Biomedical subjects

Petra M Nederlof

Publications and source records attributed to Petra M Nederlof.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Array-CGH and breast cancer.

The introduction of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in 1992 opened new avenues in genomic investigation; in particular, it advanced analysis of solid tumours, including breast cancer, because it obviated the need to culture cells before their chromosomes could be analyzed. The current generation of CGH analysis uses ordered arrays of genomic DNA sequences and is therefore referred to as array-CGH or matrix-CGH. It was introduced in 1998, and further increased the potential of CGH to provide insight into the fundamental processes of chromosomal instability and cancer. This review provides a critical evaluation of the data published on array-CGH and breast cancer, and discusses some of its expected future value and developments.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2005

Pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma following head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: metastasis or second primary?

PURPOSE: To distinguish a metastasis from a second primary tumor in patients with a history of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and subsequent pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: For 44 patients with a primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck followed by a squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, clinical data, histology, and analysis of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) were used to differentiate metastases from second primary tumors. RESULTS: Clinical evaluation suggested 38 patients with metastases and 6 with second primaries. We developed a novel interpretation strategy based on biological insight and on our observation that multiple LOH on different chromosome arms are not independent. LOH analysis indicated metastatic disease in 19 cases and second primary squamous cell carcinoma in 24 cases. In one case, LOH analysis was inconclusive. For 25 patients, LOH supported the clinical scoring, and in 18 cases, it did not. These 18 discordant cases were all considered to be second primary tumors by LOH analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of squamous cell lung lesions (50% in this study), clinically interpreted as metastases, are suggested to be second primaries by LOH analysis. For these patients, a surgical approach with curative intent may be justified.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Comparative genomic hybridization profiles in human BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors highlight differential sets of genomic aberrations.

BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations cause approximately 30% of breast cancers within high-risk families. This represents 5% of total breast cancer incidence. Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 are both implicated in DNA repair and genome stability, it is unknown whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with similar or distinct diseases. In a previous study we reported that BRCA1-related breast carcinomas show a distinct genomic profile as determined by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). We now hypothesize that, if functionally equivalent, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 would result in similar genomic profiles in tumors. Here we report the chromosomal gains and losses as measured by CGH in 25 BRCA2-associated breast tumors and compared them with our existing 36 BRCA1 and 30 control profiles. We compared all chromosomal regions and determined the regions of differential gain or loss between tumor classes and controls. BRCA2 and control tumors have very similar genomic profiles. As a consequence, and in contrast to BRCA1-associated tumors, CGH profiles from BRCA2-associated tumors could not be distinguished from control tumors using the classification methodology as we have developed before. The largest number of significant differences existed between BRCA1 and controls, followed by BRCA1 compared with BRCA2, suggesting different tumor development pathways for BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed2003

Large genomic deletions and duplications in the BRCA1 gene identified by a novel quantitative method.

We applied a novel method to detect single or multiple exon deletions and amplifications in the BRCA1 gene. The test, called multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), uses probes designed to hybridize adjacently to the target sequence. After ligation, the joined probes are amplified and quantified. Our two diagnostic laboratories have tested in the recent years 805 families by conventional PCR-based techniques, and found 116 BRCA1 and 28 BRCA2 mutation-positive families. Using MLPA, we have tested the remaining 661 noninformative breast cancer families and identified five distinct BRCA1 germ-line mutations in five families: a deletion of exon 8, a deletion of exons 20-22, a duplication of exon 13 and exons 21-23, respectively, and a triplication, encompassing exons 17-19. Genomic deletions of BRCA1 constitute a substantial fraction of mutations in Dutch breast cancer families. If MLPA had been included in our initial BRCA1 testing, 33 families with a deletion or duplication would have been identified, representing 27% of the total 121 BRCA1 mutation-positive families. The MLPA test for BRCA1 ensures a sensitive and comprehensive high-throughput screening test for genomic rearrangement and can easily be implemented in the molecular analysis of BRCA1.

Blotting, Southern↗

PubMed2003

Very late relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma represents clonally related disease and is marked by germinal center cell features.

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) rarely show relapse after 4 years of complete remission (CR). In this study, we addressed the following questions: (1) Does late-relapsing DLBCL represent clonally related disease or a second malignancy; and (2) is there a characteristic biologic background? In 10 of 13 DLBCL patients with relapse after 4 to 17 years, a clonal relationship was established based on identical IgH-sequences and/or identical bcl2-IgH translocation. Most (77%) showed features of germinal center (GC) cells, as defined by expression of CD10, bcl-2, and bcl-6 protein and ongoing immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (VH) hypermutation. A GC phenotype was seen in 8 (20%) of 38 control patients matched for age, stage, and (extra)nodal localization with relapse within 2.5 years (P =.005). In conclusion, we have found evidence that late-relapsing DLBCL represents truly clonally related disease episodes in most cases and that this clinical behavior may be related to the biologic features of GC cells.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Association of C-MYC amplification with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage in C-MYC-amplified breast carcinomas.

Human carcinoma in situ of the breast already demonstrates genomic changes found in invasive lesions. However, no specific genetic alterations have previously been identified that are associated with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage. By comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of an invasive breast carcinoma with a large associated in situ component, high-level amplification of C-MYC was found in the invasive component only. To determine the frequency of this correlation in a panel of 188 invasive breast carcinomas, 18 additional cases with C-MYC amplification were identified. Nine of these cases had a detectable adjacent in situ component. FISH analysis demonstrated increased (>5) C-MYC signals per nucleus in seven invasive components and increased (>4) C-MYC/centromere 8 signal ratios in five of these. None of the associated in situ components demonstrated these increases. The minimal amplified region was defined at 8q24.13-8qter. C-MYC amplification was correlated with overexpression of C-MYC and two of its target genes, TERT and FBL. Thus, C-MYC amplification is the first identified genetic alteration that is associated with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage of breast carcinoma.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization: a specific somatic genetic profile for BRCA1 tumors.

In approximately 70% of the families with a high frequency of early-onset breast and/or ovarian cancer, BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations cannot be identified with the current screening regime. Therefore, we used data mining to identify a somatic genetic signature to differentiate BRCA1 mutation carriers from non-BRCA1 carriers based on the genetic characteristics of their breast carcinomas. For this purpose, we developed a molecular classifier, which assigns a given tumor to either the BRCA1 or control group based on somatic genetic profiles as revealed by comparative genomic hybridization. This was performed on breast tumors selected from two groups of patients: 28 proven BRCA1 germline mutation carriers; and a control group consisting of 42 breast tumors from patients with unknown BRCA1 or BRCA2 status. We show that BRCA1 breast carcinomas exhibit specific somatic genetic aberrations and can be distinguished from control tumors with an accuracy of 84% (sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 76%). Chromosomal bands used by this classifier include regions on chromosomes 3p, 3q, and 5q. The classifier miss-assigned one patient with a BRCA1 mutation to the non-BRCA1 class. The germline mutation in this patient is a 62bp deletion in the last exon of BRCA1 (5622del62). Possibly, this mutation may give a different phenotypic effect than do mutations in other regions of the gene. Validation on an independent set of BRCA1 and sporadic tumors showed that the BRCA1 classifier correctly identified all 6 BRCA1 tumors and assigned 4 of the 19 control patients to the BRCA1 class. The resulting accuracy on the validation set is 84%.

Breast Neoplasms↗