PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Philip D Hansten

Publications and source records attributed to Philip D Hansten.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Drug interaction management.

Although thousands of articles on drug interactions have been published and numerous computerized screening systems have been developed, patients continue to suffer from adverse drug interactions. Possible methods for reducing the risk of drug interactions include improving the knowledge of health care providers, improving computerized screening systems, providing information on patient risk factors, increased use of pharmacogenetic information, more attention to drug administration risk factors, and improving patient education on drug interactions.

Computers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Concordance of severity ratings provided in four drug interaction compendia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the agreement among drug-drug interaction (DDI) compendia as to designation of interactions as having the greatest clinical importance ("major" DDIs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. SETTING: United States in fall 2001. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. INTERVENTIONS: Major DDIs involving prescription medications likely to be dispensed in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified as listed in four compendia that provide specific, detailed information about DDIs (Drug Interaction Facts, Drug Interactions: Analysis and Management, Evaluations of Drug Interactions, and the MicroMedex DRUG-REAX program). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Level of agreement between DDI compendia as assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Overall, 406 major DDIs were listed in one or more of the four compendia. Only 9 (2.2%) of these major DDIs were listed in all four compendia; in fact, the majority of interactions were listed in only one compendium (291 DDIs, 71.7%), despite these interactions being considered of greatest clinical relevance by at least one compendium. The ICC among the compendia was -0.092, indicating low agreement on the classification of major DDIs. CONCLUSION: Little agreement exists among commonly used drug interaction COMPENDIA for DDIs that were classified in fall 2001 as having the highest clinical relevance and importance. A concerted effort to identify DDIs of the highest clinical importance is needed to design effective strategies to avoid and manage them.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Identification of serious drug-drug interactions: results of the partnership to prevent drug-drug interactions.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a list of clinically important drug-drug interactions (DDIs) likely to be encountered in community and ambulatory pharmacy settings and detected by a computerized pharmacy system. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, one-time evaluation. SETTING: United States in fall 2001. PARTICIPANTS: An expert panel comprising two physicians, two clinical pharmacists, and an expert on DDIs. INTERVENTIONS: Systematic review of drug interaction compendia and published literature, ratings (on a 1 to 10 scale) of various clinical aspects of DDIs (e.g., clinical importance, quality and quantity of evidence, causal relationship, risk of morbidity and mortality), and a modified Delphi consensus-building process. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Panelists' opinions about clinical importance of DDIs. RESULTS: The expert panel considered 56 DDIs. Of these, 28 had a mean clinical importance score of 8.0 or more. The ratings for clinical importance ranged from 3.2 to 9.6, with a mean +/- SD of 7.5 +/- 1.5 across the combinations examined. The mean score for the quality of literature suggesting the interaction exists ranged from 1.0 to 9.6, with a mean +/- SD of 5.8 +/- 2.5. In terms of substantiation of the interactions evaluated, the mean +/- SD rating was 6.3 +/- 2.2, with a range from 1.4 to 9.2. Through the modified Delphi process, the panel determined that 25 interactions were clinically important. CONCLUSION: Using an expert panel and a standard evaluation tool, 25 clinically important drug interactions that are likely to occur in the community and ambulatory pharmacy settings were identified. Pharmacists should take steps to prevent patients from receiving these interacting medications, and computer software vendors should focus interaction alerts on these and similarly important DDIs.

Community Pharmacy Services↗