PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Philip B Miner

Publications and source records attributed to Philip B Miner.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effect of tegaserod on esophageal pain threshold, regurgitation, and symptom relief in patients with functional heartburn and mechanical sensitivity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Tegaserod, a 5-HT4-receptor partial agonist, effectively treats irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. The role of tegaserod in functional disorders of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine if tegaserod improves esophageal pain with mechanical and chemical stimuli, GI symptom profile, and global preference in patients with functional heartburn. METHODS: Patients with functional heartburn, as defined by Rome II criteria, underwent esophageal barostat and acid-infusion sensory tests. Mechanical hypersensitivity was required for entry. The baseline GI symptom profile was rated before treatment. Patients were blinded to treatment and randomly assigned to tegaserod 6 mg twice daily or placebo for 14 days, and crossed-over to the alternate treatment after 7 to 10 days of washout. Patients underwent sensory tests and rated GI symptoms after each treatment. Global treatment preference was completed at the end of the study. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (15 men, 27 women; age, 20-68 y) completed the study. The predominant baseline symptoms in addition to heartburn included upper-abdominal pain, upper-abdominal discomfort, regurgitation, chest pain, early satiety, and postmeal bloating. Tegaserod significantly increased balloon pressure to pain (P = .04) and the mean (P = .002) and maximum wall tension at pain (P = .0004). Tegaserod did not alter pain with acid infusion. Tegaserod significantly decreased the frequency of occurrence of heartburn/acid reflux (P = .004), regurgitation (P = .048), and distress from regurgitation (P = .039). The global preference for tegaserod was 63.4% vs 12.2% for placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tegaserod improved the esophageal pain threshold to mechanical distention, and distressing upper-GI symptoms in patients with functional heartburn.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Intragastric acidity after switching from 5-day treatment with intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/d to 5-day treatment with oral esomeprazole 40 mg/d or pantoprazole 40 mg/d: an open-label crossover study in healthy adult volunteers.

BACKGROUND: After a course of IV proton pump inhibitor therapy, patients might require continued oral antisecretory therapy. A direct comparison of therapeutic alternatives could assist physicians in decisions regarding optimal acid-suppressive therapy. Oral esomeprazole might control intragastric acidity more effectively compared with other acid-suppressive agents after IV therapy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare intragastric acid control on day 5 of administration of esomeprazole magnesium versus pantoprazole 40 mg PO QD after switching from 5 days of treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg IV in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, comparative, 2-way crossover study was conducted at the Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, between October and December 2004. Healthy, Helicobacter pylori-negative adults were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 dosing sequences: pantoprazole IV followed by esomeprazole PO or pantoprazole IV followed by pantoprazole PO. All study medications were administered for 5 days at a dose of 40 mg QD. IV pantoprazole was administered over 2 minutes; all medications were administered 30 minutes before breakfast. There was a 10- to 21-day washout period between each 10-day dosing period. All doses were administered at the study site. Before oral study drug administration on days 1 and 5, 24-hour pH monitoring was performed using a pH catheter positioned 10 cm distal to the lower esophageal sphincter in the stomach. The primary end point was percentage of time with pH >4 (%t pH >4) during the 24-hour pH-monitoring period. Tolerability was assessed using spontaneous reporting, laboratory analysis, and vital-sign measurement. RESULTS: Of 42 subjects randomized to treatment sequences, 4 were withdrawn during the study because of invalid pH data; 38 subjects (24 men, 14 women; mean [SD] age, 25.2 [8.1] years) had assessable data. Day-5 %t pH >4 was 68.5% with esomeprazole and 53.3% with pantoprazole (P < 0.001). Day-1 %t pH >4 was 62.5% with esomeprazole and 51.0% with pantoprazole (P < 0.001). The most common adverse events were rhinitis (2 subjects each with pantoprazole IV and PO; 1 subject with esomeprazole) and headache (2 subjects with esomeprazole; 1 subject with pantoprazole IV). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study in healthy adult volunteers suggest that switching from pantoprazole 40 mg IV to esomeprazole 40 mg PO QD more effectively suppresses intragastric acid compared with switching from pantoprazole 40 mg IV to pantoprazole 40 mg PO QD. All 3 treatments were well tolerated.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2006

Effect of esophageal acid and prophylactic rabeprazole on performance in runners.

INTRODUCTION: Acid reflux occurs during exercise. The effects of esophageal acid and prophylactic antisecretory treatment on exercise performance are unknown. AIMS: To determine 1) the effect of esophageal acid perfusion during exercise on pulmonary function and exercise performance, and 2) whether acid suppression with rabeprazole (RAB) 20 mg x d(-1) increases exercise performance during esophageal acid infusion. METHODS: This was a two-phase study. Twenty-four conditioned runners (11 with heartburn, 13 without) completed phase 1. Sixteen runners with heartburn completed phase 2 (RAB). For phase 1, esophageal evaluation, baseline maximum exertion test, and a standard Bruce protocol maximal stress test were performed. Runners were randomized to sham esophageal infusion (NG tube placed in the distal esophagus, no fluid) or esophageal acid perfusion (0.1 N HCl perfused) during exercise. Subjects were crossed over to the alternate perfusion. For phase 2, runners underwent three sessions with both acid and sham perfusion during running; the sessions were randomly conducted on different days at baseline and 8 and 12 wk of RAB 20 mg. RESULTS: For phase 1, esophageal function and sensitivity were normal. There was no difference in airway resistance or work capacity between groups. The acid-perfusion group significantly decreased time to exhaustion in the no-heartburn group (23.13 to 20.66 min) with a decrease in energy expenditure. For phase 2, time to exhaustion was significantly decreased with acid perfusion at all time points (P < 0.05). Total energy expenditure during exercise was less in each acid-perfusion test. No difference in pulmonary function was present at week 12 versus baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal acid perfusion decreased performance. In runners with heartburn, suppression of endogenous acid secretion did not improve exercise performance. Changes in cardiopulmonary function do not explain the decreased exercise performance during acid perfusion.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗
PubMed2005

Esophageal visceral sensitivity to bile salts in patients with functional heartburn and in healthy control subjects.

Patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease often have relatively low esophageal acid exposure and respond suboptimally to gastric acid suppression. In these patients, other constituents of gastric contents may induce esophageal symptoms. We have demonstrated that gastric contents can cause heartburn when the gastric pH >4. (Aliment Pharm Ther 14:129-134, 2000). The aim of this study was to determine relative sensitivities to chenodeoxycholic and ursodeoxycholic acids, and 0.1 N HCl, administered as provocative perfusion tests. Patients with functional heartburn and healthy control subjects were evaluated. Patients underwent a modified Bernstein acid infusion test and esophageal Barostat balloon distention. Time and volume to pain were recorded. Barostat balloon distention was performed using our standard protocol. Stepwise distentions were performed and pain was recorded. Sensitivity to chenodeoxycholic acid (Cheno) and Ursodeoxycholic acid (Urso) were assessed similarly to the Bernstein test using 2 mM concentrations of each, followed immediately by 5 mM if no pain was reported with 2 mM. Volume of bile acid infusion and length of time until pain was induced were assessed and compared to the same endpoints for acid sensitivity. "Total" time and "total" volume to induce pain were calculated for Cheno and Urso. Least-squares means were generated and two-tailed t-tests and regression analyses were performed (P < 0.05 level of significance). Ten functional heartburn patients and six healthy controls were evaluated (3 M, 13 F; age range, 19 to 56 years). Since five of six controls had pain with acid infusion (hypersensitive), all subjects were analyzed as one group. Only three subjects (all controls) had no pain with infusion of 2 mM Cheno and received the follow-up infusion of 5 mM. These same three subjects tolerated the maximum infusion (150 ml and 15 min) of 5 mM Cheno. Nine subjects did not have pain with 2 mM Urso and received the follow-up infusion of 5 mM Urso (five functional heartburn, four controls). Significantly more subjects tolerated the maximum bile acid infusion of 2 mM Urso vs 2 mM Cheno (nine vs three; P < 0.05, Chi-square test). The pain threshold (volume and time) for Urso was significantly higher than that for Cheno and acid (P < 0.05), and the pain threshold for Cheno was significantly higher than that for acid (P < 0.05). Conclusions are as follows: (1) Bile acids differ in their ability to induce pain. (2) Changing bile acid composition by treatment with Urso may change symptom presentation and symptom severity in patients with bile acid-induced esophageal pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The role of mast cells in common gastrointestinal diseases.

The gastrointestinal tract is a rich source of mast cells with an enormous surface area that permits a high degree of interaction between the mast cell and the intestinal contents. The active metabolic products of the mast cell influence gastrointestinal secretion, absorption, and motility through paracrine effects of local mast cell activation and also cause systemic effects through the release of cellular products into the bloodstream. Recent advances in our knowledge of the immune system and the recognition that the gastrointestinal immune function might be partially mediated through gastrointestinal mucosal mast cells has opened mast cell research to the field of gastroenterology. Local gastrointestinal proliferation of mast cells in response to recognized or obscure stimuli can alter gastrointestinal function and induce systemic symptoms. Symptoms can arise from the increased number of mast cells, overproduction of specific mast cell mediators, and hyperactivity of the enteric nervous system that induces mast cell activation. The diseases mentioned in this review represent a small proportion of areas where mast cell function might play an important role in the response to disease and generation of symptoms.

Female↗
PubMed2004

Economic and personal impact of fecal and urinary incontinence.

Failure to control the elimination of urine or stool causes psychological stress, complicates medical illnesses and management, and has major economic consequences. Patients often describe the impact of both fecal and urinary incontinence in terms of shame and embarrassment and report that it causes them to isolate themselves from friends and family. Incontinence frequently results in an early decision to institutionalize elderly relatives because families have difficulty coping with incontinence at home. Not surprisingly, there is an increase in symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with incontinence as well as degradation in quality of life that has been documented by standardized assessment instruments. The direct health care costs for urinary incontinence are estimated to be 16.3 billion dollars per year (1995 costs). Separate cost estimates for fecal incontinence are not available. There is an acute need for methodologically sound studies to document the economic and personal impact of incontinence to develop guidelines for the allocation of health care resources and research funding to this major public health problem. This need is especially great for fecal incontinence, for which there is much less health care economic data than for urinary incontinence.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMed2003

Neurotrophin-3 improves functional constipation.

OBJECTIVE: Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) is a neurotrophic factor involved in the growth, development, and function of the nervous system. In preliminary studies, s.c. recombinant methionyl-human NT-3 enhanced transit throughout the GI tract and increased stool frequency in normal and constipated subjects. Our aim was to assess 1) the dose-related effects of NT-3 on bowel function, colon transit, and symptoms of chronic constipation, and 2) its safety. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase II study. A total of 107 patients with a diagnosis of functional constipation (Rome II criteria) were randomized to receive 4 wk of double blind, s.c. injections of either placebo, 3 mg, or 9 mg NT-3 once per week (qW) or three times per week (TTW); or 9 mg NT-3 TTW for 1 wk, then qW. The primary endpoint was the change in number of spontaneous, complete bowel movements per week. Colon transit was assessed before and at end of treatment. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, patients who received 9 mg NT-3 TTW showed significant increases in frequency of spontaneous, complete bowel movements and total bowel movements, as well as dose-related softening of stool and improved ease of passage. The number of days per week without a bowel movement also decreased, colon transit improved, as did constipation-related symptoms. Weekly dosing was ineffective. Transient injection-site reactions, seen in one third of patients receiving NT-3 TTW, were the most frequent adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: NT-3, administered TTW, increased stool frequency, enhanced colon transit, and improved symptoms of chronic constipation. NT-3 seems to be a novel, safe, and effective agent for the treatment of functional constipation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Esophageal reflux in conditioned runners, cyclists, and weightlifters.

INTRODUCTION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a disorder in which gastric contents move from stomach to esophagus. Exercise is a recognized contributing factor to reflux in healthy volunteers and is reported to be proportional to exercise intensity and the type of exercise. Our aim was to explore changes in physiology occurring in conditioned runners, cyclists, and weightlifters. METHODS: Ten subjects from each sport with >3-month history of exercise-induced heartburn were enrolled. Subjects underwent evaluation of fasting and fed esophageal pH, heart rate, GI symptom, and perceived exertion during standardized exercise routines at 65% (60 min) and 85% (20 min) of their maximal capabilities. RESULTS: Weightlifters experienced the most heartburn and reflux: 18.51 +/- 17.34% time esophageal pH </= 4.0 fasted and 35.81 +/- 34.33% time pH </= 4.0 fed. Runners developed mild symptoms and moderate reflux: 4.90 +/- 3.96% time pH </= 4.0 (fasted) and 17.16 +/- 7.90% time (fed). Cyclists exhibited mild symptoms and reflux: 3.97 +/- 5.44% time pH </= 4.0 fasting and 6.49 +/- 6.22% time fed. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that strenuous exercise induces significant reflux and related symptoms in conditioned athletes.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Control of nocturnal gastric acidity: a role for low dose bedtime ranitidine to supplement daily omeprazole.

In some patients, proton pump inhibitors do not abolish nocturnal gastric acidity and additional evening antisecretory medication may be required. In 16 subjects with chronic heartburn, 24-hr gastric and esophageal pH were measured at baseline and again after six days of 20 mg omeprazole alone at 08:00 hr followed by placebo, 75 mg ranitidine, or 20 mg omeprazole at 22:00 hr. Integrated acidity was calculated from the cumulative, time-weighted mean acid concentrations (derived from pH values for each second). Baseline integrated gastric acidity increased progressively over 24 hr, whereas integrated esophageal acidity increased only until 22:00 hr. Morning omeprazole nearly abolished 24-hr esophageal acidity and significantly decreased overall gastric acidity but did not abolish nocturnal gastric acidity. Adding evening ranitidine or omeprazole nearly eliminated the nocturnal increase in gastric acidity. Integrated acidity was more sensitive than time pH < 4 in assessing gastric and esophageal acidity as well as their inhibition by omeprazole and ranitidine. In conclusion, integrated acidity provides novel information regarding the synergy of omeprazole plus ranitidine. Adding low-dose ranitidine helps control nocturnal gastric acidity that can occur with conventional omeprazole administration. Although the heartburn patients in the present study had nocturnal gastric acidity without accompanying nocturnal esophageal acid reflux, other patients who do have nocturnal esophageal reflux might profit from addition of bedtime ranitidine or another gastric antisecretory agent.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Calcium carbonate antacids alter esophageal motility in heartburn sufferers.

Chewed calcium carbonate (CaCO3) rapidly neutralizes esophageal acid and may prevent reflux, suggesting another mechanism of action independent of acid neutralization. Calcium is essential for muscle tone. Our aim was to determine if luminal calcium released from chewed antacids improved esophageal motor function in heartburn sufferers. Esophageal manometry and acid clearance (swallows and time to raise esophageal pH to 5 after a 15-ml 0.1 N HCl bolus) were performed in 18 heartburn sufferers before and after chewing two Tums EX (1500 mg CaCO3, 600 mg calcium). Subjects with hypertensive esophageal contractions or hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) were excluded. Subjects with normal to low LESP were included. Differences between parameters were determined by two-tailed paired t-tests, P < 0.05. Proximal esophageal contractile amplitude was significantly increased after CaCO3 (47.18 vs 52.97 mm Hg; P = 0.02), distal onset velocity was significantly decreased after CaCO3 (4.34 vs 3.71 cm/sec; P = 0.02), and acid clearance was significantly increased 30 min after CaCO3 (20.35 vs 11.7 swallows, [P < 0.005] and 12.19 vs 6.29 min [P < 0.007]). LESP was not altered after CaCO3 (22.70 vs 23.79 mm Hg; P = 0.551), however, LESP increased in 9 of 18 subjects. Depth of LES relaxation, medial and distal esophageal contractile amplitude, and duration of contractions were not altered by CaCO3. CaCO3 did not alter salivary secretion and pH in a subset of these subjects, and CaCO3 with secreted saliva did not neutralize a 15-ml acid bolus. The Ca2+ released after chewing of CaCO3 antacids may be partially responsible for the reduction of heartburn by significantly improving initiation of peristalsis and acid clearance.

Adult↗