PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Phil Snell

Publications and source records attributed to Phil Snell.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Base editing reveals an essential role for NANOG in human embryogenesis.

Understanding how the first cell lineages in human development are specified and maintained has fundamental importance and clinical implications for regenerative medicine, infertility and pregnancy loss. Although mouse models have provided valuable insights into transcription factors regulating early development, translating these findings to human embryos has been limited by ethical, technical and biological constraints. Functional studies of transcription factors in human embryos have been hindered by nuclease-based genome editing approaches that induce genotoxicity1-3. Here, to overcome this, we applied ABE8e adenine base editing4,5 to precisely target an exon splice donor site, resulting in a splicing defect and functional knockout of the developmental regulator NANOG in human embryos. This approach did not trigger genotoxicity and showed limited off-target editing. Loss of NANOG disrupts pluripotent epiblast specification and instead cells differentiate towards a primitive endoderm (yolk sac) or trophectoderm (placental) transcriptional programme. Retention of primitive endoderm differentiation in NANOG-edited human embryos reveals a functional compensation that is distinct from mouse, underscoring the importance of directly investigating human development. Our findings demonstrate an essential role for NANOG in human pluripotency and epiblast specification and highlight the utility of base editing for functional interrogation of human development.

Journal Article↗

Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development.

In addition to protein coding sequence, the human genome contains a significant amount of regulatory DNA, the identification of which is proving somewhat recalcitrant to both in silico and functional methods. An approach that has been used with some success is comparative sequence analysis, whereby equivalent genomic regions from different organisms are compared in order to identify both similarities and differences. In general, similarities in sequence between highly divergent organisms imply functional constraint. We have used a whole-genome comparison between humans and the pufferfish, Fugu rubripes, to identify nearly 1,400 highly conserved non-coding sequences. Given the evolutionary divergence between these species, it is likely that these sequences are found in, and furthermore are essential to, all vertebrates. Most, and possibly all, of these sequences are located in and around genes that act as developmental regulators. Some of these sequences are over 90% identical across more than 500 bases, being more highly conserved than coding sequence between these two species. Despite this, we cannot find any similar sequences in invertebrate genomes. In order to begin to functionally test this set of sequences, we have used a rapid in vivo assay system using zebrafish embryos that allows tissue-specific enhancer activity to be identified. Functional data is presented for highly conserved non-coding sequences associated with four unrelated developmental regulators (SOX21, PAX6, HLXB9, and SHH), in order to demonstrate the suitability of this screen to a wide range of genes and expression patterns. Of 25 sequence elements tested around these four genes, 23 show significant enhancer activity in one or more tissues. We have identified a set of non-coding sequences that are highly conserved throughout vertebrates. They are found in clusters across the human genome, principally around genes that are implicated in the regulation of development, including many transcription factors. These highly conserved non-coding sequences are likely to form part of the genomic circuitry that uniquely defines vertebrate development.

Animals↗