PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Petros Syrris

Publications and source records attributed to Petros Syrris.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

An Updated Evidence Assessment of the Genetic Causes of Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Evidence of the diverse genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) continues to emerge and requires reassessment of the clinical relevance of implicated disease genes. Building on the 2019-2020 Clinical Genome Resource evaluation, the DCM gene curation expert panel reconvened in 2024-2025 to conduct a reassessment of genes in DCM. METHODS: The Clinical Genome Resource semiquantitative clinical validity classification framework was applied with specifications to DCM to classify genes into categories on the basis of strength of published evidence for a DCM phenotype. Previously curated genes were reassessed, and newly reported gene-disease-mode of inheritance (MOI) relationships, termed "curations," were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty-eight genes were evaluated, inclusive of 72 unique gene-disease-MOI relationships across 51 previously evaluated and 17 newly assessed genes. Thirty-five curations were classified as high evidence (16 Definitive, 10 Strong, 9 Moderate), increasing by 16 from the prior assessment. Nine newly assessed genes were classified as high evidence: BAG5, FLII, LMOD2, MYLK3, MYZAP, NRAP, PPA2, PPP1R13L, and RPL3L. Twelve genes (11 newly appraised) were rated as high evidence with an autosomal recessive (AR) MOI. Five reevaluated genes from 2019-2020 had clinically significant changes in classification. Except for JPH2, for which curation was modified to separate autosomal dominant and AR MOI curations, clinically significant changes involved upgrades from low- to high-evidence categories (PLEKHM2, PRDM16, TBX20, TNNI3K), demonstrating the robustness of the Clinical Genome Resource gene curation process over time. An additional 29 gene-disease-MOI curations were classified as Limited, including 6 newly evaluated genes and 1 new MOI for a previously evaluated gene, MYBPC3-AR; 4 were classified as No Known Disease Relationship, and remained Disputed. Four previously evaluated genes were curated for both AD and AR MOIs: JPH2 (AD-Strong, AR-Limited), LDB3 (AD-Limited, AR-Strong), MYBPC3 (AD-Limited, AR-Limited), and TNNI3 (AD- and AR- Strong). CONCLUSIONS: With substantial new evidence, the genetic architecture of DCM has rapidly expanded. This updated assessment of genes reported in DCM yielded 35 high-evidence curations, an increase from 19 only 5 years ago. The results of this evidence-based evaluation process inform clinical interpretation of genetic information in the care of DCM patients and families.

dilated cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a genome-wide association meta-analysis and polygenic risk score.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heritable trait with marked variability in expression and outcomes. Our aims were to discover new genetic loci associated with HCM and to test the effect of a new polygenic risk score (PRS) on incidence, phenotype and outcomes stratified by genotype status. METHODS: A discovery genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed on 2284 HCM cases and 4525 controls. Two fixed-effects meta-analyses combined our discovery GWAS with single-trait and multi-trait results from a published study. Discovered loci underwent comprehensive bioinformatic analysis including functional and druggability annotations. A PRS using loci from the two meta-analyses was evaluated for association with HCM diagnosis in 411 213 individuals from UK Biobank (UKBB); imaging phenotypes in individuals without HCM; a composite endpoint (including all-cause mortality and transplantation); and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in 1756 HCM cases. PRS analyses were stratified by genotype status. RESULTS: Three loci were found in the discovery GWAS (BAG3, FHOD3 and novel locus PPP1R3A). In the meta-analyses, 70 unique loci were identified, four novel (MYPN, YWHAE, NOS1AP and OBSCN). Bioinformatic analyses identified NOS1AP as a candidate HCM gene. A new PRS was significantly associated with HCM diagnosis (HR=3.19, 95% CI 2.46 to 4.14 for top 5% vs lower 95%; HR=1.88, 95% CI 1.72 to 2.06 per SD increase). Significant associations were found between PRS and greater left ventricular (LV) wall thickness and higher LV ejection fraction in UKBB participants without HCM. Genotype-negative HCM cases in the top 20% of the PRS distribution had an increased risk of SCD (HR=2.72, 95% CI 1.03 to 7.17). CONCLUSIONS: We report novel HCM loci. A new PRS predicted the risk of HCM development and associated imaging characteristics in the UKBB and outcomes in an HCM cohort.

Cardiomyopathies