Biomedical subjects

Philip B Kruger

Publications and source records attributed to Philip B Kruger.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error.

The accommodation response is sensitive to the chromatic properties of the stimulus, a sensitivity presumed to be related to making use of the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye to decode the sign of the defocus. Thus, the relative sensitivity to the long- (L) and middle-wavelength (M) cones may influence accommodation and may also be related to an individual's refractive error. Accommodation was measured continuously while subjects viewed a sine wave grating (2.2c/d) that had different cone contrast ratios. Seven conditions tested loci that form a circle with equal vector length (0.27) at 0, 22.5, 45, 67.5, 90, 120, 145 deg. An eighth condition produced an empty field stimulus (CIE (x,y) co-ordinates (0.4554, 0.3835)). Each of the gratings moved at 0.2 Hz sinusoidally between 1.00 D and 3.00 D for 40s, while the effects of longitudinal chromatic aberration were neutralized with an achromatizing lens. Both the mean level of accommodation and the gain of the accommodative response, to sinusoidal movements of the stimulus, depended on the relative L and M cone sensitivity: Individuals more sensitive to L-cone stimulation showed a higher level of accommodation (p=0.01; F=12.05; ANOVA) and dynamic gain was higher for gratings with relatively more L-cone contrast. Refractive error showed a similar correlation: More myopic individuals showed a higher mean level of accommodation (p<0.01; F=11.42; ANOVA) and showed higher gain for gratings with relatively more L-cone than M-cone contrast (p=0.01; F=10.83 ANOVA). If luminance contrast is maximized by accommodation, long wavelengths will be imaged behind the photoreceptors. Individuals in whom luminance is dominated by L-cones may maximize luminance contrast both by accommodating more, as shown here, and by increased ocular elongation, resulting in myopia, possibly explaining the correlations reported here among relative L/M-cone sensitivity, refractive error and accommodation.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2006

Accommodation with higher-order monochromatic aberrations corrected with adaptive optics.

Higher-order monochromatic aberrations in the human eye cause a difference in the appearance of stimuli at distances nearer and farther from best focus that could serve as a signed error signal for accommodation. We explored whether higher-order monochromatic aberrations affect the accommodative response to 0.5 D step changes in vergence in experiments in which these aberrations were either present as they normally are or removed with adaptive optics. Of six subjects, one could not accommodate at all for steps in either condition. One subject clearly required higher-order aberrations to accommodate at all. The remaining four subjects could accommodate in the correct direction even when higher-order aberrations were removed. No subjects improved their accommodation when higher-order aberrations were corrected, indicating that the corresponding decrease in the depth of field of the eye did not improve the accommodative response. These results are consistent with previous findings of large individual differences in the ability to accommodate in impoverished conditions. These results suggest that at least some subjects can use monochromatic higher-order aberrations to guide accommodation. They also show that some subjects can accommodate correctly when higher-order monochromatic aberrations as well as established cues to accommodation are greatly reduced.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2004

Accommodation with and without short-wavelength-sensitive cones and chromatic aberration.

Accommodation was monitored while observers (23) viewed a square-wave grating (2.2 cycles/deg; 0.53 contrast) in a Badal optometer. The grating moved sinusoidally (0.2 Hz) to provide a stimulus between -1.00 D and -3.00 D during trials lasting 40.96 s. There were three illumination conditions: 1. Monochromatic 550 nm light to stimulate long-wavelength-sensitive cones (L-cones) and medium-wavelength-sensitive cones (M-cones) without chromatic aberration; 2. Monochromatic 550 nm light+420 nm light to stimulate long-, medium- and short-wavelength-sensitive cones (S-cones) with longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA); 3. Monochromatic 550 nm light+420 nm light to stimulate L-, M- and S-cones viewed through an achromatizing lens. In the presence of LCA mean dynamic gain decreased (p=0.0003; ANOVA) and mean accommodation level was reduced (p=0.001; ANOVA). The reduction in gain and increased lag of accommodation in the presence of LCA could result from a blue-yellow chromatic signal or from a larger depth-of-focus.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2004

The role of short-wavelength sensitive cones and chromatic aberration in the response to stationary and step accommodation stimuli.

The aim of the experiment was to test for a contribution from short-wavelength sensitive cones to the static and step accommodation response, to compare responses from short and long- plus middle-wavelength sensitive cone types, and to examine the contribution of a signal from longitudinal chromatic aberration to the accommodation response. Accommodation was monitored continuously (eight subjects) to a square-wave grating (2.2 c/d; 0.57 contrast) in a Badal optometer. The grating stepped (1.00 D) randomly towards or away from the eye from a starting position of 2.00 D. Five illumination conditions were used to isolate cone responses, and combine them with or without longitudinal chromatic aberration. Accuracy of the response before the step, step amplitude, latencies and time-constants, were compared between conditions using single factor ANOVA and t-test comparisons. Both S-cones and LM-cones mediated static and step accommodation responses. S-cone contrast drives "static" accommodation for near, but the S-cone response is too slow to influence step dynamics when LM-cones participate.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2004

Small foveal targets for studies of accommodation and the Stiles-Crawford effect.

The properties of small monochromatic targets as accommodative stimuli are not well understood. We used a dynamic optometer to record accommodation responses to monochromatic disc targets (1.0-27.3 min arc) and to a Maltese cross. Accommodation responded adequately to points as small as 13.6 min arc. The response to these small targets is relevant to the question of whether the Stiles-Crawford (SC) effect could provide a stimulus to accommodation. Previous studies have used pupil apodizing filters to neutralise the natural SC function and so determine how visual performance or accommodation is influenced by the SC effect. However, these filters cannot correct for known inhomogeneities in the SC function across the retina for extended targets. Therefore, we calculated the SC function inhomogeneities across the retinal image of a smaller 13.6-min arc target. Unfortunately, even this small target is too large to permit a homogenous SC function across its extent. Alternatives to the apodizing filter approach are discussed.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2004

Accommodation responses to stimuli in cone contrast space.

The aim was to identify the cone contributions and pathways for reflex accommodation. Twelve illumination conditions were used to test specified locations in cone-contrast space. Accommodation was monitored continuously in a Badal optometer while the grating stimulus (2.2 c/d sine-wave; 0.27 modulation) moved sinusoidally (0.195 Hz) towards and away from the eye from a mean position of 2.00 D (+/-1.00 D). Mean accommodation level and dynamic gain and phase at 0.195 Hz were calculated. Mean accommodation level varied significantly when the long- and middle-wavelength cone contrast ratio was altered in both the luminance and chromatic quadrants of cone-contrast space. This experiment indicates that L- and M-cones contribute to luminance and chromatic signals that produce the accommodation response, most likely through magno-cellular and parvo-cellular pathways, respectively. The L:M cone weighting to the luminance pathway that mediates accommodation is 1.63:1. The amplitude and direction of the response depends on changes in chromatic contrast and luminance contrast signals that result from longitudinal chromatic aberration and defocus of the image.

Accommodation, Ocular↗

PubMed2002

Accommodation to simulations of defocus and chromatic aberration in the presence of chromatic misalignment.

Previous studies have demonstrated that accommodation will respond to sine gratings in which the relative modulations of red, green and blue image components have been altered to simulate the effects of defocus and longitudinal chromatic aberration. The present study aimed to determine the tolerance of the accommodative system to relative phase shifts in those components induced by chromatic misalignment. It was found that accommodation can tolerate moderate amounts of chromatic misalignment (6'), but responds adversely when misalignments are large. Applications to visual display terminals and spectacle lens and instrument design are discussed.

Accommodation, Ocular↗