dialysis planning model (RENPLAN).

Strategic planning for chronic dialysis services to allow cost-effective organization of resources and workforce planning is a difficult but essential task. The planning process within an individual unit involves consideration of both generic issues and issues specific to the unit. We used the Balance of Care approach to planning, which takes into account the affect that the dependency level of patients has on the therapeutic options and on how those options can be delivered. In a workshop format, we developed a spreadsheet computer model (RENPLAN) and applied it to facilitate discussion between clinical and non clinical health care professionals, dialysis unit managers, and renal patient representatives. Within the unit concerned, we used the model to explore a variety of planning options, including reducing the number of patients receiving automated peritoneal dialysis (proposed as a cost-reduction measure by managers). The model precisely calculates future resource requirements (staff numbers, hemodialysis stations, disposables costs), indicates deficits in clinical audit data, and facilitates education of non clinical managers regarding the major issues in dialysis planning. The RENPLAN model is freely available to all units and is adaptable for analysis of local planning issues.

Ambulatory Care Facilities↗