PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Phil Rutsohn

Publications and source records attributed to Phil Rutsohn.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Anesthesiologists and anesthetist: are we paying for outcome or process?

The concept of Value Exchange is fundamental to any discipline that focuses on interactions between providers and consumers. In both the study of Marketing and the study of Economics, one learns that a producer and consumer will engage in an exchange relationship only so long as the value/cost relationship is positive. Once the cost of the exchange is equal to the value of that exchange, further economic activity is irrational. In a market-based economy, the market is obviously the regulator unless there is some imperfection inhibiting the interaction of the buyer and seller. When there is an imperfection, it is the government's responsibility to intervene and function as a proxy promoting rational buying and selling. In this paper, the author will attempt to demonstrate that the consumer has been economically irrational when purchasing anesthesia services and government has been slow and minimally effective when intervening to rectify this market imperfection.

Anesthesiology↗

The Monte Carlo method improves physician practice valuation.

This article demonstrates the use of the Monte Carlo simulation method in physician practice valuation. The Monte Carlo method allows the valuator to incorporate probability ranges into the discounted cash flow model and obtain an output indicating the probability for specified ranges of practice valuation. Given the high level of uncertainty in projected cash flows associated with physician practices, the value of this kind of information in a practice valuation decision would quite obviously be superior to any single point estimate generated by a traditional discounted cash flow model. It is postulated that virtually all hospitals support an information system that can easily accommodate a Monte Carlo simulation.

Monte Carlo Method↗

An analysis of provider attitudes toward end-of-life decision-making.

The explosion of technological and biomedical interventions over the past half century appears to have enhanced the medical profession's ability to prolong life at a faster pace than society's ability to develop comprehensive bioethical laws governing end-of-life decisions. This study was conducted to determine if there was a correlation between educational and occupational backgrounds and participants' perceptions of end-of-life care. Study participants came from various areas and levels of healthcare at a large federal healthcare facility and included nurses, doctors, pharmacists, dietitians, administrators, and others. Participants completed a questionnaire providing both sociodemographic information and perceptions of end-of-life care. Respondents were classified by type of education or background (technical, professional, or medical) and by level of involvement with patient care (direct or indirect). While the results showed a general consensus about the importance of respecting patients' end-of-life wishes, there were differences among respondents in regard to specific issues.

Anecdotes as Topic↗