PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Peter Unsbo

Publications and source records attributed to Peter Unsbo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Assessment of objective and subjective eccentric refraction.

PURPOSE: When performing perimetry, refracting subjects with central visual field loss, and in emmetropization studies, it is important to accurately measure peripheral refractive errors. Traditional methods for foveal refraction often give uncertain results in eccentric angles as a result of the large aberrations and the reduced retinal function. The aim of this study is therefore to compare and evaluate four methods for eccentric refraction. METHODS: Four eccentric methods were tested on 50 healthy subjects: one novel subjective procedure, optimizing the detection contrast sensitivity with different trial lenses, and three objective ones: photorefraction with a PowerRefractor, wavefront measurements with a Hartmann-Shack sensor, and retinoscopy. The peripheral refractive error in the horizontal nasal visual field of the right eye was measured in 20 degrees and 30 degrees. RESULTS: In general, the eccentric refraction methods compared reasonably well. However, the following differences were noted. Retinoscopy showed a significant difference from the other methods in the axis of astigmatism. In 30 degree eccentric angle, it was not possible to measure 15 of the subjects with the PowerRefractor and the instrument also tended to underestimate high myopia (<-6 D). The Hartmann-Shack sensor showed a myopic shift of approximately 0.5 D in both eccentricities. The subjective method had a relatively larger spread. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that it is possible to assess the eccentric refraction with all methods. However, the Hartmann-Shack technique was found to be the most useful method. The agreement between the objective methods and the subjective eccentric refraction shows that detection contrast sensitivity in the periphery is affected by relatively small amounts of defocus.

Adult↗

Unwrapping Hartmann-Shack images from highly aberrated eyes using an iterative B-spline based extrapolation method.

PURPOSE: When the wavefront aberrations of the eye are measured with a Hartmann-Shack (HS) sensor, the resulting spot pattern must be unwrapped, that is, for each lenslet the corresponding spot must be identified. This puts a limitation on the measurable amount of aberrations. To extend the range of an HS sensor, a powerful unwrapping algorithm has been developed. METHODS: The unwrapping algorithm starts by connecting the central HS spots to the central lenslets. It then fits a B-spline function through a least squares estimate to the deviations of the central HS spots. This function is then extrapolated to find the expected locations of HS spots for the unconnected lenslets. The extrapolation is performed gradually in an iterative manner; the closest unconnected lenslets are extrapolated and connected, and then the B-spline function is least squares fitted to all connected HS spots and extrapolated again. RESULTS: Wavefront aberrations from eyes with high aberrations can be successfully unwrapped with the developed algorithm. The dynamic range of a typical HS sensor increases 3.5 to 13 times compared with a simple unwrapping algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: The implemented algorithm is an efficient unwrapping tool and allows the use of lenslets with a low numerical aperture and thus gives a relatively higher accuracy of measurements of the ocular aberrations.

Algorithms↗

Eccentric correction for off-axis vision in central visual field loss.

BACKGROUND: Subjects with absolute central visual field loss use eccentric fixation and magnifying devices to utilize their residual vision. This preliminary study investigated the importance of an accurate eccentric correction of off-axis refractive errors to optimize the residual visual function for these subjects. METHODS: Photorefraction using the PowerRefractor instrument was used to evaluate the ametropia in eccentric fixation angles. Methods were adapted for measuring visual acuity outside the macula using filtered optotypes from high-pass resolution perimetry. Optical corrections were implemented, and the visual function of subjects with central visual field loss was measured with and without eccentric correction. RESULTS: Of the seven cases reported, five experienced an improvement in visual function in their preferred retinal locus with eccentric refraction. CONCLUSIONS: The main result was that optical correction for better image quality on the peripheral retina is important for the vision of subjects with central visual field loss, objectively as well as subjectively.

Adolescent↗

Off-axis wave front measurements for optical correction in eccentric viewing.

In a previous study we have shown that correction of peripheral refractive errors can improve the remaining vision of subjects with large central visual field loss. Measuring peripheral refractive errors with traditional methods is often difficult due to low visual acuity and large aberrations. Therefore a Hartmann-Shack sensor has been designed to measure peripheral wave front aberrations in subjects using eccentric viewing. The sensor incorporates an eye tracker and analyzing software designed to handle large wave front aberrations and elliptic pupils. To ensure that the measurement axis is aligned with the direction of the subject's preferred retinal location, a special fixation target has been developed. It consists of concentric rings surrounding the aperture of the sensor together with a central fixation mark along the measurement axis. Some initial measurements on subjects using eccentric viewing have been performed successfully. As a first step in improving the peripheral optics of the eye, the wave front has been used to calculate the eccentric refraction. This refraction has been compared to the refraction found with the PowerRefractor instrument. Measuring the off-axis wave front is a fast way to assess the optical errors in the subject's eccentric viewing angle and to better understand the problems of eccentric correction.

Equipment Design↗